Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Rabbis as Nomikoi? Questioning a New Paradigm: A Response to Yair Furstenberg
in Journal for the Study of JudaismSearch for other papers by Ishay Rosen-Zvi in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
In recent years, a new generation of Talmud scholars rediscovered Roman law as a valuable comparative tool. In addition to localized comparisons, several broad syntheses have been offered by scholars regarding Roman law and rabbinic halakhic thinking. In his article in this issue, “The Rabbinic Movement from Pharisees to Provincial Jurists” (doi: 10.1163/15700631-bja10070), Yair Furstenberg offers to explain the rise of the field of civil law in later Tannaitic literature as part of the rise of the local jurist in the eastern provinces. I seize the opportunity of Furstenberg’s novel thesis to rethink recent trends of comparing Tannaitic halakhah and Roman law and their limitations.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
-
Alonso, José Luis. “The Status of Peregrine Law in Egypt: ‘Customary Law’ and Legal Pluralism in the Roman Empire.” Journal of Juristic Papyrology 43 (2013), 351–404.
-
Amsler, Monika. The Babylonian Talmud and Late Antique Book Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023).
-
Arjava, Antti. “The Romanization of Family Law.” In Law and Legal Practice in Egypt from Alexander to the Arab Conquest, ed. James G. Keenan, J.G. Manning, and Uri Yiftach-Firanko (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 175–191.
-
Berthelot, Katell. Jews and Their Roman Rivals: Pagan Rome’s Challenge to Israel (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021).
-
Bryen, Ari Z. “Tradition, Precedent and Power in Roman Egypt.” In Official Epistolography and the Language(s) of Power: Proceedings of the First International Conference of the Research Network Imperium & Officium, ed. Stephen Procházka, Lucian Reinfandt, and Sven Tost (Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, 2015), 201–18.
-
Cohen, Boaz. Jewish and Roman Law: A Comparative Study, 2 vols. (New York: Jewish Theological Seminary, 1966).
-
Czajkowski, Kimberley. “Law and Romanization in Judaea.” In Law in the Roman Provinces, ed. Kimberley Czajkowski, Benedikt Eckhardt, and Meret Strothmann (Oxford: Oxford Academic, 2020), 84–100.
-
Czajkowski, Kimberley. “Law and Administration at the Edges of Empire: The Case of Dura-Europos.” In Law in the Roman Provinces, ed. Kimberley Czajkowski, Benedikt Eckhardt, and Meret Strothmann (Oxford: Oxford Academic, 2020), 115–134.
-
Dohrmann, Natalie B. “Law and Imperial Idioms: Rabbinic Legalism in a Roman World.” In Jews, Christians, and the Roman Empire: The Poetics of Power in Late Antiquity, ed. Natalie B. Dohrmann and Annette Yoshiko Reed (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013), 63–78.
-
Dolganov, Anna. Empire of Law: Legal Culture and Imperial Rule in the Roman Province of Egypt, PhD Dissertation (Classics Department, Princeton, 2018).
-
Dolganov, Anna. “Reichsrecht and Volksrecht in Theory and Practice: Roman Justice in the Province of Egypt.” Tyche 34 (2019), 27–60.
-
Domingo, Rafael. Roman Law: An Introduction (New York: Routledge, 2018).
-
Elman, Yaakov. “Order, Sequence, and Selection: The Mishnah’s Anthological Choices.” In The Anthology in Jewish Literature, ed. David Stern (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), 53–80.
-
Flatto, David C. The Crown and the Courts: Separation of Powers in the Early Jewish Imagination (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2020).
-
Furstenberg, Yair. “Status of the Samaritans in Early Rabbinic Law and the Roman Concept of Citizenship.” Zion 82.2 (2017), 157–182 [Hebrew].
-
Furstenberg, Yair. “From Competition to Integration: the ‘Laws of the Nations’ in Early Rabbinic Literature within its Roman Context.” Dine Israel 32 (2018), 21–58 [Hebrew].
-
Furstenberg, Yair. “Provincial Rabbis: Shaping Rabbinic Divorce Procedure in a Roman Legal Environment.” Jewish Quarterly Review 109 (2019), 471–499.
-
Furstenberg, Yair. “Imperialism and the Creation of Local Law: The Case of Rabbinic Law.” In Legal Engagement: The Reception of Roman Law and Tribunals by Jews and Other Inhabitants of the Empire, ed. Katell Berthelot, Natalie B. Dohrmann, and Capucine Nemo-Pekelman (Rome: École Française de Rome, 2021), 271–300.
-
Furstenberg, Yair. “The Literary Evolution of the Mishnah.” In What is the Mishnah? The State of the Question, ed. Shaye J.D. Cohen, David Stern, Jay Harris, and Noah Feldman (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2023), 98–125.
-
Furstenberg, Yair. “The Rabbinic Movement from Pharisees to Provincial Jurists.” Journal for the Study of Judaism 55 (2024), 1–43.
-
Furstenberg, Yair. “Acquisition and Possession (‘Hazaqah’): Tannaitic Law between Changing Legal Contexts.” Shnaton Ha-Mishpat Ha-Ivri (forthcoming) [Hebrew].
-
Goodman, Martin. “The Presentation of the Past on the Mishnah.” In What is the Mishnah? The State of the Question, ed. Shaye J.D. Cohen, David Stern, Jay Harris, and Noah Feldman (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2023), 129–140.
-
Gvaryahu, Amit. “Roman Coinage and Its Early Rabbinic Users.” Jewish Quarterly Review 111.4 (2021), 529–554.
-
Hezser, Catherine. “The Mishnah and Roman Law: A Rabbinic Compilation of ius civile for the Jewish Civitas of the Land of Israel under Roman Rule.” In What is the Mishnah? The State of the Question, ed. Shaye J.D. Cohen, David Stern, Jay Harris, and Noah Feldman (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2023), 141–166.
