Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Males of the wolf spider, Rabidosa punctulata, exhibit condition-dependent alternative mating tactics, whereby small, poor condition males engage in multimodal courtship while large, good condition males adopt a direct mount tactic that forgoes courtship. This study explores the possibility that tactic-specific costs can help explain this unintuitive pattern of mating tactic expression. Specifically, we hypothesize that courtship signaling is costly with respect to eavesdropping by predators and that males can alter their tactic expression based upon the perceived environmental predation risk. We test this by first examining the risk of predation associated with different mating tactics. We use a co-occurring predatory heterospecific, R. rabida as our predator. We found support for the prediction that courting R. punctulata males tended to be attacked more often than non-courting males, and the likelihood of being attacked was best predicted by courtship activity. Given this documented cost, we hypothesized that R. punctulata males would adjust their mating tactic based upon perceived predation risk. In a second experiment, we manipulated perceived predation risk by providing R. punctulata males with different female silk cues (conspecific; predatory heterospecific; conspecific + predatory heterospecific) and examined mating tactic expression. In support of our hypothesis, males were more likely to adopt the direct mount tactic in the presence of predatory heterospecific or mixed silk cues and were more likely to court in the presence of conspecific cues. These results support the hypothesis that the cost of predation from eavesdroppers may influence the evolution and expression of male alternative mating tactics in R. punctulata.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
Barnes M.C., Persons M.H., Rypstra A.L. (2002). The effect of predator chemical cue age on antipredator behavior in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). — J. Insect Behav. 15: 269-281.
Bell R.D., Rypstra A.L., Persons M.H. (2006). The effect of predator hunger on chemically mediated antipredator responses and survival in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). — Ethology 112: 903-910.
Bradbury J.W., Vehrencamp S.L. (1998). Principles of animal communication. — Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
Brady A.R., McKinley K.S. (1994). Nearctic species of the wolf spider genus Rabidosa (Araneae, Lycosidae). — J. Arachnol. 22: 138-160.
Brockmann H.J. (2001). The evolution of alternative strategies and tactics. — Adv. Stud. Behav. 30: 1-51.
Buddle C.M., Walker S.E., Rypstra A.L. (2003). Cannibalism and density-dependent mortality in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). — Can. J. Zool. 81: 1293-1297.
Burk T. (1982). Evolutionary significance of predation on sexually signalling males. — Fla. Entomol. 65: 90-104.
Cade W.H. (1979). The evolution of alternative male reproductive strategies in field crickets. — In: Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects ( Blum M.S., Blum N.A., eds). Academic Press, New York, NY, p. 343-379.
Candolin U. (1997). Predation risk affects courtship and attractiveness of competing threespine stickleback males. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 81-87.
Candolin U., Voigt H.R. (1998). Predator-induced nest site preference: safe nests allow courtship in sticklebacks. — Anim. Behav. 56: 1205-1211.
Eiben B., Persons M. (2007). The effect of prior exposure to predator cues on chemically-mediated defensive behavior and survival in the wolf spider Rabidosa rabida (Araneae: Lycosidae). — Behaviour 144: 889-906.
Endler J.A. (1987). Predation, light-intensity and courtship behavior in Poecilia reticulata (Pisces, Poeciliidae). — Anim. Behav. 35: 1376-1385.
Farr J.A. (1975). The role of predation in the evolution of social behavior of natural populations of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). — Evolution 29: 151-158.
Fitch H.S. (1963). Spiders of the University of Kansas Natural History Reservation and Rockefeller experimental tract. — Univ. KS. Mus. Nat. Hist. Misc. Publ. 33: 1-202.
Foelix R. (1996). Biology of spiders, 2nd edn. — Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Folz H.C., Wilder S.M., Persons M.H., Rypstra A.L. (2006). Effects of predation risk on vertical habitat use and foraging of Pardosa milvina. — Ethology 112: 1152-1158.
Forsgren E., Magnhagen C. (1993). Conflicting demands in sand gobies — predators influence reproductive behavior. — Behaviour 126: 125-135.
