Control Council Law No. 10 Cases
United States of America v Alstötter et al. (‘the Justice Case’), Opinion and Judgment (4 December 1947), Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Volume III (Washington DC, US Government Printing Office, 1946–1949); 353
Domestic Cases
Canada
R v Levogiannis, [1993] 4 SCR 475 (18 November 1993); 282, 347
RDS v The Queen, [1997] 3 SCR 484 (27 September 1997); 152, 180
Wewaykum Indian Band v Canada, [2003] 2 SCR 259 (26 September 2003); 154
Germany
Judgment in Case of Lieutenants Dithmar and Boldt, Hospital Ship ‘Llandovery Castle’, 16 July 1921, (1922) 16 American Journal of International Law 674; 225
South Africa
President of the Republic of South Africa and Others v. South African Rugby Football Union and Others, Judgement on Recusal Application, 7 BCLR 725 (CC) (3 June 1999); 123
United Kingdom
DPP v Ottewell [1970] AC 642; 530
Knuller v DPP [1973] AC 435; 534
Oxford v Moss (1979) 68 Cr App R 183; 529
R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy [1924] 1 KB 256; 116
R v Gough [1993] AC 646; 116
R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendary Magistrate ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2) [2000] 1 AC 119; 155
Tuck and Sons v Priester (1887) 19 QBD 629; 529
Trial of Erich Heyer and six others, British Military Court for the Trial of War Criminals, Essen, 1945, UNWCC, vol i; 411
United States of America
Nielsen v Johnson (1929) 279 US 41; 262
State of New York v United States (1951) 342 US 822; 306
Tehan v United States, (1966) 383 US 406; 282, 347
European Court of Human Rights
Albayrak v Turkey (App 38406/97), 31 January 2008; 195
Baka v Hungary (App 20261/12), 27 May 2014; 195
Buscemi v Italy, (Judgment) Application No. 29569/95 (16 September 1999); 173
CR v United Kingdom, (App 20190/92), 22 November 1995, (1995) 21 EHRR 363; 534
De Cubber v Belgium, (App 9186/80), 26 October 1984, (1985) 7 EHHR 236; 125, 128
Delcourt v Belgium, (App 2689/65), 17 January 1970, (1970) 1 EHHR 355; 116
Ferrantelli and Santangelo v Italy, (Judgment) Application No. 19874/92 (7 August 1996); 173
Findlay v United Kingdom, (App 22107/93), 25 February 1997, (1997) 24 EHHR 221; 120
Golder v UK, (App 4451/70), 21 February 1975, (1975) 1 EHRR 524; 365
Harabin v Slovakia (App 58688/11), 20 November 2012; 195
Hauschildt v Denmark, (App 10486/83), 24 May 1989, (1990) 12 EHHR 266; 128, 148
Kayasu v Turkey (App 64119/00 and 76292/01), 13 November 2008; 195
Kokkinakis v Greece (App 14307/88), 25 May 1993, (1994) 17 EHRR 397; 534
Kudeshkina v Russia (App 29492/05), 26 February 2009; 195
Kyprianou v Cyprus, (Judgment) Application No. 73797/01 (15 December 2005); 173
Le Compte, Van Leuven and de Meyere v Belgium, (App 6878/75 and 7238/75), 27 May 1981, (1982) 4 EHRR 1; 125
Miminoshvili v Russia (Judgment) Application No. 20197/03 (28 June 2011); 173
Piersack v Belgium, (App 8692/79), 1 October 1982, (1983) 5 EHHR 169; 125, 128
Poppe v The Netherlands (Judgment) Application No. 32271/04 (24 March 2009); 172-173, 175, 179-180
Rojas Morales v Italy, (Judgment) Application No. 39676/98 (16 November 2000); 173
Schwarzenberger v Germany, (Judgment) Application No. 75737/01 (10 August 2006); 173
Thomann v Switzerland, (Judgment) Application No. 17602/91 (10 June 1996); 173
Wille v Liechtenstein (App 28396/95), 28 October 1999, (2000) 30 EHRR 558; 195
European Commission on Human Rights
Golder v United Kingdom, Report of the European Commission on Human Rights, No 4451/70, ECHR Series B No 16, (1 June 1973); 230
Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia
Prosecutor v Nuon-Chea and Khieu Samphan (Decision of the JAC regarding appointing a national reserve Judge following disqualification motion against Judge Pen Pichsaly) E314/4/3 (10 October 2014); 132
Prosecutor v Nuon Chea, Ieng Thirith, Ieng Sary and Khieu Samphan (Decision on the Applicability of Joint Criminal Enterprise) 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/TC (12 September 2011); 425
Prosecutor v Nuon Chea and Khieu Samphan (Appeal Judgement) 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/SC (23 November 2016); 425-426
Prosecutor v Ieng Thirith, Ieng Sary and Khieu Samphan (Decision on the Appeals Against the Co-Investigating Judges Order on Joint Criminal Enterprise) 002/19-09-2007-ECCC/OCIJ (PTC38) (20 May 2010); 424
Prosecutor v. Kaing Guek Eav (Notification of Recusal of Judge Ney Thol) D99/3/20 (13 October 2008); 136
Prosecutor v Kaing Guek Eav alias “Duch” (Amicus Curiae Brief Submitted by the Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism, McGill University) 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/OCIJ (PTC 02) (27 October 2008); 423
Prosecutor v Kaing Guek Eav alias “Duch” (Amicus Curiae Brief Submitted by Professor Antonio Cassese and Members of the Journal of International Criminal Justice on Joint Criminal Enterprise Doctrine) 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/OCIJ (PTC 02) (27 October 2008); 423
Prosecutor v Kaing Guek Eav alias “Duch” (Amicus Curiae Brief Submitted by Professor Kai Ambos) 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/OCIJ (PTC 02) (27 October 2008); 424
Co-Prosecutor v Nuon Chea et al. (Decision on Application for Disqualification of Judge Silvia Cartwright) Case No. 002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC (9 March 2012); 169
Co-Prosecutors v. Nuon Chea et al. (Reasons for Decision on Applications for Disqualification) Case No. 002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC (30 January 2015); 176
Co-Prosecutors v. Nuon Chea et al. (Reasons for Decision on Applications for Disqualification – Partially Dissenting Opinion of Judge Rowan Downing) Case No. 002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC (30 January 2015); 177
Human Rights Committee
Alvo O Karttunen v Finland, Communication No. 387/1989, UN Doc CCPR/C/46?D/387/1989, 5 November 1992; 119
Miguel Gonzalez de Rio v Peru, Communication No. 263/1987, UN Doc CCPR/46/D/263/1987, 2 November 1992; 116
International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes
Eron Creditors Recovery Corporation (formerly Enron Corporation) and Ponderosa Assets, L.P. v Argentine REpublic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13 (Decision on the application for annulment of the Argentine Republic) (30 June 2010); 92
International Company for Railway Systems (ICRS) v Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/13; 92
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Barbera et al. v Venezuela (2008) Series C, No 182, Judgment of 5 August 2008; 128
Ivcher Bronstein v Peru (Competence) (1999) Series C, No 54, Judgment of 24 September 1999; 326
Palamara-Iribarne v Chile (2005) Series C, No 135, Judgment of 22 November 2005; 128
International Criminal Court
Presidency (Decision on the Request to be Excused from the Exercise of Judicial Function in Pre-Trial Chamber iii) ICC-01/05-9-Anx1 and ICC-01/05-9-Anx2 (22 April 2008); 141
Presidency (Decision on Request to be Excused from the Exercise of Judicial Functions in Trial Chamber ii, Pursuant to Article 41 of the Rome Statute) ICC-01/04-01/07-1503-Anx2 (30 September 2009); 141
Presidency (Decision on the Request for Excusal From All Pending and Future Proceedings in The Prosecutor v Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, Aimé Kilolo Musamba, Jean-Jacques Mangenda Kabongo, Fidèle Babala Wandu and Narcisse Arido) ICC-2015/PRES/00161-02 (19 May 2015); 138
Prosecutor v Abu Garda (Decision on the Confirmation of Charges) ICC-02/05-02/09-243-Red (8 February 2010); 481, 502, 522
Prosecutor v Al-Bashir (Decision on the Prosecution’s Application for a Warrant of Arrest Against Omar Hassan Ahmad Al-Bashir) ICC-02/05-01/09-3 (4 March 2009); 481, 485, 506, 538-539
Prosecutor v Al-Bashir (Corrigendum to the Decision Pursuant to Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the Failure by the Republic of Malawi to Comply with the Cooperation Requests Issued by the Court with Respect to the Arrest and Surrender of Omar Hassan Ahmad Al-Bashir) ICC-02/05-01/09 (13 December 2011); 506-507
Prosecutor v Al-Bashir (Decision Pursuant to Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the Refusal of the Republic of Chad to Comply with the Cooperation Requests Issued by the Court with Respect to the Arrest and Surrender of Omar Hassan Ahmad Al-Bashir) ICC-02/05-01/09-140-tENG (13 December 2011); 506-507
Prosecutor v Al-Bashir (Decision on the Request of Judge Monageng to be Excused from the Exercise of Judicial Functions in the Appeals Chamber Pursuant to Article 41 of the Rome Statute) ICC-01/11-01/11-118-Anx2, Presidency (19 April 2012); 138, 140
Prosecutor v Al-Bashir (Decision on the Cooperation of the Democratic Republic of the Congo Regarding Omar Al-Bashir’s Arrest and Surrender to the Court) ICC-02/05-01/09-195 (9 April 2014); 509
Prosecutor v Al-Bashir (Decision Under Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the Non-Compliance by South Africa with the Request by the Court for the Arrest and Surrender of Omar Al-Bashir) ICC-02/05-01/09-302 (6 July 2017); 510
Prosecutor v Al-Bashir (Decision Under Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the Non-Compliance by Jordan with the Request by the Court for the Arrest and Surrender or Omar Al Bashir) ICC-02/05-01/09-309 (11 December 2017); 506, 510
