Case C-626/18 Poland v. European Parliament and Council [Case in Progress] OJ C 4/12, 26.11. 2018, 289n75
Case C-621/18, Wightman [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:999, 168–169n180
Case C-620/18, Hungary v. European Parliament and Council [Case in Progress] OJ C 428/31, 07.01. 2019, 289n75
Case C-544/18, Daknevičiūtę [2019] ECLI:EU:C:2019:761, 159, 159n121
Case C-418/18 P, Puppinck and Others v. Commission (One of Us) [2019] ECLI:EU:C:2019:640, 398–399n53
Case C-410/18, Aubriet [2019] ECLI:EU:C:2019:582, 306–307n3, 314–316n42, 319–321n56, 321–323n61, 323, 325–326, 325–326n69, 325–326n70, 329
Case C-216/18 PPU, Minister for Justice and Equality v. LM [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:586, 53–54n65, 191n113
Case C-129/18, SM [2019] ECLI:EU:C:2019:248, 265–266n180
Case C-94/18, Chenchooliah [2019] ECLI:EU:C:2019:693, 191n113
Case C-93/18, Bajratari [2019] ECLI:EU:C:2019:809, 193–194n132
Case C-49/18, Escribano Vindel [2019] ECLI:EU:C:2019:106, 53–54n61
Case C-483/17, Tarola v. Ireland [2019] ECLI:EU:C:2019:309, 145n73
Case C-441/17, Commission v. Poland [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:255, 61–62n112
Case C-437/17, Gemeinsamer Betriebsrat EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach [2019] ECLI:EU:C:2019:193, 330n77
Case C-336/17 P, HB and Others v. Commission [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:74, 388–389n8
Case C-247/17, Raugevicius [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:898, 192–193n116
Case C-246/17, Diallo v. Belgium [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:499, 145n72
Case C-230/17, Altiner and Ravn [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:497, 101, 101n105, 101n106, 107–108, 107–108n124, 226–228n16, 238n62, 238–239n70, 247–248n112, 256–258nn151–154, 258–259, 258–259n155, 258–259n156, 266, 268–269
Case C-221/17, Tjebbes and Others [2019] ECLI:EU:C:2019:189, 39–40n25, 57–58n91, 98–99n99, 109n130, 115–116n8, 431–432n115, 443–447nn19–23, 447–448n29
Case C-89/17, Banger [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:570, 100–101, 100–101n103, 107–108, 151–152n74, 161–162n132, 191n113, 226–228n16, 238n62, 238–239n70, 247–248n112, 262, 262nn169–171, 262–266, 270, 469–470n65
Case C-679/16, A (Aide pour une personne handicapée) [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:601, 192–193
Case C-673/16, Coman and Others [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:385, 11–13n5, 101n103, 101n104, 202n10, 226–228n16, 226–228n17, 238–239n70, 247–248n112, 499–500n46
Case C-477/16 PPU, Kovalkovas [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:861, 60–61n110
Case C-442/16, Gusa v. Ireland [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017: 1004, 159n119
Case C-420/16 P, Izsak and Dabis v. Commission [2019] ECLI:EU:C:2019:177, 65n139, 388–389n8
Case C-359/16, Altun and Others [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:63 294–295n99
Joined Cases C-316&424/16, B [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:256, 130–131n76
Case C-193/16, E [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:542, 201n7
Case C-191/16, Pisciotti [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:222, 192–193n116
Case C-165/16, Lounes [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:862, 17–19n48, 69–71n20, 73, 75–76n37, 82, 84–85, 84–86n68, 86–88n77, 88–96n90, 96–100, 100–102, 104, 107–108, 130–131, 130–131n81, 160–161n132, 185, 188–189, 188–189n100, 188–190nn109–111, 190–191, 196–197n151, 434–435, 434–435n136, 434–436n145, 439, 527n86,
Case C-82/16, K.A. [2018] ECLI:EU:C:2018:308, 267n187, 376n44
Case C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses [2018] ECLI:EU: C:2018:117, 53, 53n61, 60–63, 62n121, 62–65n139
Case C-589/15 P, Anagnostakis v. Commission [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:663, 388–389n8, 395–397n48
Case C-560/15, Europa Way and Persidera [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:593, 217n67
