Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Anti-snake behaviour in a facultative cooperative breeder, the Cape ground squirrel
in BehaviourSearch for other papers by M.A. Phillips in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by J.M. Waterman in
Current site
Google Scholar
Predator harassment is an anti-predator behaviour that may increase an individual’s risk of predation, as individuals approach, threaten and harass a potential predator, yet this behaviour is still not well understood. The Cape ground squirrel (Xerus inauris) is a highly social facultative cooperative breeder from southern Africa that harasses several species of venomous snakes. We examined whether harassment was part of alloparental care by comparing harassment behaviours among different age and sex classes in Cape ground squirrel social groups. We also assessed how individuals adjusted their behaviour dependent on levels of risk by examining the Cape ground squirrel’s harassment behaviour among non-venomous, and two species of venomous snakes. We found adult females with emerged juvenile offspring took the most risk, harassing for longer durations and at higher intensities than other group members, suggesting that snake harassment was a maternal behaviour. Females with juvenile offspring only harassed the highest risk elapid snake but increased vigilance and inspection with increasing snake risk suggesting that the Cape ground squirrel can discriminate between different types of snake predators.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
-
Akani G.C., Luiselli L., Eniang E.A., Rugiero L. (2008). Life in the tropical suburbs: food type partitioning among sympatric African house snakes of the genus Lamprophis (Colubridae). — Ital. J. Zool. 75: 395-399.
-
Alexander G., Marais J. (2007). A guide to reptiles of southern Africa. — Struik Publishers, Cape Town.
-
Arnold K.E., Owens I.P.F., Goldizen A.W. (2005). Division of labour within cooperatively breeding groups. — Behaviour 142: 1577-1590.
-
Barbour M.A., Clark R.W. (2012). Ground squirrel tail-flag displays alter both predatory strike and ambush site selection behaviour of rattlesnakes. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 279: 3827-3833.
-
Berger J. (1979). “Predator harassment” as a defensive strategy in ungulates. — Am. Midl. Nat. 102: 197-199.
-
Blumstein D.T., Evans C.S., Daniel J.C. (2006). JWatcher v. 1.0. — Available online at http://www.jwatcher.ucla.edu.
-
Boellstorff D., Owings D.H., Penedo M., Hersek M. (1994). Reproductive behaviour and multiple paternity of California ground squirrels. — Anim. Behav. 47: 1057-1064.
-
Broadley D.G. (1990). FitzSimons’ snakes of southern Africa. — Delta Books, Johannesburg.
-
Caro T. (2005). Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. — The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
-
Chandler R., Rose R.K. (1988). Comparative analysis of the effects of visual and auditory stimuli on avian mobbing behaviour (Análisis comparativo del efecto de estímulos visuales y auditivos en conducta de tumultos en aves). — J. Field. Ornithol. 59: 269-277.
-
Colegrave N., Ruxton G. (2003). Confidence intervals are a more useful complement to nonsignificant tests than are power calculations. — Behav. Ecol. 14: 446-450.
-
Colombelli-Négrel D., Robertson J., Kleindorfer S. (2010). Nestling presence affects the anti-predator response of adult superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus). — Acta Ethol. 13: 69-74.
-
Conover W.J. (1971). Practical nonparametric statistics, 2nd edn. — Wiley, New York, NY.
-
Crofoot M.C. (2012). Why mob? Reassessing the costs and benefits of primate predator harassment. — Folia Primatol. 83: 252-273.
-
Curio E. (1978). The adaptive significance of avian mobbing I. Teleonomic hypotheses and predictions. — Z. Tierpsychol. 48: 175-183.
-
Curio E., Ernst U., Vieth W. (1978). Cultural transmission of enemy recognition: the function of mobbing. — Science 202: 899-901.
-
Doerr E.D., Doerr V.A.J. (2006). Comparative demography of treecreepers: evaluating hypotheses for the evolution and maintenance of cooperative breeding. — Anim. Behav. 72: 147-159.
-
Dominey W.J. (1983). Mobbing in colonially nesting fishes, especially the bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus. — Copeia: 1086-1088.
-
Dugatkin L.A., Godin J.G.J. (1992). Prey approaching predators — a cost-benefit perspective. — Ann. Zool. Fennici 29: 233-252.
-
Flasskamp A. (1994). The adaptive significance of avian mobbing V. An experimental test of the “move on” hypothesis. — Ethology 96: 322-333.
