Typology and performance of inter-organizational relationships among Ghanaian farmers
In: International Food and Agribusiness Management ReviewSearch for other papers by Abigail Ampomah Adaku in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Vincent Amanor-Boadu in
Current site
Google Scholar
This study explored inter-organizational relationships (IOR) between farmers and agri-food processors in Ghana and their relative effect on participating farmers’ performance. The IOR were organized into three broad types: governance (formal/informal); orientation (price/quality/quantity); and structure (direct-to-buyer/farmer-based organization (FBO)/agent). The study showed that about 44% of farmers participated in IOR, and 72% of them use direct-to-buyer relationships compared to 25% and 5% who use FBO and agent. The total exceeds 100% because some farmers used multiple IOR structures. Likewise, more than half of farmers involved in IOR use multiple orientations, with 29%, 81% and 54% of them using orientations involving quantity, quality, and price specifications, respectively. Formal governance IOR accounted for 31% of IOR by governance. On performance, the average farm income of farmers involved in IOR was GHS 3,947, which was 3.1 times higher than non-IOR farmers, and those with formal arrangements had 6.4 times higher average farm income than farmers in informal relationships. IOR with formal governance and quality-price orientation presented positive and statistically significant effects on marginal benefits while producer demographic and socio-economic characteristics did not. These results provide instruction for policymakers and practitioners in helping inform farmers’ participation in IOR that produce superior outcomes.
-
Abdul-Rahaman, A. and A. Abdulai. 2019. Vertical coordination mechanisms and farm performance amongst smallholder rice farmers in Northern Ghana. Agribusiness 36(2): 259-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21628
-
Adaku, A.A. and V. Amanor-Boadu. in press. Transaction costs and inter-organizational relations between farmers and farm product buyers in Ghana. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-01-2021-0007
-
Alemu, A.E., M. Maertens, J. Deckers, H. Bauer and E. Mathijs. 2016. Impact of supply chain coordination on honey farmers’ income in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Agricultural and Food Economics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-016-0053-x
-
Amanor-Boadu, V., P. Marletta and A. Biere. 2009. Entrepreneurial supply chains and strategic collaboration: the case of Bagòss Cheese in Bagolino, Italy. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 12(3): 20.
'Entrepreneurial supply chains and strategic collaboration: the case of Bagòss Cheese in Bagolino, Italy ' () 12 International Food and Agribusiness Management Review : 20 .
-
Argyres, N.S. and T.R. Zenger. 2012. Capabilities, transaction costs, and firm boundaries. Organization Science 23(6): 1643-1657.
'Capabilities, transaction costs, and firm boundaries ' () 23 Organization Science : 1643 -1657.
-
Barrett, C.B. 2008. Smallholder market participation: concepts and evidence from Eastern and Southern Africa. Food Policy 33(4): 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.10.005
-
Camanzi, L., E. Arba, C. Rota, C. Zanasi and G. Malorgio. 2018. A structural equation modeling analysis of relational governance and economic performance in agri-food supply chains: evidence from the dairy sheep industry in Sardinia (Italy). Agricultural and Food Economics 6(1): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-018-0099-z
-
Castrogiovanni, G.J. 1991. Environmental munificence: a theoretical assessment. The Academy of Management Review 16(3): 542. https://doi.org/10.2307/258917
-
Choe, J.M. 2008. Inter-organizational relationships and the flow of information through value chains. Information and Management 45(7): 444-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.06.006
-
Coase, RH. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16): 386-405. https://doi.org/10.2307/2626876
-
Dubbert, C. 2019. Participation in contract farming and farm performance: insights from cashew farmers in Ghana. Agricultural Economics 50(6): 749-763. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12522
-
Frank, S.D. and D.R. Henderson. 1992. Transaction costs as determinants of vertical coordination in the U.S. food industries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(4): 941-950. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243192
-
Galizzi, G. and L. Venturini. 1999. Vertical relationships and coordination in the food system. Springer, New York, NY, USA.
'Vertical relationships and coordination in the food system', ().
-
Ghanaian Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MoFA). 2016. Agriculture in Ghana: facts and figures, 2015. MoFA, Accra, Ghana.
-
Ghanaian Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MoFA). 2017. Planting for food and jobs. MoFA, Accra, Ghana.
-
Gomes-Casseres, B. 2003. Competitive advantage in alliance constellations. Strategic Organization 1(3): 327-335.
'Competitive advantage in alliance constellations ' () 1 Strategic Organization : 327 -335.
-
Henchion, M. and B. McIntyre. 2010. From transactions to relationships: the case of the Irish beef chain. In: C. Fisher and M. Hartmann (eds.) Agri-food chain relationships. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845936426.0150
-
Hobbs, J.E. 1995. A transaction cost analysis of finished beef marketing in the United Kingdom. PhD-thesis, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. Available at: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.295221
-
Hobbs, J.E. 1997. Measuring the importance of transaction costs in cattle marketing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(4): 1083-1095.
'Measuring the importance of transaction costs in cattle marketing ' () 79 American Journal of Agricultural Economics : 1083 -1095.
-
Hofstede, G.J., M. Fritz, M. Canavari, E. Oosterkamp and G.-J. Van Sprundel. 2010. Towards a cross-cultural typology of trust in B2B food trade. British Food Journal 112(6-7): 671-687.
'Towards a cross-cultural typology of trust in B2B food trade ' () 112 British Food Journal : 671 -687.
