Conflicting food production values: global free market or local production?

B.K. Myskja

Conflicting food production values: global free market or local production?

于Climate change and sustainable development

著者：

B.K. Myskja

B.K. Myskja Department of Philosophy, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway bjorn.myskja@ntnu.no

Search for other papers by B.K. Myskja in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

类型:: 章节

Page Range:: 301–306

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.3920/9789086867530_0047

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€42.00€35.00 excl. VAT

Add to Cart

找回访问令牌

Global free markets are assumed to be of important long term benefit for poor countries. This is especially important for agriculture, as most poor countries have few other income alternatives. The main obstacle to a free market is trade-distorting measures in developing and developed countries, such as taxes, subsidies of production and export. This poses a challenge for global justice, if we accept that justice is a basic moral principle regulating relations between people belonging to same social institution, and that the economic world order should be regarded as such an institution. There are, however, moral and political reasons for retaining protection of national agriculture. Removing trade-distorting measures may lead to increased long transport of food, contributing to global warming due to CO₂-release, and increased intensive agriculture in vulnerable areas which are even more exposed due to climate change. Free markets may undermine future national self-sufficiency as farm lands and farming competence deteriorate due to competition from cheap imports. In addition, increased industrialisation leads to pressure on small farms and rural life worldwide, altering ownership structure and increased global warming. Finally, protecting national farming has cultural significance. Food production and processing is crucial part of identity, signifying belonging in particular communities, and is essential for protecting cultural landscapes. Thus, there is a conflict between the duty to promote global justice and the duty to protect domestic agriculture in order to preserve cultural values, environment and self-sufficiency. I will argue that we should remove trade-distorting taxes and subsidies and instead support farmers for their work. In this way we can fulfil the duty of justice without sacrificing self-sufficiency and the cultural values of farming. The environmental challenges of a global free market still must be resolved.

引用信息

Save
Cite
Email this content

Share Link

Copy this link, or click below to email it to a friend
Email this content
or copy the link directly:

https://brill.edhh.ma/abstract/book/9789086867530/BP000047.xml
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.

Link copied successfully

折叠
展开
回到页面顶端

Climate change and sustainable development

Ethical perspectives on land use and food production

ISBN:: 9789086867530

出版社:: Wageningen Academic

印刷出版日期:: 15 Nov 2012

Subjects
- Life Sciences

统计数据

	全部期间	过去一年	过去30天
摘要浏览次数	123	44	11
全文浏览次数	1	0	0
PDF下载次数	0	0	0

African Studies	Education	Media Studies
American Studies	History	Middle East and Islamic Studies
Ancient Near East and Egypt	Human Rights and Humanitarian Law	Musicology
Art History	International Law	Philosophy
Asian Studies	International Relations	Religious Studies
Biblical Studies	Jewish Studies	Slavic and Eurasian Studies
Biology	Languages and Linguistics	Social Sciences
Book History and Cartography	Life Sciences	Theology and World Christianity
Classical Studies	Literature and Cultural Studies

Subjects

AppBar-Authors 2025

AppBar-Open Access 2025

AppBar-Product Information 2025

AppBar-Company 2025

AppBar-Contact 2025

Conflicting food production values: global free market or local production?

引用信息

Share Link

Climate change and sustainable development

Ethical perspectives on land use and food production

目录

统计数据

统计数据