Prosecutor v Al-Bashir (Decision on Jordan’s Request for Leave to Appeal) ICC-02/05-01/09-319 (21 February 2018); 511
Prosecutor v Al-Bashir (Judgment in the Jordan Referral re Al Bashir) ICC-02/05-01/09-397-Corr (6 May 2019); 511
Prosecutor v Al-Bashir (Judgment in the Jordan Referral re Al Bashir – Joint Concurring Opinion of Judges Eboe-Osuji, Morrison, Hofmański and Bossa) ICC-02/05-01/09-397-Anx1 (6 May 2019); 512
Prosecutor v Al Bashir, (Judgment in the Jordan Referral re Al Bashir Appeal) ICC-02/05-01/09-397-Corr (17 May 2019); 495, 506
Prosecutor v Al Hassan (Public Redacted Version of the Request for the Disqualification of Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut) ICC-01/12-01/18-376-Red (18 June 2019); 202
Prosecutor v Al Hassan (Observations by Judge Perrin de Brichambaut on the ‘Request for the Disqualification of Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut’) ICC-01/12-01/18–382 (24 June 2019); 201, 203
Prosecutor v Al Hassan (Decision of the Plenary of Judges on the Defence Application for the Disqualification of Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut from the case The Prosecutor v Al Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Ag Mohamed Ag Mahmoud) ICC-01/12-01/18-398-AnxI (8 July 2019); 204
Prosecutpr v Al Hassan (Decision on the Plenary of Judges on the Defence Application for the Disqualification of Judges of the Pre-Trial Chamber I from the case of The Prosecutor v Al Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Ag Mohamed Ag Mahmoud) ICC-01/12-01/18-458-Anxl-Red (12 September 2019); 194
Prosecutor v Al Mahdi, (Judgment and Sentence) ICC-01/12-01/15–171 (27 September 2016); 502-503
Prosecutor v Bemba (Decision Adjourning the Hearing Pursuant to Article 61(7)(c)(ii) of the Rome Statute) ICC-01/05-01/08 (3 March 2009); 469
Prosecutor v Bemba (Decision on the Admissibility and Abuse of Process Challenges) ICC-01/05-01/08-802 (24 June 2010); 520
Prosecutor v Bemba (Decision Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute on the Charges of the Prosecutor Against Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo) ICC-01/05-01/08-424 (15 June 2009); 469, 481, 493, 535, 537-538
Prosecutor v Bemba (Fourth Decision on Victims’ Participation) ICC-01/05-01/08-320 (12 December 2008); 521
Prosecutor v Bemba (Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute) ICC-01/05-01/08-3343 (21 March 2016); 492, 500, 504
Prosecutor v Bemba (Judgment on the Appeal of Mr Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo Against the Decision of Trial Chamber III of 28 July 2010 entitled ‘Decision on the Review of the Detention of Mr Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo Pursuant to Rule 118(2) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence’) ICC-01/05-01/08-1019 (19 November 2010); 470
Prosecutor v Bemba (Judgment on the appeal of Mr Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo against Trial Chamber iii’s “Judgment pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute”) ICC-01/05-01/08-3636-Red (8 June 2018); 495
Prosecutor v Bemba (Dissenting Opinion of Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng and Judge Pitor Hofmanski) ICC-01/05-01/08-3636-Anx1-Red (8 June 2018); 496
Prosecutor v Bemba et al. (Decision of the Plenary of Judges on the Defence Applications for the Disqualification of Judge Cuno Tarfusser from the case of The Prosecutor v Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, Aimé Kilolo Musamba, Jean-Jacques Mangenda Kabongo, Fidèle Babala Wandu and Narcisse Arido) ICC-01/05-01/13-511-Anx (26 June 2014); 166, 169
Prosecutor v Banda and Jerbo (Corrigendum of the Decision on the Confirmation of Charges) ICC-02/05-03/09-121-Corr-Red (7 March 2011); 481
Prosecutor v Banda and Jerbo (Decision on the Joint Submissions Regarding the Contested Issues and Agreed Facts) ICC-02/05-03/09 (28 September 2011); 338
Prosecutor v Banda and Jerbo (Decision of the Plenary of the Judges on the ‘Defence Request for the Disqualification of a Judge of 2 April 2012) ICC-02/05-03/09 (5 June 2012); 121, 194
Prosecutor v Chui (Order on the Implementation of the Cooperation Agreement Between the Court and the Democratic Republic of the Congo Concluded Pursuant to Article 93(7) of the Statute) ICC-01/04-02/12–158 (20 January 2014); 525
Prosecutor v Gaddafi and Al-Senussi (Judgment on the Appeal of Mr Abdullah Al-Senussi Against the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I of 11 October 2013 Entitled ‘Decision on the Admissibility of the Case Against Abdullah Al-Senussi) ICC-01/11-01/11–565 (24 July 2014); 526
Prosecutor v. Gbagbo and Blé Goudé (Transcript) ICC-02/11-01/15-T-234-ENG ET WT 16-01-2019 1–6 SZ T (16 January 2019); 340
Prosecutor v Gbagbo and Blé Goudé (Judgment on the Prosecutor’s Appeal Against the Oral Decision of Trial Chamber I Pursuant to Article 81(3)(c)(i) of the Statute) ICC-01/11-01/15-1251-Red2 (21 February 2019); 519
Prosecutor v Gbagbo and Blé Goudé (Reasons for oral decision of 15 January 2019 on the Requête de la Défense de Laurent Gbagbo afin qu’un jugement d’acquittement portant sur toutes les charges soit prononcé en faveur de Laurent Gbagbo et que sa mise en liberté immédiate soit ordonnée) ICC-02/11-01/15–1263 (16 July 2019); 340
Prosecutor v Gbagbo and Blé Goudé (Reasons for the authroisation of victim participation in the Interlocutory Appeals) ICC-02/11-01/15-171 (31 July 2015); 492
Prosecutor v Katanga (Decision on Request to be Excused from the Exercise of Judicial Functions in Trial Chamber II, Pursuant to Article 41 of the Rome Statute) ICC-01/04-01/07-1503=Anx2 (30 September 2009); 141
Prosecutor v Katanga (Decision on the Application for the Interim Release of Detained Witnesses DRC-D02-P-0236, DRC-D02-P-0228 and DRC-D02-P-0350) ICC-01/04-01/07-3405-tENG (1 October 2013); 524
Prosecutor v Katanga (Jugement Rendu en Application de l’Article 74 du Statut) ICC-01/04-01/07-3426 (7 March 2014) ; 483, 500, 504, 531
Prosecutor v. Katanga (Requête sollicitant la récusation de Mme la juge C. Van den Wyngaert) ICC-1/04-01/07-3847 (30 May 2014); 133
Prosecutor v Katanga (Decision of the Plenary of Judges on the Application of the Legal Representative for Victims for the Disqualification of Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert from the Case of The Prosecutor v Germain Katanga), ICC-01/04-01/07-3504-Anx, Plenary (22 July 2014); 128-129, 133
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal by the Defence of Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui Against the Decision on Joinder) ICC-01/04-01/07-384 (9 April 2008); 469, 485, 535
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Decision on Article 54(3)(e) Documents Identified as Potentially Exculpatory or Otherwise Material to the Defence’s Preparation for the Confirmation Hearing) ICC-01/04-01/07-621 (20 June 2008); 494
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Decision on Confirmation of Charges) ICC-01/04-01/07-717 (30 September 2008); 469, 478, 480-481, 485, 493, 502-503, 538
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Decision on the Implementation of Regulation 55 of the Regulations of the Court and Severing the Charges Against the Accused Persons) ICC-01/04-01/07 (21 November 2012); 339, 344, 521
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Decision on the Implementation of Regulation 55 of the Regulations of the Court and Severing the Charges Against the Accused Persons, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert) ICC-01/04-01/07 (21 November 2012); 344, 521
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Decision on the Joinder of the Cases Against Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui) ICC-01/04-01/07-257 (10 March 2008); 469, 515
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Decision on the Set of Procedural Rights Attached to the Procedural Status of Victims at the Pre-Trial Stage of the Case) ICC-01/04-01/07-475 (13 May 2008); 515-516
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Defence for Germain Katanga’s Additional Observations on Victims’ Participation and Scope Thereof) ICC-01/04-01/07 (10 November 2009); 339
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Judgment on the Appeal Against the Decision on Joinder Rendered on 10 March 2008 by the Pre-Trial Chamber in the Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui Cases) ICC-01/04-01/07-573 (9 June 2008); 470, 536
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Judgment on the Appeal of Mr Germain Katanga against the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I entitled ‘Decision on the Defence Request Concerning Languages’) ICC-01/04-01/07-522 (28 May 2008); 470, 473
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Judgment on the Appeal of Mr Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui Against the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I entitled ‘Decision on the Prosecution Request for Authorisation to Redact Statements of Witnesses 4 and 9’) ICC-01/04-01/07-521 (27 May 2008); 469
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Judgment on the Appeal of the Prosecutor against the Decision of Trial Chamber i entitled ‘Decision on the Consequences of Non-Disclosure of Exculpatory Materials Covered by Article 54(3)(e) Agreements and the Application to Stay the Prosecution of the Accused, Together with Certain Other Issues Raised at the Status Conference on 10 June 2008’) ICC-01/04-01/06-1486 (21 October 2008); 470
