The ability of animals to disperse towards their original home range following displacement has been demonstrated in a number of species. However, little is known about the homing ability of three-spine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus), an important model species in behavioural ecology. In addition, few studies have examined the role of social facilitation in relation to homing behaviour in fishes. We examined homing behaviour of sticklebacks displaced over distances of between 80 m and 160 m in land-drains with directional water flow. Fish were translocated from their original capture site, tagged and then released either in groups or solitarily. We performed recapture transects either one or two days later. Data provided by recaptured sticklebacks show that the fish dispersed in the direction of their original capture site. Although fish translocated downstream typically moved further than those translocated upstream, both dispersed towards their original capture site. There was no difference between fish released solitarily or in groups in their homing ability and indeed there was little evidence that fish translocated in groups remained together following their release. The homing ability of the fish was demonstrated by the finding that up to 80% of fish returned to their home ranges within two days of release over a distance equivalent to approximately 5000 body lengths of these small fish.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Alcock J. (1996). Site fidelity and homing ability of males of Dawson’s burrowing bee (Amegilla dawsoni) (Apidae, Anthophorini). — J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 69: 182-190.
Alyan S., Jander R. (1994). Short-range homing in the house mouse, Mus musculus — stages in the learning of directions. — Anim. Behav. 48: 285-298.
Arai T., Goto A., Miyazaki N. (2003). Migratory history of the threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. — Ichthyol. Res. 50: 9-14.
Armstrong J.D., Herbert N.A. (1997). Homing movements of displaced streamdwelling brown trout. — J. Fish Biol. 50: 445-449.
Avens L., Braun-McNeill J., Epperly S., Lohmann K.J. (2003). Site fidelity and homing behavior in juvenile loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta). — Mar. Biol. 143: 211-220.
Belanger G., Rodriguez M.A. (2001). Homing behaviour of stream-dwelling brook charr following experimental displacement. — J. Fish Biol. 59: 987-1001.
Bell M.A., Foster S.A. (1994). The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bingman V., Jechura T., Kahn M.C. (2006). Behavioral and neural mechanisms of homing and migration in birds. — In: Animal spatial cognition: comparative, neural, and computational approaches ( Brown M.F., Cook R.G., eds), available online at http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/asc/bingman/.
Biro D., Guilford T., Dell’Omo G., Lipp H.P. (2002). How the viewing of familiar landscapes prior to release allows pigeons to home faster: evidence from GPS tracking. — J. Exp. Biol. 205: 3833-3844.
Bolnick D.I., Svanback R., Fordyce J.A., Yang L.H., Davis J.M., Hulsey C.D., Forister M.L. (2003). The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. — Am. Nat. 161: 1-28.
Braithwaite V.A., Armstrong J.D., McAdam H.M., Huntingford F.A. (1996). Can juvenile Atlantic salmon use multiple cue systems in spatial learning? — Anim. Behav. 51: 1409-1415.
Cook A., Bamford O.S., Freeman J.D.B., Teideman D.J. (1969). A study of the homing habit of the limpet. — Anim. Behav. 17: 330-336.
Coolen I., van Bergen Y., Day R.L., Laland K.N. (2003). Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. 270: 2413-2419.
Croft D.P., Arrowsmith B.J., Bielby J., Skinner K., White E., Couzin I.D., Magurran A.E., Ramnarine I., Krause J. (2003). Mechanisms underlying shoal composition in the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata. — Oikos 100: 429-438.
Crump M.L. (1986). Homing and site fidelity in a neotropical frog, Atelopus varius (Bufonidae). — Copeia: 438-444.
Dahl J., Nilsson P.A., Pettersson L.B. (1998). Against the flow: chemical detection of downstream predators in running waters. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. 265: 1339-1344.
Darby H.C. (1940). The draining of the fens. — Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Fernö A., Pitcher T.J., Melle W., Nøttestad L., Mackinson S., Hollingworth C., Misund O.A. (1998). The challenge of the herring in the Norwegian Sea: making optimal collective spatial decisions. — Sarsia 83: 149-167.
Freeman R., Mann R., Guilford T., Biro D. (2011). Group decisions and individual differences: route fidelity predicts flight leadership in homing pigeons (Columba livia). — Biol. Lett. 7: 63-66.
Garcia de Leaniz C. (1989). Site fidelity and homing of Atlantic salmon parr in a small Scottish stream. — In: Proceedings of the salmon migration and distribution symposium ( Brannon E.L., Jonsson B., eds). School of Fisheries, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Girvan J.R., Braithwaite V.A. (1998). Population differences in spatial learning in three-spined sticklebacks. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. 265: 913-918.
