Aggression to dummy cuckoos by potential European cuckoo hosts
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by Eivin Røskaft in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Arne Moksnes in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Bård Stokke in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Vítezslav Bicík in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Csaba Moskát in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Aggression directed by 53 potential host species towards a dummy of the parasitic common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, was tested in relation to their breeding habitat, their suitability as a host and whether they were breeding in sympatry or not with the cuckoo. Host habitats were divided into three categories: (1) always breeding near trees, (2) some populations breeding near trees, others in open areas, and (3) always breeding in open areas. Each species was also placed in one of five categories according to their suitability as a cuckoo host. Strong support was found for predictions derived from the 'spatial habitat structure hypothesis', which argues that common cuckoos only breed in areas where they have access to vantage points in trees. Thus, species which have some populations breeding near trees and others breeding further from trees have a different cuckoo-host population dynamics than species that always breed near trees, or always breed in open areas. Aggression levels were highest among species regarded as being always suitable as hosts, and species which always breed near trees. However, populations breeding in sympatry with the cuckoo were more aggressive than allopatric populations, indicating the plasticity of aggressive behaviour. Adaptive behaviour in cuckoo hosts can be predicted from the 'spatial habitat structure hypothesis'.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 852 | 87 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 215 | 3 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 99 | 7 | 2 |
Aggression to dummy cuckoos by potential European cuckoo hosts
In: BehaviourSearch for other papers by Eivin Røskaft in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Arne Moksnes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bård Stokke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vítezslav Bicík in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Csaba Moskát in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Aggression directed by 53 potential host species towards a dummy of the parasitic common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, was tested in relation to their breeding habitat, their suitability as a host and whether they were breeding in sympatry or not with the cuckoo. Host habitats were divided into three categories: (1) always breeding near trees, (2) some populations breeding near trees, others in open areas, and (3) always breeding in open areas. Each species was also placed in one of five categories according to their suitability as a cuckoo host. Strong support was found for predictions derived from the 'spatial habitat structure hypothesis', which argues that common cuckoos only breed in areas where they have access to vantage points in trees. Thus, species which have some populations breeding near trees and others breeding further from trees have a different cuckoo-host population dynamics than species that always breed near trees, or always breed in open areas. Aggression levels were highest among species regarded as being always suitable as hosts, and species which always breed near trees. However, populations breeding in sympatry with the cuckoo were more aggressive than allopatric populations, indicating the plasticity of aggressive behaviour. Adaptive behaviour in cuckoo hosts can be predicted from the 'spatial habitat structure hypothesis'.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 852 | 87 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 215 | 3 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 99 | 7 | 2 |