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Decision on the Treatment of Application for Participation) ICC-01/04-01/07-933 (26 February 2009); 522
Prosecutor v Katanga and Chui (Decision on the Request of First Vice President Diarra and Second Vice President Kaul to be Excused from the Presidency in Relation to the “Defence Application for Review of the Registrar’s Decision of 10 June 2009 entitled Third Decision of the Registrar on the Monitoring of Non-privileged Telephone Communications and Visits of Mr Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui”) ICC-RoR221-04/09-2-Conf-Exp-Anx2 (17 December 2009); 138
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Decision on the Request of 16 February 2010 to be Excused from Sitting in the Appeal of Mr Germain Katanga Against the Decision of Trial Chamber ii of 20 November 2009 and From Sitting in All Future Appeals Arising in the Case of The Prosecutor v Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, Pursuant to Article 41(1) of the Statute and Rule 33 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence) ICC-01/04-01/07-1949-Anx2, Presidency (8 March 2010); 139
Prosecutor v Katanga and Chui (Decision on an Amicus Curiae Application on the ‘Requête Tendant á Obtenir Présentations des Témoins DRC-D02-P-0350, DRC-D02-P-0236, DRC-D02-P-0228 aux Autorités Néerlandaises aux Fins d’Asile’ (Articles 68 and 93(7) of the Statute)) ICC-01/04-01/07-3003-tENG (9 June 2011) ; 523
Prosecutor v Katanga and Ngudjolo Chui (Judgment on the Appeal of Germain Katanga Against the Decision of Trial Chamber II of 21 November 2012 Entitled ‘Decision on the Implementation of Regulation 55 of the Regulations of the Court and Severing the Charges Against the Accused Persons’) ICC-01/04-01/07-3363 (27 March 2013); 521
Prosecutor v Kenyatta et al. (Decision on Prosecution’s Application for a Further Adjournment) ICC-01/09-02/11 (3 December 2014); 341
Prosecutor v Kenyatta et al. (Decision on Prosecution’s Applications for Finding of Non-Compliance Pursuant to Article 87(7) and for an Adjournment of the Provisional Trial Date) ICC-01/09-02/11 (31 March 2014); 341
Prosecutor v Kenyatta et al. (Decision on the Confirmation of Charges Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute) ICC-01/09-02/11-382-Red (23 January 2012); 481
Prosecutor v Kenyatta et al. (Decision on the Renewed Request for Withdrawal from the Case of The Prosecutor v Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta) ICC-01/09-02/11-890-Anx1, Presidency (20 January 2014); 142
Prosecutor v Kenyatta et al. (Decision on Victims’ Participation at the Confirmation of Charges Hearing and in the Related Proceedings) ICC-01/09-02/11–267 (26 August 2011); 521
Prosecutor v Kony et al. (Decision on the Admissibility of the Case under Article 19(1) of the Statute) ICC-02/04-01/05-377 (10 March 2009); 498
Prosecutor v Kony et al. (Decision on the Prosecutor’s Position on the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber ii to Redact Factual Descriptions of Crimes in the Warrants of Arrest, Motion for Reconsideration, and Motion for Clarification) ICC-02/04-01/05-60 (28 October 2005); 497
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision Establishing General Principles Governing Applications to Restrict Disclosure Pursuant to Rule 81(2) and (4) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence) ICC-01/04-01/06-108-Corr (19 May 2006); 515
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision Establishing the Principles and Procedures to be Applied to Reparations) ICC-01/04-01/06-2904 (7 August 2012); 522
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision on the Applications by Victims to Participate in the Proceedings) ICC-01/04-01/06-1556 (15 December 2008); 521
Prosecutor v Lubanga, (Decision on the Confirmation of Charges) ICC-01/04-01/06-803-tEN (29 January 2007); 468, 476-477, 493, 500, 522, 537
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision on the Consequence of Non-Disclosure of Exculpatory Materials Covered by Article 54(3)(e) Agreements and the Application to Stay the Prosecution of the Accused, Together with Certain Other Issues Raised at the Status Conference on 10 June 2008) ICC-01/04-01/06 (13 June 2008); 341
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision on the Final System of Disclosure and the Establishment of a Timetable) ICC-01/04-01/06-102 (15 May 2006); 469
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision on the Practice of Witness Familiarization and Witness Proofing) ICC-01/04-01/06-679 (8 November 2006); 468
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision on the Prosecution Motion for Reconsideration) ICC-01/04-01/06-123 (23 May 2006); 468
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision on the Prosecution Motion for Reconsideration and, in the Alternative, Leave to Appeal) ICC-01/04-01/06-166 (23 June 2006); 468
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision on the Prosecutor’s “Application for Leave to Reply to ‘Conclusions de la défense en réponse au mémoire d’appel du Procureur’ ”) ICC-01/04-01/06-424 (12 September 2006) ; 467
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Judgment on Appeal Against Oral Disclosure) ICC-01/04-01/06-1433 (11 July 2008); 498
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision on the Request of 16 September 2009 to be Excused from Sitting in the Appeals Against the Decision of Trial Chamber I of 14 July 2009 in the Case of The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Pursuant to Article 41(1) of the Statute and Rule 33 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence) ICC-01/04-01/06 (23 September 2009); 142
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision on the Request of 16 September 2009 to be Excused from Sitting in the Appeals Against the Decision of Trial Chamber I of 14 July 2009 in the Case of The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo Pursuant to Article 41(1) of the Statute and Rule 33 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence) ICC-01/04-01/06-2138-AnxIII, Presidency (13 November 2009); 137
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision of the Plenary of Judges on the Defence Application of 20 February 2013 for the Disqualification of Judge Sang-Hyun Song from the Case of The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo) ICC-01/04-01/06-3040-Anx (11 June 2013); 154-155, 197
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision Regarding the Practices Used to Prepare and Familiarise Witnesses for Giving Testimony at Trial) ICC-01/04-01/06-1049 (11 June 2007); 468, 497
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Judgment on the Appeal of Mr Thomas Lubanga Dyilo Against the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber i entitled “Décision sur la Demande de Mise en Líberté Provisoire de Thomas Lubanga Dyilo”) ICC-01/04-01/06-824 (13 February 2007); 469
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Judgment on the Appeal of Mr Thomas Lubanga Dyilo Against the Decision on the Defence Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court Pursuant to Article 19(2) of the Statute of 3 October 2006) ICC-01/04-01/06 (14 December 2006); 341, 474, 515, 519
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Judgment on the Appeal of the Prosecutor against the Decision of Trial Chamber i entitled “Decision on the Consequences of Non-Disclosure of Exculpatory Materials Covered by Article 54(3)(e) Agreements and the Application to Stay the Prosecution of the Accused, Together with Certain Other Issues Raised at the Status Conference on 10 June 2008”) ICC-01/04-01/06 (21 October 2008); 341
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Judgment on the Appeals of Mr Lubanga Dyilo and the Prosecutor Against the Decision of Trial Chamber i of 14 July 2009 entitled “Decision Giving Notice to the Parties and Participants that the Legal Characterisation of the Facts May be Subject to Change in Accordance with Regulation 55(2) of the Regulations of the Court”) ICC-01/04-01/06 (8 December 2009); 343-344, 520
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Judgment on the Appeals of the Prosecutor and the Defence Against Trial Chamber i’s Decision on Victims’ Participation of 18 January 2008) ICC-01/04-01/06-1432 (11 July 2008); 469
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Prosecution’s Closing Brief) ICC-01/04-01/06-2748-Red (1 June 2011); 471
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Redacted Decision on the “Defence Application Seeking a Permanent Stay of the Proceedings”) ICC-01/04-01/06 (2 March 2011); 341
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Trial Judgment) ICC-01/04-01/06-2842 (14 March 2012); 469, 471-472, 476, 478, 515, 538
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Trial Judgment, Separate and Dissenting Opinion of Judge Odio Benito) ICC-01/04-01/06-2842 (14 March 2012); 472
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Trial Judgment, Separate Opinion of Judge Adrian Fulford) ICC-01/04-01/06-2842 (14 March 2012); 476, 482, 493, 536
