Bibliography
Abbink, G.J. “A bibliography on Christianity in Ethiopia.” ASC Working Paper Series 52. Leiden: African Studies Centre, 2003.
Aland, K. “Der Schluß des Markusevangeliums.” In L’Évangile Selon Marc, edited by M. Sabbe, 435–470. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1971.
Aland, K. “Bemerkungen zum Schluss des Markusevangeliums.” In Neotestamentica et Semitica: Studies in Honour of Matthew Black, edited by E. Earle Ellis and Max Wilcox, 157–180. T. & T. Clark, 1969.
Aland, K. and B. Aland. Text Und Textwert Der Griechischen Handschriften Des Neuen Testaments IV. Band 1.2. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2012.
Aland, K. and B. Aland. The Text of the New Testament. 2nd ed. Translated by E.F. Rhodes. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1989.
Andrist, P. “Structure and History of the Biblical Manuscripts Used by Erasmus for His 1516 Edition.” In Basel 1516: Erasmus’ Edition of the New Testament, edited by Martin Wallraff, Silvana S. Menchi, and Kaspar von Greyerz, 81–124. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.
Andrist, P. “Toward a definition of paratexts and paratextuality: The case of ancient Greek manuscripts.” In Bible as Notepad, edited by L. Lied and M. Maniaci, 130–150. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.
Allen, G., and A.P. Royle. “Paratexts Seeking Understanding: Manuscripts and Aesthetic Cognitivism.” Religions 11.10 (2020): 523. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11100523.
Anderson, A.S. “Family 1 in Mark: Preliminary Results.” In Early Readers, Scholars and Editors of the New Testament, edited by H.A.G. Houghton, 119–162. NJ: Gorgias Press, 2014.
Anderson, A.S. “Codex 2193 and Family 1 in Mark.” In Studies on the Text of the New Testament and Early Christianity, edited by D.M. Gurtner, J. Hernández Jr., and P. Foster, 100–133. Leiden: Brill, 2015.
Anderson, A.S. The Textual Tradition of the Gospels: Family 1 in Matthew. Leiden: Brill, 2004.
Aquinas, Thomas. Catena Aurea: Commentary on the Four Gospels. Volume 2: St. Mark. Translated by John Henry Newman. Oxford: James Parker and Co., 1874.
Atiya, A.S., ed. The Coptic Encyclopedia. London: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1991.
Batovici, D. “The displaced longer ending of Mark in Armenian.” COMSt 8.2 (2022): 603–624.
Beza, T. Novum D.N. Iesu Christi Testamentum. Geneva: Nicolas Barbier & Thomas Courteau, 1559.
Birch, Andreas. Beskrivelse over græske Haandskrifter af det Nye Testamente. Copenhagen, 1785.
Blomkvist, Vemund. Euthalian Traditions: Text, Translation and Commentary. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.
Boeten, Julie, and Sien de Groot. “Byzantine Book Epigrams: The case of ὥσπερ ξένοι.” Paper given at the 23rd International Congress of Byzantine Studies, August 2016.
Boud’hors, Anne, and Sofía Torallas Tovar. “The Shorter Ending of the Gospel of Mark in the Coptic Versions.” COMSt 8.2 (2022): 495–511.
Brown, A.J. “The Gospel Commentary of Theophylact, and a Neglected Manuscript in Oxford.” Novum Testamentum 49.2 (2007): 185–196.
Browning, R. “The Correspondence of a Tenth-Century Byzantine Scholar.” Byzantion 24.2 (1954): 397–452.
Burkitt, F.C. “Further Notes on Codex K,” JTS 5.17 (1903): 100–107.
Burgon, John W. The Last Twelve Verses of the Gospel According to S. Mark. London: Parker & Company, 1871.
Cahill, M. “The Identification of the First Markan Commentary.” Revue Biblique 101.2 (1994): 258–268.
Cahill, M. The First Commentary on Mark: An Annotated Translation. Oxford: OUP, 1998.
Clivaz, C. “Mk 16 im Codex Bobbiensis. Neue Materialien zur conclusio brevior des Markusevangeliums.” Zeitschrift für Neues Testament 47.24 (2021): 59–85.
