Save

The Servetus Challenge

Eisegesis and the Problematic of Differing Chronologies of Ecclesiastical Corruption

于Journal of Reformed Theology
著者:
Joao Chaves Baptist University of the Américas Joao_Chaves@baylor.edu

Search for other papers by Joao Chaves in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation 获得许可

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login with Institutional Access

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€36.93

This piece focuses on how the challenge that Servetus’s Trinitarian thought posed to reformers in general and Calvin in particular illustrates the oftentimes overlooked similarities between their interpretative frameworks. Although many works on the Servetus-Calvin affair have been produced, such works focus on the dissimilarities between Servetus and Calvin. I will argue that there is a significant similarity between Servetus’s and Calvin’s hermeneutical presuppositions insofar as both thinkers not only do not acknowledge the tentative nature of their scriptural interpretations but also allow their respective hermeneutic to be guided by sources that were produced by people who belonged to a time when, according to their respective convictions, the church was still able to properly recognize true scriptural teaching.

内容统计数据

全部期间 过去一年 过去30天
摘要浏览次数 547 94 10
全文浏览次数 161 2 0
PDF下载次数 119 3 0