Doxa and EpistÄmÄ in Platoâs Theaetetus and Aristotleâs Posterior Analytics

Walter Cavini

Jump to Content

Chapter 14 Doxa and EpistÄmÄ in Platoâs Theaetetus and Aristotleâs Posterior Analytics

äºNew Explorations in Plato's Theaetetus

èèï¼

Walter Cavini

Walter Cavini
Search for other papers by Walter Cavini in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

ç±»å:: ç« è

Page Range:: 307â324

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004516014_016

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

â¬42.00â¬35.00Â excl. VAT

Add to Cart

æ¾åè®¿é®ä»¤ç

Abstract

Platoâs Theaetetus and Aristotleâs Posterior Analytics are the two greatest works that antiquity has handed down to us concerning the problem of knowledge and of scientific knowledge in particular. The two works probably date to much the same period. In the first part of this essay I examine a chapter of the Posterior Analytics (I 33) in which Aristotle establishes a clear difference between epistÄmÄ and doxa, and between their respective objects, implicitly rejecting the third definition of epistÄmÄ that we find in the Theaetetus, according to which epistÄmÄ is a kind of doxa. For Aristotle, instead, epistÄmÄ and doxa are two species of the genus hypolÄpsis, where âhypolÄpsisâ is a new technical term introduced by Aristotle to designate simply holding something to be true and can be translated with âbeliefâ, while doxa is a mere opinion, that is, believing something to be true without knowing it. In this way it is clear that, for Aristotle, knowledge cannot be an opinion. In the second part, I examine the Aristotelian definitions of knowing in the Posterior Analytics (I 2) and in the Physics (I 1), noting that they are in fact circular. My conclusion is quite skeptical: Aristotle is simply telling us that scientific knowledge, whatever it might be, is knowledge of causes, and this is something that he takes over already starting with Platoâs Gorgias and Meno. But, at the end of the day, we do not have an explicit, non-circular, definition of epistÄmÄ neither in Plato nor in Aristotle.

å¼ç¨ä¿¡æ¯

Save
Cite
Email this content

Share Link

Copy this link, or click below to email it to a friend
Email this content
or copy the link directly:

https://brill.edhh.ma/abstract/book/9789004516014/BP000023.xml
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.

Link copied successfully

New Explorations in Plato's Theaetetus

Belief, Knowledge, Ontology, Reception

ä¸ç¼ï¼ Brill's Plato Studies Series, å·ï¼ 10

Cover New Explorations in Plato's <i>Theaetetus</i>

ISBN:: 9789004516014

åºçç¤¾:: Brill

å°å·åºçæ¥æ:: 13 May 2022

Subjects
- Classical Studies
  - Ancient Philosophy
- Philosophy

Front Matter

Section 1 The Theaetetus and Plato

Section 2 Relativism between Ontology and Epistemology

Section 3 Maieutics, Sophistry, Philosophy

Section 4 Images of the Cognitive Soul

Section 5 Belief, Knowledge, Ontology

Section 6 The Theaetetus beyond Plato

Back Matter

ç»è®¡æ°æ®

	å¨é¨æé´	è¿å»ä¸å¹´	è¿å»30å¤©
æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ°	850	319	26
å¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ°	25	9	1
PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ°	34	7	0

African Studies	Education	Media Studies
American Studies	History	Middle East and Islamic Studies
Ancient Near East and Egypt	Human Rights and Humanitarian Law	Musicology
Art History	International Law	Philosophy
Asian Studies	International Relations	Religious Studies
Biblical Studies	Jewish Studies	Slavic and Eurasian Studies
Biology	Languages and Linguistics	Social Sciences
Book History and Cartography	Life Sciences	Theology and World Christianity
Classical Studies	Literature and Cultural Studies

Subjects

AppBar-Authors 2025

AppBar-Open Access 2025

AppBar-Product Information 2025

AppBar-Company 2025

AppBar-Contact 2025

Chapter 14 Doxa and EpistÄmÄ in Platoâs Theaetetus and Aristotleâs Posterior Analytics

Abstract

å¼ç¨ä¿¡æ¯

Share Link