-
Hezser, Catherine. “The Codification of Legal Knowledge in Late Antiquity: The Talmud Yerushalmi and Roman Law Codes.” The Talmud Yerushalmi and Graeco-Roman Culture, vol. I, ed. Peter Schäfer (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1998), 581–641 [Hebrew].
-
Kahana, Menahem. “The Relations between Exegeses in the Mishnah and Halakhot in the Midrash.” Tarbiz 84.1/2 (2015), 17–76 [Hebrew].
-
Kahana, Menahem. Derash Hamazhir and its Contribution to the Research of Sifre on Deuteronomy and Mekhilta on Deuteronomy (Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, 2022) [Hebrew].
-
Lapin, Hayim. Rabbis as Romans: The Rabbinic Movement in Palestine, 100–400 CE (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).
-
Letteney, Mark. “Widening the Frame of Ancient Legal History.” Koinonia 46 (2022), 341–350.
-
MacRae, Duncan. Legible Religion: Books, Gods, and Rituals in Roman Culture (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2016).
-
Naeh, Shlomo. “Omanut ha-zikaron, mivnim shel zikaron ve-tavniot shel teqst be-sifrut ḥazal.” Mehqarei Talmud 3 (2005), 543–589.
-
Neusner, Jacob. Judaism: The Evidence of the Mishnah (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1981).
-
Rosen-Zvi, Ishay. “Mishna Sotah Chapter 5 and the Midrash of Rabbi Akiva.” Tarbiz 70 (2006), 95–128.
-
Rosen-Zvi, Ishay. “Rabbis and Romanization.” In Jewish Cultural Encounters in the Ancient Mediterranean and Near Eastern World, ed. Mladen Popović, Myles Schoonover, and Marijn Vandenberghe (Leiden: Brill, 2016), 218–245.
-
Rosen-Zvi, Ishay. “Is the Mishnah a Roman Composition?” In The Faces of Torah. Studies in the Texts and Contexts of Ancient Judaism in Honor of Steven Fraade, ed. Michal Bar-Asher Siegal, Tzvi Novick, and Christine Hayes (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2017), 487–508.
-
Rosen-Zvi, Ishay. Between Mishnah and Midrash: The Birth of Rabbinic Literature (Raanana: Open University of Israel Press, 2019) [Hebrew].
-
Rowlandson, Jane. “Dissing the Egyptians: Legal, Ethnic, and Cultural Identities in Roman Egypt.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement, No. 120 (2013), 213–247.
-
Sagiv, Yonathan. Studies in Early Rabbinic Hermeneutics as Reflected in Selected Chapters in the Sifra, Ph.D. Dissertation (Department of Talmud, Hebrew University, 2009) [Hebrew].
-
Schmidt-Hofner, Sebastian. “Plato and the Theodosian Code.” Early Medieval Europe 27 (2019), 35–60.
-
Schremer, Adiel. “The Lost Chapter: Imperialism and Jewish Society, 70–135 CE.” Revue des études juives 179 (2020), 63–82.
-
Schwartz, Seth. Imperialism and Jewish Society, 200 B.C.E. to 640 C.E. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).
-
Schwartz, Seth. “The Mishnah and the Limits of Roman Power.” In Reconsidering Roman Power: Roman, Greek, Jewish and Christian Perceptions and Reactions (Rome: École Française de Rome, 2020), 387–415.
-
Shapira, Haim. “A Chosen Court in Tannaitic Court System.” Shnaton Ha-Mishpat Ha-Ivri (forthcoming) [Hebrew].
-
Simon-Shoshan, Moshe. Stories of the Law: Narrative Discourse and the Construction of Authority in the Mishnah (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).
-
Sussman, Yaakov. “Yerushalmi Nezikin: Once Again.” Mehqarei Talmud 1 (1990), 96–114 [Hebrew].
-
Tropper, Amram D. Wisdom, Politics, and Historiography: Tractate Avot in the Context of the Graeco-Roman Near East (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).
-
Yiftach, Uri. “Order and Chaos in Roman Administrative Terminology.” In Law in the Roman Provinces, ed. Kimberley Czajkowski, Benedikt Eckhardt, and Meret Strothmann (Oxford: Oxford Academic, 2020), 32–43.
-
Yiftach, Uri. “Law in Ptolemaic and Roman Egypt.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Law, ed. Edward M. Harris and Mirko Canevaro (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 1–54.
-
Yiftach, Uri. “Law in Graeco-Roman Egypt: Hellenization, Fusion, Romanization.” In The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology, ed. Roger S. Bagnall (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 541–560.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 689 | 149 | 9 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 150 | 34 | 2 |
| PDF-Downloads | 464 | 85 | 5 |
Rabbis as Nomikoi? Questioning a New Paradigm: A Response to Yair Furstenberg
in Journal for the Study of JudaismSearch for other papers by Ishay Rosen-Zvi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
In recent years, a new generation of Talmud scholars rediscovered Roman law as a valuable comparative tool. In addition to localized comparisons, several broad syntheses have been offered by scholars regarding Roman law and rabbinic halakhic thinking. In his article in this issue, “The Rabbinic Movement from Pharisees to Provincial Jurists” (doi: 10.1163/15700631-bja10070), Yair Furstenberg offers to explain the rise of the field of civil law in later Tannaitic literature as part of the rise of the local jurist in the eastern provinces. I seize the opportunity of Furstenberg’s novel thesis to rethink recent trends of comparing Tannaitic halakhah and Roman law and their limitations.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 689 | 149 | 9 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 150 | 34 | 2 |
| PDF-Downloads | 464 | 85 | 5 |