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Judgment on the Appeal of Mr Thomas Lubanga Dyilo Against his Conviction) ICC-01/04-01/06-3121-Red (1 December 2014); 494-495
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Corrected Version of the ‘Decision Setting the Size of Reparations Award for which Thomas Lubanga Dyilo is Liable’) ICC-01/04-01/06-3379-Red-Corr-tENG (21 December 2017); 197
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Version Publique Expurgée de la Requête Urgente de la Défense aux Fins de Récusation de M le Juge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut Déposée le 10 Avril 2019) ICC-01/04-01/06-3451-Red (10 April 2019); 200
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Annex i to Requête Urgente de la Défense aux Fins de Récusation de M le Juge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut) ICC-01/04-01/06-3451-Anx1 (10 April 2019); 197-200
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Réponse du Juge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut à la Requête Urgente de la Défense aux Fins de Récusation de M le Juge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut Déposée le 10 Avril 2019) ICC-01/04-01/06-3453-Anx3 (20 May 2019) ; 200
Prosecutor v Lubanga (Decision of the Plenary of Judges on the Defence Application for the Disqualification of Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut from the Case The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo) ICC-01/04-01/06-3459-Anx (28 June 2019); 200-201
Prosecutor v Mbarushimana (Decision on the Request of Judge Ekaterina Trendafilova of 16 March 2012 to be Excused from Participating in the Appeal ‘OA4’ in the Case of The Prosecutor v Mbarushimana, Pursuant to Article 41 of the Rome Statute and Rules 33 and 35 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence) ICC-01/04-01/10-503-AnxII, Presidency (21 March 2012); 139
Prosecutor v Mbarushimana (Defence Response to the Prosecution’s Document in Support of the Appeal) ICC-01/04-01/10-508-tENG (2 April 2012); 535
Prosecutor v Muthaura, Kenyatta, and Ali (Decision on the Request to Make Oral Submissions) ICC-01/09-02/11-421 (1 May 2012); 513
Prosecutor v. Muthaura, Kenyatta & Ali (Judgment on Kenya’s Appeal on the Admissibility of the Case) ICC-01/09-02/11-274 OA (30 August 2011); 494
Prosecutor v Ngudjolo Chui (Trial Judgment, Concurring Opinion of Judge Christine Van den Wyngaert) ICC-01/04-02/12-4 (18 December 2012); 476, 480, 483, 518
Prosecutor v Ngudjolo (Judgment on the Prosecutor’s Appeal against the Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute) ICC-01/04-02/12-271-Corr A (7 April 2015); 494
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Decision on the Request of Judge Akua Kuenyehia of 18 February 2010 to be Excused from Participating in the Exercise to Reclassify Documents in the Appeals Proceedings Related to the Case of The Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda and in All Appeals in the Case) ICC-01/04-584-Anx4, Presidency (11 November 2010); 139
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Decision on Request to be Excused from the Exercise of Judicial Functions in the Case of The Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda, Pursuant to Article 41 of the Rome Statute) ICC-01/04-02/06-162-Anx2, Presidency (4 December 2013); 138
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Decision Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute on the Charges of the Prosecutor Against Bosco Ntaganda) ICC-01/04-02/06-309 (9 June 2014); 481
Prosecutor v Ntaganda, (Second Decision on the Defence’s Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court in Respect of Counts 6 and 9) ICC-01/04-02/06-1707 (4 January 2017); 500, 505
Prosecutor v Ntaganda, (Judgment on Ntaganda’s Appeal on the Second Decision on the Jurisdiction of the Court in Respect of Counts 6 and 9) ICC-01/04-02/06-1962 (15 June 2017); 500, 502, 505, 531
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Annex 1 to the Notification of the Decision of the Plenary of Judges Pursuant to Article 40 of the Rome Statute) ICC-01/04-02/06-2326-Anx 1(22 March 2019); 156-157, 159, 164
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Request for Disclosure Concerning the Decision of the Plenary of Judges on the Judicial Independence of Judge Ozaki) ICC-01/04-02/06-2327 (1 April 2019); 159
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Motion for Temporary Stay of Proceedings) ICC-01/04-02/06-2328 (1April 2019); 160
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Request for Disclosure Concerning the Visit of the Registrar to Japan on 21 and 22 January 2019) ICC-01/04-02/06-2332 (8 April 2019); 160
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Decision Concerning the ‘Request for Disclosure Concerning the Decision of the Plenary of Judges on the Judicial Independence of Judge Ozaki’ and the ‘Request for Disclosure Concerning the Visit of the Registrar to Japan on 21 and 22 January 2019) ICC-01/04-02/06-2336 (18 April 2019); 160
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Decision on Defence Request for Temporary Stay of Proceedings) ICC-01/04-02/06-2335 (18 April 2019); 161
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Notification Concerning Judge Kuniko Ozaki) ICC-01/04-02/06-2338 (1 May 2019); 161
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Request for Reconsideration of ‘Decision Concerning the ‘Request for Disclosure Concerning the Decision of the Plenary of Judges on the Judicial Independence of Judge Ozaki’ and the ‘Request for Disclosure Concerning the Visit of the Registrar to Japan on 21 and 22 January 2019’’ (Filing 2336), and for Additional Disclosure) ICC-01/04-02/06-2339 (2 May 2019); 161
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Decision on the “Request for Reconsideration of Decision Concerning Judge Ozaki Pursuant to Article 40 of the Rome Statute” (ICC-01/04-02/06-2337) and the “Request for Disclosure Concerning the Decision of the Plenary of Judges on the Judicial Independence of Judge Ozaki”, the “Request for Disclosure Concerning the Visit of the Registrar to Japan on 21 and 22 January 2019’’ (Filing 2336), and for Additional Disclosure” (ICC-01/04-02/06-2339) and Related Requests) ICC-01/04-02/06-2346 (14 May 2019); 161
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Public Redacted Version of “Request for Disqualification of Judge Ozaki”) ICC-01/04-02/06-2347-Red (21 May 2019); 163-164
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Public Redacted Version of Confidential Annex I: “Decision of the Plenary of Judges on the Defence Request for the Disqualification of Judge Kuniko Ozaki from the Case of The Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda) ICC-01/04-02/06-2355-AnxI-Red (20 June 2019); 163
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Order Scheduling the Delivery of the Judgment) ICC-01/04-02/06-2356 (24 June 2019); 164
Prosecutor v Ntaganda (Judgment) ICC-01/04-02/06-2359 (8 July 2019); 42, 53, 62, 81, 207, 500
Prosecutor v Ongwen (Decision on the Confirmation of Charges Against Dominic Ongwen) ICC-02/04-01/15-422-Red (23 March 2016); 481
Prosecutor v Ruto and Sang (Judgment on Ruto and Sang’s Appeals Against the Prosecution’s Application for Witness Summonses) ICC-01/09-01/11-1598 (9 October 2014); 485
Prosecutor v Ruto and Sang (Decision No 5 on the Conduct of Trial Proceedings (Principles and Procedure on ‘No Case to Answer’ Motions)) ICC-01/09-01/11 (3 June 2014); 340
Prosecutor v Ruto and Sang (Decision on the Request to be Excused from the Exercise of Judicial Functions in the Case of The Prosecutor v William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang, Pursuant to Article 41of the Rome Statute) ICC-01/09-01/11 (21 May 2013); 141
Prosecutor v Ruto and Sang (Decision on Witness Preparation) ICC-01/09-01/11-524 (2 January 2013); 338
Prosecutor v Ruto and Sang (Judgment on the Appeal of the Prosecutor Against the Decision of Trial Chamber v(a) of 18 June 2013 entitled “Decision on Mr Ruto’s Request for Excusal from Continuous Presence at Trial”) ICC-01/09-01/11 (25 October 2013); 338
Prosecutor v Ruto and Sang (Decision on the Defence Applications for Judgments of Acquittal – Reasons of Judge Eboe-Osuji) ICC-01/09-01/11-2027-Red-Corr (5 April 2016); 531
Prosecutor v Ruto et al. (Decision on the Confirmation of Charges Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute) ICC-01/09-01/11-373 (23 January 2012); 481, 485
Prosecutor v. Ruto et al. (Judgment on Kenya’s Appeal on the Admissibility of the Case) ICC-01/09-01/11-307 OA (30 August 2011); 494
Request under Regulation 46(3) (Prosecution’s Request for a Ruling on Jurisdiction Under Article 19(3) of the Statute) ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-1 (9 April 2018); 498
Request Under Regulation 46(3) of the Regulations of the Court (Decision on the ‘Prosecution’s Request for a Ruling on Jurisdiction Under Article 19(3) of the Statute’) ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-37 (6 September 2018); 498
Request Under Regulation 46(3) of the Regulations of the Court, (Decision on the ‘Prosecution’s Request for a Ruling on Jurisdiction Under Article 19(3) of the Statute’) ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-37 (9 September 2018); 480
