References
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Perseus Books, 1979.
Barbour, J. D. (1994). Versions of deconversion. Autobiography and the loss of faith. University Press of Virginia.
Bou Malham, P. (2017). Investigating the structure and functions of worldview assumptions [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Oregon].
Bourdieu, P. (1971a). Gènese et structure de champ religieux. Revue fraiçais de Sociologie, XII, 295–334.
Bourdieu, P. (1971b). Une interprétation de la théorie de la religion selon Max Weber. Archives européennes de sociologie, 12(1), 3–21.
Bromley, D. G. (1998). The social construction of contested exit roles: Defectors, whistleblowers, and apostates. In D. G. Bromley (Ed.), The politics of religious apostasy: The role of apostates in the transformation of religious movements (pp. 19–48). Praeger.
Broockman, D. E., & Kalla, J. L. (2016). Durably reducing transphobia: A field experiment on door-to-door canvassing. Science, 352(6282), 220–224. https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/science.aad9713.
Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1962.tb02303.x.
Bullik, R. (2022). A faithful journey. Following a married couple’s religious trajectory over the adult lifespan Religions, 13(8), Article 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13080673.
Bullik, R. (2024). Leitmotifs in life stories. Developments and stabilities of religiosity and narrative identity. transcript/Bielefeld University Press. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839471227.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131.
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13.
Chapman, B. P. (2007). Bandwidth and fidelity on the NEO-Five Factor Inventory: Replicability and reliability of Saucier’s (1998) item cluster subcomponents. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701268082.
Chen, Z., Cowden, R. G., & Streib, H. (2023). More spiritual than religious: Concurrent and longitudinal relations with personality traits, mystical experiences, and other individual characteristics. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1025938. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025938.
Chen, Z. J., & Streib, H. (2025). Characteristics, predictors and outcomes of religious deconversion: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2025.2520104.
Chen, Z. J., & Streib, H. (under review). What predicts faith development? A longitudinal analysis with faith development interviews.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor-Inventory (NEO-FFI). Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources 1992.
Crownover, C. A. (2007). Faith development, religious fundamentalism, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, Christian orthodoxy, and proscribed prejudice as predictors of prejudice [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Oklahoma].
Dagnall, N., Drinkwater, K., Parker, A., Denovan, A., & Parton, M. (2015). Conspiracy theory and cognitive style: a worldview. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 206. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00206.
DeNicola, K., & Fowler, J. W. (1993). Manual for faith development research (2nd ed.). Center for Research in Faith and Moral Development, Emory University.
Döbert, R. (1990). Against the neglect of “content” in the moral theories of Kohlberg and Habermas: Implications for the relativism-universalism controversy. In T. E. Wren (Ed.), The moral domain. Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences (pp. 71–108). MIT Press.
Döbert, R. (1991). Oser and Gmünder’s Stage 3 of religious development and its social context: A vicious circle. In J. W. Fowler, K. E. Nipkow, & F. Schweitzer (Eds.), Stages of faith and religious development (pp. 162–179). Crossroad.
Duriez, B., Soenens, B., & Hutsebaut, D. (2005). Introducing the shortened Post-Critical Belief Scale. Personality & Individual Differences, 38, 851–857.
Erikson, E. H. (1959a). Growth and crisis of the healthy personality. In Identity and the life cycle. Selected papers by Erik H. Erikson (3rd ed., pp. 50–100). International Universities Press.
Erikson, E. H. (1959b). The problem of ego identity. In Identity and the life cycle. Selected papers by Erik H. Erikson (3rd ed., pp. 101–171). International Universities Press.
Eyal, T., Steffel, M., & Epley, N. (2018). Perspective mistaking: Accurately understanding the mind of another requires getting perspective, not taking perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(4), 547–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000115.
Fowler, J. W. (1980). Faith and the structuring of meaning. In C. Brusselmans (Ed.), Toward moral and religious maturity. First international conference on moral and religious development (pp. 51–85). Silver Burdett Company.
Fowler, J. W. (1981). Stages of faith. The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning. Harper & Row.
Fowler, J. W. (1987). Faith development and pastoral care. Fortress Press.
Fowler, J. W. (1996). Faithful change. The personal and public challenges of postmodern life. Abingdon Press.
Fowler, J. W. (2001). Faith development theory and the postmodern challenges. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327582IJPR1103_03.
