An experimental study measuring the effects of a tarsus-mounted tracking device on the behaviour of a small pursuit-diving seabird
äºBehaviourSearch for other papers by Jill L. Robinson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Ian Lawrence Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
Miniaturized tracking devices are taking a rapidly increasing role in studies measuring animal movement and other aspects of behaviour, especially for wide-ranging species such as seabirds that are difficult to observe otherwise. A crucial, but questionable criterion of such migration research is assuming that effects of tracking devices on animal behaviour are negligible, to ensure results of tracking studies are biologically relevant. To address this concern, we experimentally quantified effects of a 2 g (ca. 1.1% of body mass) geolocation device on crested auklet (Aethia cristatella) behaviour, including return rate, activity on the colony surface, and measures of reproductive performance in a two-year, two-part field study. In experiment 1, we fitted tracking devices (or identical dummy devices) to one mate of a breeding pair in nesting crevices, to quantify effects on reproductive performance and nest fidelity. In experiment 2, we assigned dummy devices to birds captured at the colony site surface, to quantify effects on social activity, return rate and provisioning behaviour. For birds tagged in crevices, we detected no effect on fledging success, or chick growth rate (mass and wing length). However, mass at fledging age of chicks provisioned with one tagged parent was significantly lower than control, and low nest site fidelity (compared to control birds) was observed for tagged birds. Individuals tagged on the colony surface showed significantly reduced colony surface activity, return rates and provisioning behaviour. This study shows strong âobserver effectsâ of an attached device well below the recommended size limit for wildlife tagging. Future studies should both quantify effects of attached devices and consider the biological relevance of measures of the behaviour of interest.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abraham C.L., Sydeman W.J. (2004). Ocean climate, euphausiids and auklet nesting: inter-annual trends and variation in phenology, diet and growth of a planktivorous seabird, Ptychoramphus aleuticus. â Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 274: 235-250.
-
Ackerman J.T., Adams J., Takekawa J.Y., Carter H.R., Whitworth D.L., Newman S.H., Golightly R.T., Orthmeyer D.L. (2004). Effects of radiotransmitters on the reproductive performance of Cassinâs auklets. â Wildife Soc. Bull. 32: 1229-1241.
-
Adams J., Scott D., Mckechnie S., Blackwell G., Shaffer S.A., Moller H. (2009). Effects of geolocation archival tags on reproduction and adult body mass of sooty shearwaters (Puffinus griseus). â New Zeal. J. Zool. 36: 37-41.
-
Aldridge H.D.J.N., Brigham R.M. (1988). Load carrying and maneuverability in an insectivorous bat: a test of the 5% âruleâ of radio-telemetry. â J. Mammal. 69: 379-382.
-
Ballard G., Ainley D.G., Ribic C.A., Barton K.R., Ribic A. (2001). Effect of instrument attachment and other factors on foraging trip duration and nesting success of Adélie penguins. â Condor 103: 481-490.
-
Barron D.G., Brawn J.D., Weatherhead P.J. (2010). Meta-analysis of transmitter effects on avian behaviour and ecology. â Methods Ecol. Evol. 1: 180-187.
-
Bouten W., Baaij E.W., Shamoun-Baranes J., Camphuysen K.C.J. (2013). A flexible GPS tracking system for studying bird behaviour at multiple scales. â J. Ornithol. 154: 571-580.
-
Bowlin M.S., Henningsson P., Muijres F.T., Vleugels R.H.E., Liechti F., Hedenström A. (2010). The effects of geolocator drag and weight on the flight ranges of small migrants. â Methods Ecol. Evol. 1: 398-402.
-
Bridge E.S., Kelly J.F., Contina A., Gabrielson R.M., MacCurdy R.B., Winkler D.W. (2013). Advances in tracking small migratory birds: a technical review of light-level geolocation. â J. Field Ornithol. 84: 121-137.
-
Burger A.E., Shaffer S.A. (2008). Application of tracking and data-logging technology in research and conservation of seabirds. â Auk 125: 253-264.
-
Byrd G.V., Renner H.M., Renner M. (2005). Distribution patterns and population trends of breeding seabirds in the Aleutian Islands. â Fish. Oceanogr. 14: 139-159.
-
Caccamise D.F., Hedin R.S. (1985). An aerodynamic basis for selecting transmitter loads in birds. â Wilson Bull. 97: 306-318.
-
Calvo B., Furness R.W., Unit A.O. (1992). AÂ review of the use and the effects of marks and devices on birds. â Ringing Migr. 13: 129-151.
-
Casper R.M. (2009). Guidelines for the instrumentation of wild birds and mammals. â Anim. Behav. 78: 1477-1483.
-
Constantini D., Møller A.P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of geolocator application on birds. â Curr. Zool. 59: 697-706.