-
Francis A.M., Hailman J.P., Woolfenden G.E. (1989). Mobbing by Florida scrub jays: behaviour, sexual asymmetry, role of helpers and ontogeny. — Anim. Behav. 38: 795-816.
-
Graw B., Manser M.B. (2007). The function of mobbing in cooperative meerkats. — Anim. Behav. 74: 507-517.
-
Griesser M., Ekman J. (2005). Nepotistic mobbing behaviour in the Siberian jay, Perisoreus infaustus. — Anim. Behav. 69: 345-352.
-
Gursky S. (2006). Function of snake mobbing in spectral tarsiers. — Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 129: 601-608.
-
Helfman G.S. (1989). Threat-sensitive predator avoidance in damselfish–trumpetfish interactions. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 47-58.
-
Higgins J.J. (2004). Introduction to modern nonparametric statistics. — Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
-
Joubert F.J. (1976). Snake venom toxins: the amino acid sequence of three toxins (CM-2e, CM-4a and CM-7) from Naja haje annulifera (Egyptian Cobra) venom. — H.-S. Z. Physiol. Chem. 357: 1735-1750.
-
King R.B. (2002). Predicted and observed maximum prey size-snake size allometry. — Funct. Ecol. 16: 766-772.
-
Koprowski J.L. (2002). Handling tree squirrels with a safe and efficient restraint. — Wildlife Soc. B 30: 101-103.
-
Loughry W.J. (1987). The dynamics of snake harassment by black-tailed prairie dogs. — Behaviour 103: 26-48.
-
Loughry W.J. (1989). Discrimination of snakes by two populations of black-tailed prairie dogs. — J. Mammal. 70: 627-630.
-
Maklakov A.A. (2002). Snake-directed, mobbing in a cooperative breeder: anti-predator behaviour or self advertisement for the formation of dispersal coalitions? — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52: 372-378.
-
Mallow D., Ludwig D., Nilson G. (2003). True vipers: natural history and toxicology of old world vipers. — Krieger, Melbourne, VIC.
-
Manjerovic M.B. (2010). The influence of sexual selection on behavioral and physiological mechanisms underlying reproductive success in male Cape ground squirrels (Xerus inauris). — PhD thesis, University of Central Florida, Coral Gables, FL.
-
Ostreiher R. (2003). Is mobbing altruistic or selfish. — Anim. Behav. 66: 145-149.
-
Owings D.H., Coss R.G. (1977). Snake mobbing by California ground squirrels; adaptive variation and ontogeny. — Behaviour 62: 50-69.
-
Owings D.H., Hennessy D.F., Leger D.W., Gladney A.B. (1986). Different functions of “alarm” calling for different time scales: a preliminary report on ground squirrels. — Behaviour 99: 101-116.
-
Owings D.H., Coss R.G., Mckernon D., Rowe M.P., Arrowood P.C. (2001). Snake-directed antipredator behaviour of rock squirrels (Spermophilus variegatus): population differences and snake-species discrimination. — Behaviour 138: 575-595.
-
Patterson T.L., Petrinovich L., James D.K. (1980). Reproductive value and appropriateness of response to predators by white-crowned sparrows. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7: 227-231.
-
Pettitt B.A., Waterman J.M. (2011). The mechanisms of reproductive suppression in a low-skew cooperative breeder. — J. Mammal. 92: 378-386.
-
Pettitt B.A., Waterman J.M., Wheaton C.J. (2008). Assessing the effects of resource availability and parity on reproduction in female Cape ground squirrels: resources do not matter. — J. Zool. 276: 291-298.
-
Phillips M.A., Waterman J.A. (2013). Olfactory snake-predator discrimination in the Cape ground squirrel. — Ethology 119: 278-285.
-
Phillips M.A., Waterman J.A., Du Plessis P., Smit M., Bennett N.C. (2012). No evidence for proteolytic venom resistance in southern African ground squirrels. — Toxicon 60: 760-763.
-
Rasa O.A.E. (1987). The dwarf mongoose; a study of behavior and social structure in relation to ecology in a small social carnivore. — In: Advances in the study of behavior, Vol. 17 ( Kaufman S., ed.). Academic Press Inc., Orlando, Florida, p. 121-221.
-
Rood J.P., Nellis D. (1980). Freeze-marking mongooses. — J. Wildl. Manage. 44: 500-502.