Clivaz, C. “New Testament and Digital Humanities.” Verkündigung und Forschung 65.2 (2020): 98–104.
Clivaz, C. “A Multilingual Turn: Introducing the ‘MARK16’ COMSt Bulletin.” COMSt 8.2 (2022): 303–310.
Clivaz, C., M. Monier, and D. Batovici (eds.). “The Transmission of Mark’s Endings in Different Traditions and Languages.” COMSt 8.2 (2022): 303–745.
Colwell, E. “Mark 16,9–20 in the Armenian Version.” Journal of Biblical Literature 56 (1937): 369–386.
Connor, W. Robert. “A Post-Modernist Thucydides?” In Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Thucydides, edited by J.S. Rusten. Oxford: OUP, 2009.
Cook, Brad L. “Plutarch’s Use of λέγεται: Narrative Design and Source in Alexander.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 42.4 (2001): 329–360.
Cook, John G. “Julian’s Contra Galilaeos and Cyril’s Contra Iulianum: Two Witnesses to the Short Ending of Mark.” TC 20 (2015): 1–21.
Coogan, J. Eusebius the Evangelist: Rewriting the Fourfold Gospel in Late Antiquity. Oxford: OUP, 2023.
Coogan, J. “Transmission and Transformation of the Eusebian Gospel Apparatus in Greek Medieval Manuscripts.” In Canones: The Art of Harmony: The Canon Tables of the Four Gospels, edited by A. Bausi, B. Reudenbach, and H. Wimmer, 29–46. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2020.
Cooper, G. “Intrusive oblique infinitives in Herodotus.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 104 (1974): 23–76.
Cosmas Indicopleustes. The Christian Topography of Cosmas, an Egyptian Monk. Translated by J.W. McCrindle. Reprint, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Cox, S.L. A History and Critique of Scholarship Concerning the Markan Endings. Lampeter: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1993.
Cramer, J.A. Catena graecorum patrum in Novum Testamentum, vol. 1. Oxford, 1840.
Cranfield, C. The Gospel According to St. Mark, Cambridge Greek Testament Commentary Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959.
Crawford, M. “The Eusebian Canon Tables as a Corpus-Organizing Paratext within the Multiple-Text Manuscript of the Fourfold Gospel.” In The Emergence of Multiple-Text Manuscripts, edited by A. Bausi, M. Friedrich, and M. Maniaci, 107–124. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2019.
Crawford, M. The Eusebian Canon Tables: Ordering Textual Knowledge in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Crusius, Magnus. “Analecta de antiquissimis Harmoniae Evangelicae circa Resurrectionem Christi oppugnatoribus & defensoribus.” Miscellanea Groningana 4.1 (1743/45): 140–189. https://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/werkansicht/?PPN=PPN71746654X.
Cyril of Alexandria. Commentary on the Gospel According to St. John. Translated by P.E. Pusey. Vol. 2. London: Walter Smith, 1885.
De Bruin, C.C. Het Luikse Diatesseron. Leiden: Brill, 1970.
De Jonge, Henk J. “Erasmus’ Novum Testamentum of 1519.” NovT 61 (2019): 1–25.
Deissmann, G.A. Light from the Ancient East: The New Testament Illustrated by Recently Discovered Texts of the Graeco-Roman World. Translated by L.R.M. Strachan. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1910.
Derrenbacker, R.A. “‘Unfinished’ Mark ‘Replaced’ by Matthew and Luke? Some Recent Studies and their Implications for the Synoptic Problem.” In The Synoptic Problem 2022: Proceedings of the Loyola University Conference, edited by O. Andrejevs et al., 179–194. Leuven: Peeters, 2023.
Diller, A. “Notes on Greek Codices of the Tenth Century.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 78 (1947): 184–188.
Ehlers, W., L. Mundt, H.-G. Roloff, and P. Schäfer (eds.). Johannes Reuchlin: Sämtliche Werke, Band I,1: De verbo mirifico. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1996.
Ehrman, B., and M.W. Holmes, eds. The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research. Leiden: Brill, 2013.
