Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
In many social species, the victim often attacks an uninvolved third individual soon after a conflict. This behaviour is called ‘redirected aggression’ or ‘redirection’, and its role(s) remain(s) controversial. We observed semi-provisioned free-ranging Japanese macaques at Iwatayama Monkey Park in Arashiyama, Kyoto, Japan, to test three hypotheses concerning the function of redirected aggression: Japanese macaques perform redirection to (1) indirectly retaliate against the aggressor, (2) reduce post-conflict stress, or (3) reduce post-conflict uncertainty. When we observed aggressive interactions, we recorded the behaviour of victims during the subsequent 10 min. Redirection occurred more frequently when the rank of the victim of the initial conflict was high, when the victim was an older monkey, and when conflicts occurred among kin. The results largely supported hypothesis 3. Victims received renewed aggression not only from the initial aggressor but also from bystanders more frequently within 1 min after the initial conflict than in the subsequent 9 min. Victims who performed redirection received less aggression from bystanders. Victims might have been able to avoid renewed aggression because they could change their state from victim to aggressor by performing redirection. This effect of redirection did not differ with the victim’s rank. However, the lower the victim’s rank, the higher the risk that they would receive retaliation from the target of the redirected aggression or the latter’s kin. Thus, redirection caused the same magnitude of benefit and a different magnitude of risk according to the victim’s rank. The victim may need to judge his/her own situation when making the decision as to whether to perform redirection.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
Altmann J. (1974). Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. — Behaviour 49: 227-266.
Asquith P.J. (1989). Provisioning and the study of free-ranging primates: history, effect, and prospects. — Yb. Phys. Anthropol. 32: 129-158.
Aureli F. (1992). Post-conflict behaviour among wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). — Behav Ecol. Sociobiol. 31: 329-337.
Aureli F. (2002). Conflict resolution following aggression in gregarious animals: a predictive framework. — Anim. Behav. 64: 325-343.
Aureli F., Cozzolino R., Cordischi C., Scucchi S. (1992). Kin-oriented redirection among Japanese macaques: an expression of a revenge system? — Anim. Behav. 44: 283-291.
Aureli F., van Schaik C.P. (1991a). Post-conflict behaviour in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) I. The social event. — Ethology 89: 89-100.
Aureli F., van Schaik C.P. (1991b). Post-conflict behaviour in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) II. Coping with the uncertinty. — Ethology 89: 101-114.
Aureli F., Veenema H.C., van Panthaleon van Eck C.J., van Hooff J.A.R.A.M. (1993). Reconciliation, consolation, and redirection in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). — Behaviour 124: 1-21.
Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B. (2013). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-2. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
Castles D.L., Whiten A. (1998). Post-conflict behaviour of wild olive baboons. II. Stress and self-directed behaviour. — Ethology 104: 148-160.
Chapais B., Gauthier C., Prud’Homme J. (1997). Relatedness threshold for nepotism in Japanese macaques. — Anim. Behav. 53: 1089-1101.
Cheney D., Seyfarth R. (1986). The recognition of social alliances by vervet monkeys. — Anim. Behav. 34: 1722-1731.
Cooper M.A., Aureli F., Singh M. (2007). Sex differences in reconciliation and post-conflict anxiety in bonnet macaques. — Ethology 113: 26-38.
de Waal F.B.M., Yoshihara D. (1983). Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys. — Behaviour 85: 224-241.
Engh A.L., Siebert E.R., Greenberg D.A., Holekamp K.E. (2005). Patterns of alliance formation and postconflict aggression indicate spotted hyenas recognize third-party relationships. — Anim. Behav. 69: 209-217.
Everitt B.S. (1996). Making sense of statistics in psychology. — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Fashing P.J. (2001). Male and female strategies during intergroup encounters in guerezas (Colobus guereza): evidence for resource defense mediated through males and a comparison with other primates. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50: 219-230.
Hill D.A. (1999). Effect of provisioning on the social behavior of Japanese and rhesus macaques: implication for socioecology. — Primates 40: 187-198.
Hsu Y. (2001). The winner and loser effect: what fighting behaviours are influenced? — Anim. Behav. 61: 777-786.
Hsu Y., Earley R.L., Wolf L.L. (2006). Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. — Biol. Rev. 81: 33-74.
Itani J. (1963). Vocal communication of the wild Japanese monkey. — Primates 4: 11-66.
Judge P.G. (1982). Redirection of aggression based on kinship in captive group of pigtail macaques. — Int. J. Primatol. 3: 301 (abstract).
Kappeler P.M., van Schaik C.P. (2002). Evolution of primate social systems. — Int. J. Primatol. 23: 707-740.
Kawamura S. (1958). The matriarchal social order in the Minoo-B group — a study on the rank system of Japanese macaques. — Primates 1: 149-156.
Kazahari N., Agetsuma N. (2010). Mechanisms determining relationships between feeding group size and foraging success in food patch use by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). — Behaviour 147: 1481-1500.