Case C-541/15, Freitag [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:432, 67–69n3, 81–82n54, 87, 91–92, 106–107, 106–107n123
Joined Cases C-401&402/15, Depesme and Kerrou [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:955, 306n3, 315–316, 315–316n42, 323
Case C-238/15, Bragança Linares Verruga and Others [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:949, 306n3, 315–317n47, 328n73, 330–332n82
Case C-133/15, Chávez-Vílchez and Others [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:354, 55–57n85, 125–126, 125–126n55, 160–161n132, 192–194n133, 194–195, 203n18
Case C-337/15 P, Ombudsman v. Staelen [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:256, 389–390n18
Case C-300/15, Kohll and Kohll-Schlesser [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:361, 421–422n62, 425–426, 425–426n79, 425–426n80, 522–523n72,
Joined Cases C-203&698/15, Tele2 Sverige AB [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:970, 60, 60n107
Case C-115/15, NA [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:487, 107–108n124
Case C-72/15, Rosneft [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:236, 60–61n111
Joined Cases C-8&10/15 P, Ledra Advertising v. Commission and ECB [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:701, 53, 53n60
Case C-438/14, Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:401, 11–13n5, 67–69n3, 75n35,
Case C-308/14, Commission v. United Kingdom [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:436 164n156-158, 166, 166n168-171, 167, 167n172, 168
Case C-304/14, CS [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:674 131, 131n83-85, 194n133
Case C-299/14, García Nieto [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:114, 135–137n5, 148, 180–181n48, 180–181n49, 183, 183n69, 197
Case C-258/14, Florescu and Others [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:448, 52, 52n55, 52n56
Case C-165/14, Rendón Marín [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:675, 55–57, 55–57n87, 55–57n88, 131, 131n82, 131n84
Case C-115/14, RegioPost [2015] ECLI:EU:C:2015:760, 283, 283n55
Case C-67/14, Alimanovič [2015] ECLI:EU:C:2015:597, 126–129, 128–129n70, 135–137, 135–137n5, 148–150, 148–149n60, 148–149n62, 148–149n63, 153–156, 155–156n104, 159–164, 161–163n149, 163n150, 166–168, 180–181n48, 180–181n49, 183, 183–184, 197, 385–386, 385–386n74, 446–447n24
Case C-28/14, Pańczyk [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014: 2003, 65n139
Case C-650/13, Delvigne [2015] ECLI:EU:C:2015:648, 367–368, 367–368n14, 370–371, 373, 375–377, 377–379n52, 379–380, 385–386, 445, 445n18
Case C-505/13, Yumer [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014: 2129, 65n139
Case C-409/13, Council v. Commission [2015] ECLI:EU:C:2015:217, 398–399n54, 398–399n55, 401–402n69
Case C-396/13, Sähköalojen ammattiliitto [2015] ECLI:EU:C:2015:86, 277–278nn29–32
Case C-333/13, Dano [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014: 2358, 113–114, 113–114n6, 118–119n22, 126–130, 135–137, 135–137n2, 135–138, 143–144, 147–148n58, 152–155, 152–153n87, 156–157, 156–159n116, 158–164, 162–163n143, 162–163n144, 162–163n146, 166–168, 166n168, 180–181, 180–181n48, 180–182n55, 182–183, 182–183n58, 182–184, 196, 196n145, 196–197n147, 385–386, 385–386n73, 464–465n39
Case C-265/13, Torralbo Marcos [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:187, 370, 370n28
Case C-244/13, Ogieriakhi [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014: 2068, 251–252, 251–252n129, 251–252n132
Case C-206/13, Siragusa [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:126, 370–371, 370n29, 370–371n30,
Case C-202/13, McCarthy and Others [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014: 2450, 69–70n14, 501, 501n49
Case C-522/12, Isbir [2013] ECLI:EU:C:2013:711, 277–278n28
Case C-507/12, Saint Prix [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014: 2007, 19–20n57, 155n99
Case C-457/12, S. and G. [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:136, 172n12, 172n13, 203n17, 218n69, 254–255n145, 254–255n147