Ehrman, B., and Zlatko Pleše. The Apocryphal Gospels: Texts and Translations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Elliott, J.K. “Manuscripts Cited by Stephanus.” NTS 55 (2009): 390–395.
Elliott, J.K. New Testament Textual Criticism: The Application of Thoroughgoing Principles. Leiden: Brill, 2010.
Elliott, J.K. “The Endings of Mark’s Gospel and the Presentation of the Variants in the Marc multilingue Edition.” In Textual Research on the Psalms and Gospels, edited by C. Amphoux and J.K. Elliott, 113–124. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2012.
Elliott, J.K. “The Last Twelve Verses of Mark: Original or Not?” In Perspectives on the Ending of Mark, 4 Views, edited by D.A. Black, 80–102. Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2008.
Elliott, J.K. The Apocryphal New Testament: A Collection of Apocryphal Christian Literature in an English Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Emmenegger, G. “Ein koptisches Amulett als Beleg für den kurzen Markusschluss.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentiche Wissenschaft 103 (2012): 142–145.
Erasmus, D. In novum testamentum annotationes. Basel: In officina Frobenianna, 1540.
Erasmus, D. Novum Instrumentum omne. Basel: Johann Froben, 1516. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3931/e-rara-2849.
Erasmus, D. Novum Testamentum. Basel: Johann Froben, 1519.
Ernst, Josef. Das Evangelium nach Markus. Regensburg: Verlag Friedrich Pustet, 1981.
Évieux, Pierre. Isidore de Péluse. Théologie Historique 99. Paris: Beauchesne, 1995.
Farmer, W.R. The Last Twelve Verses of Mark. Cambridge: CUP, 1974.
Feltoe, C.L., ed. The Letters and Other Remains of Dionysius of Alexandria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1904.
Filiposki, T. “Theophylact and the People of Ohrid: the Issue of the ‘Otherness’.” Macedonian Historical Review 2.2 (2011): 87–102.
Foskolou, V. “Mary Magdalene between East and West: Cult and Image, Relics and Politics in the Late Thirteenth-Century Eastern Mediterranean.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 65/66 (2011–2012): 271–296.
Fouskas, Constantine M. St. Isidore of Pelusium with Special Reference to His Use of the New Testament. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, 1961.
Frey, Jörg. “Die Scholien nach dem jüdischen Evangelium und das sogenannte Nazoräerevangelium.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 94.1 (2003): 122–137.
Genette, Gérard. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Translated by Jane E. Lewin. Cambridge: CUP, 1997.
Gould, E. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to St. Mark. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1896.
Gray, Patrick. “George of Cappadocia (d. 361).” The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470670606.wbecc0581.
Grenfell, B.P., and A.S. Hunt. Catalogue of the Greek Papyri in the John Rylands Library Manchester, vol. 1. Manchester: The John Rylands Library, 1903.
Griesbach, J.J. Novum Testamentum Graece. London: impensis F.C. et J. Rivington, 1818.
Gwilliam, G. “The Ammonian Sections, the Eusebian Canons, and harmonizing tables in the Syriac Tetraevangelium.” Studia Biblica et Ecclesiastica 2 (1890): 241–272.
Heer, J. “Neue Griechisch-Saidische Evangelienfragmente.” Oriens Christianus 2 (1912): 1–47.
Hoogterp, P.W. Etude sur le Latin dus codex Bobiensis (k) des evangiles. Diss. Veenman, 1930.
Horner, G. The Coptic Version of the New Testament in the Southern Dialect, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911.
Horner, G. The Coptic Version of the New Testament in the Northern Dialect, vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1898.
Houghton, H.A.G. “Unfinished Business: The Ending of Mark in Two Catena Manuscripts.” New Testament Studies 69.1 (2023): 35–42.
Houghton, H.A.G. and M. Monier. “Greek Manuscripts in Alexandria.” Journal of Theological Studies 71.1 (2020): 119–133.
Houghton, H.A.G. The Latin New Testament: A Guide to Its Early History, Texts, and Manuscripts. Oxford: OUP, 2016.