Kazem A.J.N., Aureli F. (2005). Redirection of aggression: multiparty signalling within a network? — In: Animal communication networks ( MacGregor P.K., ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 191-218.
Kutsukake N. (2000). Matrilineal rank inheritance varies with absolute rank in Japanese macaques. — Primates 41: 321-335.
Kutsukake N., Castles D.L. (2001). Reconciliation and variation in post-conflict stress in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata fuscata): testing the integrated hypothesis. — Anim. Cogn. 4: 259-268.
Leca J.B., Huffman M.A., Vasey P.L. (2012). The monkeys of stormy mountain: 60 years of primatological research on the Japanese macaques of Arashiyama. — Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
Majolo B., Ventura R., Koyama N.F. (2009). Anxiety level predicts post-conflict behaviour in wild Japanese macaques Macaca fuscata yakui. — Ethology 115: 986-995.
McFarland R., Majolo B. (2011). Reconciliation and the costs of aggression in wild barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus): a test of the integrated hypothesis. — Ethology 117: 928-937.
Mundry R., Nunn C.L. (2009). Stepwise model fitting and statistical inference: turning noise into signal pollution. — Am. Nat. 173: 119-123.
Palagi E., Cordoni G. (2009). Postconflict third-party affiliation in Canis lupus: do wolves share similarities with the great apes? — Anim. Behav. 78: 979-986.
Rizaldi B.C., Watanabe K. (2008). Successive aggression: another pattern of polyadic aggressive interactions in a captive group of Japanese macaques. — Am. J. Primatol. 70: 349-355.
Schino G., Perretta G., Taglioni A.M., Monaco V., Troisi A. (1996). Primate displacement activities as an ethopharmacological model of anxiety. — Anxiety 2: 186-191.
Schino G., Rosati L., Geminiani S., Aureli F. (2007). Post-conflict anxiety in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata): aggressor’s and victim’s perspectives. — Ethology 113: 1081-1088.
Scucchi S., Cordishi C., Aureli F., Cozzolino R. (1988). The use of redirection in a captive group of Japanese monkeys. — Primates 29: 229-236.
Shimizu K. (2012). Birth control in female Japanese macaques at Iwatayama monkey park, Arashiyama. — In: The monkeys of stormy mountain: 60 years of primatological research on the Japanese macaques of Arashiyama ( Leca J.B., Huffman M.A., Vasey P.L., eds). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, p. 435-452.
Thierry B. (2000). Covariation in conflict management patterns across macaque species. — In: Natural conflict resolution ( Aureli F., de Waal F.B.M., eds). University of California Press, London, p. 106-128.
van Schaik C.P. (1989). The ecology of social relationships amongst female primates. — In: Comparative socioecology: the behavioural ecology of humans and other mammals ( van Schaik C.P., ed.). Blackwell, Oxford, p. 195-218.
Virgin J.C.E., Sapolsky R.M. (1997). Styles of male social behavior and their endocrine correlates among low-ranking baboons. — Am. J. Primatol. 42: 25-39.
Watts D.P., Colmenares F., Arnold K. (2000). Redirection, consolation and male policing: how targets of aggression interact with bystanders. — In: Natural conflict resolution ( Aureli F., de Waal F.B.M., eds). University of California Press, London, p. 281-301.
Whittingham M.J., Stephens P.A., Bradbury R.B., Freckleton R.P. (2006). Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? — J. Anim. Ecol. 75: 1182-1189.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 615 | 64 | 19 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 239 | 14 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 116 | 2 | 0 |
In many social species, the victim often attacks an uninvolved third individual soon after a conflict. This behaviour is called ‘redirected aggression’ or ‘redirection’, and its role(s) remain(s) controversial. We observed semi-provisioned free-ranging Japanese macaques at Iwatayama Monkey Park in Arashiyama, Kyoto, Japan, to test three hypotheses concerning the function of redirected aggression: Japanese macaques perform redirection to (1) indirectly retaliate against the aggressor, (2) reduce post-conflict stress, or (3) reduce post-conflict uncertainty. When we observed aggressive interactions, we recorded the behaviour of victims during the subsequent 10 min. Redirection occurred more frequently when the rank of the victim of the initial conflict was high, when the victim was an older monkey, and when conflicts occurred among kin. The results largely supported hypothesis 3. Victims received renewed aggression not only from the initial aggressor but also from bystanders more frequently within 1 min after the initial conflict than in the subsequent 9 min. Victims who performed redirection received less aggression from bystanders. Victims might have been able to avoid renewed aggression because they could change their state from victim to aggressor by performing redirection. This effect of redirection did not differ with the victim’s rank. However, the lower the victim’s rank, the higher the risk that they would receive retaliation from the target of the redirected aggression or the latter’s kin. Thus, redirection caused the same magnitude of benefit and a different magnitude of risk according to the victim’s rank. The victim may need to judge his/her own situation when making the decision as to whether to perform redirection.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 615 | 64 | 19 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 239 | 14 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 116 | 2 | 0 |