In Common Words in Muslim-Christian Dialogue Vebjørn L. Horsfjord offers an analysis of texts from an international dialogue process between Christian and Muslim leaders. Through detailed engagement with the Muslim dialogue letter A Common Word between Us and You (2007) and a large number of Christian responses to it, the study analyses the dialogue process in the wake of the Muslim initiative and shows how the various texts gain meaning through their interaction.
The author uses tools from critical discourse analysis and speech act analysis and claims that the Islamic dialogue initiative became more important as an invitation to Muslim-Christian dialogue than as theological reflection. He shows how Christian leaders systematically chose to steer the dialogue process towards practical questions about peaceful coexistence and away from theological issues.
Vebjørn L. Horsfjord, Ph.D. (2015), University of Oslo, is senior lecturer in interreligious studies at the Faculty of Theology of that university. He has published on interreligious relations and human rights, and has long experience from facilitating international interreligious dialogue.
Acknowledgements
1 Introduction: It Takes Two to Dialogue
â1.1âLetters and Conference Statements
â1.2âJordanian Roots
â1.3âThe Common Word Process and Academia
â1.4âGoal: To Understand What These Men are Doing
2 We Muslims and You Christians: A Common Word between us and You
â2.1âA Complex Text: Structure and Main Argument
â2.2âTextual Forerunners
â2.3âA Common Word: A Second Open Letter
â2.4âUsing Sacred Texts
â2.5âPublication, Promotion and Related Dialogue Initiatives
â2.6âMuslims and Christians: Construction of Group Identities
â2.7âWhat Does acw Do?
â2.8âConclusion: It Takes Two to Dialogue
3 The First Christian Responses
â3.1âResponse from David Ford
â3.2âSenior Church Leaders Respond
â3.3âAn Alternative Reading: Michael Nazir-Ali
â3.4âConclusion
4 Roman Catholic Responses
â4.1âCatholic-Muslim Dialogue since the Second Vatican Council
â4.2âFirst Official Catholic Responses to acw 74
â4.3âFive Substantial Commentaries from Four Scholars
â4.4âCatholic-Muslim Dialogue in the Wake of acw 83
â4.5âConclusion
5 The Yale Response: Loving God and Neighbor Together
â5.1âAn Advertisement in the New York Times
â5.2âInteracting with acw: Arguments, Speech Acts, Construals
â5.3âBodily Gestures, but Little Flesh
â5.4âConclusion
6 World Evangelical Alliance: We Too Want to Live in Love, Peace, Freedom and Justice
â6.1âThe Text and Its Main Arguments
â6.2âWhat wwll Does
â6.3âDifferent Difference
â6.4âInterpreting Evangelicals: Beyond Polite Dialogue?
â6.5âConclusion
7 World Council of Churches: Learning to Explore Love Together
â7.1âFour Decades of Christian-Muslim Dialogue
â7.2âLearning to Explore Love Together: A Resource Document
â7.3âConclusion
8 Rowan Williams: A Common Word for the Common Good
â8.1âBackground and Context
â8.2âThe Text and Its Main Arguments
â8.3âWhat the Text Does
â8.4âManaging Differences Discursively
â8.5âConclusion
9 Orthodox Church Leaders: Responses from Five Contexts
â9.1âResponse from Archbishop Mor Eustathius Matta Roham, Syrian Orthodox Church of Antioch
â9.2âResponse from Catholicos Aram i, Armenian Orthodox Church
â9.3âResponse from the See of Etchmiadzin (The Armenian Orthodox Church)
â9.4âResponse from Patriarch Alexy ii of Moscow and all Russia
â9.5âResponse from Archbishop Chrisostomos ii of Cyprus
10 We Muslims and Christians Together: Statements from Dialogue Conferences
â10.1âDeclaration from the Yale University Conference, July 2008
â10.2âCommunique from the Cambridge Conference, October 2008
â10.3âDeclaration from the CatholicâMuslim Forum, November 2008
â10.4âStatement from the Geneva Consultation, November 2010
â10.5âConclusion: acw as Proposition and Invitation
11 Lessons
â11.1âMaking Sense of a Common Word
â11.2âCross-cutting Topics
â11.3âReligion and the Religious
â11.4âThe Myth of Interreligious Dialogue
â11.5âA Hermeneutics of Good Will
â11.6âManaging Difference â In-groups and Out-groups
Bibliography Index
Scholars and students (theology and religious studies) interested in interreligious relations, and (scholar) practitioners of Christian-Muslim dialogue.