Houghton, H.A.G., and David C. Parker. “An introduction to Greek New Testament commentaries with a preliminary checklist of New Testament catena manuscripts.” In Commentaries, Catenae and Biblical Tradition, edited by H.A.G. Houghton, 1–35. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2016.
Hug, J. La Finale de l’Évangile de Marc: Mc 16, 9–20. Paris: J. Gabalda et Cie Éditeurs, 1978.
Jongkind, D. Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus. NJ: Gorgias Press, 2013.
Kahle, P.E. “The End of St. Mark’s Gospel. The Witnesses of the Coptic Versions.” The Journal of Theological Studies 2.1 (1951): 49–57.
Kashouh, H. The Arabic Versions of the Gospels: The Manuscripts and Their Families. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.
Kessel, G. “A New (Double Palimpsest) Witness to the Old Syriac Gospels (Vat. iber. 4, ff. 1 & 5).” New Testament Studies 69.2 (2023): 210–221.
Kelhoffer, J.A. Conceptions of “Gospel” and legitimacy in early Christianity. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.
Kelhoffer, J.A. “The Witness of Eusebius’ ad Marinum and Other Christian Writings to Text-Critical Debates concerning the Original Conclusion to Mark’s Gospel.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 92.1–2 (2001): 78–112.
Kelhoffer, J.A. Miracle and Mission: The Authentication of Missionaries and Their Message in the Longer Ending of Mark. Mohr Siebeck, 2000
Khalil, Samir. “La version arabe des évangiles d’Al-Asad Ibn Al-Assal: [étude des manuscrits et spécimens].” Parole de l’Orient 19 (1994): 441–551.
Kim, K.W. “Codices 1582, 1739, and Origen,” JBL 69.2 (1950): 167–175.
Kiraz, G. and J. Childers, The Syriac Peshiṭta Bible with English Translation. NJ: Gorgias Press, 2012.
Knust, J. and T. Wasserman. “The Pericope of the Adulteress (John 7:53–8:11): A New Chapter in Its Textual Transmission,” SEÅ 85 (2020): 22–55.
Knust, J. and T. Wasserman. To Cast the First Stone: The Transmission of a Gospel Story. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.
Krans, Jan. Beyond What is Written: Erasmus and Beza as Conjectural Critics of the New Testament. Leiden: Brill, 2006.
Krans, Jan., and A. Yi. “Trajectories in the History of Textual Scholarship on Mark’s Endings: A Reconsideration,” COMSt 8.2 (2022): 712–730.
Labbei, Philip and Gabriel Cossartii, Sacrosancta concilia ad Regiam editionem exacta, vol. 6. Lutetiæ Parisiorum: Impensis Societatis Typographicæ Librorum Ecclesiasticorum jussu Regis constitutæ., 1671–1672.
Lake, K. Codex 1 of the Gospels and Its Allies. Cambridge: CUP, 1902.
Lake, K., and S. Lake. “The Scribe Ephraim,” JBL 62.4 (1943): 263–268.
Lake, K., and R.P. Blake and S. New. “The Caesarean Text of the Gospel of Mark,” HTR 21.4 (1928): 207–404.
Lamb, W.S. The Catena in Marcum. Leiden: Brill, 2012.
Lane, William. The Gospel of Mark. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1974.
Larsen, L.I. “The Letter Collection of Isidore of Pelusium,” in Late Antique Letter Collections, edited by C. Sogno, B.K. Storin and E.J. Watts, 286–308. California: University of California Press, 2016.
Leroy, J. Les manuscrits coptes et coptes-arabes illustrés. Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner, 1974.
Lieu, M. Marcion and the Making of a Heretic. Cambridge: CUP, 2015.
Lowe, E. The Oldest Omission Signs in Latin Manuscripts: Their Origin and Significance. Rome: Bibl. Apostolica Vaticana, 1946.
Manafis, P. (Re)writing History in Byzantium. London: Routledge, 2020.
Maniaci, M. “The Emergence of Multiple-Text Manuscripts: A Comparative Perspective.” In The Emergence of Multiple-Text Manuscripts, edited by A. Bausi, M. Friedrich, and M. Maniaci, 1–26. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.
