Save

Smuggled Migrants as Victims?

Reflecting on the UN Protocol against Migrant Smuggling and on Its Implementation

In: Brill Research Perspectives in Transnational Crime
Author:
Alessandro Spena
Search for other papers by Alessandro Spena in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

Abstract

After outlining the UN Protocol’s general approach to migrant smuggling, this article raises the question of whether and to what extent smuggled migrants can be said to be victims of this crime. The author argues that an affirmative answer is possible in at least three different respects: smuggled migrants can be victimized by states fighting against migrant smuggling and irregular immigration (secondary victimization); but, of course, they can also be victimized by smugglers (primary victimization), in two ways: first, if smuggling is so performed as to put their lives, physical integrity or dignity at risk; secondly, smugglers also victimize migrants by profiting of their vulnerable condition, and their need to enter a foreign country, in order to gain economic benefit.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 855 195 11
Full Text Views 24 4 0
PDF Views & Downloads 56 12 0