Case C-456/12, O. and B. [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:135, 185n76, 192–193, 192–193n119, 192–193n121, 192–195, 197, 197n149, 197n150, 218n69, 225–228n17, 232–234n49, 236–239n70, 242–244n90, 246–247, 246–247n112, 253–257, 253–254n140, 253–254n141, 253–256n150, 258–259, 261, 266, 268–269, 469n65, 498–502, 504
Joined Cases C-293&594/12, Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger and Others [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:238, 47n16
Case C-378/12, Onuekwere [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:13, 17–19n52, 129–130n75
Case C-370/12, Pringle [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:756, 50–51n41, 50–53, 53n59
Case C-264/12, Sindicato Nacional dos Profissionais de Seguros e Afins [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014: 2036, 52, 52n52
Case C-140/12, Brey [2013] ECLI:EU:C:2013:565, 135–137n5, 140, 143–144, 143–144n40, 161–162, 165–167n172, 178, 180–181, 180–181n47, 180–182n54, 182–183, 182–183n59, 182–183n62, 182–184, 195–196, 236–237n60, 464–465n39
Case C-134/12, Corpul Naţional al Poliţiştilor [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:288, 52n53
Case C-128/12, Sindicato dos Bancários do Norte and Others [2013] ECLI:EU:C:2013:149, 51–52n48
Case C-87/12, Ymeraga and Ymeraga-Tafarshiku [2013] ECLI:EU:C:2013:291, 55–57n85
Case C-86/12, Alokpa and Moudoulou [2013] ECLI:EU:C:2013:645, 17–19n49, 192–193n115, 202–203n16
Case C-20/12, Giersch and Others [2013] ECLI:EU:C:2013:411, 306n3, 315–316, 315–316n45, 318–320, 318–320n55, 322–324n66, 324, 327–332n82
Case C-656/11, UK v. Council [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:97, 486n11
Case C-399/11, Melloni [2013] ECLI:EU:C:2013:107, 446–447n25
Case C-379/11, Caves Krier Frères [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:798, 314–315, 314–315n38, 328–329
Case C-367/11, Prete [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:668, 306–307n9, 321–322n60
Joined Cases C-356&357/11, O.S. and L [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:776, 267n187
Case C-256/11, Dereci and Others [2011] ECLI:EU:C:2011:734, 11–13n9, 17–19n46, 55–57, 55–57n81, 62n122, 69–70n18, 202–203n16, 235n56, 430–431n113, 430–431n114
Case C-171/11, Fra.bo [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:453, 519–520n56
Case C-83/11, Rahman and Others [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:519, 201–202n10
Case C-40/11, Iida [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:691, 55–57n83, 192–193n116
Case C-617/10, Åkerberg Fransson [2013] ECLI:EU:C:2013:105, 48–49, 48–49n29, 61–62, 61–62n116, 370, 370–372
Case C-571/10, Kamberaj [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:233, 515n33
Joined Cases C-424&425/10, Ziółkowski & Szeja [2011] ECLI:EU:C:2011:866, 135–137, 143–146n50, 146–149, 146nn51–54, 146–147n55, 151–152, 155, 161, 167–168, 435–436n144
Case C-400/10 PPU, McB [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:582, 515n33
Case C-364/10, Hungary v. Slovakia [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:630, 242–244n90, 253–254n142
Case C-108/10, Scattolon [2011] ECLI:EU:C:2011:542, 49–50, 49–50n36, 62, 62n120
Case C-7/10, Kahveci and Inan [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:180, 73, 82, 82n57, 84–85, 84nn62–64, 84n65, 88–89
Case C-542/09, Commission v. Netherlands [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:346, 306n3, 312–313, 312–314n36, 314–317, 317–325, 327, 329–330,
Case C-434/09, McCarthy [2011] ECLI:EU:C:2011:277, n46, 55–57, 55–57n77, 55–57n78, 55–58, 69–70nn14–16, 69–70n18, 73, 76n36, 76n37, 78, 89–90, 89n82, 93, 95, 98–99n100, 102–103, 105, 172n14, 172n16, 233–234n49, 251–252n130, 259–261n159, 430–431n113
Case C-391/09, Runevič-Vardyn [2011] ECLI:EU:C:2011:291, 17–21n65, 67–69n3, 75n35, 108–109, 108–109n129
Case C-348/09, P.I. v. Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:300, 129, 129n72, 129n74, 520–521n60, 520–521n61
Case C-325/09, Dias [2011] ECLI:EU:C:2011:498, 128–129, 128–129n69, 146, 146n53, 466–467n49
Case C-212/09, Commission v. Portugal [2011] ECLI:EU:C:2011:717, 520–521n64