Fowler, J. W., Streib, H., & Keller, B. (2004). Manual for faith development research (3rd ed.). Research Center for Biographical Studies in Contemporary Religion, Bielefeld; Center for Research in Faith and Moral Development, Emory University. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4232.4804.
Franks, B., Bangerter, A., & Bauer, M. (2013). Conspiracy theories as quasi-religious mentality: An integrated account from cognitive science, social representations theory, and frame theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(424). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00424.
Furnham, A., & Marks, J. (2013). Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the recent literature. Psychology, 4(9), 717–728. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.49102.
Gerteis, J., & Rotem, N. (2023). Connecting the “others”: White anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim views in America. Sociological Quarterly, 64(1), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2022.2045882.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2019). Being other: Intersubjectivity, allocentrism and the possible. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 49(4), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12221.
Glück, J. (2024). Wisdom and aging. Current Opinion in Psychology, 55, Article 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101742.
Habermas, J. (1981a). The theory of communicative action, Vol I. Beacon Press, 1984.
Habermas, J. (1981b). The theory of communicative action, Vol II. Beacon Press, 1987.
Habermas, J. (1983). Moral consciousness and communicative action (C. Lenhardt & S. Weber Nicholsen, Trans.). In J. Habermas (Ed.), Moral consciousness and communicative action (pp. 116–195). MIT Press 1990.
Harambam, J. (2024). Conspirituality: An (un)happy marriage of conspiracy theories and spirituality? In H. Dick & W. Galen (Eds.), The Shape of Spirituality (pp. 267–298). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/hout21684-011.
Heitmeyer, W. (2002). Gruppenbezogene Menschenfeindlichkeit. Die theoretische Konzeption und erste empirische Ergebnisse [Group-focused enmity. The theoretical concept and first empirical results]. In W. Heitmeyer (Ed.), Deutsche Zustände, Folge 1 (pp. 15–34). suhrkamp.
Hood, R. W. (1975). The construction and preliminary validation of a measure of reported mystical experience. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 14, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/1384454.
Hood, R. W., Streib, H., & Keller, B. (2022). What is deconversion? Critiques and current conceptualizations from a faith developmental perspective. In H. Streib, B. Keller, R. Bullik, A. Steppacher, C. F. Silver, M. Durham, S. B. Barker, & R. W. Hood, (Eds.), Deconversion revisited. Biographical studies and psychometric analyses ten years later (pp. 17–31). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666568688.17.
Houtman, D., & Aupers, S. (2007). The spiritual turn and the decline of tradition: The spread of post-Christian spirituality in 14 Western countries, 1981–2000. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00360.x.
Huber, S. (2009). Religion Monitor 2008: Structuring principles, operational constructs, interpretive strategies. In F. Bertelsmann (Ed.), What the world believes: Analysis and commentary on the Religion Monitor 2008 (pp. 17–51). Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of the Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710.
Hutsebaut, D. (2000). Post-critical belief scales. Exploration of a possible developmental process. Journal of Empirical Theology, 13(2), 19–28.
James, W., Griffiths, B., & Pedersen, A. (2011). The “making and unmaking” of prejudice against Australian Muslims and gay men and lesbians: The role of religious development and fundamentalism. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21(3), 212–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2011.581579.
Jedinger, A., & Siegers, P. (2024). Religion, spirituality, and susceptibility to conspiracy theories: examining the role of analytic thinking and post-critical beliefs. Politics and Religion, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755048324000130.
Johnson, K. A., Hill, E. D., & Cohen, A. B. (2011). Integrating the study of culture and religion: Toward a psychology of worldview. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(3), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00339.x.
Johnson, K. A., Sharp, C. A., Okun, M. A., Shariff, A. F., & Cohen, A. B. (2018). SBNR identity: The role of impersonal God representations, individualistic spirituality, and dissimilarity with religious groups. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 28(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2018.1445893.
Kalla, J. L., & Broockman, D. E. (2020). Reducing exclusionary attitudes through interpersonal conversation: Evidence from three field experiments. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000923.
Kalla, J. L., & Broockman, D. E. (2023). Which narrative strategies durably reduce prejudice? Evidence from field and survey experiments supporting the efficacy of perspective-getting. American Journal of Political Science, 67(1), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12657.