Request Under Regulation 46(3) of the Regulations of the Court (Decision on the ‘Prosecution’s Request for a Ruling on Jurisdiction Under Article 19(3) of the Statute’ – Partially Dissenting Opinion of Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut) ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-37-Anx (6 September 2018); 499
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Decision on the Applications for Participation in the Proceedings of vprs 1, vprs 2, vprs 3, vprs 4, vprs 5 and vprs 6) ICC-01/04-101-tEN-Corr (17 January 2006); 468, 521
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Decision on the OPCD’s Request for Leave to Appeal the 3 July 2008 Decision on Applications for Participation) ICC-01/04-535 (4 September 2008); 536
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application for Warrants of Arrest, Article 58) ICC-01/04-02/06-20-Anx2 (10 February 2006); 469, 522
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Decision on the Requests of the Legal Representative of Applicants on Application Process for Victim’s Participation and Legal Representation) ICC-01/04-374 (17 August 2007); 494
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Decision on the Requests of the opcd on the Production of Relevant Supporting Documentation Pursuant to Regulation 86(2)(e) of the Regulations of the Court and on the Disclosure of Exculpatory Materials by the Prosecutor) ICC-01/04-417 (7 December 2007); 537
Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Decision on Victims’ Participation in Proceedings) ICC-01/09-24 (3 November 2010); 521
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Judgment on the Prosecutor’s Application for Extraordinary Review of Pre-Trial Chamber I’s 31 March 2006 Decision Denying Leave to Appeal), ICC-01/04-168 (13 July 2006); 468, 473
Situation in the Republic of Kenya (Decision Pursuant to Article 15 of the Rome Statute on the Authorization of an Investigation into the Situation in the Republic of Kenya) ICC-01/09-19 (31 March 2010); 469
Situation in Uganda (Decision on the Prosecutor’s Position on the Decision of Pre-Trial Chamber ii to Redact Factual Descriptions of Crimes from the Warrants of Arrest, Motion for Reconsideration and Motions for Clarification) ICC-02/04-01/05-60 (28 October 2005); 468-469
Situation in Uganda (Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application that the Pre-Trial Chamber Disregard as Irrelevant the Submission Filed by the Registry on 5 December 2005) ICC-02/04-01/05-147 (9 March 2006); 498
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
Prosecutor v Akayesu (Appeals Judgment) ICTR-96-4-A (1 June 2001); 367
Prosecutor v Akayesu (Trial Judgment) ICTR-96-4-T (2 September 1998); 533
Prosecutor v Bagosora et al. (Appeals Chamber Decision on the Admissibility of the Prosecutor’s Appeal from the Decision of a Confirming Judge Dismissing an Indictment against Théoneste Bagosora and 28 Others) ICTR-98-37-A (8 June 1998); 363
Prosecutor v Barayagwiza (Decision) ICTR-97-19 (3 November 1999); 328
Prosecutor v Gacumbitsi (Appeals Judgment, Separate Opinion of Judge Schomburg) ICTR-01-64-A (7 July 2006); 478
Prosecutor v Gacumbitsi (Separate Opinion of Judge Shahabuddeen) ICTR-2001-64-A (7 July 2006); 419
Prosecutor v Kajelijeli (Judgment) ICTR-98-44A-A (23 May 2005); 328
Prosecutor v Kanyarukiga (Decision on Gaspard Kanyarukiga’s Motion to Disqualify Judge Vaz) ICTR-02-78-A (24 February 2011); 168
Prosecutor v Kanyabashi (Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on the Jurisdiction of Trial Chamber I, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Shahabuddeen) ICTR-96-15-A (3 June 1999); 325, 364
Prosecutor v Kanyabashi (Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on the Jurisdiction of Trial Chamber I, Joint and Separate Opinions of Judge MacDonald and Judge Vohrah) ICTR-96-15-A (3 June 1999); 119
Prosecutor v Kanyabashi (Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on the Jurisdiction of Trial Chamber I, Separate and Concurring Opinion of Judge Wang Tieya and Rafael Nieto-Navia) ICTR-96-15-A (3 June 1999); 370
Prosecutor v Karemera et al. (Motion for Disqualification of Trial Chamber iii Judges (Karemera)) ICTR-98-44-T (29 March 2004); 145
Prosecutor v Karemera et al. (Motion for Disqualification of Judges Andresia Vaz, Florence Rita Arrey, and Flavia Lattanzi (Nzirorera) ICTR-98-44-T (30 March 2004); 145
Prosecutor v Karemera et al. (Request to the Bureau for the Recusal of the Judges of Trial Chamber iii (Ngirumpatse) ICTR-98-44-T (30 March 2004); 145
Prosecutor v Karemera et al. (Supplemental Motion for Disqualification of Judge Andresia Vaz) ICTR-98-44-T (29 April 2004); 145
Prosecutor v Karemera et al. (Decision on Motion by Karemera for Disqualification of Judges) ICTR-98-44-T (17 May 2004); 146, 169
Prosecutor v Karemera et al. (Request and Argument on Behalf of Dr Andre Rwamakuba Seeking the Recusal or Disqualification of Her Honour Judge Andresia Vaz) IT-98-44-T (11 May 2004); 144
Prosecutor v Karemera et al. (Decision on Motions by Nzirorera and Rwamakuba for Disqualification of Judge Vaz) ICTR-98-44-T (17 May 2004); 145
Prosecutor v Karemera et al. (Decision on Continuation of Trial – Rule 15bis(D) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence) ICTR-98-44-T (16 July 2004); 146
Prosecutor v Karemera et al. (Reasons for Decision on Interlocutory Appeals Regarding the Continuation of Proceedings with a Substitute Judge and on Nzirorera’s Motion for Leave to Consider New Material) ICTR-98-44-AR15bis.2 (22 October 2004); 131-132, 146
Prosecutor v Karera (Appeals Judgment) ICTR-01-74-A (2 February 2009); 167, 441
Prosecutor v Kayishema and Ruzindana (Appeals Judgment) ICTR-95-1-A (1 June 2001); 381
Prosecutor v Kayishema and Ruzindana (Trial Judgment) ICTR-95-1-T (21 May 1999); 367, 532
Prosecutor v Musema (Trial Judgment) ICTR-96-13-T (27 January 2000); 532
Prosecutor v Muvunyi (Appeals Judgment) ICTR-2000-55-A (29 August 2008); 442
Prosecutor v Nahimana et al. (Appeals Judgment) ICTR-99-52-A (28 November 2007); 167
Prosecutor v Nahimana et al. (Decision on Appellant Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza’s Motion Contesting the Decision of the President Refusing to Review and Reverse the Decision of the Registrar Relating to the Withdrawal of Co-Counsel) ICTR-99-52-A (23 November 2006); 328
Prosecutor v Nchamihigo (Appeals Judgment) ICTR-2001-63-A (18 March 2010); 441
Prosecutor v Niyitegeka (Decision on Request for Review) ICTR-96-14-R (6 March 2007); 328
Prosecutor v Ntagerura (Appeals Judgment) ICTR-99-46-A (7 July 2006); 440
Prosecutor v Ntahobali (Decision on Motion for Disqualification of Judges) ICTR-97-21-T (7 March 2006); 169
Prosecutor v Ntakirutimana et al. (Appeal Judgment) ICTR-96-10-A and ICTR-96-17-A (13 December 2004); 419
Prosecutor v Ntawukulilyayo (Decision on Motion for Disqualification of Judges) ICTR-05-82-A (8 February 2011); 168
Prosecutor v Nyiramasuhuko et al. (Decision on Motion for Disqualification of Judge Fausto Pocar) ICTR-98-42-A (2 October 2012); 168
Prosecutor v Nyiramasuhuko et al. (Judgment) ICTR-98-42-A (14 December 2015); 495
Prosecutor v Renzaho (Appeals Judgment) ICTR-97-31-A (1 April 2011); 168, 442
Prosecutor v Rutaganda (Decision on Request for Reconsideration, Review, Assignment of Counsel, Disclosure, and Clarification) ICTR-96-03-R (8 December 2006); 328
Prosecutor v Rutaganda (Trial Judgment) ICTR-96-3-T (6 December 1999); 532
Prosecutor v Rwamakuba (Decision on Appeal Against Decision on Appropriate Remedy) ICTR-98-44C-A (31 January 2007); 328
Prosecutor v Seromba (Decision on Motion for Disqualification of Judges) ICTR-2000-66-T (25 April 2006); 169
Prosecutor v Zigiranyirazo (Appeals Judgment) ICTR-01-73-A (16 November 2009); 441
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
In the Case Against Florence Hartmann (Report of Decision on Defence Motion for Disqualification of Two Members of the Trial Chamber and of Senior Legal Office) IT-02-54-R77.5 (27 March 2009); 132, 139, 165
Prosecutor v Aleksovski (Appeals Judgment) IT-95-14/1-A (24 March 2000); 431, 441, 492
Prosecutor v Aleksovski (Trial Judgment, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Rodrigues) IT-95-14/1-T (25 June 1999); 369
Prosecutor v Aleksovski (Trial Judgment, Joint Concurring Opinion of Judge Vohrah and Judge Nieto-Navia) IT-95-14/1-T (25 June 1999); 370
Prosecutor v Aleksovski (Decision on Prosecutor’s Appeal on Admissibility of Evidence) IT-95-14/1-AR73 (16 February 1999); 291
Prosecutor v Babić (Sentencing Judgment) IT-03-72-S (29 June 2004); 413
Prosecutor v Blagojević and Jokić (Appeals Judgment) IT-02-60-A (9 May 2007); 428, 431
Prosecutor v Blaškić (Judgment on the Request of the Republic of Croatia for Review of the Decision of Trial Chamber ii of 18 July 1997) IT-95-14-AR108bis (29 October 1997); 325-326
Prosecutor v Bobetko (Decision on Challenge by Croatia to Decision and Orders of Confirming Judge) IT-02-62-AR54bis (29 November 2002); 328
Prosecutor v Boškoski and Tarčulovski (Appeals Judgment) IT-04-82-A (19 May 2010); 441
Prosecutor v Brđanin and Talić (Decision on Application of Momir Talić for the Disqualification and Withdrawal of a Judge) IT-99-36-PT (18 May 2000); 139-140, 168
Prosecutor v Brđanin and Talić (Decision on Second Motion by Brđanin to Dismiss the Indictment) IT-99-36 (16 May 2001); 328