Case C-208/09, Sayn-Wittgenstein [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:806, 67–69n3, 75n35, 108–109n125, 383–384n68
Case C-162/09, Lassal [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:592, 146, 146n52, 172–173n17
Case C-160/09, Ioannis Katsivardas – Nikolaos Tsitsikas [2010] ECLI:EU: C:2010:293, 220–221n79
Case C-145/09, Tsakouridis [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:708, 129, 129n71, 520–521n61
Case C-34/09, Ruiz Zambrano [2011] ECLI:EU:C:2011:124, 3–4, 3–4n16, 11–13n5, 11–13, 11–13n9, 24–25n92, 47–48, 47–48n20, 47–48n22, 47–48n24, 55, 55nn71–73, 58, 61, 63–65n135, 69–70n14, 69–70n16, 125–126, 125–126n54, 175–176n29, 192–193n116, 202–203, 202–203n14, 232–233n46, 235–237n58, 375–377, 375–376n43, 415–416, 415–416n13, 430–433, 430–431nn109–112, 436–437, 436–439, 450–451n37
Case C-515/08, dos Santos Palhota and Others [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:589, 279n35
Case C-371/08, Ziebell [2011] ECLI:EU:C:2011:809, 504–505, 504–505n62
Case C-325/08, Olympique Lyonnais [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:143, 519–520n57, 522–523n70
Case C-310/08, Ibrahim [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:80, 107–108n124
Case C-303/08, Bozkurt [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:800, 242–244n90, 253–254n142
Case C-135/08, Rottmann [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:104, 6–7, 11–13, 11–13n10, 11–13n24, 23–24n83, 37, 37–41, 41n30, 47–48n23, 54–55, 54–55n66, 54–55n68, 57–58, 96, 96–98n97, 98, 98–99n102, 115, 115–116n14, 125–126, 125–126n53, 204–205, 204–205n21, 375–376, 375–376n42, 415–416, 415–416n12, 427–428, 427–428n91, 427–434, 429–430n100, 429–430nn102–106, 429–430n108, 432–433n126, 432–434n135, 439, 441, 441–443n8, 443n9, 443n10, 443n11, 443n13, 443–447n27, 449–451, 527n85
Case C-127/08, Metock and Others [2008] ECLI:EU:C:2008:449, 87–89, 120–121, 120–121n33, 159–160, 159–161, 167–168, 173n17, 185–187n93, 196–197, 225–228n18, 236–237n62, 236–237n63, 239n70, 246–247, 246–247n112, 251–253n137, 253–254n140, 259–261n161, 433–434n135, 524–525n74
Case C-103/08, Gottwald [2009] ECLI:EU:C:2009:597, 306–307n12
Case C-73/08, Bressol [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:181, 343–345n38, 520–521n60
Case C-29/08, SKF [2009] ECLI:EU:C:2009:665, 390n21
Case C-12/08, Mono Car Styling [2009] ECLI:EU:C:2009:466, 62–63n124
Case C-555/07, Kücükdeveci [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:21, 47n17
Case C-544/07, Rüffler [2009] ECLI:EU:C:2009:258, 497, 497n41
Case C-246/07 Commission v. Sweden [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:203, 51–52n51
Case C-158/07, Förster [2008] ECLI:EU:C:2008:630, 127–129n65, 135–137, 143–145n47, 145n48, 147–148, 147–148n57, 151–156, 161, 163, 168–169, 306–307n10, 312–313, 341–342, 341–342n24
Case C-94/07, Raccanelli [2008] ECLI:EU:C:2008:425, 345–346n48, 515n29
Case C-45/07, Commission v. Greece [2009] ECLI:EU:C:2009:81, 51–52n51
Case C-398/06, Commission v. Netherlands [2008] ECLI:EU:C:2008:214, 236–237n60
Case C-353/06, Grunkin and Paul [2008] ECLI:EU:C:2008:559, 47–48n20
Case C-346/06, Rüffert [2008] ECLI:EU:C:2008:189, 282–283, 282–283n48, 282–283n54, 292–293
Case C-319/06, Commission v. Luxembourg [2008] ECLI:EU:C:2008:350, 282–283, 282–283n49
Case C-275/06, Promusicae [2008] ECLI:EU:C:2008:54, 62–63n125
Case C-210/06, Cartesio [2008] ECLI:EU:C:2008:723, 450n36
Joined Cases C-11&12/06, Morgan [2007] ECLI:EU:C:2007:626, 341–342, 341–342n25
Case C-438/05, Viking [2007] ECLI:EU:C:2007:772, 282–284, 282–283n47, 282–283n50, 282–284n56
Case C-341/05, Laval [2007] ECLI:EU:C:2007:809, 117n16, 276n24, 280–284, 280n40, 280–282n46, 282–283n51, 519–520n56
Case C-380/05, Centro Europa 7 [2008] ECLI:EU:C:2008:59, 60–61n113
Case C-291/05, Eind [2007] ECLI:EU:C:2007:771, 38n22, 73, 76–77n40, 80, 80n50, 187–189n102, 192–193n115, 225–226n16, 236–237n62, 236–237n63, 246–247, 246–247n112, 253–254n140, 469n65, 500–501, 500–501n48
Case C-287/05, Hendrix [2007] ECLI:EU:C:2007:494, 308–309n14, 308–309n16, 308–311, 310–311n25, 310–311n26