Fowler-Finn K.D., Hebets E.A. (2011a). More ornamented males exhibit increased predation risk and antipredatory escapes, but not greater mortality. — Ethology 117: 102-114.
Fowler-Finn K.D., Hebets E.A. (2011b). The degree of response to increased predation risk corresponds to male secondary sexual traits. — Behav. Ecol. 22: 268-275.
Godin J.G.J. (1995). Predation risk and alternative mating tactics in male Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). — Oecologia 103: 224-229.
Gross M.R. (1996). Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 92-98.
Hedrick A.V. (2000). Crickets with extravagant mating songs compensate for predation risk with extra caution. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 267: 671-675.
Hoefler C.D., Persons M.H., Rypstra A.L. (2008). Evolutionarily costly courtship displays in a wolf spider: a test of viability indicator theory. — Behav. Ecol. 19: 974-979.
Howard R.D. (1984). Alternative mating behaviors of young male bullfrogs. — Am. Zool. 24: 397-406.
Koga T., Backwell P.R.Y., Jennions M.D., Christy J.H. (1998). Elevated predation risk changes mating behaviour and courtship in a fiddler crab. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 265: 1385-1390.
Krupa J.J., Sih A. (1998). Fishing spiders, green sunfish, and a stream-dwelling water strider: male–female conflict and prey responses to single versus multiple predator environments. — Oecologia 117: 258-265.
Larison B. (2007). Environmental heterogeneity and alternative mating tactics in the damselfly Protoneura amatoria. — Behav. Ecol. 18: 1021-1028.
Lehmann L.M., Walker S.E., Persons M.H. (2004). The influence of predator sex on chemically mediated antipredator response in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). — Ethology 110: 323-339.
Lima S.L., Dill L.M. (1990). Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. — Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.
Lizotte R.S., Rovner J.S. (1988). Nocturnal capture of fireflies by lycosid spiders — visual versus vibratory stimuli. — Anim. Behav. 36: 1809-1815.
Luyten P.H., Liley N.R. (1985). Geographic variation in the sexual behaviour of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Peters). — Behaviour 95: 164-179.
Magnhagen C. (1991). Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 183-185.
Magurran A.E., Seghers B.H. (1990). Risk sensitive courtship in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). — Behaviour 112: 194-201.
Nossek M.E., Rovner J.S. (1983). Agonistic behavior in female wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). — J. Arachnol. 11: 407-422.
Oku K., Yano S. (2008). Effects of predation risk on mating behavior of the Kanzawa spider mite. — J. Ethol. 26: 261-266.
Persons M.H., Rypstra A.L. (2001). Wolf spiders show graded antipredator behavior in the presence of chemical cues from different sized predators. — J. Chem. Ecol. 27: 2493-2504.
Persons M.H., Uetz G.W. (2005). Sexual cannibalism and mate choice decisions in wolf spiders: influence of male size and secondary sexual characters. — Anim. Behav. 69: 83-94.
Persons M.H., Walker S.E., Rypstra A.L., Marshall S.D. (2001). Wolf spider predator avoidance tactics and survival in the presence of diet-associated predator cues (Araneae: Lycosidae). — Anim. Behav. 61: 43-51.
Pruden A.J., Uetz G.W. (2004). Assessment of potential predation costs of male decoration and courtship displays in wolf spiders using video digitization and playback. — J. Insect Behav. 17: 67-80.
Reed D.H., Nicholas A.C. (2008). Spatial and temporal variation in a suite of life-history traits in two species of wolf spider. — Ecol. Entomol. 33: 488-496.
Reynolds J.D. (1993). Should attractive individuals court more? Theory and a test. — Am. Nat. 141: 914-927.
Reynolds J.D., Gross M.R., Coombs M.J. (1993). Environmental conditions and male morphology determine alternative mating behavior in Trinidadian guppies. — Anim. Behav. 45: 145-152.
Roberts J.A., Uetz G.W. (2004). Species-specificity of chemical signals: silk source affects discrimination in a wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae). — J. Insect Behav. 17: 477-491.