Matthaei, C.F.
McGuckin, J. St. Cyril of Alexandria: The Christological Controversy. Leiden: Brill, 1994.
McLeod, Frederick G. Theodore of Mopsuestia. London: Routledge, 2009.
Metzger, Bruce M. “The Ending of the Gospel According to St. Mark in Ethiopic Manuscripts.” In New Testament Studies: Philological, Versional, and Patristic, edited by Bart D. Ehrman, 127–147. Leiden: Brill, 2013.
Metzger, Bruce M. The Early Versions of the New Testament. Oxford: OUP, 1977.
Metzger, Bruce M., and Bart D. Ehrman. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Migne, Jacques-Paul (ed.). Theophylacti Archiepiscopi Bulgariae Opera Omnia. Vols. 123–126 of Patrologiae Cursus Completus, Series Graeca. Paris: Imprimerie Catholique, 1864.
Milne, H.J. and T.C. Skeat. Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus. London: British Museum, 1938.
Moawad, S. (ed.). Al-Asʿad Abū al-Faraǧ Hibat Allāh ibn al–ʿAssāl: The Arabic Translation of the Gospels [Arabic]. Cairo: Alexandria School, 2014.
Monier, M. “The History of the Arabic Diatessaron: Codicological Evidence.” Early Christianity 15 (2024): 322–346.
Monier, M. “Tatian and the Arabic Diatessaron: Mark’s Ending as a Case Study.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 46.3 (2024): 261–293.
Monier, M. “‘According to the Egyptians’: Mark 16 in GA 72.” COMSt 8.2 (2022): 365–384.
Monier, M. “Mark’s Ending in the Digital Age: Paratextual Evidence, New Findings and Transcription Challenges.” Postscripts 12 (2021): 75–98.
Monier, M. “GA 304, Theophylact’s Commentary and the Ending of Mark.” Filología Neotestamentaria 52 (2019): 94–106.
Monier, M. “Reading Luke in Rome: The Lukan Attitude to the Temple and Roman Pietas.” Studia Patristica 99 (2018): 115–138.
Monier, M., and J. E. Taylor. “Tatian’s Diatessaron: The Arabic Version, the Dura Europos Fragment, and the Women Witnesses.” Journal of Theological Studies 72.1 (2021): 192–230.
Most, G.W. Impagination—Layout and Materiality of Writing and Publication. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.
Moschonas, Theodorus D.
Mosshamer, Alden A. The Easter Computus and the Origins of the Christian Era. Oxford: OUP, 2008.
Mynors, R.A.B., and D.F.S. Thomson, trans. The Correspondence of Erasmus: Letters 298 to 445. Collected Works of Erasmus, vol. 3. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976.
Nordenfalk, C. “Canon Tables on Papyrus,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 36 (1982): 29–38.
Nury, Elisa and Elena Spadini. “Automatic Collation Tools and Virtual Research Environments,” Classics@ 18 (2021): online https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/155627.
Obolensky, D. Six Byzantine Portraits. Oxford: OUP, 1988.
Oden, Thomas C., and Christopher A. Hall, eds. Mark. Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture: New Testament, vol. 2. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1998.
Omont, H. “Le dernier des copistes grecs en Italie, Jean de Sainte-Maure (1572–1612).” Revue des Études Grecques 1–2 (1888): 177–191.
Parker, D.C. “Family 1 in the Gospel of John: Its Members, Text and the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method.” In The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium, edited by H.A.G. Houghton, D.C. Parker, and H. Strutwolf, 325–342. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2019.
Parker, D.C. Manuscripts, Texts, Theology: Collected Papers 1977–2007. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2009.
Parpulov, G.R. Catena Manuscripts of the Greek New Testament. NJ: Gorgias Press, 2021.
Peltanus, Theodor. Victoris Antiocheni in Marcum, et Titi Bostrorum episcopi in Evangelium Lucae commentarii. Ingolstadt: David Sartorius, 1580.