Case C-213/05, Geven [2007] ECLI:EU:C:2007:438, 308–309n14, 308–310n24, 327, 327n71
Case C-212/05, Hartmann [2007] ECLI:EU:C:2007:437, 308–309n14, 308–309n15, 308–309n21, 327
Case C-192/05, Tas-Hagen and Tas [2006] ECLI:EU:C:2006:676, 45–46n11, 101–102n108, 306–307n11
Case C-76/05, Schwarz and Gootjes-Schwarz [2007] ECLI:EU:C:2007:492, 343–345n40
Case C-406/04, De Cuyper [2006] ECLI:EU:C:2006:491, 497, 497n40
Case C-300/04, Eman and Sevinger [2006] ECLI:EU:C:2006:545, 34n12, 58n97, 374–375, 374–375n40, 378–379, 381–382
Case C-196/04, Cadbury Schweppes and Cadbury Schweppers Overseas ECLI:EU:C:2006:544, 240–241n80, 240–241n83, 244, 244nn96–99, 247–248, 254, 254n143
Case C-145/04, Spain v. United Kingdom [2006] ECLI:EU:C:2006:543, 32–34n12, 366n9, 371, 371n31, 374, 374n38, 378n50
Case C-109/04, Kranemann [2005] ECLI:EU:C:2005:187, 497, 497n39, 518–519n48,
Case C-445/03, Commission v. Luxembourg [2004] ECLI:EU:C:2004:655, 279n35
Case C-403/03, Schempp [2005] ECLI:EU:C:2005:446, 17–19n47, 24–25n89, 47–48n21
Case C-209/03, Bidar [2005] ECLI:EU:C:2005:169, 124–125, 124–125n49, 124–125n52, 127–128, 131–132, 140–141, 140–143, 142–146, 180n45, 306–307n10, 312–313, 341–342, 341–342n21
Case C-293/03, My [2004] ECLI:EU:C:2004:821, 514–515n28
Case C-199/03, Ireland v. Commission [2005] ECLI:EU:C:2005:548, 390n21
Case C-157/03, Commission v. Spain [2005] ECLI:EU:C:2005:225, 185n79
Case C-147/03, Commission v. Austria [2005] ECLI:EU:C:2005:427, 343–345n38
Case C-65/03, Commission v. Belgium [2004] ECLI:EU:C:2004:402, 343–345n38
Case C-60/03, Wolff and Müller [2004] ECLI:EU:C:2004:610, 275n18, 279–280n37, 279–280n38
Case C-456/02, Trojani [2004] ECLI:EU:C:2004:488, 138–140, 180n45
Case C-386/02, Baldinger [2004] ECLI:EU:C:2004:535, 101–102
Case C-341/02, Commission v. Germany [2005] ECLI:EU:C:2005:220, 277–279n36, 289–290n79
Case C-263/02 P, Commission v. Jégo-Quéré [2004] ECLI:EU:C:2004:210, 62–63n124
Case C-255/02, Halifax and Others [2006] ECLI:EU:C:2006:121, 240–244nn93–95
Case C-200/02, Zhu and Chen [2004] ECLI:EU:C:2004:639, 17–19n49, 37, 37n18, 47–48n21, 75n33, 90, 92, 192–193n115
Case C-153/02, Valentina Neri v. European School of Economics [2003] ECLI:EU:C:2003:614, 343–345n41, 355n 91
Case C-148/02, Garcia Avello [2003] ECLI:EU:C:2003:539, 24–25n91, 47–48n21, 69–70, 69–70n16
Case C-138/02, Collins [2004] ECLI:EU:C:2004:172, 142–143, 142–143n37, 142–143n38, 306–307n9
Joined Cases C-482&493/01, Orfanopoulos [2004] ECLI:EU:C:2004:262, 520–521n61
Case C-253/01, Krüger [2004] ECLI:EU:C:2004:59, 235n57
Case C-109/01, Akrich [2003] ECLI:EU:C:2003:491, 159–160, 159–160n126, 185–186, 185–187n93, 191n114, 225–226n16, 236–237n62, 236–237n63, 239n70, 246n108, 246–249, 246–248n116, 248–250, 252–254, 259–261n159, 268–269
Case C-60/00, Carpenter [2002] ECLI:EU:C:2002:434, 76n36, 105, 105n115, 235n56, 421–422n55
Case C-50/00 P, Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v. Council [2002] ECLI:EU:C:2002:462, 62–63n124
Case C-503/99, Commission v. Belgium [2002] ECLI:EU:C:2002:328, 520–521n64
Case C-459/99, MRAX [2002] ECLI:EU:C:2002:461, 185n79, 259–261n160
Case C-413/99, Baumbast [2002] ECLI:EU:C:2002:493, 11–13n5, 41, 41n29, 45–46n11, 107–108n124, 124–125, 124–125n51, 128–129, 128–129n68, 131–132, 138–140, 140n24, 163, 172–174n20, 186–187n92, 194–195n137, 426–427n81
Case C-192/99, Kaur [2001] ECLI:EU:C:2001:106, 14n25, 37, 37n17, 37–38n21, 97n96
Case C-184/99, Grzelczyk [2001] ECLI:EU:C:2001:458, 11–13, 11–13n5, 41, 41n28, 45–46n11, 53n62, 119–121, 121–122n40, 124–125, 124–125n48, 131–132, 140–143, 140–142n32, 144–145, 161–162, 172n10, 204–205n20, 426–427n81, 429–430, 460n12
Case C-164/99, Portugaia Construções [2002] ECLI:EU:C:2002:40 275n18
Case C-110/99, Emsland-Stärke [2000] ECLI:EU:C:2000:695, 228–229n32, 242–244, 242–244n90, 242–244n91, 247–248, 253–254n143
Case C-63/99, Gloszczuk [2001] ECLI:EU:C:2001:488, 228–229n31
Case C-281/98, Angonese [2000] ECLI:EU:C:2000:296, 519–520n55
Case C-224/98, D’Hoop [2002] ECLI:EU:C:2002:432, 306–307n9
Case C-179/98, Mesbah [1999] ECLI:EU:C:1999:549, 84n64
