The Evolution of Monogamy in Large Primates: a New Hypothesis and Some Crucial Tests
äºBehaviourSearch for other papers by C.P. VAN SCHAIK in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by R.I.M. Dunbar in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Monogamy among the large primates is not accompanied by high levels of male care for infants. The selective pressures that have led to its evolution in this case are far from clear. In this paper, we evaluate and test four different hypotheses. Monogamy in these species did not evolve because males are unable to defend access to more than one female. Hence, it must be related to behavioural services provided by the male which substantially increase the female's reproductive output. Existing data argue against the suggestion that these services involve protection against predators or defence of an exclusive feeding area. We propose that the male's service consists primarily in protecting the female against infanticide by other males. Tests that would differentiate this hypothesis unequivocally from other hypotheses are suggested. To the extent that these predictions can be tested with the data currently available, the evidence supports the infanticide hypothesis. We speculate that infanticide avoidance is also responsible for the near-universal occurrence among primates of male-female bonds.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 3138 | 284 | 18 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 663 | 19 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 706 | 30 | 0 |
The Evolution of Monogamy in Large Primates: a New Hypothesis and Some Crucial Tests
äºBehaviourSearch for other papers by C.P. VAN SCHAIK in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R.I.M. Dunbar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Monogamy among the large primates is not accompanied by high levels of male care for infants. The selective pressures that have led to its evolution in this case are far from clear. In this paper, we evaluate and test four different hypotheses. Monogamy in these species did not evolve because males are unable to defend access to more than one female. Hence, it must be related to behavioural services provided by the male which substantially increase the female's reproductive output. Existing data argue against the suggestion that these services involve protection against predators or defence of an exclusive feeding area. We propose that the male's service consists primarily in protecting the female against infanticide by other males. Tests that would differentiate this hypothesis unequivocally from other hypotheses are suggested. To the extent that these predictions can be tested with the data currently available, the evidence supports the infanticide hypothesis. We speculate that infanticide avoidance is also responsible for the near-universal occurrence among primates of male-female bonds.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 3138 | 284 | 18 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 663 | 19 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 706 | 30 | 0 |