Keller, B. (2022). Religiöse Entwicklung und Veränderung von Glaubensbiographien über die Zeit [Religious development and change of faith biographies over time]. In D. Abel, D.-M. Kosack, & A. Reinhardt (Eds.), Lebensabschnittspartner? Identität, Glaubensbiographien und kirchliche Lebensformen im Umbruch (pp. 76–96). Echter.
Keller, B., Bullik, R., & Streib, H. (2024). Deconversion from high-tension religious groups. In K. Taku & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Changes in Human Perceptions and Behaviors (pp. 489–507). Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003316602-35.
Keller, B., Bullik, R., Streib, H., Steppacher, A., & Hood, R. W. (2022). Deconversion typologies revisited: Biographical trajectories ten years later. In H. Streib, B. Keller, R. Bullik, A. Steppacher, C. F. Silver, M. Durham, S. B. Barker, & R. W. Hood (Eds.), Deconversion revisited. Biographical studies and psychometric analyses ten years later (pp. 287–300). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666568688.287.
Knasmuller, F., Menzel, G., Reuss, T., Brunner, M., & Heller, A. (2023). „Wider die Natur“—Zur sozialpsychologischen Dimension des Bündnisses von Verschwörungsdenken und Spiritualität in den Corona-Protesten. Eine Fallanalyse [‘Against Nature’—On the social psychological dimension of the alliance between conspiracy beliefs and spirituality in COVID-19 protests. A case study]. Zeitschrift für Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik, 7, 589–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-023-00150-7.
Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., & Hewer, A. (1983). The current formulation of the theory. In L. Kohlberg (Ed.), Essays on moral development, Vol.II. The psychology of moral development (pp. 212–319). Harper&Row 1984.
Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2000). The Worldview Assessment Instrument (WAI): The development and preliminary validation of an instrument to assess world view components relevant to counseling and psychotherapy [Ph.D. Thesis, New York University, School of Education]. New York.
Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2004). The psychology of worldviews. Review of General Psychology, 8(1), 3–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.3.
Krumrei-Mancuso, E. L., & Rouse, S. V. (2016). The development and validation of the comprehensive intellectual humility scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1068174.
Küpper, B., & Zick, A. (2014). Group-focused enmity: Prevalence, correlations and causes of prejudices in Europe. In P. Nesbitt-Larking, C. Kinnvall, T. Capelos, & H. Dekker (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Political Psychology (pp. 242–262). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-29118-9_14.
Lamiell, J. T. (1981). Toward an idiothetic psychology of personality. American Psychologist, 36(3), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.3.276.
Leak, G. K. (2003). Validation of the Faith Development Scale using longitudinal and cross-sectional designs. Social Behavior & Personality, 31(6), 637–342.
Leak, G. K. (2008). Factorial validity of the Faith Development Scale. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 18(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508610701879399.
Leak, G. K., Loucks, A. A., & Bowlin, P. (1999). Development and initial validation of an objective measure of faith development. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9(2), 105–124.
Luckmann, T. (1967). The invisible religion. The problem of religion in modern society. Macmillan.
Luckmann, T. (1991). Die unsichtbare Religion [The invisible religion]. Suhrkamp.
McAdams, D. P., & de St Aubin, E. D. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1003-1015. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1003.
McCrae, R. R. (2002). NEO-PI-R data from 36 cultures. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The Five-Factor Model of Personality across cultures (pp. 105–125). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0763-5_6.
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Martin, T. A., Oryol, V. E., Rukavishnikov, A. A., Senin, I. G., … Urbanek, T. (2004). Consensual validation of personality traits across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00056-4.
McCutcheon, R. T. (2024). Studying religion: An introduction (3rd ed.). Routledge.
McLean, K. C., Lilgendahl, J. P., Fordham, C., Alpert, E., Marsden, E., Szymanowski, K., & McAdams, D. P. (2018). Identity development in cultural context: The role of deviating from master narratives. Journal of Personality, 86(4), 631–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12341.
Moseley, R. M., Jarvis, D., & Fowler, J. W. (1986). Manual for faith development research. Center for Faith Development, Emory University.
Nakamura, Y. (2000). Xenosophie: Bausteine für eine Theorie der Fremdheit [Xenosophia: Building blocks for a theory of alienness]. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Nelson, C. E., & Aleshire, D. (1986). Research in faith development. In C. Dykstra & S. Parks (Eds.), Faith development and Fowler (pp. 180–201). Religious Education Press.
Niebuhr, H. R. (1929). The social sources of denominationalism. H. Holt and Company.