Case C-165/98, Mazzoleni and ISA [2001] ECLI:EU:C:2001:162, 276–277n25
Case C-49/98, Finalarte and Others [2001] ECLI:EU:C:2001:564, 271–272n1, 275n18
Case C-373/97, Diamantis [2000] ECLI:EU:C:2000:150, 241–242n86
Case C-337/97, Meeusen [1999] ECLI:EU:C:1999:284, 306n6
Case C-212/97, Centros [1999] ECLI:EU:C:1999:126, 228–229n32, 240–242n88, 245, 250n123, 252–253n136
Joined Cases C-369&376/96, Arblade [1999] ECLI:EU:C:1999:575, 241–242n86, 275n18
Case C-367/96, Kefalas and Others [1998] ECLI:EU:C:1998:222, 520–521n61
Case C-348/96, Calfa [1999] ECLI:EU:C:1999:6, 11–13n17
Joined Cases C-64&65/96, Uecker and Jacquet [1997] ECLI:EU:C:1997:285, 232–233n47
Case C-85/96, Martínez Sala [1998] ECLI:EU:C:1998:217, 11–13, 11–13n12, 45–46, 45–46n9, 118–120n27, 124–125, 124–125n47, 138–140, 138–139n19, 138–139n23, 172n9, 178–179, 178–179nn33–35, 178–179n40
Case C-57/96, Meintsj [1997] ECLI:EU:C:1997:564,
Case C-51/96, Deliège [2000] ECLI:EU:C:2000:199, 518–519n49
Case C-285/95, Kol [1997] ECLI:EU:C:1997:280,
Case C-144/95, Maurin [1996] ECLI:EU:C:1996:235, 48–49n28
Case C-24/95, Land Rheinland-Pfalz v. Alcan Deutschland [1997] ECLI:EU:C:1997:163, 390n22
Case C-272/94, Guiot [1996] ECLI:EU:C:1996:147, 275–276n19, 275–276n20
Case C-107/94, Asscher v. Staatssecretaris van Financiën [1996] ECLI:EU:C:1996:251, 464–465n37
Case C-55/94, Gebhard [1995] ECLI:EU:C:1995:411, 235n56, 421–422, 421–422n54, 421–422n55, 464–465n37
Case C-7/94, Gaal [1995] ECLI:EU:C:1995:118, 524–525n77
Case C-441/93, Patifis and Others [1996] ECLI:EU:C:1996:92, 241–242n86
Case C-415/93, Bosman [1995] ECLI:EU:C:1995:463, 497, 497n38, 519n51, 522–523n70
Case C-279/93, Schumacker [1995] ECLI:EU:C:1995:31, 516n36
Case C-132/93, Steen v. Deutsche Bundespost [1994] ECLI:EU:C:1994:254, 235n57
Joined Cases C-46&48/93, Brasserie du Pêcheur [1996] ECLI:EU:C:1996:79, 47n16
Case C-419/92, Scholz [1994] ECLI:EU:C:1994:62, 105–107, 105–106n122
Case C-19/92, Kraus [1993] ECLI:EU:C:1993:125, 343–345n38, 353–354, 353–354n84
Case C-370/90, Singh [1992] ECLI:EU:C:1992:296, 73, 76–77n40, 107–108n124, 160–161n130, 160–161n132, 185, 185n76, 185n77, 187–189n104, 225–228n20, 236–237n62, 236–237n63, 246–248, 246–247nn110–112, 250n123, 261, 469, 469n64, 469n65, 497, 497n37, 500–501,
Case C-369/90, Micheletti [1992] ECLI:EU:C:1992:295, 11–13, 11–14n23, 36–40, 71–72, 71–73, 84, 90, 92, 94, 96, 105, 214–215n63, 415–416, 415–416n11, 427–428, 427n87, 429–430, 429–432
Joined Cases C-6&9/90, Francovich [1991] ECLI:EU:C:1991:428, 47n16
Case C-340/89, Vlassopoulou [1991] ECLI:EU:C:1991:193, 517–518n42
Case C-292/89, Antonissen [1991] ECLI:EU:C:1991:80, 516–517n39
Case C-260/89, ERT v. DEP [1991] ECLI:EU:C:1991:254, 48–49n28
Case C-113/89, Rush Portuguesa [1990] ECLI:EU:C:1990:142, 275–276, 275–276n21,
Case 5/88, Wachauf [1989] ECLI:EU:C:1989:321, 49–50n35
Case 379/87, Groener [1989] ECLI:EU:C:1989:599, 343–345n39
Case 344/87, Bettray [1989] ECLI:EU:C:1989:226, 245–246n106, 309–310n23
Case 242/87, Commission v. Council (Erasmus) [1989] ECLI:EU:C:1989:217, 340–341n19
Case 120/86, Mulder v Minister van Landbouw en Visserij [1988] ECLI:EU:C:1988:213, 477–478n96
Case 98/86, Mathot [1978] ECLI:EU:C:1987:89, 235n57
Case 39/86, Lair [1988] ECLI:EU:C:1988:322, 240–241n80, 245, 245n103, 245n104
Case 24/86, Blaizot [1988] ECLI:EU:C:1988:43, 340–341n16
Case 355/85, Driancourt v. Cognet [1986] ECLI:EU:C:1986:410, 235n57
Case 66/85, Lawrie-Blum [1986] ECLI:EU:C:1986:284, 236–237n59, 248–249, 248–249n118, 252, 515n29
Case 94/84, ONEM v. Deak [1985] ECLI:EU:C:1985:264, 524–525n78
Case 44/84, Hurd v. Jones [1986] ECLI:EU:C:1986:2, 235n57
Case 294/83, Les Verts v. Parliament [1986] ECLI:EU:C:1986:166, 47n17, 170n1
Case 293/83, Gravier [1985] ECLI:EU:C:1985:69, 340–342, 340–341n16, 354
Case 267/83, Diatta [1985] ECLI:EU:C:1985:67, 251–252, 251–252n129, 251–252n132
Case 72/83, Campus Oil [1984] ECLI:EU:C:1984:256, 520–521n63
Joined Cases 35&36/82, Morson and Jhanjan [1982] ECLI:EU:C:1982:368, 232–233n47
Case 289/81, Mavrides [1983] ECLI:EU:C:1983:142, 390n22
