Codex Hammurabi 49â52 and the esip-tabal Contracts from Susa
äºJournal of the Economic and Social History of the OrientSearch for other papers by Dr. Hossein Badamchi in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Professor Guido Pfeifer in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The so-called esip-tabal contract is a particular type of agricultural transaction known from Codex Hammurabi and the Akkadian legal texts found in Susa. The Akkadian phrase esip-tabal is a statement made by the owner of the field to the other party, which is commonly understood to be a tenant. Modern scholarship first interpreted this contract as a lease. Later it was considered an antichretic loan, a loan in which the creditor takes over the debtorâs agricultural land as security. However, the place of this contract in the long-term history of law is still unknown and scholars have not made any analogies from other legal cultures. Using the methodology of comparative legal history, and drawing especially on Islamic law, this essay offers a new interpretation of the esip-tabal contract as a sale of future crops. The essay then discusses the rationale behind the contract and its possible continuity into later periods.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
al-Jaziri, Abd al-Rahman. 2003. Al-Fiqh âala al-Madhahib al-Arbaâah, Beirut: Dar al-kotob al-ilmiyah, vol. 2: 261â271 (sale of fruits/crops) 272â285 (salam).
-
Badamchi, Hossein 2016. Fraud and Forgery in Old Babylonian Law, Zeitschrift für Altorientalische und Biblische Rechtsgeschichte 22: 1â28.
-
Badamchi, Hossein 2017. Usurpation of Agricultural Land and Codex Ur-Namma, 39, Akkadica 138/2: 81â188.
-
Badamchi, Hossein 2018. Law in a Multicultural Society: Akkadian Legal Texts from Susa in Comparative Perspective, Elamica: Contributions on History and Culture of Elam and Its Neighbouring Regions 8: 3â12.
-
Badamchi, Hossein 2021. Lease of Agricultural Land and Sharecropping: a Re- examination of CH 45â46, Akkadica 142/1: 43â62.
-
Badamchi, Hossein and Guido Pfeifer 2019. Partnership in Elamite Society: Akkadian Legal Texts from Susa in Comparative Perspective, Zeitschrift für Altorientalische und Biblische Rechtsgeschichte 25: 13â28.
-
Berger, Adolf, 1953. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
-
Birks, Peter 2014. The Roman Law of Obligations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
De Graef, Katrien. 2010. InÅ¡uÅ¡inak lu dÄrû! Lawsuits in Old-Babylonian Susa, Zeitschrift für Altorientalische und Biblische Rechtsgeschichte 16: 27â48.
-
De Graef, Katrien. 2013. The Use of Akkadian in Iran. In the Oxford Handbook of Ancient Iran, edited by D. T. Potts, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 263â282.
-
De Graef, Katrien. 2018. In Susaâs Fields. On the Topography of Fields in Old Babylonian Administrative Documents from Susa. In Topography and Toponymy in the Ancient Near East: Perspectives and Prospects, edited by J. Tavernier, E. Gorris, K. Abraham, and V. Boschloos, Louvain: Peeters: 267â312.
-
Driver, Godfrey R., and John C. Miles 1952. The Babylonian Laws, vol. 1: Legal Commentary, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Goddeeris, Anne 2016 The Old Babylonian Legal and Administrative Texts in the Hilprecht Collection Jena, THM 10, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
-
Johansen, Baber. 2006. Le Contrat salam: Droit et formation du capital dans lâEmpire Abbasside (XIeâXIIe siècle). Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 61/4: 863â899.
-
Kaser, Max, Rolf Knütel, and Sebastian Lohsse, 2021. Römisches Privatrecht: ein Studienbuch, 22nd ed. Munich: C.H. Beck.
-
Kienast, Burkhart. 1978. Die Altbabylonischen Briefe und Urkunden aus Kisurra, vol. 1, Wiesbaden: Steiner.
-
Knütel, Rolf. 2000. Hoffnungskauf und Eviktionshaftung. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romanistische Abteilung 117/1: 445â453.
-
Koschaker, Paul. 1931. Ãber einige griechische Rechtsurkunden aus den östlichen Randgebieten des Hellenismus: mit Beiträgen zum Eigentums- und Pfandbegriff nach griechischem und orientalischen Rechten. Leipzig: Hirzel.
-
Koschaker, Paul and Arthur Ungnad. 1923. Hammurabiâs Gesetz. Vol. 6. Leipzig: Pfeiffer.
-
Kouwenberg, N.J.C. 2005. Reflections on the Gt-Stem in Akkadian, Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 95/1: 77â103.
-
Landsberger, Benno. 1955. Remarks on the Archive of the Soldier Ubarum. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 9/4: 121â131.
-
Lobban, Michael. 2015. Legal Fictions before the Age of Reform. In Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice, edited by Maksymilian Del Mar & William Twining, New York: Springer: 199â224.
-
Maine, Henry Sumner. 1906. Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and Its Relation to Modern Ideas, with introduction and notes by Frederick Pollock, New York: Henry Holt and Company (first published in 1861).
-
Malbran-Labat, Florence. 2021. Akkadian in Elam. In History of the Akkadian Language, edited by Juan-Pablo Vita. 2 Vols. Leiden: Brill: 1316â1343.
-
Mauer, Gerlinde. 1980. Das Formular der altbabylonischen Bodenpachtverträge, Ph.D Dissertation, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.
-
Mayer, Werner R. 2005. Die altbabylonischen Keilschrifttexte in der Sammlung des Päpstlichen Bibelinstituts. Orientalia NS 74/4: 317â351.