-
Croll D.A., Osmel S.D., Bengtson J.L. (1991). An effect of instrument attachment on foraging trip duration in Chinstrap Penguins. â Condor 93: 777-779.
-
Dias M.P., Granadeiro J.P., Phillips R.A., Alonso H., Catry P. (2011). Breaking the routine: individual Coryâs shearwaters shift winter destinations between hemispheres and across ocean basins. â Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 278: 1786-1793.
-
Elliott K.H., Davoren G.K., Gaston A.J. (2007). The influence of buoyancy and drag on the dive behaviour of an Arctic seabird, the Thick-billed Murre. â Can. J. Zool. 85: 352-361.
-
Elliott K., McFarlane-Tranquilla L., Burke C., Hedd A., Montevecchi W., Anderson W. (2012). Year-long deployments of small geolocators increase corticosterone levels in murres. â Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 466: 1-7.
-
Fossette S., Corbel H., Gaspar P., Le Maho Y., Georges J. (2008). An alternative technique for the long-term satellite tracking of leatherback turtles. â Endanger. Species Res. 4: 33-41.
-
Fraser G.S., Jones I.L., Williams J.C., Hunter F.M., Scharf L., Vernon Byrd G., Byrd G.V. (1999). Breeding biology of crested auklets at Buldir and Kasatochi Islands, Alaska. â Auk 116: 690-701.
-
Fraser G.S., Jones I.L., Hunter F.M. (2002). Maleâfemale differences in parental care in monogamous crested auklets. â Condor 104: 413-423.
-
Fraser G.S., Jones I.L., Hunter F.M., Cowen L. (2004). Mate switching patterns in crested auklets (Aethia cristatella): the role of breeding success and ornamentation. â Bird Behav. 16: 7-12.
-
Frederiksen M., Harris M.P., Daunt F., Rothery P., Wanless S. (2004). Scale-dependent climate signals drive breeding phenology of three seabird species. â Glob. Chang. Biol. 10: 1214-1221.
-
Golet G.H., Kuletz K.J., Roby D.D., Irons D.B. (2000). Adult prey choice affects chick growth and reproductive success in pigeon guillemots. â Auk 117: 82-91.
-
Hagelin J.C., Jones I.L., Rasmussen L.E.L. (2003). AÂ tangerine-scented social odour in a monogamous seabird. â Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 270: 1323-1329.
-
Hamel N.J., Parrish J.K., Conquest L.L. (2004). Effects of tagging on behavior, provisioning, and reproduction in the common murre (Uria aalge), a diving seabird. â Auk 121: 1161-1171.
-
Hunt G.L., Harrison N.M., Piatt J.F. (1993). Foraging ecology as related to the distribution of planktivorous auklets in the Bering Sea. â In: The status, ecology, and conservation of marine birds of the North Pacific. Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON, p. 18-26.
-
Igual J.M., Forero M.G., Tavecchia G., Gonzalez-Solis J., Martinez-Abrain A., Hobson K.A., Ruiz X., Oro D. (2004). Short-term effects of data-loggers on Coryâs shearwater (Calonectris diomedea). â Mar. Biol. 146: 619-624.
-
Jenni L., Kéry M. (2003). Timing of autumn bird migration under climate change: advances in long-distance migrants, delays in short-distance migrants. â Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 270: 1467-1471.
-
Jessopp M.J., Cronin M., Doyle T.K., Wilson M., McQuatters-Gollop A., Newton S., Phillips R.A. (2013). Transatlantic migration by post-breeding puffins: a strategy to exploit a temporarily abundant food resource? â Mar. Biol. 160: 2755-2762.
-
Jones I.L. (1993). Sexual differences in bill shape and external measurements of crested auklets. â Wilson Bull. 105: 525-529.
-
Jones I.L., Hunter F.M. (1999). Experimental evidence for mutual inter- and intrasexual selection favouring a crested auklet ornament. â Anim. Behav. 57: 521-528.
-
Jones I.L., Hunter F.M., Fraser G. (2000). Patterns of variation in ornaments of crested auklets Aethia cristatella. â J. Avian Biol. 31: 119-127.
-
Jones I.L., Hunter F.M., Robertson G.J., Fraser G. (2004). Natural variation in the sexually selected feather ornaments of crested auklets (Aethia cristatella) does not predict future survival. â Behav. Ecol. 15: 332-337.
-
Klenova A.V., Zubakin V.A., Zubakina E.V. (2011). Vocal and optical indicators of individual quality in a social seabird, the crested auklet (Aethia cristatella). â Ethology 117: 356-365.
-
Knudtson E.P., Byrd V.G. (1982). Breeding biology of Crested, Least, and Whiskered Auklets on Buldir Island, Alaska. â Condor 84: 197-202.