Joined Cases 62&63/81, Seco v. EVI [1982] ECLI:EU:C:1982:34, 275–276n19, 275–276n20
Case 53/81, Levin [1983] ECLI:EU:C:1982:105, 37n20, 236–237n59, 240–241n83, 248–249n119, 252, 309–310n23, 515n31
Case 175/78, Saunders [1979] ECLI:EU:C:1979:88, 232–233n47
Case 120/78, Cassis de Dijon [1979] ECLI:EU:C:1979:42, 263–264n177
Case 115/78, Knoors [1979] ECLI:EU:C:1979:31, 232–233n47
Case 30/77, Bouchereau [1977] ECLI:EU:C:1977:172, 121n37, 520–521n61
Case 46/76, Bauhuis [1977] ECLI:EU:C:1977:6, 521–522n65
Case 63/76, Inzirillo [1976] ECLI:EU:C:1976:192, 524–525n78
Case 104/75, De Peijper [1976] ECLI:EU:C:1976:67, 521–522n65
Case 48/75, Royer [1976] ECLI:EU:C:1976:57, 466–467n49
Case 36/75, Rutili [1975] ECLI:EU:C:1975:137, 520–521n61
Case 41/74, Van Duyn [1974] ECLI:EU:C:1974:133, 173–174n20, 486–487, 486–487n13, 520–521n61
Case 36/74, Walrave and Koch [1974] ECLI:EU:C:1974:140, 518–520n56
Case 33/74, Van Binsbergen [1974] ECLI:EU:C:1974:131, 239–242, 241n84, 250n123
Case 21/74, Airola [1975] ECLI:EU:C:1975:24, 94n87
Case 9/74, Casagrande [1974] ECLI:EU:C:1974:74, 340–341n15
Case 152/73, Sotgiu v. Deutsche Bundespost [1974] ECLI:EU:C:1974:13, 515n30, 520–521n62
Case 76/72, Michel S [1973] ECLI:EU:C:1973:46, 524–525n78
Case 11/70, Internationale Handelsgesellschaft [1970] ECLI:EU:C:1970:114, 512, 512n16,
Case 29/69, Stauder [1969] ECLI:EU:C:1969:57, 512, 512n15
Case 15/69, Ugliola [1969] ECLI:EU:C:1969:46, 513–514n26
Case 54/65, Châtillon v. High Authority [1966] ECLI:EU:C:1966:33, 390n22
Case 26/62, Van Gend en Loos [1963] ECLI:EU:C:1963:1, 13, 13n16
Case 9/56, Meroni v. High Authority [1958] ECLI:EU:C:1958:7, 398n54
Court of Justice of the European Union: European Court of Justice
Case T-388/19 R, Puigdemont i Casamajó and Antoni Comín i Oliveres [2019] ECLI:EU:T:2019:467, 380–381n59
Case T-754/14, Efler [2017] ECLI:EU:T:2017:323, 387–389n9, 396–399n54, 401–402n70
Case T-561/14, One of Us [2018] ECLI:EU:T:2018:210, 387–388n5, 398–400, 398–399n53, 398–399n54, 398–400n62, 407–408n89
Case T-361/14, HB and Others [2017] ECLI:EU:T:2017:252, 388–389n8
Case T-44/14, Constantini and Others [2016] ECLI:EU:T:2016:223, 388–389n8, 396–397n48, 405n79
Case T-646/13, Minority SafePack – one million signatures for diversity in Europe [2017] ECLI:EU:T:2017:59, 65n139, 388–389, 388–389n10, 393–394, 393–394n36, 396–397n48, 402, 405, 409
Case T-529/13, Izsák and Dabis [2016] ECLI:EU:T:2016:282, 65n139, 388–389n8
Case T-450/12, Anagnostakis [2015] ECLI:EU:T:2015:739, 388–389n8, 396–397n48
Court of Justice of the European Union: General Court
Case E-28/15 Yankuba Jabbi v. The Norwegian Government [2016] EFTA Court Reports 573, 492, 492–494, 496, 499–504
Case E-26/13 The Icelandic State and Atli Gunnarsson [2014] EFTA Court Reports 254, 492, 492–496, 498–500, 502–504
Case E-15/12 Jan Anfinn Wahl v. The Icelandic State [2013] EFTA Court Reports 534, 486–488, 486n12, 489, 496, 506
Case E-04/11 Arnulf Clauder [2011] EFTA Court Reports 216, 489–490, 489n18, 491–492, 504
Case E-2/06 EFTA Surveillance Authority v. Norway [2007] EFTA Court Reports 164, 492n29
EFTA Court
Judgment of 6 April 1955, Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala), 40, 71–72, 71–72n23
International Court of Justice
Advisory Opinion of 7 February 1923, Nationality Decrees Issued in Tunis and Morocco, 71–72n22
Permanent Court of International Justice
Orlandi and Others v. Italy, Judgment of 14 December 2017, Nos. 26431/12, 26742/12, 44057/12, and 60088/12, 195–196n144, 266n183
K2 v. The United Kingdom, Decision of 7 February 2017, No. 42387/13, 209–210n43
Chbihi Loudoudi and Others v. Belgium, Judgment of 16 December 2014, No. 52265/10, 266n183
Jeunesse v. The Netherlands, Judgment of 3 October 2014, No. 12738/10, 226–228n21, 226–228n25, 239n71, 259–261n164, 259–261n166, 266n184
Vallianatos and Others v. Greece, Judgment of 7 November 2013, Nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, 266n183
Shindler v. The United Kingdom, Judgment of 7 May 2013, No. 19840/09, 384–385, 384–385n72
Harroudj v. France, Judgment of 4 October 2012, No. 43631/09, 266n183