-
Scantlebury M., Waterman J.M., Bennett N.C. (2008). Alternative reproductive tactics in male Cape ground squirrels Xerus inauris. — Physiol. Behav. 94: 359-367.
-
Shields W.M. (1984). Barn swallow mobbing — self-defense, collateral kin defense, group defense, or parental care. — Anim. Behav. 32: 132-148.
-
Swaisgood R.R., Rowe M.P., Owings D.H. (1999). Assessment of rattlesnake dangerousness by California ground squirrels: exploitation of cues from rattling sounds. — Anim. Behav. 57: 1301-1310.
-
Tamura N. (1989). Snake-directed mobbing by the Formosan squirrel Callosciurus erythraeus thaiwanensis. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 175-180.
-
Tamura N., Yong H.S. (1993). Vocalizations in response to predators in 3 species of Malaysian Callosciurus (Sciuridae). — J. Mammal. 74: 703-714.
-
Tamura N., Hayashi F., Miyashita K. (1988). Dominance hierarchy and mating behavior of the Formosan squirrel, Callosciurus erythraeus thaiwanensis. — J. Mammal. 69: 320-331.
-
Tan K., Wang Z., Chen W., Hu Z., Oldroyd B.P. (2013). The ‘I see you’ pre-predator signal of Apis cerana is innate. — Naturwissenschaften 100: 245-248.
-
Tórrez L., Robles N., González A., Crofoot M.C. (2012). Risky business? Lethal attack by a jaguar sheds light on the costs of predator mobbing for Capuchins (Cebus capucinus). — Int. J. Primatol. 33: 440-446.
-
Towers S.R., Coss R.G. (1990). Confronting snakes in the burrow-snake-species discrimination and antisnake tactics of 2 California ground-squirrel populations. — Ethology 84: 177-192.
-
Unck C.E., Waterman J.M., Verburgt L., Bateman P.W. (2009). Quantity versus quality: how does level of predation threat affect Cape ground squirrel vigilance? — Anim. Behav. 78: 625-632.
-
Van Zyl J.H.M. (1965). The vegetation of the S.A. Lombard Nature Reserve and its utilization by certain antelope. — Afr. Zool. 1: 55-71.
-
Waterman J.M. (1995). The social organization of the Cape ground squirrel (Xerus inauris; Rodentia: Sciuridae). — Ethology 101: 130-147.
-
Waterman J.M. (1996). Reproductive biology of a tropical non-hibernating ground squirrel. — J. Mammal. 77: 134-146.
-
Waterman J.M. (1997). Why do male Cape ground squirrels live in groups? — Anim. Behav. 53: 809-817.
-
Waterman J.M. (2002). Delayed maturity, group fission and the limits of group size in female Cape ground squirrels (Sciuridae: Xerus inauris). — J. Zool. 256: 113-120.
-
Waterman J.M., Roth J.D. (2007). Interspecific associations of Cape ground squirrels with two mongoose species: benefit or cost? — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61: 1675-1683.
-
Zar J.H. (1999). Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. — Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 623 | 76 | 13 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 209 | 2 | 1 |
| PDF-Downloads | 62 | 6 | 3 |
Anti-snake behaviour in a facultative cooperative breeder, the Cape ground squirrel
in BehaviourSearch for other papers by M.A. Phillips in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J.M. Waterman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Predator harassment is an anti-predator behaviour that may increase an individual’s risk of predation, as individuals approach, threaten and harass a potential predator, yet this behaviour is still not well understood. The Cape ground squirrel (Xerus inauris) is a highly social facultative cooperative breeder from southern Africa that harasses several species of venomous snakes. We examined whether harassment was part of alloparental care by comparing harassment behaviours among different age and sex classes in Cape ground squirrel social groups. We also assessed how individuals adjusted their behaviour dependent on levels of risk by examining the Cape ground squirrel’s harassment behaviour among non-venomous, and two species of venomous snakes. We found adult females with emerged juvenile offspring took the most risk, harassing for longer durations and at higher intensities than other group members, suggesting that snake harassment was a maternal behaviour. Females with juvenile offspring only harassed the highest risk elapid snake but increased vigilance and inspection with increasing snake risk suggesting that the Cape ground squirrel can discriminate between different types of snake predators.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 623 | 76 | 13 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 209 | 2 | 1 |
| PDF-Downloads | 62 | 6 | 3 |
