âThis article presents several examples of how the Aramaic incantation bowls from late-antique Mesopotamia receive and use earlier traditions preserved in Mesopotamian cuneiform and Jewish alphabetic sources, with a view to demonstrating the importance of the bowls when discussing the earlier process of âAramaic cultural mediationâ. Four ways in which the bowls receive the earlier traditions are discussed (formulaic, terminological, conceptual and methodological), which help us appreciate what we should be looking for in other contexts. The clear reception of motifs from 11Q11 in the incantation bowls allows us to bridge the gap between the earlier cuneiform sources and the later incantation bowls.â¬
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
âSee Shaked, Ford and Bhayro, Aramaic Bowl Spells, pp. 273 and 56.â¬
âSee Shaked, Ford and Bhayro, Aramaic Bowl Spells, pp. 66 and 91. See also C. Müller-Kessler, âA Mandaic Incantation against an Anonymous Dew Causing Fright (Drower Collection 20 and its variant 43 E)â, ARAM 22 (2010), pp. 453â476 (469â470), where this is mentioned in a discussion of the Mandaic cognate.â¬
âSee Shaked, Ford and Bhayro, Aramaic Bowl Spells, p. 110. Cf. JBA 19:5, JBA 24:3 and JBA 62:2.â¬
âBen-Dov, Head of All Years, p. 263. This statement is made in the context of a discussion of one of the few such sources, i.e. the cuneiform Aramaic incantation from Hellenistic Uruk.â¬
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 369 | 43 | 6 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 185 | 7 | 1 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 155 | 17 | 0 |
âThis article presents several examples of how the Aramaic incantation bowls from late-antique Mesopotamia receive and use earlier traditions preserved in Mesopotamian cuneiform and Jewish alphabetic sources, with a view to demonstrating the importance of the bowls when discussing the earlier process of âAramaic cultural mediationâ. Four ways in which the bowls receive the earlier traditions are discussed (formulaic, terminological, conceptual and methodological), which help us appreciate what we should be looking for in other contexts. The clear reception of motifs from 11Q11 in the incantation bowls allows us to bridge the gap between the earlier cuneiform sources and the later incantation bowls.â¬
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 369 | 43 | 6 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 185 | 7 | 1 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 155 | 17 | 0 |