Kurić and Others v. Slovenia, Judgment of 26 June 2012, No. 26828/06, 209–210, 209–210n41
Communist Party of Russia and Others v. Russia, Judgment of 19 June 2012, No. 29400/05, 379–380n57
Alajos Kiss v. Hungary, Judgment of 20 May 2010, No. 38832/06, 379–380n54
Grosaru v. Romania, Judgment of 2 March 2010, No. 78039/01, 379–380n55, 379–380n56
Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer v. The Netherlands, Judgment of 31 January 2006, No. 50435/99, 226–228n21, 226–228n25, 239n71, 259–261n164, 266n184
Tuquabo-Tekle et al v. The Netherlands, Judgment of 1 December 2005, No. 60665/00, 226–228n22, 259–261n165
Melnitchenko v. Ukraine, Judgment of 19 October 2004, No. 17707/02, 379–380n58
Sen v. The Netherlands, Judgment of 21 December 2001, No. 31465/96, 226–228n22, 259–261n165
Boultif v. Switzerland, Judgment of 2 August 2001, No. 54273/00, 186–187n93
Matthews v The United Kingdom, Judgment of 18 February 1999, No. 24833/94, 379–380, 379–380n53
Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, Judgment of 2 March 1987, No. 9267/81, 368–369, 368–369n23
Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. The United Kingdom, Judgment of 28 May 1985, Nos. 9214/80, 9473/81 and 9474/81, 226–228n21, 226–228n25, 239n71, 259–261n164, 266n184
European Court of Human Rights
Decision of 10 May 1979, No. 8612/79, Alliance des Belges v. Belgium, 368–369n22, 430–431n118
European Commission of Human Rights
Advisory Opinion of 7 December 2018, Case CE-2-2/5-18-BK, Eurasian Economic Commission (Professional Athletes case), 509–510, 509–510n6, 512–514, 512–513n19, 515n32, 518–520, 518–520n54, 520–523n69, 526–527, 530
Advisory Opinion of 15 October 2018, Case CE-2-1/3-18-BK, Ministry of national economy of Kazakhstan (Movement of Currency across the EAEU Customs Border), 521–522n67
Advisory Opinion of 30 October 2017, Case CE-2-2/2-17-BK, Eurasian Economic Commission (Free Movement of Goods Restrictions), 521–522n66
Advisory Opinion of 12 September 2017, Case CE-2-2/1-17-BK, Eurasian Economic Commission (Clarification upon the request of the Eurasian Economic Commission), 513–514n23
Advisory Opinion of 4 April 2017, Case CE-2-1/1-17-BK, Ministry of Justice of Belarus (Vertical Agreements case), 512n13, 512–513n18
Advisory Opinion of 20 December 2018, Case СЕ-2-2/7-18-BK, Eurasian Economic Commission (Pensions case), 512n14
Judgment of 28 December 2015, 3 March 2016, Cases CE-1-2/2-15-KC and CE-1-2/2-15/AP, Tarasik K.P. v. Eurasian Economic Commission, 513–514n22
Judgment of 21 February 2015, Case CE-1-1/1-16-BK, Russian Federation v. Republic of Belarus, 513–514n22, 520n58
Court of the Eurasian Economic Union
Austria
Regional Administrative Court of Oberösterreich, Judgment of 4 December 2017, LVwG-750471/3/BP/SA, C5.P192 n125
Regional Administrative Court of Salzburg, Judgment of 28 June 2017, 405–10/265/1/7-2017, 108–109n125
Regional Administrative Court of Salzburg, Judgment of 25 January 2017, 405–10/200/1/4-2017, 108–109n125
National Courts
Administrative Court of Munich, Judgment of 20 January 2016, 10 81n51, 81n52
Germany
Vilnius District Court, Judgment of 12 April 2016, 2-01-3-11866-2010-1, 109, 109n128
Lithuania
Gerechtshof Amsterdam, Judgment of 20 June 2018, 200.235.073/01 SKG, 450n36
Rechtbank Amsterdam, Judgment of 7 February 2018, C/13/640244 / KG ZA 17–1327, 205–206n25, 205–206n26, 217n66, 442, 442n7, 450n34
Dutch Council of State, Judgment of 25 March 2013, BZ 7520, 105n117, 105n118
Dutch Council of State, Judgment of 28 January 2013, BZ 0412, 105n118
Netherlands
Swiss Federal Supreme Court, Judgment of 20 January 2017, C2_284/ 2016, 98–99n100
Swiss Federal Administrative Court, Judgment of 10 February 2016, C-3189/ 2015, 98–99n100
Swiss Federal Supreme Court, Judgment of 28 January 2016, C2_296/ 2015, C2_296/2015 n100
Switzerland
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, R (on the application of Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice & McGeoch (AP) v The Lord President of the Council and another (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 63, 367–368n8