Grounding Critique: Marxism, Concept Formation, and Embodied Social Relations argues that marxism must have a robust understanding of embodied social relations, such as race, gender, and sexuality, in order to produce the knowledge necessary for transformative social change. Tanyildiz subjects two important strands of marxist social theory âmarxist-feminism and social reproduction theoryâ to a methodological examination and demonstrates their shortcomings. Focusing on these strandsâ critiques of intersectionality as a moment of crystallization in concept formation, Grounding Critique explores alternative ways of using Marxâs method to understand contemporary human praxis.
Gökbörü Sarp Tanyildiz is an Assistant Professor of Sociology at Brock University, Canada. As a theoretical methodologist of social sciences and humanities, his research focuses on concept formation in social and spatial theories of marxism, racial capitalism, and social reproduction.
Foreword
Acknowledgements
Introduction: The Living Individual and the Marionette
âiâThe Predicament of the Marxist Sociologist
âiiâA Marxism Made to the Measure of Life
âiiiâThe Principle of Sociability for Social Relations
âivâThe Specificity of Social Relations in Marx
âvâEmbodied Social Relations under Capitalism
âviâEmbodied Social Relations in Contemporary Marxist Social Thought
âviiâA Brief Note on Intersectionality
âviiiâA Marxist-Feminist Symposium on Intersectionality
âixâEmbodied Social Relations in Social Reproduction Theory
âxâA Conceptual Ground Clearing to Return to Marx
part i Embodied Social Relations in Contemporary Marxist-Feminism
âiâIntroduction
âiiâIntersectionality
âiiiâSome Methodological Propositions for a Marxist Engagement with Intersectionality
âivâThe Generalization of Embodied Social Relations as the Categories of Subjective Human Life
âvâThe Framing of the Marxist-Feminist Engagement with Intersectionality
âviâThe Analytic Primacy of Class and the Transformative Pedagogies
âviiâThe Ideological Techniques of Bourgeois Management
âviiiâThe Concept of the Mode of Production
âixâThe Methodological Tension between the Phenomenology and Ontology of the Social
âxâThe Need for the Recovery of the Concept of Experience in its Lived Sense
âxiâEmbodied Social Relations and the Levels of Analysis in Social Sciences
âxiiâClass Burdened with the Difficult Conceptual Task of Reconciling History with the Social
âxiiiâMistaking Critical Marxist Epistemologies for a Sociology of Knowledge
âxivâA Quasi-transcendental Framework of Explanation Premised upon a First Principle
âxvâMarxism and the Non-identity of the Law and Life in Contemporary Capitalist Societies
âxviâSupra-racial Epistemology of an Aleatory and Subjectless Conception of History
âxviiâMarxist-Feminist Aporetic of Description versus Explanation
âxviiiâ10 + 1 Theses on Feuerbach
âxixâThe Non-coincidence of Experience and Explanation
âxxâMarxist-Feminist Inscription of the Binary of the Idiographic versus the Nomothetic
âxxiâWhy âRaceâ Cannot Be Accommodated within a Marxist-Feminist Analysis as an Embodied Social Relation?
âxxiiâConclusion
part ii Embodied Social Relations in Social Reproduction Theory
âiâIntroduction
âiiâWhat Is the Relationship between Social Reproduction Theory and Intersectionality?
âiiiâSocial Reproduction Theoryâs Ambiguous and Inadequately Self-reflexive Relationship to Intersectionality
âivâSocial Reproduction Theory as a Marxist-Feminist Alternative to Intersectionality
âvâSocial Reproduction Theoryâs âMethodologyâ and its Articulation and Selection of Social Problems
âviââRace,â Racialization, and Experience in Social Reproduction Feminism
âviiâVacillating between Supplementing and Supplanting Intersectionality
âviiiâInauguration of Socialist-Feminist Political Economy as a Unitary Social Theory
âixâOne-Sidedness of Experience in Social Reproduction Theory
âxâThe Values, Facts, and Factuality of Oppression in the Quasi-transcendental Structure of Social Reproduction Theory
âxiâSocial Reproduction Theory as Sublated Intersectionality
âxiiiâ(Hegelian-Marxist) Totality in Social Reproduction Theory?
âxivâSevering Methodology from the Rest of the Theoretical Framework in Social Reproduction Theory
âxvâCo-constitutivity in Social Reproduction Theory
âxviââAdditive Method,â Anti-additivity, and Social Reproduction Theory
âxviiâLiberalism, Ontological Atomism, Social Newtonianism, and Intersectionality According to Social Reproduction Theory
âxviiiâAn Alternative Outlook on the Relationship between Intersectionality and the Critical Import of Newtonâs System into Liberal Bourgeois Social Thought
âxixâThe Pitfalls of the âMethodologyâ of Analogical Argumentations and Battling Metaphors
âxxâTowards a Marxist Social Theory of Embodied Social Relations
Coda: A Long Dayâs Evening
âiâA Critique of Concept Formation
âiiâThrough Intersectionality to Concept Formation in Contemporary Marxist Social Thought
âiiiâDissolving Intersecting Lines in Favour of Parallel Planes Bereft of Social Existence and Life
âivâConceptual Conditions of Dialectically Overcoming Intersectionality
âvâThe Finality of Conceptual Judgement?
âviâTarrying with Marxist-Feminism and Social Reproduction Theory
âviiâQuo Vadis Social Reproduction?
âviiiâSocial Reproduction Qua Method
âixâReturning to Marx to Study Embodied Social Relations
Afterword
Bibliography
Index
Academic institutions, libraries, specialists, post-graduate and undergraduate students, activists in the fields of marxism; sociology; social and political thought; women, gender, and sexuality studies; critical race studies; and human geography.