Ocean-finding in marine turtles: the importance of low horizon elevation as an orientation cue
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by Col Limpus in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Ruth L. Kamrowski in
Current site
Google Scholar
Sea finding behaviour in hatchling sea turtles is widely believed to be guided by orientation towards the brightest horizon and away from high silhouettes. We propose that the horizon profile at the lowest angle of elevation is a more important cue for ocean finding than light intensity. Examples of hatchling orientation occurring at natural nest sites, at preselected beach release sites, and within a walled wooden arena under various conditions in the field, are presented. We conclude that hatchlings orient as follows: (1) Hatchlings move towards the horizon line at the lowest angle of elevation; (2) Hatchlings move away from high silhouettes, in a direction that remains close to the horizon line at the lowest angle of elevation; (3) Should a conflict exist regarding the direction of lowest horizon elevation, hatchlings move towards the brightest lowest horizon. This refinement to current theory explains numerous instances of natural non-ocean-finding behaviour in marine turtles, which occur both by day and by night, and in the absence of artificial lighting. We propose that the disruption caused to hatchling orientation by artificial lighting close to nesting beaches occurs because bright lights mask the horizon line as a cue by making it impossible to discern, causing the hatchlings to move towards the only visible âhorizonâ â the artificial lights. Consequently, we recommend that managers of sea turtle rookeries where turtles have an ocean-finding problem should manipulate the beach profile to ensure the direction of the ocean matches the lowest angle of elevation, in combination with light reduction strategies â as the most effective means of preventing disrupted orientation.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Bartol S.M., Musick J.A. (2003). Sensory biology of sea turtles. â In: The biology of sea turtles, Vol. II ( Lutz P.L., Musick J.A., Wyneken J., eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p. 79-102.
-
Bertolotti L., Salmon M. (2005). Do embedded roadway lights protect sea turtles? â Environ. Manage. 36: 702-710.
-
Bjorndal K. (1999). Priorities for research in foraging habitats. â In: Research and management techniques for the conservation of sea turtles, IUCN/SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication No. 4 ( Eckert K., Bjorndal K., Abreu-Grobois A.F., Donnelly M., eds). IUCN/SSC, Washington, DC, p. 12-14.
-
Carr A., Ogren L. (1960). The ecology and migrations of sea turtles, 4: the green turtle in the Caribbean Sea. â Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 121: 7-48.
-
Clark B.A.J. (2005). Is artificial light at night too much of a good thing? â Clin. Exp. Optometr. 88: 197-199.
-
Ehrenfeld D.W. (1968). The role of vision in the sea-finding orientation of the green turtle (Chelonia mydas), 2. Orientation mechanism and range of spectral sensitivity. â Anim. Behav. 16: 281-287.
-
Ehrenfeld D.W. (1979). Behavior associated with nesting. â In: Turtles: perspectives and research ( Harless M., Morlock H., eds). Wiley, New York, NY, p. 417-434.
-
Ehrenfeld D.W., Carr A. (1967). The role of vision in the sea-finding orientation of the green turtle (Chelonia mydas). â Anim. Behav. 15: 25-36.
-
Fritsches K.A. (2012). Australian loggerhead sea turtle hatchlings do not avoid yellow. â Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 45: 79-89.
-
Godfrey M.H., Barreto R. (1995). Beach vegetation and seafinding orientation of turtle hatchlings. â Biol. Conserv. 74: 29-32.
-
Granda A., OâShea P. (1972). Spectral sensitivity of the green turtle (Chelonia mydas) determined by electrical responses to heterochromatic light. â Brain Behav. Evol. 5: 143-154.
-
Hooker D. (1908). Preliminary observations on the behavior of some newly hatched loggerhead turtles (Thalassochelys caretta). â Yb. Carnegie Inst. Washington (1907) 6: 111-112.
-
Horch K.W., Gocke J.P., Salmon M., Forward R.B. (2008). Visual spectral sensitivity of hatchling loggerhead (Caretta caretta L.) and leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea L.) sea turtles, as determined by single-flash electroretinography. â Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 41: 107-119.
-
Lake K.N., Eckert K. (2009). Reducing light pollution in a tourism-based economy, with recommendations for a national lighting ordinance, WIDECAST Technical Report No. 11. â WIDECAST, Ballwin, MO.