-
Moyle, John B. 1892. The Contract of Sale in the Civil Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Nicholas, Barry. 1962. An Introduction to Roman Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Oelsner, Joachim 2022, Der Kodex Ḫammu-rÄpi. Textkritische Ausgabe und Ãbersetzung, dubsar 4, Münster: Zaphon.
-
Oers, Lotte. 2013. To Invest in Harvest: Field Leases in Old Babylonian Susa. Zeitschrift für Altorientalische und Biblische Rechtsgeschichte 19: 155â169.
-
Olivier, Pierre J.J. 1975. Legal Fictions in Practice and Legal Science, Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.
-
Petschow, Herbert. 1984. Die §§ 45 und 46 des Codex Hammurapi. Ein Beitrag zum altbabylonischen Bodenpachtrecht und zum Problem: Was ist der Codex Hammurapi? Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 74: 181â212.
-
Pfeifer, Guido. 2013. Fortschritt auf Umwegen: Umgehung und Fiktion in Rechtsurkunden des Altertums. Munich: C.H. Beck.
-
Potts, Daniel T. 1997. Mesopotamian Civilization: the Material Foundations. London: the Athlone Press.
-
Powell, Marvin A. 1990. Masse und Gewichte. Reallexikon der Assyriologie. 7: 457â530.
-
Rabel, Ernst. 1906. Nachgeformte Rechtsgeschäfte. Mit Beiträgen zu den Lehren von der Injurezession und vom Pfandrecht. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romanistische Abteilung 27: 290â335; continued in 28 (1907): 311â379.
-
Roth, Martha T. 1997. Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor. 2nd edition, Atlanta: Scholars Press.
-
Saleh, Nabil A. 1986. Unlawful Gain and Legitimate Profit in Islamic Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Sallaberger, Walther. 2015. Sumerische und altbabylonische Eidesformeln in lexikalischer und kulturhistorischer Perspektive. In Prozessrecht und Eid: Recht und Rechtsfindung in antiken Kulturen, edited by H. Barta, M. Lang, R. Rollinger. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz: 179â192.
-
Salonen, Erkki. 1967. Glossar zu den altbabylonischen Urkunden aus Susa. StOr 36. Helsinki.
-
San Nicolò, M. 1932. Review of Koschaker 1931. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romanistische Abteilung 52/1: 460â466.
-
Schacht, Joseph. 1965. An Introduction to Islamic Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Scheil, Vincent. 1916. Notules XIV. Le paragraphe 49 du Code, appliqué (texte susien de lâépoque Kuk-NaÅ¡ur). Revue dâAssyriologie 13/3: 125â128.
-
Steinkeller, Piotr. 1989. Sale Documents of the Ur-III-Period. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
-
Stol, Marten. 2004. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft in Altbabylonischer Zeit. In Mesopotamien: Die Altbabylonische Zeit, ed. Dominique Charpin, Dietz Otto Edzard, and Marten Stol, Fribourg: Academic Press: 643â977.
-
Stol, Marten. 2004b. Pacht. B. Altbabylonisch. Reallexikon der Assyriologie. Vol. 10: 170â172.
-
Stol, Marten. 2021. Esip tabal in Agriculture. In dNisaba za3-mi2, Ancient Near Eastern Studies in Honor of Francesco Pomponio, dubsar 19, edited by Palmiro Notizia, Annunziata Rositani and Lorenzo Verderame, Münster: Zaphon: 301â318.
-
von Jhering, Rudolf. 1865. Geist des roÌmischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung. Vol. 3. Leipzig: Breitkopf und HaÌrtel.
-
Watson, Alan, ed. 1985. The Digest of Justinian, 4 volumes, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
-
Westbrook, Raymond, ed. 2003. A History of Ancient Near Eastern Law, 2 volumes, Leiden: E.J. Brill.
-
Westbrook, Raymond. 2001. The Old Babylonian Period. In Security for Debt in Ancient Near Eastern Law, edited by R. Westbrook and R. Jasnow, Leiden: Brill: 63â92.
-
Westbrook, Raymond. 2011. The Early History of Law: A Theoretical Essay. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romanistische Abteilung 127: 1â13.
-
Zimmermann, Reinhard. 1996. The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Zulueta, Francis de. 1945. The Roman Law of Sale: Introduction and Select Texts, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 705 | 118 | 6 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 49 | 8 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 111 | 16 | 0 |
Codex Hammurabi 49â52 and the esip-tabal Contracts from Susa
äºJournal of the Economic and Social History of the OrientSearch for other papers by Dr. Hossein Badamchi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Professor Guido Pfeifer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The so-called esip-tabal contract is a particular type of agricultural transaction known from Codex Hammurabi and the Akkadian legal texts found in Susa. The Akkadian phrase esip-tabal is a statement made by the owner of the field to the other party, which is commonly understood to be a tenant. Modern scholarship first interpreted this contract as a lease. Later it was considered an antichretic loan, a loan in which the creditor takes over the debtorâs agricultural land as security. However, the place of this contract in the long-term history of law is still unknown and scholars have not made any analogies from other legal cultures. Using the methodology of comparative legal history, and drawing especially on Islamic law, this essay offers a new interpretation of the esip-tabal contract as a sale of future crops. The essay then discusses the rationale behind the contract and its possible continuity into later periods.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 705 | 118 | 6 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 49 | 8 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 111 | 16 | 0 |
