The Catholic Church answered Reformation-era contestations of the cult of images in a famous decree of the Council of Trent (1563). Art in Dispute revisits this response by focusing on its antecedents rather than its consequences. The mid-sixteenth century saw, besides new scholarship on Byzantine doctrines, heated debates about neo-scholastic interpretations. Disagreement, suppressed at Trent but re-emerging soon afterwards, centered on the question whether religious images were solely signs referring to holy subjects or also sacred objects in their own right. It was a debate with major implications for art theory and devotional practice.
Wietse de Boer, Ph.D. (1995) is Professor of History at Miami University. His research focuses on Italian early-modern religious and cultural history. His publications include The Conquest of the Soul: Confession, Discipline, and Public Order in Counter-Reformation Milan (Brill, 2001).
â[...] the value of Art in Dispute is undeniable. It is a necessary reference for graduate students and scholars in early modern religious history and art history. For art historians, the book opens avenues to consider the potential impact these debates had on sacred style during these respective periods.â
Anne H. Muraoka, Old Dominion University. In: Renaissance Quarterly, Vol. 76, No. 4 (Winter 2023), pp. 1478â1480.
âWietse de Boerâs superb book delves into the intense mid-sixteenth-century debates among Catholic scholars, about sacred images. [â¦] I strongly recommend this book to anyone interested in the early modern image debate. De Boer enriches our understanding of the heterogeneous opinions and intense discussions among leading Catholic theologians before, during, and after 1563.â
Jeffrey Chipps Smith, University of Texas, Austin. In: Church History, Vol. 91, No. 4 (December 2022), pp. 925â926.
â[â¦] a distinguished contribution to recent attempts to put the Council of Trent (1543â1563) in its proper place [â¦]. This book is essential reading not only for art historians but also for anyone interested in how and why the Roman Catholic church after Trent managed to save visual images âas the language of new devotional or meditative practicesâ (130)â.
Simon Ditchfield, University of York. In: Journal of Modern History, Vol. 96. No. 4 (December 2024), pp. 980â981.
âDe Boer setzt einen neuen Standard [â¦] und leistet einen zentralen Beitrag zur aktuellen Reflexion über den medialen und ontologischen Status von Bildern.â
Theresa Gatarski, Bayerisches Nationalmuseum. In: Kunstchronik, Vol. 75, No. 12 (December 2022), pp. 609â614.
1 Premises: The Sacred Image in an Age of Religious Crisis
â1âThe Thomist View and Its Critics
â2âEarly Catholic Responses to Reformation Critiques
â3âThe Image Question in the Mid-Sixteenth Century
â4âMarcello Cervini and the Image Debate
3 Reverberations: St. Germain, Trent, and Beyond
â1âOn the Sidelines of Trent: Eliseo and Ninguarda
â2âDiego LaÃnez between St. Germain and Trent
â3âTrent: The French Connection
â4âA Previously Unknown Draft
â5âA Question about Honor
â6âBeyond Trent: Paleotti to Bellarmino
â7âConclusion