Neo-Liberal, State-Capitalist and Ordo-Liberal Conceptions of World Trade: The Rise and Fall of the WTO Dispute Settlement System

Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann

Neo-Liberal, State-Capitalist and Ordo-Liberal Conceptions of World Trade: The Rise and Fall of the WTO Dispute Settlement System

In: Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs, Volume 38, 2020

Author:

Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann

Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann Emeritus Professor of International and European Law and former head of the Law Department at the European University Institute, Florence, Italy. Former legal advisor in the German Ministry of Economic Affairs, GATTand the WTO; former secretary, member or chairman of GATTand WTOdispute settlement panels. The author was secretary of the Uruguay Round Negotiating Group 13 that elaborated the WTODispute Settlement Understanding (1987–1993). He chaired the International Trade Law Committee of the International Law Association from 1999 to 2014. ulrich.petersmann@eui.eu.

Search for other papers by Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

Type:: Chapter

Pages:: 1–41

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501638_002

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€42.00€35.00 excl. VAT

Add to Cart

Redeem Access Token

Abstract

This contribution begins with an overview of the historical evolution of international trade leading to, today, five competing conceptions of international economic regulation (section I). The more some areas of trade regulation (like trade remedies, subsidies, internet services, intellectual property rights, appellate review) became dominated by business-driven, neo-liberal interest-group politics (section II), or are circumvented by non-transparent practices of state-capitalism and state-owned enterprises (section III), the less successful have the “regulatory functions” of the World Trade Organization (WTO) become. From the entry into force of the WTO Agreement in 1995 up to 2020, the more than 420 WTO panel, appellate and arbitration findings – similar to the, by now, more than 1,020 publicly known investor-state arbitration (ISA) cases and related national court decisions (e.g., enforcing ISA awards) – protected higher degrees of transnational rule-of-law in worldwide trade and investment relations than in any previous period (section IV). Compared with rule-of-law among the 30 member states of the European Economic Area, however, ordo-liberal European economic constitutionalism has limited market failures, governance failures and rule-of-law deficits through more comprehensive judicial remedies and “constitutional methods” than in neo-liberal and state-capitalist economies (section V). Since 2017, the hegemonic US assault on the WTO legal and dispute settlement system has disrupted WTO appellate review by re-introducing power politics (section VI). Similar to the criticism of neo-liberal “investor biases” in commercial ISA, some WTO Appellate Body judges from the USA revealed political biases in support of neo-liberal, US trade policies (section VII). Justice, democratic constitutionalism and rule-of-law require protecting impartial WTO third-party adjudication as a precondition for rules-based, multilevel governance protecting global public goods like “sustainable development,” climate change mitigation, poverty reduction and public health for the benefit of citizens and their human rights, yet with due respect for legitimately diverse “constitutional pluralism” (section VIII).

Citation Info

Save
Cite
Email this content

Share link with colleague or librarian

You can email a link to this page to a colleague or librarian:
Email this content
or copy the link directly:

https://brill.edhh.ma/abstract/book/9789004501638/BP000008.xml
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.

Link copied successfully

Collapse
Expand

Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs, Volume 38, 2020

Series: Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs, Volume: 38

E-Book ISBN:: 9789004501638

Publisher:: Brill | Nijhoff

Print Publication Date:: 14 Dec 2021

Subjects
- International Law
  - Public International Law
  - International Commercial, Trade & Investment Law
- International Relations
  - International Relations

Front Matter

Articles

Special Reports

Book Review

Back Matter

Metrics

	All Time	Past 365 days	Past 30 Days
Abstract Views	807	208	19
Full Text Views	25	3	1
PDF Views & Downloads	53	4	2

African Studies	Education	Media Studies
American Studies	History	Middle East and Islamic Studies
Ancient Near East and Egypt	Human Rights and Humanitarian Law	Musicology
Art History	International Law	Philosophy
Asian Studies	International Relations	Religious Studies
Biblical Studies	Jewish Studies	Slavic and Eurasian Studies
Biology	Languages and Linguistics	Social Sciences
Book History and Cartography	Life Sciences	Theology and World Christianity
Classical Studies	Literature and Cultural Studies

Subjects

Authors

Open Access

Product Information

Company

Contact

Neo-Liberal, State-Capitalist and Ordo-Liberal Conceptions of World Trade: The Rise and Fall of the WTO Dispute Settlement System

Abstract

Citation Info

Share link with colleague or librarian

Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs, Volume 38, 2020

Table of Contents

Metrics

Metrics