Save

The Foundational Role of Apostolicity in Augustine’s Understanding of Catholicity

in Journal of Chinese Theology
Autor:in:
Jenny Yan Yang School of Divinity, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Search for other papers by Jenny Yan Yang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0083-5807
Zitierung herunterladen Berechtigungen erhalten

Optionen für den Zugriff

Nutzen Sie bitte eine der untenstehenden Zugriffsmöglichkeiten, um den vollständigen Artikel zu lesen.

Institutszugang

Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.

Über Institut einloggen

Kauf

Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):

36,93 €

Weitere Zugriffsmöglichkeiten

Auf DeepDyve mieten
Token einlösen

Abstract

This article examines the foundational role of apostolicity in Augustine’s understanding of catholicity. While early Christian discussions often highlighted the Church’s universality, Augustine consistently insisted that doctrinal completeness – another dimension of catholicity – is inseparable from continuity with the apostles. Through a study of his anti-Manichaean, anti-Donatist, and anti-Pelagian writings, this article demonstrates how Augustine grounded catholic doctrine in apostolic Scripture and, increasingly, in apostolic tradition as preserved in the universal Church and the apostolic sees. Augustine used apostolicity to expose the pseudo-catholic claims of heretical groups and to defend the Church’s authoritative teaching, creed, custom, and interpretation of Scripture. His integrative account suggests that true catholicity entails both geographical extension and fidelity to apostolic tradition. The article concludes by considering the implications of Augustine’s framework for contemporary Sino-Reformed ecclesiology, arguing that catholicity must be understood as inseparably linked to apostolicity, that is, to faithful continuity with the apostolic teaching and tradition in the early Church.

摘要

本文探讨使徒性在奥古斯丁对大公性理解中的基础性地位。尽管早期教 会对大公性的讨论多集中于其普世性,奥古斯丁却强调,大公性的另一 面——教义的完备性——唯有在与使徒教导保持延续时才能得以确立。通 过考察其反摩尼教、反多纳徒及反伯拉纠著作,本文展现出奥古斯丁如何 将大公教义奠基于使徒圣经,并日益重视由使徒教会所传承的使徒传统。 奥古斯丁借此揭露异端“伪大公性”的声称,并维护使徒教会在教义、信 经、习俗与释经上的权威。本文最后指出,此框架对当代华人改革宗教会 的教会论具有重要启示:真正的大公性必须与使徒性不可分割,即,与初 代教会的使徒教导和传统忠信地传承紧密相连。

Kennzahlen

Insgesamt Letzte 365 Tage In den letzten 30 Tagen
Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen 36 36 14
Gesamttextansichten 1 1 0
PDF-Downloads 4 4 2