In Debating the Stars, Ovanes Akopyan sheds new light on the astrological controversies that arose in the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries after the publication of Giovanni Pico della Mirandolaâs Disputationes adversus astrologiam divinatricem (1496). This treatise has often been held responsible for a contemporary reassessment of the status of astrology, a discipline that attracted widespread fascination in the Renaissance. Akopyanâs reconstruction of the development of Picoâs views demonstrates that the Disputationes was a continuation of rather than a drastic rupture with the rest of his legacy. By investigating the philosophical and humanist foundations for Picoâs attack on astrological predictions, Akopyan challenges the popular assumption that the treatise was written under Girolamo Savonarolaâs spell. He shows instead how it was appropriated ideologically by pro-Savonarolan circles after Picoâs death.
This book also offers a comprehensive study of the immediate reception of the Disputationes across Italy and Europe and reveals that the debates initiated by Picoâs intervention pervaded all of the European intellectual oikumene.
1 Scientia naturalis, Kabbalah and Celestial Spheres: Giovanni Pico della Mirandola on Astrology (1486â1493)
â1âIntroduction
â2âThe Commento alla Canzone dâamore
â3âThe Trilogy
â4âThe Heptaplus and the Expositiones in Psalmos
Part 2: The Disputationes adversus astrologiam divinatricem
2 Introductory Remarks
â1âText and Its Structure
â2âEdition and Authorship
3 Reading Texts: Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and His Sources
4 Me quoque adolescentem olim fallebat: Giovanni Pico della Mirandola versus Prisca theologia
â1âIntroduction
â2âPrisca theologia in Giovanni Picoâs Writings before the Disputationes adversus astrologiam divinatricem
â3âOn the Origin of Astrology: Giovanni Pico della Mirandola Versus Prisca theologia
â4âConclusion
5 âPrinceps aliorumâ and His Followers: Giovanni Pico della Mirandola on the âAstrological Traditionâ in the Disputationes adversus astrologiam divinatricem
â1âIntroduction
â2âThe Use of Astrological Techniques and Its Controversies
â3âPseudo-Ptolemyâs Centiloquium in the Disputationes adversus astrologiam divinatricem
â4âThe Great Conjunctions, Abu Maâshar and âOtherâ Astrologers
â5âMedieval Christian Astrologers and the Problem of Religion in the Disputationes adversus astrologiam divinatricem
â6âConclusion
6 Back to Aristotle? Natural Philosophy in the Disputationes adversus astrologiam divinatricem
Part 3: The Disputationes: Pro et contra
7 Ideological Appropriation of Giovanni Picoâs Disputationes: Girolamo Savonarola and his Contro gli astrologi
8 Praenotio, Prisca haeresis and Astrology: Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola Between Savonarola and Giovanni Pico
â1âIntroduction
â2âThe De rerum praenotione and the Quaestio de falsitate astrologiae: Praenotio Versus Prophetia
â3âThe Controversial Use of (Anti-)Astrological Authorities in the De rerum praenotione
â4âPrisca theologia as prisca haeresis
â5âAristotle and Natural Philosophical Arguments Against Astrology
â6âConclusion
9 With âLatinsâ Against âLatin Viceâ: Maximus the Greek on Astrology
10 Lucio Bellanti and the Return to âChristian Astrologyâ
11 Poet, Astrologer, Courtier: Giovanni Gioviano Pontano versus Giovanni Pico della Mirandola
12 Astrology in Francesco Zorziâs De harmonia mundi: A Response to Giovanni Pico della Mirandolaâs Disputationes adversus astrologiam?
13 Conclusion
Bibliography
âPrimary Sources
âSecondary Literature
Index
All interested in the history of Renaissance astrology/astronomy, science and humanism, as well as in Giovanni Pico della Mirandolaâs thought and its reception across Europe. Keywords: Renaissance astrology and magic, early modern cosmology, Renaissance humanism, Renaissance astronomy, Ptolemy in the Renaissance, Aristotle in the Renaissance, Renaissance Platonism, Marsilio Ficino, Girolamo Savonarola, Maximus the Greek.