Prosecutor v Brđanin and Talić (Decision on Form of Further Amended Indictment and Prosecution Application to Amend) IT-99-36-PT (26 June 2001); 413
Prosecutor v Brđjanin and Talić (Trial Judgment) IT-99-36-T (1 September 2004); 357
Prosecutor v Delalić et al. (Appeals Judgment) IT-96-21-A (20 February 2001); 149, 166, 357
Prosecutor v Delalić et al. (Decision of the Bureau on Motion on Judicial Independence) IT-96-21-T (4 September 1998); 147-148
Prosecutor v Delalić et al. (Trial Judgment) IT-96-21-T (16 November 1998); 373, 409, 534
Prosecutor v Deronjić (Sentencing Judgment) IT-02-61 (30 March 2004); 283
Prosecutor v Dragomir Milošević (Appeals Judgment) IT-98-29/1-A (12 November 2009); 441
Prosecutor v Erdemović (Sentencing Appeals Judgment) IT-96-22-A (7 October 1997); 382
Prosecutor v Erdemović (Sentencing Appeals Judgment, Separate and Dissenting Opinion of Judge Cassese) IT-96-22-A (7 October 1997); 382, 513, 532
Prosecutor v Erdemović (Sentencing Judgment) IT-96-22-Tbis (5 March 1998); 283
Prosecutor v Furundžija (Appeals Judgment) IT-95-17/IA (21 July 2000); 123-124, 151-153, 180
Prosecutor v Furundžija (Trial Judgment) IT-95-17/1-T (10 December 1998); 381-382, 409, 429
Prosecutor v Galić (Decision on Galić’s Application Pursuant to Rule 15(B)) IT-98-29-T (28 March 2003); 168
Prosecutor v Galić (Appeals Judgment) IT-98-29-A (30 November 2006); 168, 371
Prosecutor v Galić (Trial Judgment) IT-98-29-T (5 December 2003); 502
Prosecutor v Gotovina (Appeals Judgment) IT-06-90-A (16 November 2012); 442
Prosecutor v Gotovina (Appeals Judgment, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Carmel Agius) IT-06-90-A (16 November 2012); 444
Prosecutor v Gotovina (Appeals Judgment, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Fausto Pocar) IT-06-90-A (16 November 2012); 445, 449
Prosecutor v Gotovina (Appeals Judgment, Separate Opinion of Judge Theodor Meron) IT-06-90-A (16 November 2012); 444
Prosecutor v Gotovina (Application and Proposed Amicus Curiae Brief Concerning the 15 April 2011 Trial Chamber Judgment and Requesting that the Appeals Chamber Reconsider the Findings of Unlawful Artillery Attacks During Operation Storm) IT-06-90-A (13 January 2012); 448
Prosecutor v Gotovina (Decision on Application and Proposed Amicus Curiae Brief) IT-06-90-A (14 February 2012); 448
Prosecutor v Gotovina (Trial Judgment) IT-06-90-T (15 April 2011); 442
Prosecutor v Hadžihasanović et al. (Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Challenging Jurisdiction in Relation to Command Responsibility, Separate and Partially Dissenting Opinion of Judge David Hunt) IT-01-47-AR72 (16 July 2003); 370
Prosecutor v Hadžihasanović et al. (Decision on Prosecution’s Motion for Review of the Decision of the Registrar to Assign Mr Rodney Dixon as Co-Counsel for the Accused Kubura) IT-01-47-PT (26 March 2002); 328
Prosecutor v Haradinaj (Appeals Judgment) IT-04-84-A (19 July 2010); 441
Prosecutor v Hartmann (Report of Decision on Defence Motion for Disqualification of Two Members of the Trial Chamber and of Senior Legal Officer) IT-02-54-R77.5 (27 March 2009); 132, 139, 165
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Preliminary Motion to Dismiss jce iii – Special Intent Crimes) IT-95-05/18-PT (27 March 2009); 412
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Decision on Appeal from Decision on Motion to Disqualify Judge Picard) IT-95-5/18-AR15.1 (26 June 2009); 182
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Decision on the Accused’s Holbrooke Agreement Motion) IT-95-5/18 (8 July 2009); 284
Prosecutor v Karadžić and Mladić (Review of the Indictment Pursuant to Rule 61 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence) IT-95-5-R61 and IT-95-18-R61 (16 July 1996); 317
Prosecutor v Kordić and Čerkez (Appeals Judgment) IT-95-14/2-A (17 December 2004); 381-382
Prosecutor v. Kordić and Čerkez (Decision of the Bureau on Application Requesting Disqualification of Judges Jorda and Riad) IT-95-14/2-PT (4 May 1998); 124, 167
Prosecutor v Krajišnik (Appeals Judgment) IT-00-39-A (17 March 2009); 438, 441
Prosecutor v Krajišnik (Decision on Krajišnik’s Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Decision Dismissing the Defence Motion for a Ruling that Judge Canivell is Unable to Continue Sitting in this Case) IT-00-39-AR73.2, (15 September 2006); 371
Prosecutor v Krajišnik (Decision on the Defence Application for Withdrawal of a Judge from the Trial) IT-00-39-PT (22 January 2003); 143, 165, 218
Prosecutor v Krajišnik and Plavsić (Decision on Prosecution Motion for Clarification in Respect of Application of Rules 65ter, 66(B) and 67(C)) IT-00-39-PT & IT-00-40-PT (1 August 2001); 370
Prosecutor v Krnojelac (Trial Judgment) IT-97-25-T (15 March 2002); 414
Prosecutor v Krstić (Trial Judgment) IT-98-33-T (2 August 2001); 371, 381, 414
Prosecutor v Kupreškić (Trial Judgment) IT-95-16-T (14 January 2000); 326, 400-401
Prosecutor v Kvočka (Trial Judgment) IT-98-30/1-T (2 November 2001); 414
Prosecutor v Lukić and Lukić (Order on Second Motion to Disqualify President and Vice-President from Appointing Judges to Appeal Bench and to Disqualify President and Judge Meron from Sitting on Appeal) IT-98-32/1-AR11bis.1 (11 May 2007); 197
Prosecutor v Martić (Appeals Judgment) IT-95-11-A (08 October 2008); 441
Prosecutor v Martić (Decision) IT-95-11-R61 (8 March 1996); 402
Prosecutor v Mladić (Order Denying Defence Motion Pursuant to Rule 15(B) Seeking Disqualification of Presiding Judge Alphons Orie and for a Stay of the Proceedings) IT-09-92-PT (15 May 2012); 171
Prosecutor v Mladić (Decision Concerning Defence Motions to Exceed Word Count and Defence Motion Pursuant to Rule 15(B) Seeking Disqualification of Judge Christoph Flügge) IT-09-92-T (22 January 2014); 171
Prosecutor v Mladić (Decision on Ratko Mladić’s Motion for Disqualification of Judge Carmel Agius) IT-09-92-T (26 October 2016); 172
Prosecutor v Milošević (Decision on Preliminary Motions) IT-99-37-PT (8 November 2001); 364, 381
Prosecutor v Milosević (Reasons for Decision on Prosecution Interlocutory Appeal from Refusal to Order Joiner) IT-01-51-AR73 (18 April 2002); 176, 367
Prosecutor v Milošević (Decision on Motion for Judgment of Acquittal, Separate Opinion of Judge Patrick Robinson) IT-02-54-T (16 June 2004); 371
Prosecutor v Milošević (Reasons for Decision on Assignment of Defence Counsel) IT-99-37-T (22 September 2004); 364, 371
Prosecutor v Milutinović et al. (Appeals Chamber Decision on Dragoljub Ojdanić’s Motion Challenging Jurisdiction – Joint Criminal Enterprise) IT-99-37-AR72 (21 May 2003); 374
Prosecutor v Milutinović et al. (Decision on Dragoljub Ojdanić’s Motion Challenging Jurisdiction – Joint Criminal Enterprise, Separate Opinion of Judge Mohamed Shahabuddeen) IT-99-37-AR72 (21 May 2003); 415-417
Prosecutor v Milutinović et al. (Decision on Request of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation for Review) IT-05-87-AR108bis.1 (15 May 2006); 371
Prosecutor v Mrkšić and Šljivančanin (Appeals Judgment) IT-95-13/1-A (5 May 2009); 431, 441
Prosecutor v Nikolić (Decision on Defence Motion Challenging the Jurisdiction of the Tribunal) IT-94-2-PT (9 October 2002); 371
Prosecutor v Nikolić (Sentencing Judgment) IT-02-60/1-S (2 December 2003); 287
Prosecutor v Ojdanić (Interlocutory Appeal Judgment) IT-99-37-AR72 (21 May 2003); 535
Prosecutor v Perišić (Decision on Motion for Reconsideration) IT-04-81-A (20 March 2014); 438
Prosecutor v Perišić (Prosecution Filing of Revised Second Amended Indictment with Annex A) IT-04-81-PT (5 February 2008); 427
Prosecutor v Perišić (Summary of the Judgment in the Case of Prosecutor v Momčilo Perišić) IT-04-81-T (6 September 2011); 428
Prosecutor v Perišić (Trial Judgment) IT-04-81-T (6 September 2011); 428-429
Prosecutor v Perišić, (Trial Judgment, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Moloto) IT-04-81-T (6 September 2011); 428-430
Prosecutor v Perišić (Appeals Judgment) IT-04-81-A (28 February 2013); 431-432, 439
Prosecutor v Perišić (Appeals Judgment, Partially Dissenting Opinion of Judge Liu) IT-04-81-A (28 February 2013); 432
Prosecutor v Plavsić (Sentencing Judgment) IT-00-39&40/1 (27 February 2003); 288
Prosecutor v Prlić et al. (Decision of the President on Jadranko Prlić’s Motion to Disqualify Judge Arpad Prandler) IT-04-74-T (4 October 2010); 144
Prosecutor v Prlić et al. (Judgment) IT-04-74-A (29 November 2017); 495, 502
Prosecutor v Šainović (Appeals Judgment) IT-05-87-A (23 January 2014); 437-439
Prosecutor v Šešelj (Decision on the Interlocutory Appeal Concerning Jurisdiction) IT-03-67-AR72.1 (31 August 2004); 369
Prosecutor v Šešelj (Decision on Motion for Dismissal Proceedings to be Issued by the Bureau Against Judge Patrick Robinson, Judge Alphons Orie and Judge Bakone Justice Moloto) IT-03-67-PT (20 November 2006); 208
Prosecutor v Šešelj (Decision on Motions for Disqualification of Judge Patrick Robinson, Judge Alphons Orie and Judge Bakone Justice Moloto) IT-03-67-PT (6 November 2006); 208
Prosecutor v Šešelj (Oral Application for the Disqualification and Withdrawal of Judge Frederik Harhoff) IT-03-67T-T-2338 (8 January 2008); 133, 186
Prosecutor v Šešelj (Report to the President Pursuant to Rule 15(B)(ii) Concerning the Prosecution Application for the Disqualification and Withdrawal of Judge Frederik Harhoff) IT-03-67-T (14 January 2008); 208
