Preliminary study of intra- and inter-group behavioural synchronization in owl monkeys (Aotus azarae) in the Argentine Chaco
In: Folia PrimatologicaFundación Para La Tierra, Centro IDEAL, Pilar, Ãeembucú Department, Paraguay
Search for other papers by Wendy Yael Kobrinsky in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Mariana Inés Ayala in
Current site
Google Scholar
Departament of Anthropology, Yale University, Connecticut, United States
Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Universidad de Formosa, Formosa, Argentina
Search for other papers by Eduardo Fernandez-Duque in
Current site
Google Scholar
Laboratorio de EcologÃa y Comportamiento Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Search for other papers by Alba Garcia de la Chica in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Maintaining behavioural synchronization is crucial in primate groups to preserve cohesion among individuals. For primates with a monogamous mating system and pair-living social organization, maintaining strong bonds and cooperation is essential. The aim of this preliminary study was to explore behavioural synchronization in owl monkeys (Aotus azarae). We simultaneously observed five groups in the Argentinean Chaco to evaluate within-group synchronization between adult maleâfemale pair mates, between-group synchronization among males and among females, and the spatial dynamics of neighbouring groups. Pair mates showed a high degree of activity synchrony, often performing the same activity at the same time, with resting being the most synchronized behaviour. However, at the inter-group level, only resting showed a high degree of synchronization. All groups were active in the morning, began their first resting period at approximately the same time, and finished their activities at similar times, evidence of temporal synchronization. Neighbouring groups moved apart more often than they approached each other, particularly in the afternoon, suggesting active avoidance and potentially explaining the lack of inter-group encounters observed. These preliminary results provide insights into the social behaviour of the species and the cohesion they maintain. Further analyses are needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying cohesive behaviour and how it shapes group synchronization in Aotus azarae.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Altmann J (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227â267.
-
Beauchamp G (2015). Animal vigilance: monitoring predators and competitors. San Diego, CA, Academic Press.
-
Bonadonna G, Zaccagno M, Torti V, Valente D, De Gregorio C, Randrianarison R, Tan C, Gamba M, Giacoma C (2020). Intra- and intergroup spatial dynamics of a pair-living singing primate, Indri indri: a multiannual study of three Indri groups in Maromizaha forest, Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 41: 224â245.
-
Brügger R, Willems E, Burkart J (2022). Looking out for each other: coordination and turn taking in common marmoset vigilance. Animal Behaviour 196: 183â199.
-
Busia L, Schaffner CM, Aureli F (2022). Should I stay or should I go? How activity synchronization affects fission decisions. Biology Letters 18: 20210410.
-
Cabana F, Dierenfeld E, Wirdateti W, Donati G, Nekaris KAI (2017). The seasonal feeding ecology of the javan slow loris (Nycticebus javanicus). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 162: 768â781.
-
Chartrand TL, Lakin JL (2013). The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annual Reviews in Psychology 64: 285â308.
-
Conradt L, Roper TJ (2000). Activity synchrony and social cohesion: a fission-fusion model. Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series B: Biological Sciences 267: 2213â2218.
-
Corley M, Fernandez-Duque E (2023). Dispersal: a critical life history stage influencing populations, social dynamics and individual fitness. In Owl monkeys: biology, adaptive radiation and behavioral ecology of the only nocturnal primate in the Americas (Fernandez-Duque E, ed.), pp. 423â459. Cham, Springer.
-
Couzin ID (2009). Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends in Cognitive Science 13: 36â43.
-
Daoudi S, OâSullivan E, Moat G, Lee P, Buchanan-Smith H (2023). Do mixed-species groups of capuchin (Sapajus apella) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) synchronize their behaviour? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London Series B: Biological Sciences 378: 20220111.
-
Dostálková I, Å pinka M (2007). Synchronization of behaviour in pairs: the role of communication and consequences in timing. Animal Behaviour 74: 1735â1742.
-
Dostálková I, Å pinka M (2010). When to go with the crowd: modelling synchronization of all-or-nothing activity transitions in grouped animals. Journal of Theoretical Biology 263: 437â448.
-
Duranton C, Gaunet F (2016). Behavioural synchronization from an ethological perspective: Overview of its adaptive value. Adaptive Behaviour 24: 181â191.
-
Fernandez-Duque E (2009). Natal dispersal in monogamous owl monkeys (Aotus azarai) of the Argentinean Chaco. Behaviour 146: 583â606.
-
Fernandez-Duque E (2015). Social monogamy in wild owl monkeys (Aotus azarae) of Argentina: the potential influences of resource distribution and ranging patterns: monogamy in owl monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 78: 355â371.
-
Fernandez-Duque E, de la Iglesia HO (2023). Temporal niche plasticity of owl monkeys. In Owl monkeys: biology, adaptive radiation and behavioral ecology of the only nocturnal primate in the Americas (Fernandez-Duque E, ed.), pp. 375â390. Cham, Springer.