Peters, R. “Erasmus and the Fathers: Their Practical Value.” Church History 36.3 (1967): 254–261.
Popovic, V. “Sur l’origine de l’évangéliaire latin de la British Library, Harley 1775.” Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 134.3 (1990): 709–735.
Possinus, P. Catena Graecorum patrum in Evangelium secondum Marcum. Rome: Typis Barberinis, 1673. Available: http://books.google.com/books?id=JFrAsO0mAqEC (accessed: 10/03/2021).
Price, D.H. “Christian Humanism and the Representation of Judaism: Johannes Reuchlin and the Discovery of Hebrew.” Arthuriana 19.3 (2009): 80–96.
Price, R., and M. Gaddis. The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2005.
Price, R., and T. Graumann. The Council of Ephesus 431: Documents and Proceedings. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2022.
Pusey, P.E., and G.H. Gwilliam. Tetraeuangelium Sanctum: iuxta simplicem Syrorum versionem. Oxford: OUP, 1901.
Ranke, E., ed. Codex Fuldensis–Novum Testamentum Latine. Marburg: E.G. Elwert, 1868.
Reuss, J. Matthäus‑, Markus‑, Lukas‑, Johanness-Katenen. Münster: Aschendorffsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1941.
Robinson, M. “The Longer Ending of Mark as Canonical Verity.” In Perspectives on the Ending of Mark: 4 Views, edited by D.A. Black, 40–79. Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2008.
Rukuni, Rugare, and Erna Oliver. “A case for organic indigenous Christianity: African Ethiopia as derivate from Jewish Christianity.” HTS: Theological Studies 75.1 (2019): 1–10.
Schaff, P., and H. Wace, eds. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, vol. 14. London: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1916.
Schedinger, R.F. “Did Tatian Use the Old Testament Peshitta? A Response to Jan Joosten.” NovT 41.3 (1999): 265–279.
Schmidtke, Alfred. Neue Fragmente und Untersuchungen zu den judenchristlichen Evangelien. Leipzig: JC Hinrichs, 1911.
Scholz, Andreas. Novum Testamentum Graece. Vol. 1, Lipsiae: Hahn, 1830.
Schulthess, S. “Vaticanus Arabicus 13: What Do We Really Know? With an Additional Note on the Ending of Mark,” Journal of Eastern Christian Studies 70.1–2 (2018): 63–84.
Schwab, Hans-Rüdiger. Johannes Reuchlin—Deutschlands erster Humanist. Ein biographisches Lesebuch. München: dtv Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co, 1998.
Schweizer, E. Das Evangelium nach Markus. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1998.
Scrivener, F.C. A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, vol. 1. Cambridge: Deighton Bell and Co., 1883.
Scrivener, F.C. A Full Collation of the Codex Sinaiticus with The Received Text of the New Testament. London: Bell and Daldy, 1864.
Sievers, Joseph. “The Ancient Lists of Contents of Josephus’ Antiquities.” In Studies in Josephus and the Varieties of Ancient Judaism, edited by S.J.D. Cohen and J.J. Schwartz, 271–292. Leiden: Brill, 2007.
Skeat, T.C. “The Codex Sinaiticus, the Codex Vaticanus and Constantine.” JTS 50.2 (1999): 583–625.
Smith, W.A. “Mark 16 and the Eusebian Apparatus: Greek and Latin Solutions.” COMSt 8.2 (2022): 475–494.
Smith, W.A. “Mining Manuscript Data in the New Testament Virtual Manuscript Room.” Classics@ 18 (2021): online https://classics-at.chs.harvard.edu/classics18-smith/.
Smith, W.A. A Study of the Gospels in Codex Alexandrinus. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
Stein, R.H. “The Ending of Mark.” Bulletin of Biblical Research 18.1 (2008): 79–98.
Streeter, B.H. The Four Gospels: A Study of Origins. London: McMillan and Co., 1930.
Strutwolf, Holger, et al., eds. Novum Testamentum Graecum: Editio Critica Maior. Series I, Volume II: The Gospel of Mark. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2021–2022.
Taylor, D. “The Endings of the Gospel of Mark in Syriac Witnesses.” COMSt 8.2 (2022): 513–540.
