Leaving the ivory tower or back into theory? Learning from paradigm cases in animal ethics

H. Grimm

Leaving the ivory tower or back into theory? Learning from paradigm cases in animal ethics

in Climate change and sustainable development

Autor:in:

H. Grimm

H. Grimm Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University Vienna, University Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria; herwig.grimm@vetmeduni.ac.at

Search for other papers by H. Grimm in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

Art:: Kapitel

Seiten:: 439–446

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.3920/9789086867530_0069

Über Institut einloggen

Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):

42,00 €35,00 € excl. VAT

Add to Cart

Token einlösen

Ethical issues are per definition issues of public concern and interest. Media plays a vital role in presenting and shaping them. From the beginnings of modern animal ethics, paradigm cases – e.g. factory farming, laboratory animal science and fur farming – were used in the public debate and presented offensively. The moral wrong of these paradigm cases has a high plausibility in the wider public. Of course, nobody is against respectful treatment of animals. However, these paradigm cases do not raise the question of moral duties towards animals only. Further, they implicitly conflict with a wide range of values and provide the platform for the societal debate about values. Under this perspective, the character of the ongoing debate can be much better understood. Ethics can help to address moral issues in human-animal relations with explicit respect to conflicting (morally relevant) values. To focus solely on the moral status of animals in animal ethics loses sight of the related societal problem at stake. This position runs the risk of putting forward a perspective under which ethical issues in human-animal relations appear to be problems of the real world where moral outlaws mistreat animals for unworthy reasons. If our duties towards animals were the only duties we had, this view would be justified. However, this is not the case and a number of other values are at stake. Animal protection is an important value but other values like human welfare, gaining knowledge, etc. are equally important. Therefore, the moral issues of animal ethics should not be framed irrespectively of conflicting values and under the perspective of ‘the right treatment of animals’ only. In a wider sense animal ethics should use the frame of ‘normative orientation of societies’ in general. This shifts the role of animal ethics within society. I will argue in favor of a ‘healthy social distance’ or in other words ‘academic freedom’ that provides the basis for trustworthy mediation of societal conflicts without losing sight of practical demands. There is no stepping back into the ivory tower. However, looking at these issues from a distance can serve as a powerful source of philosophical insights that can be used in future practice-oriented animal ethics.

Zitierungsangaben

Save
Cite
Inhalt per Mail versenden

Link teilen

Sie können einen Link zu dieser Seite per E-Mail senden:
Inhalt per Mail versenden
oder den Link direkt kopieren:

https://brill.edhh.ma/abstract/book/9789086867530/BP000069.xml
Der Link wurde nicht kopiert. Ihr aktueller Browser unterstützt das Kopieren über diese Schaltfläche möglicherweise nicht.

Link wurde kopiert

Reduzieren
Erweitern
Nach oben

Climate change and sustainable development

Ethical perspectives on land use and food production

ISBN:: 9789086867530

Verleger:: Wageningen Academic

Print-Publikationsdatum:: 15 Nov 2012

Fachgebiete
- Biowissenschaften

Kennzahlen

	Insgesamt	Letzte 365 Tage
Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen	85	26
Gesamttextansichten	1	0
PDF-Downloads	2	0

Afrikanistik	Internationale Beziehungen	Nahost- und Islamwissenschaften
Altorientalistik und Ägyptologie	Internationales Recht	Pädagogik
Amerikanistik	Judaistik	Philosophie
Asienwissenschaften	Klassische Altertumswissenschaft	Religionswissenschaft
Bibelauslegung	Kunstgeschichte	Slawistik und Eurasienkunde
Biologie	Literatur- und Kulturwissenschaften	Sozialwissenschaften
Biowissenschaften	Medienwissenschaft	Sprachen und Linguistik
Buchgeschichte und Kartographie	Menschenrechte und humanitäres Völkerrecht	Theologie und Christentum
Geschichte	Musikwissenschaft

Fachgebiete

Autor:innen

Open Access

Produkt-Informationen

Über uns

Kontakt

Leaving the ivory tower or back into theory? Learning from paradigm cases in animal ethics

Zitierungsangaben

Link teilen

Climate change and sustainable development

Ethical perspectives on land use and food production

Inhaltsverzeichnis

Kennzahlen

Kennzahlen