-
Limpus C. (1971). Sea turtle ocean finding behaviour. â Search 2: 385-387.
-
Limpus C.J. (1985). AÂ study of the loggerhead turtle, Caretta caretta, in Queensland. â PhD Thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.
-
Limpus C.J. (2009). A biological review of Australian marine turtles. â Environmental Protection Agency, Queensland Government, Brisbane, QLD.
-
Limpus C.J., Fleay A., Baker V. (1984). The flatback turtle, Chelonia depressa, in Queensland: reproductive periodicity, philopatry and recruitment. â Wildlife Res. 11: 579-587.
-
Limpus C.J., Limpus D.J. (2003). Loggerhead turtles in the equatorial and southern Pacific Ocean: a species in decline. â In: Loggerhead sea turtles ( Bolten A., Witherington B., eds). Smithsonian Books, Washington, DC, p. 199-209.
-
Limpus C.J., Reed P. (1985). Green sea turtles stranded by Cyclone Kathy on the south-western coast of the Gulf of Carpentaria. â Wildlife Res. 12(3): 523-533.
-
Limpus C.J., Miller J.D., Parmenter C.J., Limpus D.J. (2003). The green turtle, Chelonia mydas, population of Raine Island and the northern Great Barrier Reef: 1843â2001. â Mem. Queensland Mus. 49: 349-440.
-
Lohmann K.J., Witherington B., Lohmann C.M.F., Salmon M. (1997). Orientation, navigation, and natal beach homing in sea turtles. â In: The biology of sea turtles ( Lutz P.L., Musick J.A., eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p. 107-135.
-
Mardia K.V., Jupp P.E. (2000). Directional statistics. â Wiley, Chichester.
-
Miller J.D. (1997). Reproduction in sea turtles. â In: The biology of sea turtles ( Lutz P.L., Musick J.A., eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p. 51-81.
-
Miller J.D., Limpus C.J., Godfrey M.H. (2003). Nest site selection, oviposition, eggs, development, hatching, and emergence of loggerhead turtles. â In: Loggerhead sea turtles ( Bolten A., Witherington B., eds). Smithsonian Books, Washington, DC, p. 125-143.
-
Mrosovsky N. (1972). The water-finding ability of sea turtles; behavioural studies and physiological speculations. â Brain Behav. Evol. 5: 202-225.
-
Mrosovsky N. (1978). Effects of flashing lights on sea-finding behavior of green turtles. â Behav. Biol. 22: 85-91.
-
Mrosovsky N., Kingsmill S. (1985). How turtles find the sea. â Z. Tierpsychol. 67: 237-256.
-
Mrosovsky N., Shettleworth S.J. (1968). Wavelength preferences and brightness cues in the water finding behaviour of sea turtles. â Behaviour 32: 211-257.
-
Mrosovsky N., Shettleworth S.J. (1974). Further studies of the sea-finding mechanism in green turtle hatchlings. â Behaviour 51: 195-208.
-
Mrosovsky N., Shettleworth S.J. (1975). Orientation circle of leatherback turtle, Dermochelys coriacea. â Anim. Behav. 23: 568-591.
-
Parker G.H. (1922). The crawling of young loggerhead turtles toward the sea. â J. Exp. Zool. 36: 322-331.
-
Pendoley K. (2005). Sea turtles and the environmental management of industrial activities in north west Western Australia. â PhD Thesis, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA.
-
Salmon M. (2006). Protecting sea turtles from artificial night lighting at Floridaâs oceanic beaches. â In: Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting ( Rich C., Longcore T., eds). Island Press, Washington, DC, p. 141-168.
-
Salmon M., Tolbert M.G., Painter D.P., Goff M., Reiners R. (1995). Behavior of loggerhead sea turtles on an urban beach, II. Hatchling orientation. â J. Herpetol. 29: 568-576.
-
Salmon M., Witherington B. (1995). Artificial lighting and seafinding by loggerhead hatchlings: evidence for lunar modulation. â Copeia: 931-938.
-
Salmon M., Wyneken J. (1994). Orientation by hatchling sea turtles: mechanisms and implications. â Herpetol. Nat. Hist. 2: 13-24.
-
Salmon M., Wyneken J., Fritz E., Lucas M. (1992). Seafinding by hatchling sea turtles: role of brightness, silhouette and beach slope as orientation cues. â Behaviour 122: 56-77.