Verheyden, J. “A Puzzling Chapter in the Reception History of the Gospels: Victor of Antioch and His So-called Commentary on Mark.” Studia Patristica 63 (2013): 17–27.
Vinzent, Markus. Resetting the Origins of Christianity: A New Theory of Sources and Beginnings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.
von Soden, Hermann. Die Schriften des Neuen Testaments in ihrer ältesten erreichbaren Textgestalt hergestellt auf Grund ihrer Textgeschichte, vol. 1, pt. 1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1911.
von Tischendorf, Constantin. Novum Testamentum Vaticanum. Leipzig: Giesecke & Devrient, 1867.
Wallace, Daniel B. “Mark 16:8 as the Conclusion to the Second Gospel.” In Perspectives on the Ending of Mark, 4 Views, edited by D.A. Black, 16–29. Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2008.
Wallraff, M. Die Kanontafeln des Euseb von Kaisareia. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021.
Wasserman, T. “The Text and Paratext of Family 1 in Mark 16.” COMSt 8.2 (2022): 345–364.
Wasserman, T. “Greek New Testament Manuscripts in Sweden with an Excursus on the Jerusalem Colophon.” Svensk exegetisk årsbok 75 (2010): 77–108.
Wasserman, T., and Conrad Thorup Elmelund, “New Light on the Marginalia of Family 1 in the Synoptic Gospels.” In Intersection: Interdisciplinary Approaches to New Testament Text and Manuscript Studies, edited by Daniel B. Wallace and Denis L. Salgado, 137–150. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2025.
Welsby, A.S. A Textual Study of Family 1 in the Gospel of John. Diss. University of Birmingham, 2011.
Westlake, H.D. “ΛΕΓΕΤΑΙ in Thucydides.” Mnemosyne 30.4 (1977): 345–362.
Williams, C.R. “The Appendices to the Gospel According to Mark.” Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 18 (1915): 347–447.
Williams, P.J. “The Syriac Versions of the New Testament.” In The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research, edited by B. Ehrman and M. Holmes, 143–166. Leiden: Brill, 2013.
Wilson, N. “The Autograph of Nicephorus Callistus Xanthopoulos.” JTS 25 (1974): 437–442.
Wisse, F. The Profile Method for Classifying and Evaluating Manuscript Evidence. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1982.
Wolska-Conus, W., tr. and ed. Cosmas Indicopleustès: Topographie chrétienne. SC 141–143. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1968–1973.
Wordsworth, J. Portions of the Gospels according to St. Mark and St. Matthew. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1886.
Wright, W. Catalogue of the Syriac Manuscripts at the British Museum Acquired Since the Year 1838. London: Trustees of the British Museum, 1870.
Yang, J. Other Endings of Mark as Responses to Mark. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield, 2004. Available here: https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/3555/.
Yi, An-Ting. From Erasmus to Maius: The History of Codex Vaticanus in New Testament Textual Scholarship. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2024.
Yohanna, S.S. The Gospel of Mark in the Syriac Harklean Version. Rome: Gregorian Biblical Press, 2015.
Zahn, T. Introduction to the New Testament, vol. 2. Translated by J.M. Trout et al. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1909.
Zika, C. “Reuchlin’s De Verbo Mirifico and the Magic Debate of the Late Fifteenth Century.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 39 (1976): 104–138.
Zola, N.J. “The Ending of Mark in Tatian’s Diatessaron.” COMSt 8.2 (2022): 439–474
Zola, N.J. Tatian’s Diatessaron in Latin: A New Edition and Translation of Codex Fuldensis. PhD diss., Baylor University, 2014. Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2104/9121.
Zuurmond, R. Novum Testamentum Aethiopice: The Synoptic Gospels, parts 1 and 2. ÄF 27. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1989.
Zuurmond, R., and C. Niccum. “The Ethiopic Version of the New Testament.” In The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis, edited by B. Ehrman and M.W. Holmes, 231–252. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
Zuntz, G. The Ancestry of the Harklean New Testament. London: Oxford University Press, 1945.