Prosecutor v Šešelj (Decision on Motion by Professor Vojislav Šešelj for the Disqualification of Judges O-Gon Kwon and Kevin Parker) IT-03-67-R77.3 (19 November 2010); 176
Prosecutor v Šešelj (Scheduling Order) IT-03-67-T (12 April 2013); 207
Prosecutor v Šešelj (Decision to Unseal the Report of the Presiding Judge to the President of the Tribunal or Alternatively the Judge Designated by Him Regarding the Motion for Disqualification of Judge Harhoff) IT-03-67-T (4 September 2013); 211
Prosecutor v Šešelj (Prosecution Motion for Reconsideration of Decision on Defence Motion for Disqualification of Judge Frederik Harhoff) IT-03-67-T (4 September 2013); 210
Prosecutor v Šešelj (Request for Clarification of the Panel Decision of 28 August 2013) IT-03-67-T (3 September 2013); 210
Prosecutor v Šešelj (Request for Urgent Clarification to the Panel and the Vice President) IT-03-67-T (3 September 2013); 210
Prosecutor v Šešelj (Decision on Prosecution Motion for Reconsideration of Decision on Disqualification, Requests for Clarification, and Motion on Behalf of Stanišić and Župljanin) IT-03-67-T (7 October 2013); 211
Prosecutor v Šešelj (Judgement – Volume 1) IT-03-67-T (31 March 2016); 211
Prosecutor v Šešelj (Concurring Opinion of Presiding Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti Attached to the Judgement) IT-03-67-T (31 March 2016); 136, 211
Prosecutor v Sikirica (Order of the President on the Early Release of Dragan Kolundžija) IT-95-8-S (5 December 2001); 328
Prosecutor v Simić (Trial Judgment, Separate and Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judge Per-Johan Lindholm) IT-95-9-T (17 October 2003); 418
Prosecutor v Stakić (Trial Judgment) IT-97-24-T (31 July 2003); 417-418, 477, 481
Prosecutor v Stakić (Appeal Judgment) IT-97-24-A (22 March 2006); 418
Prosecutor v Stakić (Appeals Judgment, Partly Dissenting Opinion of Judge Shahabuddeen) IT-97-24-A (22 March 2006); 370, 372
Prosecutor v Stanišić and Simatović (Appeals Judgment) IT-03-69-A (9 December 2015); 438
Prosecutor v Stanišić and Simatović (Trial Judgment) IT-03-69-T (30 May 2013); 434
Prosecutor v Stanišić and Simatović (Trial Judgment, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Michèle Picard) IT-03-69-T (30 May 2013); 434
Prosecutor v Stanišić and Župljanin (Judgment) IT-08-91-A (30 June 2016); 495
Prosecutor v Strugar (Appeals Judgment) IT-01-42-A (17 July 2008); 441
Prosecutor v Tadić (Appeals Chamber Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, Separate Opinion of Judge Abi-Saab) IT-94-1-AR72 (2 October 1995); 354, 368, 373, 383-384, 386-387, 394
Prosecutor v Tadić (Appeals Judgment) IT-94-1-A (15 July 1999); 168, 325, 356, 372, 381-382, 384, 408-409, 411-414, 419-426, 431-433, 437
Prosecutor v. Tadić (Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction) IT-94-1-AR72 (2 October 1995); xvii, 326
Prosecutor v. Tadić (Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, Separate Opinion of Judge Sidhwa) IT-94-1-AR72 (2 October 1995); 368
Prosecutor v Tadić (Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion Requesting Protective Measures for Victims and Witnesses) IT-94-1-T (10 August 1995); 12, 363
Prosecutor v Tadić (Judgment on Allegations of Contempt Against Prior Counsel, Milan Vujin) IT-94-1-A-AR77 (31 January 2000); 327
Prosecutor v Stanišić and Župljanin (Decision on Župljanin Defence Request for Appointment of a Panel to Adjudicate the Request for Disqualification of Judge Liu Daqun) IT-08-91-A (7 February 2014); 182
Prosecutor v Žigić (Decision on Žigić’s “Motion for Reconsideration of Appeals Chamber Judgment IT-98-30/I-A Delivered on 28 February 2005”) IT-98-30/I-A (26 June 2006); 328
International Court of Justice
Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, 2010 icj Reports 403 (22 July 2010); 266
Admissibility of Hearings of Petitioners by the Committee on South West Africa, Advisory Opinion, Separate Opinion of Judge Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, 1956 icj Reports 23 (1 June 1956); 244
Application of the Convention of 1902 Governing the Guardianship of Infants (Netherlands v Sweden), Judgment, Separate Opinion of Judge Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, 1958 icj Reports 55 (28 November 1958); 244
Arbitral Award of 31 July 1989 (Guinea-Bissau v Senegal), Judgment, 1991 icj Rep 53 (12 November 1991); 326
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, Separate Opinion of Judge Tanaka, 1964 icj Reports 65 (24 July 1964); 265
Case Concerning a Right of Passage over Indian Territory (Portugal v India), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, 1957 icj Reports 125 (26 November 1957); 245
Case Concerning Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v France), Judgment, 2008 icj Reports 177 (4 June 2008); 365
Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States of America), Merits, Judgment, 1986 icj Rep 14 (27 June 1986); 375, 388
Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America), Preliminary Objection, Judgment, 1996 icj Reports 803 (12 December 1996); 365
Case Concerning the Aerial Incident of 27 July 1955 (Israel v Bulgaria), Judgment, Preliminary Objections, Joint Dissenting Opinion by Judges Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, Wellington Koo and Sir Percy Spender, 1959 icj Reports 127 (26 May 1959); 244
Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v Belgium), Judgment, 2002 icj Rep 3 (14 February 2002); 91, 507
Case of Certain Norwegian Loans (France v Norway), Judgment Separate Opinion of Judge Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, 1957 icj Reports 9 (6 July 1957); 244, 326
Case Concerning the Northern Cameroons (Cameroon v United Kingdom), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, Separate Opinion of Judge Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice, 1963 icj Reports 15, (2 December 1963); 230
Competence of the General Assembly for the Admission of a State to the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Alvarez, 1950 icj Reports 12 (3 March 1950); 251
Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta), Application by Italy for Permission to Intervene, Judgment, 1984 icj Reports 3 (21 March 1984); 253-254, 375
Continental Shelf (Tunisia/Libyan Arab Jamahiriya), Judgment, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Gros, 1982 icj Reports 143, (24 February 1982); 229, 230
Fisheries Jurisdiction (United Kingdom v Iceland), Merits, Judgment, 1974 icj Reports 3 (25 July 1974); 231
Interhandel Case (Switzerland v United States of America), Judgment, Preliminary Objections, Dissenting Opinion of Sir Hersch Lauterpacht, 1959 icj Reports 6 (21 March 1959); 244
Judgments of the Administrative Tribunal of the ILO upon Complaints Made Against UNESCO, Advisory Opinion, 1956 icj Reports 77 (23 October 1956); 244-245
Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy: Greece Intervening), Judgment, 2012 icj Reports 99 (3 February 2012); 266
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, Order of 30 January 2004, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Buergenthal, 2004 icj Reports 7 (30 January 2004); 126
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, 2004 icj Reports 136 (9 July 2004); 255, 266
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, Separate Opinion of Judge Koroma, 2004 icj Rep 204 (9 July 2004); 256
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, Declaration of Judge Vereschchetin, 1996 icj Reports 279 (8 July 1996); 258
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Higgins, 1996 icj Reports 583 (8 July 1996); 241-242
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Shahabuddeen, 1996 icj Rep 226 (8 July 1996) 410; 398-399
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Weeramantry, 1996 icj Rep 429 (8 July 1996); 256
Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict, Advisory Opinion, 1996 icj Reports 66 (8 July 1996); 231, 370, 544
Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v Portugal), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, Joint Declaration of Vice-President Ranjeva, Judges Guillaume, Higgins, Kooijmans, Al-Khasawneh, Buergenthal and Elaraby, 2004 icj Reports 1208 (15 December 2004); 255
North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands), Judgment, 1969 icj Rep 3 (20 February 1969); 375
Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v Guatemala) Preliminary Objections, Judgment, 1953 icj Reports 111 (18 November 1953); 326
Question of Voting Procedure Related to Reports and Petitions Concerning the Territory of South West Africa, Advisory Opinion, Separate Opinion of Judge Lauterpacht, 1955 icj Reports 67 (7 June 1955); 244
Questions of Interpretation and Application of the 1971 Montreal Convention Arising from the Aerial Incident at Lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v United Kingdom and Libyan Arab Jamhiriya v United States of America), Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures, Order of 14 April 1992, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Weeramantry, 1992 icj Reports 114 (14 April 1992); 250
South West Africa Cases (Ethiopia v South Africa; Liberia v South Africa), Second Phase, Judgment, 1966 icj Reports 6 (18 July 1966); 230, 261, 543