-
Tuxbury S.M., Salmon M. (2005). Competitive interactions between artificial lighting and natural cues during seafinding by hatchling marine turtles. â Biol. Conserv. 121: 311-316.
-
van de Merwe J.P., West E.J., Ibrahim K. (2012). Effects of off-road vehicle tyre ruts on the beach dispersal of green sea turtle Chelonia mydas hatchlings. â Endang. Species Res. 18: 27-34.
-
van Rhijn F.A. (1979). Optic orientation in hatchlings of the sea turtle, Chelonia mydas: I. Brightness: not the only optic cue in sea-finding orientation. â Mar. Behav. Physiol. 6: 105-121.
-
van Rhijn F.A., van Gorkom J. (1983). Optic orientation in hatchlings of the sea turtle, Chelonia mydas, III. Sea-finding behaviour: the role of photic and visual orientation in animals walking on the spot under laboratory conditions. â Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 9: 211-228.
-
Verheijen F. (1958). The mechanisms of the trapping effect of artificial light sources upon animals. â Arch. Neerland. Zool. 13: 1-107.
-
Verheijen F. (1985). Photopollution: artificial light optic spatial control systems fail to cope with. Incidents, causation, remedies. â Exp. Biol. 44: 1-18.
-
Verheijen F., Wildschut J. (1973). The photic orientation of hatchling sea turtles during water finding behaviour. â Neth. J. Sea Res. 7: 53-67.
-
Witherington B. (1992). Behavioral responses of nesting sea turtles to artificial lighting. â Herpetologica 48: 31-39.
-
Witherington B. (1997). The problem of photopollution for sea turtles and other nocturnal animals. â In: Behavioral approaches to conservation in the wild ( Clemmons J.R., Buchholz R., eds). Cambridge University press, Cambridge, p. 303-328.
-
Witherington B., Bjorndal K. (1991a). Influences of artificial lighting on the seaward orientation of hatchling loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta. â Biol. Conserv. 55: 139-149.
-
Witherington B., Bjorndal K. (1991b). Influences of wavelength and intensity on hatchling sea turtle phototaxis: implications for sea-finding behavior. â Copeia: 1060-1069.
-
Witherington B., Martin R.E. (2000). Understanding, assessing, and resolving light-pollution problems on sea turtle nesting beaches, 2nd edn. â MRI Tech. Rep. TR-2. Florida Marine Research Institute, St. Petersburg, FL.
-
Zar J.H. (2010). Biostatistical analysis. â Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1368 | 194 | 52 |
| Full Text Views | 340 | 10 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 199 | 16 | 0 |
Ocean-finding in marine turtles: the importance of low horizon elevation as an orientation cue
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by Col Limpus in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ruth L. Kamrowski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Sea finding behaviour in hatchling sea turtles is widely believed to be guided by orientation towards the brightest horizon and away from high silhouettes. We propose that the horizon profile at the lowest angle of elevation is a more important cue for ocean finding than light intensity. Examples of hatchling orientation occurring at natural nest sites, at preselected beach release sites, and within a walled wooden arena under various conditions in the field, are presented. We conclude that hatchlings orient as follows: (1) Hatchlings move towards the horizon line at the lowest angle of elevation; (2) Hatchlings move away from high silhouettes, in a direction that remains close to the horizon line at the lowest angle of elevation; (3) Should a conflict exist regarding the direction of lowest horizon elevation, hatchlings move towards the brightest lowest horizon. This refinement to current theory explains numerous instances of natural non-ocean-finding behaviour in marine turtles, which occur both by day and by night, and in the absence of artificial lighting. We propose that the disruption caused to hatchling orientation by artificial lighting close to nesting beaches occurs because bright lights mask the horizon line as a cue by making it impossible to discern, causing the hatchlings to move towards the only visible âhorizonâ â the artificial lights. Consequently, we recommend that managers of sea turtle rookeries where turtles have an ocean-finding problem should manipulate the beach profile to ensure the direction of the ocean matches the lowest angle of elevation, in combination with light reduction strategies â as the most effective means of preventing disrupted orientation.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1368 | 194 | 52 |
| Full Text Views | 340 | 10 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 199 | 16 | 0 |