Niebuhr, H. R. (1943). Radical monotheism and Western culture. Harper&Row 1960.
Niebuhr, H. R. (1961). On the nature of faith. In S. Hook (Ed.), Religious experience and truth (pp. 93–102). New York University Press.
Noam, G. G. (1990). Beyond Freud and Piaget: Biographical worlds—interpersonal self. In T. E. Wren (Ed.), The moral domain (pp. 360–399). MIT Press.
Paloutzian, R. F., Murken, S., Streib, H., & Namini, S. (2013). Conversion, deconversion, and transformation: A multilevel interdisciplinary view. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality, 2nd ed. (pp. 399–421). The Guilford Press.
Paluck, E. L., Porat, R., Clark, C. S., & Green, D. P. (2021). Prejudice reduction: Progress and challenges. In S. T. Fiske (Ed.), Annual review of psychology, Vol. 72 (Vol. 72, pp. 533–560). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-071620-030619.
Pargament, K. I., & Mahoney, A. (2002). Spirituality. Discovering and conserving the sacred. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 646–659). Oxford UP.
Parker, S. (2006). Measuring faith development. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34(4), 337–348.
Parker, S. (2010). Research in Fowler’s faith development theory: A review article. Review of Religious Research, 51(3), 233–252.
Porter, T., Baldwin, C. R., Warren, M. T., Murray, E. D., Cotton Bronk, K., Forgeard, M. J. C., … Jayawickreme, E. (2022). Clarifying the content of intellectual humility: A systematic review and integrative framework. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(5), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.1975725.
Porter, T., Elnakouri, A., Meyers, E. A., Shibayama, T., Jayawickreme, E., & Grossmann, I. (2022). Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(9), 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00081-9.
Power, F. C. (1991). Hard versus soft stages of faith and religious development. In J. W. Fowler, K. E. Nipkow, & F. Schweitzer (Eds.), Stages of faith and religious development. Implications for church, education, and society (pp. 116–129). Crossroad.
Pratt, M. W., Matsuba, M. K., Lawford, H. L., & Villar, F. (2020). The life span development of generativity. In The Oxford handbook of moral development (pp. 365–384). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190676049.013.20.
Pummerer, L., Böhm, R., Lilleholt, L., Winter, K., Zettler, I., & Sassenberg, K. (2021). Conspiracy theories and their societal effects during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211000217.
Richardson, J. T. (1985). The active vs. passive convert: Pradigm conflict in conversion/recruitment research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 24(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386340.
Ricoeur, P. (1960). The symbolism of evil. Beacon Press, 1969.
Ricoeur, P. (1965). Freud and philosophy. An essay on interpretation. Yale University Press, 1970.
Ricoeur, P. (1975). The rule of metaphor. Multi-disciplinary studies in the creation of meaning in language. University of Toronto Press, 1977.
Ricoeur, P. (1983). Time and narrative, Vol.I. Chicago UP, 1984.
Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative, Vol.II. Chicago UP, 1985.
Ricoeur, P. (1985). Time and narrative, Vol.III. Chicago UP, 1988.
Ricoeur, P. (1990). Oneself As Another. Univ. of Chicago Press, 1992.
Ryff, C. D. (2010). Documentation of psychosocial constructs and composite variables in MIDUS II Project 1. University of Wisconsin, Institute of Aging.
Saroglou, V. (2010). Religiousness as a cultural adaptation of basic traits: A five-factor model perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352322.
Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging. The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320–1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111412267.
Saroglou, V., Clobert, M., Cohen, A. B., Johnson, K. A., Ladd, K. L., van Pacherbeke, M., … Valladres, J. T. (2020). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging. The cognitive, emotional, moral, and social dimensions of religiousness across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5(7–8), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022120946488.
Saucier, G. (1998). Replicable item-cluster subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(2), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa7002_6.
Saucier, G., & Skrzypinska, K. (2006). Spiritual but not Religious? Evidence for Two Independent Dispositions. Journal of Personality, 74(5), 1257–1292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00409.x.
Scharff, C. (2011). Disarticulating feminism: Individualization, neoliberalism and the othering of ‘Muslim women’. European Journal of Womens Studies, 18(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506810394613.
Schütz, A. (1932). The phenomenology of the social world. Northwestern University Press 1967.
Schütz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world, Vol.1. Northwestern University Press.
Schütz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1989). The structures of the life-world, Vol.2. Northwestern University Press.
Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of personal understanding: Developmental and clinical aspects. Academic Press.
Shaker, R., & Ahmadi, D. (2022). Everyday embodied othering experiences of young Muslims in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(19), 4567–4585. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2022.2096577.
Simmonds, R. J. (1986). Content and structure in faith development: A case examination of James Fowler’s theory [Ph.D. Thesis, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary].
Siouti, I., Spies, T., Tuider, E., von Unger, H., & Yildiz, E. (Eds.). (2022). Othering in der postmigrantischen Gesellschaft. Herausforderungen und Konsequenzen für die Forschungspraxis [Othering in the post-migrant society. Challenges and consequences for research]. transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839463086.
Smith, W. C. (1963). The meaning and end of religion. Fortress Press, 1991.
Smith, W. C. (1979). Faith and belief. Princeton University Press.
Snarey, J., Kohlberg, L., & Noam, G. G. (1983). Ego development in perspective: Structural stage, functional phase, and cultural age-period models. Developmental Review, 3(3), 303–338.
Steppacher, A., Streib, H., Bullik, R., & Keller, B. (2022). Recent research on deconversion. In H. Streib, B. Keller, R. Bullik, A. Steppacher, C. F. Silver, M. Durham, S. B. Barker, & R. W. Hood (Eds.), Deconversion revisited. Biographical studies and psychometric analyses ten years later (pp. 33–58). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666568688.33.
Sternberg, R. J., & Hagen, E. S. (2019). Teaching for wisdom. In J. Glück & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 372–406). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568272.018.
Streib, H. (1991). Hermeneutics of metaphor, symbol and narrative in faith development theory. Peter Lang. https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/1861851/2315007/Streib01.pdf.
Streib, H. (1997). Religion als Stilfrage. Zur Revision struktureller Differenzierung von Religion im Blick auf die Analyse der pluralistisch-religiösen Lage der Gegenwart [Religion as a question of style. On the revision of structural differentiation of religion in respect to the analysis of the contemporary pluralist-religious situation]. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 22(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1163/157361297X00054. (for the translation, see Streib, 2003b).
Streib, H. (1999). Biographies in Christian fundamentalist milieus and organizations (Part of the research project on “Drop-outs, converts and believers: Contrasting biographical analyses of why individuals join, have a career and stay in, or leave religious/ideological contexts or groups”). In Deutscher Bundestag, Referat Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (Ed.), Final report of the Enquête Commission on ‘So-called Sects and Psychogroups’. New religious and ideological communities and psychogroups in the Federal Republic of Germany (pp. 402–414). Deutscher Bundestag.
Streib, H. (2001). Faith development theory revisited: The religious styles perspective. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11(3), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327582IJPR1103_02.
Streib, H. (2003a). Faith development research at twenty years. In R. R. Osmer & F. Schweitzer (Eds.), Developing a public faith. New directions in practical theology. Essays in honor of James. W. Fowler (pp. 15–42). Chalice Press. https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/1778599/2312485/Streib-twentyyears.pdf.
Streib, H. (2003b). Religion as a question of style: Revising the structural differentiation of religion from the perspective of the analysis of the contemporary pluralistic-religious situation. International Journal for Practical Theology, 7(1), 1–22.
Streib, H. (2003c). Variety and complexity of religious development: Perspectives for the 21st century. In P. H. M. P. Roelofsma, J. M. T. Corveleyn, & J. W. Van Saane (Eds.), One hundred years of psychology of religion. Issues and trends in a century long quest (pp. 123–138). Free University Press.
Streib, H. (2005). Faith development research revisited: Accounting for diversity in structure, content, and narrativity of faith. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15(2), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1502_1.
Streib, H. (2007). Faith development and a way beyond fundamentalism. In C. Timmerman, D. Hutsebaut, S. Mels, W. Nonneman, & W. van Herck (Eds.), Faith-based radicalism: Christianity, Islam and Judaism between constructive activism and destructive fanaticism (pp. 151–167). Peter Lang. https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/1782813/2314007/OCT3340.pdf.
Streib, H. (2013). Conceptualisation et mesure du développement religieux en termes de schémas et de styles religieux—Résultats et nouvelles considérations. In P.-Y. Brandt & J. M. Day (Eds.), Psychologie du développement religieux: questions classiques et perspectives contemporaines (pp. 39–76). Labor et Fides.