International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg
The Trial of Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg 14 November 1945-1 October 1946 – Volume 1: Judgment (Nuremberg, International Military Tribunal, 1947–1949): 226-227, 304, 352, 384, 388, 423, 426, 460, 559
The Trial of Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg 14 November 1945-1 October 1956 – Volume II: Proceedings, 14 November 1945 to 30 November 1945 (Nuremberg, International Military Tribunal, 1947-1949); 291
The Trial of Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg – Volume VIII: Covering the Period from 27 February to 11 March (Nuremberg, International Military Tribunal, 1947–1949); 304
International Military Tribunal for the Far East
Judgment of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Pal, 4–12 November 1948, reprinted in N Boister and R Cryer (eds), Documents on the Tokyo International Tribunal (OUP 2008); 307
International Residual Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals (irmct)
Prosecutor v. Karadžić (Decision) MICT-13-55-AA7054-A7051 (27 September 2018); 136
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Motion to Disqualify Judge Theodor Meron) MICT-13-55-A (25 September 2018); 183
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Decision) MICT-13-55-A (27 September 2018); 183-184
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Order on Motion to Disqualify Judge Theodor Meron) MICT-13-55-A (2 October 2018); 184
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Decision in Response to Order on Motion to Disqualify) MICT-13-55-A (3 October 2018); 184
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Motion to Reconsider Order Replacing a Judge) MICT-13-55-A (5 October 2018); 185
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Decision on Motion to Reconsider Order Replacing a Judge) MICT-13-55-A (10 October 2018); 185
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Second Motion to Disqualify Judge Theodor Meron, Motion to Disqualify Judge William Sekule, and for Related Orders) MICT-13-55-A (12 October 2018); 185
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Prosecution Motion to Strike Karadžić’s Second Motion to Disqualify Judge Theodor Meron, Motion to Disqualify Judge William Sekule, and for Related Orders) MICT-13-55-A (15 October 2018); 185
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Order on Defence Motion for Disqualification or Judges Theodor Meron and William Sekule and for Related Orders) MICT-13-55-A (17 October 2018); 186
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Order Assigning Judges to the Appeals Chamber to Consider a Matter) MICT-13-55-A (17 October 2018); 186
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Decision in Relation to the Order Assigning the Appeals Chamber to Consider a Matter of 17 October 2018) MICT-13-55-A (18 October 2018); 186
Prosecutor v. Karadžić (Prosecution Motion to Disqualify Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti) MICT-13-55-A 7299 A7299 – A7294 (25 October 2018); 133, 186
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Proprio Motu Decision on Reconsideration) MICT-13-55-A (31 October 2018); 187
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Decision on Prosecution Motion to Strike Karadžić’s Second Motion to disqualify Judge Theodor Meron, Motion to Disqualify Judge William Sekule, and for Related Matters) MICT-13-55-A (1 November 2018); 189
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Decision on Prosecution Motion to Disqualify Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti) MICT-13-55-A (6 November 2018); 190
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Decision with Observations for the President of the Mechanism on Motion to Disqualify of 25 October 2018) MICT-13-55-A (9 November 2018); 190
Prosecutor v Karadžić (Judgment) MICT-13-55-A (20 March 2019); 495
Prosecutor v Mladić (Defence Motion Respectfully Seeking the Disqualification of Judge Carmel Agius for Actual or Apparent Bias) MICT-13-56-A (12 June 2018); 171
Prosecutor v Mladić (Defence Motion Respectfully Seeking the Disqualification of Judge Liu Daqun for Actual or Apparent Bias) MICT-13-56-A (12 June 2018); 171
Prosecutor v Mladić (Defence Motion Respectfully Seeking the Disqualification of Theodor Meron for Actual or Apparent Bias) MICT-13-56-A (12 June 2018); 171
Prosecutor v Mladić (Decision on Mladić’s Motions for Disqualification of Judges) MICT-13-56-A (20 June 2018); 174
Prosecutor v Mladić (Prosecution Consolidated Response to Defence Motions Seeking the Disqualification of Judges Theodor Meron, Liu Daqun and Carmel Agius for Actual or Apparent Bias) MICT-13-56-A (28 June 2018); 175
Prosecutor v Mladić (Decision on Defence Motions for Disqualification of Judges Theodor Meron, Carmel Agius and Liu Daqun) MICT-13-56-A (3 September 2018); 132, 175, 180
Prosecutor v Mladić (Décision Relative aux Requêtes de la Défense aux fin du Dessaisissement des Judge Theordo Meron, Carmel Agius et Liu Daqun – Annexe F – Memoranda du Jude Jean-Claude Antonetti aux Judges Theodor Meron, Carmel Agius et Liu Daqun) MICT-13-56-A (3 September 2018); 174
Prosecutor v Mladić (Order Assigning Three Judges Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules) MICT-13-56-A (4 September 2018); 182
Prosecutor v Mladić (Prosecution’s Request for the President to appoint a Panel of Three Judges to Determine Mladić’s Disqualification Applications) MICT-13-56-A (7 September 2018); 182
Prosecutor v Mladić (Decision on Prosecution’s Request for the President to Appoint a Panel of Three Judges to Determine Mladić Disqualification Applications) MICT-13-56-A (7 September 2018); 183
Prosecutor v Mladić (Prosecution’s Appeal of Acting President’s Decision Denying Request to Appoint a Panel of Three Judges to Determine Mladić’s Disqualification Applications) MICT-13-56-A (19 September 2018); 183
Prosecutor v Mladić (Order Assigning a Bench of the Appeals Chamber) MICT-13-56-A (18 October 2018); 183
Prosecutor v Mladić (Decision on Prosecution Appeal of the Acting President’s Decision of 13 September 2018) MICT-13-56-A (4 December 2018); 183
Prosecutor v Ngirabatware (Judgment) MICT-12-99-A (18 December 2014); 495
Prosecutor v. Vojislav Šešelj (Judgment) MICT-16-99-A (11 April 2018); 495
Permanent Court of International Justice
Interpretation of the Greco-Turkish Agreement of 1 December 1926 (Final Protocol, Article IV), Advisory Opinion, pcij, Series B, No 16 (28 August 1928); 326
Special Court for Sierra Leone
Prosecutor v Brima et al. (Prosecution Motion for Voluntary Recusal or Disqualification of Justice Robertson) SCSL-04-16-633 (2 August 2007); 133, 186
Prosecutor v Norman (Decision on the Motion to Recuse Judge Winter from the Deliberation in the Preliminary Motion on the Recruitment of Child Soldiers) SCSL-2004-14 (28 May 2004); 153-154
Prosecutor v Sesay et al. (Decision on Defence Motion Seeking the Disqualification of Justice Robertson from the Appeals Chamber) SCSL-2004-15-AR15 (13 March 2004); 132, 192-193
Prosecutor v Sesay et al. (Decision on Sesay and Gbao Motion for Voluntary Withdrawal or Disqualification of Hon. Justice Bankole Thompson from the ruf Case) SCSL-04-15-T (6 December 2007); 119, 128, 170
Prosecutor v Taylor (Appeals Judgment) SCSL-03-01-A (26 September 2013); 214-215, 435-437, 439
Prosecutor v Taylor (Appeals Judgment, Concurring Opinion of Justice Shireen Avis Fisher on Aiding and Abetting Liability) SCSL-03-01-A (26 September 2013); 436
Prosecutor v Taylor (Appeal Transcript) SCSL-03-01-A (22 January 2013); 436
Prosecutor v Taylor (Appellant’s Submissions of Charles Ghankay Taylor – Public with Confidential Annex A and Public Annexes B and C) SCSL-2003-01-A (1 October 2012); 215
Prosecutor v Taylor (Appellant’s Submissions of Charles Ghankay Taylor – Public with Confidential Annex A and Public Annexes B and C, Public Annex C: Statement of Justice El Hadji Malick Sow on 26 April 2012) SCSL-2003-01-A (1 October 2012); 214
Prosecutor v Taylor (Decision on Charles Ghankay Taylor’s Motion for Partial Voluntary Withdrawal or Disqualification of Appeals Chamber Judges) SCSL-03-01-A (13 September 2012); 215
Prosecutor v Taylor (Separate Opinion of Justice George Gelaga King on Decision on Charles Ghankay Taylor’s Motion for Partial Voluntary Withdrawal or Disqualification of Appeals Chamber Judges) SCSL-03-01-A (13 September 2012); 215
Prosecutor v Taylor (Transcript), SCSL-2003-01-T (26 April 2012); 214
Prosecutor v Taylor (Transcript – Sentencing Hearing), SCSL-2003-01-T (16 May 2012); 215
Prosecutor v Taylor (Trial Judgment) SCSL-03-01-T (18 May 2012); 435
Special Tribunal for Lebanon
In the Matter of El Sayed (Decision on Mr El Sayed’s Motion for the Disqualification of Judge Riachy from the Appeals Chamber Pursuant to Rule 25) CH/PRES/2010/08 (5 November 2010); 218
Prosecutor v El Sayed (Decision on Appeal of Pre-Trial Judge’s Order Regrading Jurisdiction and Standing) CH/AC/2010/2 (10 November 2010); 326
Prosecutor v Ayyash et al. (Decision Relative a la Demande de Deport du Juge Baragwanath) STL-11-01/T/OTH/AR126.10/R25 (11 March 2016); 136
Prosecutor v Ayyash et al. (Interlocutory Decision on the Applicable law: Terrorism, Conspiracy, Homicide, Perpetration, Cumulative Charging, Special Tribunal for Lebanon) STL-11-01/I (16 February 2011); 425