Girvan J.R., Braithwaite V.A. (2000). Orientation behaviour in sticklebacks: modified by experience or population specific? — Behaviour 137: 833-843.
Gunning G.E. (1959). The sensory basis for homing in the longear sunfish, Lepomis megalotis megalotis (Raf.). — Invest. Indiana Lakes Streams 5: 103-130.
Hagstrum J.T. (2000). Infrasound and the avian navigational map. — J. Exp. Biol. 203: 1103-1111.
Halvorsen M., Stabell O.B. (1990). Homing behavior of displaced stream-dwelling brown trout. — Anim. Behav. 39: 1089-1097.
Harcup M.F., Williams R., Ellis D.M. (1984). Movements of brown trout, Salmo trutta, in the river Gwyddon, South Wales. — J. Fish Biol. 24: 415-426.
Hasler A.D., Cooper J.C. (1976). Chemical cues for homing salmon. — Experientia 32: 1091-1093.
Helfman G.S., Schultz E.T. (1984). Social transmission of behavioral traditions in a coral-reef fish. — Anim. Behav. 32: 379-384.
Hert E. (1992). Homing and home-site fidelity in rock-dwelling cichlids (Pisces, Teleostei) of Lake Malawi, Africa. — Environ. Biol. Fish. 33: 229-237.
Hoare D.J., Couzin I.D., Godin J.G.J., Krause J. (2004). Context-dependent group size choice in fish. — Anim. Behav. 67: 155-164.
Huijbers C.M., Nagelkerken I., Lossbroek P.A.C., Schulten I.E., Siegenthaler A., Holderied M.W., Simpson S.D. (2012). A test of the senses: fish select novel habitats by responding to multiple cues. — Ecology 93: 46-55.
Huse G., Railsback S., Ferno A. (2002). Modelling changes in migration pattern of herring: collective behaviour and numerical domination. — J. Fish Biol. 60: 571-582.
Jackson A.L., Ruxton G.D. (2006). Toward an individual-level understanding of vigilance: the role of social information. — Behav. Ecol. 17: 532-538.
Jamon M., Bovet P. (1987). Possible use of environmental gradients in orientation by homing wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus. — Behav. Process. 15: 93-107.
Krause J., Ruxton G.D. (2002). Living in groups. — Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kume M., Mori S. (2009). Sea-run migratory behaviour in the Japan Sea form of three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus in the tidal pool of eastern Hokkaido Island, Japan. — J. Fish Biol. 75: 2845-2850.
Laland K.N., Dean L., Hoppitt W., Rendell L., Webster M.M. (2012). Social learning: strategies, mechanisms and models. — In: Handbook of comparative cognition ( Zentall T.R., Wasserman E., eds). University of Oxford Press, Oxford.
Lima S.L., Dill L.M. (1990). Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation — a review and prospectus. — Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.
McQuinn I.H. (1997). Metapopulations and the Atlantic herring. — Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 7: 297-329.
Mitamura H., Arai N., Sakamoto W., Mitsunaga Y., Tanaka H., Mukai Y., Nakamura K., Sasaki M., Yoneda Y. (2005). Role of olfaction and vision in homing behaviour of black rockfish Sebastes inermis. — J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 322: 123-134.
Moore J.S., Hendry A.P. (2009). Can gene flow have negative demographic consequences? Mixed evidence from stream threespine stickleback. — Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B: Biol. 364: 1533-1542.
Odling-Smee L., Braithwaite V.A. (2003). The role of learning in fish orientation. — Fish Fish. 4: 235-246.
Odling-Smee L.C., Boughman J.W., Braithwaite V.A. (2008). Sympatric species of threespine stickleback differ in their performance in a spatial learning task. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 1935-1945.
Papi F. (1992). Animal homing. — Chapman & Hall, London.
Piper W.H. (2011). Making habitat selection more “familiar”: a review. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 1329-1351.
Reader S.M., Kendal J.R., Laland K.N. (2003). Social learning of foraging sites and escape routes in wild Trinidadian guppies. — Anim. Behav. 66: 729-739.
Snyder R.J. (1991). Migration and life histories of the threespine stickleback — evidence for adaptive variation in growth-rate between populations. — Environ. Biol. Fish. 31: 381-388.
Stamps J. (1995). Motor learning and the value of familiar space. — Am. Nat. 146: 41-58.
Stone R.P., O’Clair C.E. (2002). Behavior of female Dungeness crabs, Cancer magister, in a glacial southeast Alaska estuary: homing, brooding-site fidelity, seasonal movements, and habitat use. — J. Crust. Biol. 22: 481-492.
Sumpter D.J.T., Buhl J., Biro D., Couzin I. (2008a). Information transfer in moving animal groups. — Theor. Biosci. 127: 177-186.