-
Le Corre M., Jaeger A., Pinet P., Kappes M.A., Weimerskirch H., Catry T., Ramos J.A., Russell J.C., Shah N., Jaquemet S. (2012). Tracking seabirds to identify potential Marine Protected Areas in the tropical western Indian Ocean. â Biol. Conserv. 156: 83-93.
-
Le Maho Y., Saraux C., Durant J.M., Viblanc V.A., Gauthier-Clerc M., Yoccoz N.G., Stenseth N.C., Le Bohec C. (2011). An ethical issue in biodiversity science: the monitoring of penguins with flipper bands. â C. R. Biol. 334: 378-384.
-
Lisovski S., Hewson C.M., Klaassen R.H.G., Korner-Nievergelt F., Kristensen M.W., Hahn S. (2012). Geolocation by light: accuracy and precision affected by environmental factors. â Methods Ecol. Evol. 3: 603-612.
-
Marra P.P., Francis C.M., Mulvihill R.S., Moore F.R. (2004). The influence of climate on the timing and rate of spring bird migration. â Oecologia 142: 307-315.
-
Maxwell S.M., Breed G.A., Nickel B.A., Makanga-Bahouna J., Pemo-Makaya E., Parnell R.J., Formia A., Ngouessono S., Godley B.J., Costa D.P., Witt M.J., Coyne M.S. (2011). Using satellite tracking to optimize protection of long-lived marine species: olive ridley sea turtle conservation in Central Africa. â PloS One 6: e19905.
-
Mayer-Gross H., Crick H.Q.P., Greenwood J.J.D. (1997). The effect of observers visiting the nests of passerines: an experimental study. â Bird Stud. 44: 53-65.
-
Mayfield H.F. (1975). Suggestions for calculating nest success. â Wilson Ornithol. Soc. 87: 456-466.
-
McMahon C.R., Field I.C., Bradshaw C.J.A., White G.C., Hindell M.A. (2008). Tracking and data-logging devices attached to elephant seals do not affect individual mass gain or survival. â J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 360: 71-77.
-
Mellas E.J., Haynes J.M. (1985). Swimming performance and behavior of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) and white perch (Morone americana): effects of attaching telemetry transmitters. â Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42: 488-493.
-
Meyers P.M., Hatch S.A., Mulcahy D.M. (1998). Effect of implanted satellite transmitters on the nesting behavior of murres. â Condor 100: 172-174.
-
Murray D.L., Fuller M.R. (2000). A critical review of the effects of marking on the biology of vertebrates. â In: Research techniques in animal ecology â controversies and consequences ( Boitani L., Fuller T.K., eds). Columbia University Press, New York, NY, p. 15-64.
-
Navarro J., González-SolÃs J. (2007). Experimental increase of flying costs in a pelagic seabird: effects on foraging strategies, nutritional state and chick condition. â Oecologia 151: 150-160.
-
Paredes R., Jones I.L., Boness D.J. (2005). Reduced parental care, compensatory behaviour and reproductive costs of thick-billed murres equipped with data loggers. â Anim. Behav. 69: 197-208.
-
Passos C., Navarro J., Giudici A., González-SolÃs J. (2010). Effects of extra mass on the pelagic behavior of a seabird. â Auk 127: 100-107.
-
Pennycuick C.J., Fast P.L., Ballerstädt N., Rattenborg N. (2012). The effect of an external transmitter on the drag coefficient of a birdâs body, and hence on migration range, and energy reserves after migration. â J. Ornithol. 153: 633-644.
-
Phillips R.A., Xavier J.C., Croxall J.P. (2003). Effects of satellite transmitters on albatrosses and petrels. â Am. Ornithol. Union 120: 1082-1090.
-
Piatt J.F., Roberts B.D., Lidster W.W., Wells J.L., Hatch S.A. (1990). Effects of human disturbance on breeding least and crested auklets at St. Lawrence Island, Alaska. â Auk 107: 342-350.
-
R Development Core Team (2012). R software. â R Development Core Team, Vienna.
-
Recio M.R., Mathieu R., Denys P., Sirguey P., Seddon P.J. (2011). Lightweight GPS-tags, one giant leap for wildlife tracking? An assessment approach. â PloS One 6: e28225.
-
Renner M., Hunt G.L. Jr., Piatt J.F., Byrd G.V. (2008). Seasonal and distributional patterns of seabirds along the Aleutian Archipelago. â Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 357: 301-311.
-
Robinson W.D., Bowlin M.S., Bisson I., Shamoun-Baranes J., Thorup K., Diehl R.H., Kunz T.H., Mabey S., Winkler D.W. (2010). Integrating concepts and technologies to advance the study of bird migration. â Front. Ecol. Environ. 8: 354-361.