Roberts J.A., Uetz G.W. (2005). Information content of female chemical signals in the wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata: male discrimination of reproductive state and receptivity. — Anim. Behav. 70: 217-223.
Roberts J.A., Taylor P.W., Uetz G.W. (2007). Consequences of complex signaling: predator detection of multimodal cues. — Behav. Ecol. 18: 236-240.
Ryan M.J. (1985). The Tungara frog: a study in sexual selection and communication. — University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Rypstra A.L., Schmidt J.M., Reif B.D., DeVito J., Persons M.H. (2007). Tradeoffs involved in site selection and foraging in a wolf spider: effects of substrate structure and predation risk. — Oikos 116: 853-863.
Shuster S.M., Wade M.J. (2003). Mating systems and strategies. — Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Sih A. (1994). Predation risk and the evolutionary ecology of reproductive behavior. — J. Fish Biol. 45: 111-130.
Taylor A.R., Persons M.H., Rypstra A.L. (2005). The effect of perceived predation risk on male courtship and copulatory behavior in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae). — J. Arachnol. 33: 76-81.
Tietjen W.J. (1977). Dragline following by male lycosid spiders. — Psyche 84: 165-178.
Tietjen W.J. (1979a). Is the sex pheremone of Lycosa rabida (Araneae: Lycosidae) deposited on a substratum? — J. Arachnol. 6: 207-212.
Tietjen W.J. (1979b). Tests for olfactory communication in four species of wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). — J. Arachnol. 6: 197-206.
Tuttle M.D., Ryan M.J. (1982). The role of synchronized calling, ambient light, and ambient noise, in anti-bat predator behavior of a treefrog. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11: 125-131.
Wagner J.D., Wise D.H. (1996). Cannibalism regulates densities of young wolf spiders: evidence from field and laboratory experiments. — Ecology 77: 639-652.
Wilgers D.J., Hebets E.A. (2011). Complex courtship displays facilitate male reproductive success and plasticity in signaling across variable environments. — Curr. Zool. 57: 175-186.
Wilgers D.J., Hebets E.A. (2012). Age-related female mating decisions are condition dependent in wolf spiders. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 66: 29-38.
Wilgers D.J., Nicholas A.C., Reed D.H., Stratton G.E., Hebets E.A. (2009). Condition-dependent alternative mating tactics in a sexually cannibalistic wolf spider. — Behav. Ecol. 20: 891-900.
Wise D.H., Chen B.R. (1999). Impact of intraguild predators on survival of a forest-floor wolf spider. — Oecologia 121: 129-137.
Zuk M., Kolluru G.R. (1998). Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. — Q. Rev. Biol. 73: 415-438.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 527 | 73 | 16 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 209 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 72 | 6 | 0 |
Males of the wolf spider, Rabidosa punctulata, exhibit condition-dependent alternative mating tactics, whereby small, poor condition males engage in multimodal courtship while large, good condition males adopt a direct mount tactic that forgoes courtship. This study explores the possibility that tactic-specific costs can help explain this unintuitive pattern of mating tactic expression. Specifically, we hypothesize that courtship signaling is costly with respect to eavesdropping by predators and that males can alter their tactic expression based upon the perceived environmental predation risk. We test this by first examining the risk of predation associated with different mating tactics. We use a co-occurring predatory heterospecific, R. rabida as our predator. We found support for the prediction that courting R. punctulata males tended to be attacked more often than non-courting males, and the likelihood of being attacked was best predicted by courtship activity. Given this documented cost, we hypothesized that R. punctulata males would adjust their mating tactic based upon perceived predation risk. In a second experiment, we manipulated perceived predation risk by providing R. punctulata males with different female silk cues (conspecific; predatory heterospecific; conspecific + predatory heterospecific) and examined mating tactic expression. In support of our hypothesis, males were more likely to adopt the direct mount tactic in the presence of predatory heterospecific or mixed silk cues and were more likely to court in the presence of conspecific cues. These results support the hypothesis that the cost of predation from eavesdroppers may influence the evolution and expression of male alternative mating tactics in R. punctulata.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 527 | 73 | 16 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 209 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 72 | 6 | 0 |