-
Kataike, J. and X. Gellynck. 2018. 22 years of governance structures and performance: what has been achieved in agrifood chains and beyond? A review. Agriculture 8: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8040051
-
Kitamura, H., M. Sato and K. Arai. 2014. Exclusive contracts when the incumbent can establish a direct retailer. Journal of Economics 112(1): 47-60.
'Exclusive contracts when the incumbent can establish a direct retailer ' () 112 Journal of Economics : 47 -60.
-
Krathu, W., C. Pichler, G.H. Xiao, H. Werthner, J. Neidhardt, M. Zapletal and C. Huemer. 2015. Interorganizational success factors: a cause and effect model. Information Systems and e-Business Management 13(3): 553-593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-014-0258-z
-
Lo Nigro, G. and L. Abbate. 2011. Risk assessment and profit sharing in business networks. International Journal of Production Economics 131(1): 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.08.014
-
Miyata, S., N. Minot and D. Hu. 2009. Impact of contract farming on income: linking small farmers, packers, and supermarkets in China. World Development 37(11): 1781-1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.025
-
Nigh, R. 1997. Organic agriculture and globalization. A Maya associative corporation in Chiapas, Mexico. Human Organization 56(4): 427-436.
'Organic agriculture and globalization ' () 56 Human Organization : 427 -436.
-
Oliver, C. 1990. Determinants of interorganizational relationships: integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review 15(2): 241-266. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1990.4308156
-
Oya, C. 2012. Contract farming in sub-Saharan Africa: a survey of approaches, debates and issues. Journal of Agrarian Change 12(1): 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00337.x
-
Poku, A.-G., R. Birner and S. Gupta. 2018. Making contract farming arrangements work in Africa’s bioeconomy: evidence from cassava outgrower schemes in Ghana. Sustainability 10(5): 1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051604
-
Poole, N. and A. De Frece. 2010. A review of existing organisational forms of smallholder farmers’ associations and their contractual relationships with other market participants in the East and Southern African ACP Region. AAACP Paper Series – No. 11. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, Italy.
'A review of existing organisational forms of smallholder farmers’ associations and their contractual relationships with other market participants in the East and Southern African ACP Region', ().
-
Provan, K.G. and J. Sydow. 2009. Evaluating inter-organizational relationships. In: S. Cropper, C. Huxham, M. Ebers and S.P. Ring (eds.) The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199282944.003.0026
-
Rao, E.J.O. and M. Qaim. 2011. Supermarkets, farm household income, and poverty: insights from Kenya. World Development 39(5): 784-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.09.005
-
Salifu, A., R.L. Funk, M. Keefe and S. Kolavalli. 2012. Farmer based organizations in Ghana. IFPRI Working Paper 31. IFPRI-Accra, Accra, Ghana. Available at: https://researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au/islandora/object/uws:19138/datastream/PDF/view
-
Saxton, T. 1997. The effects of partner and relationship characteristics on alliance outcomes. The Academy of Management Journal 40(2): 443-461. https://doi.org/10.2307/256890
-
Simpson, C.R. and A. Rapone. 2000. Community development from the ground up: social-justice coffee. Human Ecology Review 7(1): 46-57.
'Community development from the ground up: social-justice coffee ' () 7 Human Ecology Review : 46 -57.
-
Williamson, O.E. 1973. Markets and hierarchies, some elementary considerations. American Economic Review 63(2): 316-325.
'Markets and hierarchies, some elementary considerations ' () 63 American Economic Review : 316 -325.
-
Williamson, O.E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1496720
-
Yameogo, T.B., A.Y. Bossa, B.M. Torou, J.-L. Fusillier, D.E.C. Da, Y. Yira, G. Serpantie, F. Somé and M.M. Dama-Balima. 2018. Socio-economic factors influencing small-scale farmers’ market participation: case of rice producers in Dano. Sustainability 10(12): 4354. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124354
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 324 | 135 | 9 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 226 | 92 | 11 |
Typology and performance of inter-organizational relationships among Ghanaian farmers
In: International Food and Agribusiness Management ReviewSearch for other papers by Abigail Ampomah Adaku in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vincent Amanor-Boadu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
This study explored inter-organizational relationships (IOR) between farmers and agri-food processors in Ghana and their relative effect on participating farmers’ performance. The IOR were organized into three broad types: governance (formal/informal); orientation (price/quality/quantity); and structure (direct-to-buyer/farmer-based organization (FBO)/agent). The study showed that about 44% of farmers participated in IOR, and 72% of them use direct-to-buyer relationships compared to 25% and 5% who use FBO and agent. The total exceeds 100% because some farmers used multiple IOR structures. Likewise, more than half of farmers involved in IOR use multiple orientations, with 29%, 81% and 54% of them using orientations involving quantity, quality, and price specifications, respectively. Formal governance IOR accounted for 31% of IOR by governance. On performance, the average farm income of farmers involved in IOR was GHS 3,947, which was 3.1 times higher than non-IOR farmers, and those with formal arrangements had 6.4 times higher average farm income than farmers in informal relationships. IOR with formal governance and quality-price orientation presented positive and statistically significant effects on marginal benefits while producer demographic and socio-economic characteristics did not. These results provide instruction for policymakers and practitioners in helping inform farmers’ participation in IOR that produce superior outcomes.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 324 | 135 | 9 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 226 | 92 | 11 |