-
Rodriguez A., Negro J.J., Fox J.W., Afanasyev V. (2009). Effects of geolocator attachments on breeding parameters of Lesser Kestrels. â J. Field Ornithol. 80: 399-407.
-
Ropert-Coudert Y., Wilson R.P. (2005). Trends and perspectives in animal-attached remote sensing. â Front. Ecol. Environ. 3: 437-444.
-
Schumacher J.D., Kruse G.H. (2005). Toward sustainable ecosystem services from the Aleutian archipelago. â Fish. Oceanogr. 14: 277-291.
-
Sykes R.E. (1978). Toward a theory of observer effect in systematic field observation. â Human Org. 37: 148-156.
-
Thorstad E.B., Okland F., Finstad B. (2000). Effects of telemetry transmitters on swimming performance of adult Atlantic salmon. â J. Fish Biol. 57: 531-535.
-
Vandenabeele S.P., Wilson R.P., Grogan A. (2011). Tags on seabirds: how seriously are instrument-induced behaviours considered? â Anim. Welfare 20: 559-571.
-
Vandenabeele S.P., Shepard E.L., Grogan A., Wilson R.P. (2012). When three per cent may not be three per cent; device-equipped seabirds experience variable flight constraints. â Mar. Biol. 159: 1-14.
-
Walker B.G., Boveng P.L. (1995). Effects of time depth recorders on maternal foraging and attendance behavior of Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella). â Can. J. Zool. 73: 1538-1544.
-
Wanless A.S., Harris M.P., Morris J.A. (1989). Behavior of alcids with tail-mounted radio transmitters. â Colon. Waterbirds 12: 158-163.
-
Watson K., Granger R. (1998). Hydrodynamic effect of a satellite transmitter on a juvenile green turtle (Chelonia mydas). â J. Exp. Biol. 201: 2497-2505.
-
Whidden S.E., Williams C.T., Breton A.R., Buck C.L. (2007). Effects of transmitters on the reproductive success of tufted puffins. â J. Field Ornithol. 78: 206-212.
-
White G., Garrott R. (1990). Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. â Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
-
Williams T.D., Croxall J.P. (1990). Is chick fledging weight a good index of food availabiliy in seabird populations? â Nord. Soc. Oikos 59: 414-416.
-
Wilson R.P., McMahon C.R. (2006). Measuring devices on wild animals: what consititutes acceptable practice? â Ecol. Soc. Am. 4: 147-154.
-
Wilson R.P., Grant W.S., Duffy D.C. (1986). Recording devices on free-ranging marine animals: does measurement affect foraging performance? â Ecol. Soc. Am. 67: 1091-1093.
-
Zubakin V.A., Volodin I.A., Klenova A.V., Zubakina E.V., Volodina E.V., Lapshina E.N. (2010). Behavior of crested auklets (Aethia cristatella, Charadriiformes, Alcidae) in the breeding season: visual and acoustic displays. â Biol. Bull. 37: 823-835.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 927 | 64 | 6 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 255 | 4 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 94 | 9 | 0 |
An experimental study measuring the effects of a tarsus-mounted tracking device on the behaviour of a small pursuit-diving seabird
äºBehaviourSearch for other papers by Jill L. Robinson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ian Lawrence Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Miniaturized tracking devices are taking a rapidly increasing role in studies measuring animal movement and other aspects of behaviour, especially for wide-ranging species such as seabirds that are difficult to observe otherwise. A crucial, but questionable criterion of such migration research is assuming that effects of tracking devices on animal behaviour are negligible, to ensure results of tracking studies are biologically relevant. To address this concern, we experimentally quantified effects of a 2 g (ca. 1.1% of body mass) geolocation device on crested auklet (Aethia cristatella) behaviour, including return rate, activity on the colony surface, and measures of reproductive performance in a two-year, two-part field study. In experiment 1, we fitted tracking devices (or identical dummy devices) to one mate of a breeding pair in nesting crevices, to quantify effects on reproductive performance and nest fidelity. In experiment 2, we assigned dummy devices to birds captured at the colony site surface, to quantify effects on social activity, return rate and provisioning behaviour. For birds tagged in crevices, we detected no effect on fledging success, or chick growth rate (mass and wing length). However, mass at fledging age of chicks provisioned with one tagged parent was significantly lower than control, and low nest site fidelity (compared to control birds) was observed for tagged birds. Individuals tagged on the colony surface showed significantly reduced colony surface activity, return rates and provisioning behaviour. This study shows strong âobserver effectsâ of an attached device well below the recommended size limit for wildlife tagging. Future studies should both quantify effects of attached devices and consider the biological relevance of measures of the behaviour of interest.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 927 | 64 | 6 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 255 | 4 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 94 | 9 | 0 |