Streib, H. (2014). Deconversion. In L. R. Rambo & C. E. Farhadian (Eds.), Oxford handbook on religious conversion (pp. 271–296). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195338522.013.012.
Streib, H. (2018). What is xenosophia? Philosophical contributions to prejudice research. In H. Streib & C. Klein (Eds.), Xenosophia and religion: Biographical and statistical paths for a culture of welcome (pp. 3–21). Springer International Publishing Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74564-0_1 (post-print at: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dfx5j).
Streib, H. (2021). Leaving religion: Deconversion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.007 (post-print at: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/r46qt).
Streib, H. (2024a). Wisdom and the Other: Responsiveness in development between the egocentric and xenocentric style. Possibility Studies & Society, 2(2), 154–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699231205016.
Streib, H. (2024b). Xenocentric responsiveness—Challenges and future directions. Response to the commentaries. Possibility Studies & Society, 2(2), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699241261413.
Streib, H., & Chen, Z. (2024a). Attitudes toward refugees between group-focused enmity and other-oriented responsiveness. Evidence from nationally representative German samples 2015/2016 and 2022. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 12(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.13493.
Streib, H., & Chen, Z. (2024b). The omnibus document. Description of data characteristics, including both Faith Development Interview evaluation and survey data as basis of the analyses 2024 and later in the Bielefeld-Chattanooga faith development research. https://osf.io/nyaxz.
Streib, H., Chen, Z. J., & Hood, R. W. (2020). Categorizing people by their preference for religious styles: Four types derived from evaluation of Faith Development Interviews. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 30(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2019.1664213 (post-print at: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d3kbr).
Streib, H., Chen, Z. J., & Hood, R. W. (2023). Faith development as change in religious types: Results from three-wave longitudinal data with Faith Development Interviews. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 15(2), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000440 (post-print at: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qrcb2).
Streib, H., Glaveanu, V. P., Sternberg, R. J., Kachhiyapatel, N., Grossmann, I., Ardelt, M., … Stam, H. J. (2024). Special Issue: Wisdom and the Other. Possibility Studies & Society, 2(2), 151–263.
Streib, H., & Hood, R. W. (2024). Religious styles and types: Studying change and development in worldview and faith. In H. Streib & R. W. Hood (Eds.), Faith in development. Mixed-method studies on worldviews and religious styles (pp. 17–42). Bielefeld University Press. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839471234-003.
Streib, H., Hood, R. W., & Klein, C. (2010). The religious schema scale. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20(3), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2010.481223.
Streib, H., & Hood, R. W. (2011). “Spirituality” as privatized experience-oriented religion: Empirical and conceptual perspectives. Implicit Religion, 14(4), 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v14i4.433.
Streib, H., & Hood, R. W. (2013). Modeling the religious field: Religion, spirituality, mysticism and related world views. Implicit Religion, 16(3), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v16i2.133.
Streib, H., & Hood, R. W. (Eds.). (2016). Semantics and psychology of spirituality. A cross-cultural analysis. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21245-6.
Streib, H., & Hood, R. W. (Eds.). (2024). Faith in development. Mixed-method studies on worldviews and religious styles. Bielefeld University Press. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839471234.
Streib, H., Hood, R. W., Keller, B., Csöff, R.-M., & Silver, C. (2009). Deconversion. Qualitative and quantitative results from cross-cultural research in Germany and the United States of America. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666604393.
Streib, H., & Keller, B. (2004). The variety of deconversion experiences: Contours of a concept in respect to empirical research. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 26(1), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1163/0084672053598030.
Streib, H., & Keller, B. (2018). Manual for the assessment of religious styles in Faith Development Interviews (Fourth, revised edition of the Manual for Faith Development Research). Bielefeld University. https://doi.org/10.4119/unibi/2920987.
Streib, H., & Keller, B. (2022). Quantitative Perspectives on Deconverts and Traditionalists Revisited. In H. Streib, B. Keller, R. Bullik, A. Steppacher, C. F. Silver, M. Durham, S. B. Barker, & R. W. Hood (Eds.), Deconversion Revisited. Biographical Studies and Psychometric Analyses Ten Years Later (pp. 59–82). https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666568688.59.
Streib, H., Keller, B., Bullik, R., Steppacher, A., Silver, C. F., Durham, M., … Hood, R. W. (2022). Deconversion revisited. Biographical studies and psychometric analyses ten years later. Brill Germany/Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666568688.