Sumpter D.J.T., Krause J., James R., Couzin I.D., Ward A.J.W. (2008b). Consensus decision making by fish. — Curr. Biol. 18: 1773-1777.
Sundaresan S.R., Fischhoff I.R., Dushoff J. (2009). Avoiding spurious findings of nonrandom social structure in association data. — Anim. Behav. 77: 1381-1385.
Swaney W., Kendal J., Capon H., Brown C., Laland K.N. (2001). Familiarity facilitates social learning of foraging behaviour in the guppy. — Anim. Behav. 62: 591-598.
Switzer P.V. (1993). Site fidelity in predictable and unpredictable habitats. — Evol. Ecol. 7: 533-555.
Ward A.J.W., Hart P.J.B. (2003). The effects of kin and familiarity on interactions between fish. — Fish Fish. 4: 348-358.
Ward A.J.W., Hart P.J.B. (2005). Foraging benefits of shoaling with familiars may be exploited by outsiders. — Anim. Behav. 69: 329-335.
Ward A.J.W., Botham M.S., Hoare D.J., James R., Broom M., Godin J.G.J., Krause J. (2002). Association patterns and shoal fidelity in the three-spined stickleback. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. 269: 2451-2455.
Ward A.J.W., Hart P.J.B., Krause J. (2004). The effects of habitat- and diet-based cues on association preferences in three-spined sticklebacks. — Behav. Ecol. 15: 925-929.
Ward A.J.W., Holbrook R.I., Krause J., Hart P.J.B. (2005). Social recognition in sticklebacks: the role of direct experience and habitat cues. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57: 575-583.
Ward A.J.W., Webster M.M., Hart P.J.B. (2007). Social recognition in wild fish populations. — Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 274: 1071-1077.
Ward A.J.W., Herbert-Read J.E., Sumpter D.J.T., Krause J. (2011). Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 2312-2315.
Warner R.R. (1988). Traditionality of mating-site preferences in a coral-reef fish. — Nature 335: 719-721.
Webster M.M., Laland K.N. (2009). Evaluation of a non-invasive tagging system for laboratory studies using three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus. — J. Fish Biol. 75: 1868-1873.
Webster M.M., Goldsmith J., Ward A.J.W., Hart P.J.B. (2007). Habitat-specific chemical cues influence association preferences and shoal cohesion in fish. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62: 273-280.
Webster M.M., Ward A.J.W., Hart P.J.B. (2008). Shoal and prey patch choice by co-occurring fishes and prawns: inter-taxa use of socially transmitted cues. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. 275: 203-208.
Webster M.M., Atton N., Hart P.J.B., Ward A.J.W. (2011). Habitat-specific morphological variation among threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) within a drainage basin. — Plos One 6: e21060, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021060.
Wisenden B.D. (2008). Active space of chemical alarm cue in natural fish populations. — Behaviour 145: 391-407.
Wisenden B.D., Chivers D.P., Brown G.E., Smith R.J.F. (1995). The role of experience in risk assessment — avoidance of areas chemically labeled with fathead minnow alarm pheromone by conspecifics and heterospecifics. — Ecoscience 2: 116-122.
Wisenden B.D., Binstock C.L., Knoll K.E., Linke A.J., Demuth B.S. (2010). Risk-sensitive information gathering by cyprinids following release of chemical alarm cues. — Anim. Behav. 79: 1101-1107.
Yoder J.M., Marschall E.A., Swanson D.A. (2004). The cost of dispersal: predation as a function of movement and site familiarity in ruffed grouse. — Behav. Ecol. 15: 469-476.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 891 | 82 | 14 |
| Full Text Views | 118 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 59 | 1 | 0 |
The ability of animals to disperse towards their original home range following displacement has been demonstrated in a number of species. However, little is known about the homing ability of three-spine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus), an important model species in behavioural ecology. In addition, few studies have examined the role of social facilitation in relation to homing behaviour in fishes. We examined homing behaviour of sticklebacks displaced over distances of between 80 m and 160 m in land-drains with directional water flow. Fish were translocated from their original capture site, tagged and then released either in groups or solitarily. We performed recapture transects either one or two days later. Data provided by recaptured sticklebacks show that the fish dispersed in the direction of their original capture site. Although fish translocated downstream typically moved further than those translocated upstream, both dispersed towards their original capture site. There was no difference between fish released solitarily or in groups in their homing ability and indeed there was little evidence that fish translocated in groups remained together following their release. The homing ability of the fish was demonstrated by the finding that up to 80% of fish returned to their home ranges within two days of release over a distance equivalent to approximately 5000 body lengths of these small fish.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 891 | 82 | 14 |
| Full Text Views | 118 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 59 | 1 | 0 |