Streib, H., & Klein, C. (Eds.). (2018). Xenosophia and religion: Biographical and statistical paths for a culture of welcome. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74564-0.
Streib, H., Klein, C., Keller, B., & Hood, R. W. (2021). The Mysticism Scale as measure for subjective spirituality: New results with Hood’s M-Scale and the development of a short form. In A. L. Ai, K. A. Harris, R. F. Paloutzian, & P. Wink (Eds.), Assessing spirituality in a diverse world (pp. 467–491). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52140-0_19 (post-print at: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gwj2c).
Strickler, R. (2025). Perspective getting and cross-party support for electoral fairness. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-025-10056-0.
Taves, A. (2018a). Finding and articulating meaning in secular experience. In U. Riegel, E.-M. Leven, & D. Fleming (Eds.), Religious experience and experiencing religion in religious education (pp. 13–22). Waxmann.
Taves, A. (2018b). What is nonreligion? On the virtues of a meaning systems framework for studying nonreligious and religious worldviews in the context of everyday life. Secularism & Nonreligion, 7, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.104.
Taves, A. (2020). From religious studies to worldview studies. Religion, 50(1), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721x.2019.1681124.
Taves, A., & Asprem, E. (2019). Scientific worldview studies: A programmatic proposal. In A. Klostergaard Petersen, I. S. Gilhus, L. H. Martin, J. S. Jensen, & J. Sørensen (Eds.), Evolution, cognition, and the history of religion: A new synthesis. Festschrift in honour of Armin W. Geertz (pp. 297–308). Brill.
Taves, A., Asprem, E., & Ihm, E. (2018). Psychology, meaning making, and the study of worldviews: Beyond religion and non-religion. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000201.
Tillich, P. (1928). Das religiöse Symbol. In Main Works/Hauptwerke, Bd.4 (pp. 213–228). deGruyter/Evang. Verlagswerk 1987.
Tillich, P. (1929). Der Protestantismus als kritisches und gestaltendes Prinzip [Protestantism as critical and constructive principle]. In Main Works / Hauptwerke, Bd.6 (pp. 127–149). deGruyter; Evang.Verlagswerk 1992.
Tillich, P. (1940). The religious symbol. In Main Works/Hauptwerke Bd.4 (pp. 253–269). DeGruyter/Evang. Verlagswerk 1987.
Tillich, P. (1942). Our protestant principles. In Main Works / Hauptwerke, Bd.6 (pp. 247–254). deGruyter; Evang.Verlagswerk 1992.
Tillich, P. (1951). Systematic Theology, Vol. 1. University of Chicago Press.
Tillich, P. (1957a). Dynamics of faith. Harper & Row.
Tillich, P. (1957b). Systematic Theology, Vol. 2. The University of Chicago Press.
Tillich, P. (1963). Systematic Theology, Vol. 3. University of Chicago Press.
Verger, N. B. (2025). The aesthetics of the possible. Possibility Studies & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699251318068.
Verhoeven, E., Dhoest, A., & Paulussen, S. (2023). ‘No room for hate in our country’: Constructing the LGBTI-friendly nation in news discourses after the murder of a gay man in Belgium. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 26(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779221131080.
Waldenfels, B. (2011). Phenomenology of the alien: Basic concepts [Grundmotive einer Phänomenologie des Fremden, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, 2006, transl. by A. Kozin and T. Stähler]. Northwestern University Press.
Waldenfels, B. (2012). Responsive ethics. In D. Zahavi (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of contemporary phenomenology (pp. 423–441). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199594900.013.0021.
Waldenfels, B. (2016). The birth of Ἦθος out of Πάθος. Paths of responsive phenomenology. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 37(1), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.5840/gfpj20163716.
Waldenfels, B. (2020). Responsivity and co-responsivity from a phenomenological point of view. Studia Phänomenologica, 20, 341–355. https://doi.org/10.5840/studphaen20202015.
Ward, C., & Voas, D. (2011). The emergence of conspirituality. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 26(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2011.539846.
Wulff, D. M. (1997). Psychology of religion. Classic and contemporary views (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Zick, A., Wolf, C., Küpper, B., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Heitmeyer, W. (2008). The syndrome of Group-Focused Enmity: The interrelation of prejudices tested with multiple cross-sectional and panel data. Journal of Social Issues, 64(2), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00566.x.