-
Fernandez-Duque E, Huck M, Van Belle S, Di Fiore A (2020). The evolution of pair-living, sexual monogamy and cooperative infant care: Insights from research on wild owl monkeys, titis, sakis and tamarins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 171: 118â173.
-
Fernandez-Duque E, Rotundo M, Seltzer J, Di Fiore A, Link A (2023). Past, present and future use of technology for field studies of owl monkeys. In Owl monkeys: biology, adaptive radiation and behavioral ecology of the only nocturnal primate in the Americas (Fernandez-Duque E, ed.), pp. 325â352. Cham, Springer.
-
Fernandez-Duque M, Chapman CA, Glander KE, Fernandez-Duque E (2018). Darting primates: steps toward procedural and reporting standards. International Journal of Primatology 39: 1009â1016.
-
Fichtel C, Zucchini W, Hilgartner R (2011). Out of sight but not out of mind? Behavioral coordination in Red-tailed sportive lemurs (Lepilemur ruficaudatus). International Journal of Primatology 32: 1383â1396.
-
Focardi S, Pecchioli E (2005). Social cohesion and foraging decrease with group size in fallow deer (Dama dama). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 59: 84â91.
-
Furuichi T (2020). Variation in intergroup relationships among species and among and within local populations of African Apes. International Journal of Primatology 41: 203â223.
-
Garcia de la Chica A, Spence-Aizenberg A, Wolovich CK, Evans S, Fernandez-Duque E (2023). The social life of owl monkeys. In Owl monkeys: biology, adaptive radiation and behavioral ecology of the only nocturnal primate in the Americas (Fernandez-Duque E, ed.). Cham, Springer.
-
Garnier S, Ross N, Rudis R, Camargo AP, Sciaini M, Scherer C (2024). viridis(Lite) Colorblind-friendly color maps for R. viridis package version 0.6.5. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
-
Gautrais J, Michelena P, Sibbald A, Bon R, Deneubourg J-L (2007). Allelomimetic synchronization in Merino sheep. Animal Behaviour 74: 1443â1454.
-
Grolemund G, Wickham H (2011). Dates and times made easy with lubridate. Journal of Statistical Software 40: 1â25.
-
Gussone L, Garcia de la Chica AT, Fernandez Duque E (2024). Intergroup encounters in pair-living primates: Comparative analysis and a case study of pair-living and monogamous owl monkeys (Aotus azarae) of Argentina. American Journal of Primatology 86: e23572.
-
Hattori Y (2021). Behavioral coordination and synchronization in non-human primates. In Comparative cognition: commonalities and diversity (Anderson JR, Kuroshima H, eds.), pp. 139â151. Singapore, Springer.
-
Hijmans R (2022). geosphere: spherical trigonometry. R package version 1.5-18. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
-
Huck M, Rotundo M, Fernandez-Duque E (2011). Growth and development in wild owl monkeys (Aotus azarai) of Argentina. International Journal of Primatology 32: 1133â1152.
-
Juarez CP, Rotundo MA, Berg W, Fernández-Duque E Costs and benefits of radio-collaring on the behavior, demography and conservation of Owl Monkeys (Aotus azarai) in Formosa, Argentina. International Journal of Primatology 32: 69â82.
-
Kassambara A (2023). ggpubr: âggplot2â based publication ready plots. R package version 0.6.0. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
-
King AJ, Cowlishaw G (2009). All together now: behavioural synchrony in baboons. Animal Behaviour 78: 1381â1387).
-
King AJ, Sueur C (2011). Where next? Group coordination and collective decision making by primates. International Journal of Primatology 32: 1245â1267.
-
Langergraber KE, Watts DP, Vigilant L, Mitani JC (2017). Group augmentation, collective action and territorial boundary patrols by male chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114: 7337â7342.
-
Louwerse MM, Dale R, Bard EG, Jeuniaux P (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science 36: 1404â1426.
-
McDougall PL, Ruckstuhl KE (2018). Doing what your neighbour does: neighbour proximity, familiarity and postural alignment increase behavioural mimicry. Animal Behaviour 135: 177â185.
-
Müller K (2023). hms: Pretty time of day. R package version 1.1.3. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
-
Ooms J, LesiÅski K, Authors of the dependency Rust crates (2025). gifski: Highest quality GIF encoder. R package version 1.32.0-2, 2025. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
-
Pays O, Renaud P-C, Loisel P, Petit M, Gerard J-F, Jarman PJ (2007). Prey synchronize their vigilant behaviour with other group members. Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series B: Biological Sciences 274: 1287â1291.
-
Pearce F, Carbone C, Cowlishaw G, Isaac NJB (2013). Space-use scaling and home range overlap in primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series B: Biological Sciences 280: 20122122.
-
Pebesma E, Bivand R (2005). Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 5: 9â13.
-
Pedersen T (2024). patchwork: the composer of plots. R package version 1.3.0. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
-
Pedersen T, Robinson D (2024). gganimate: a grammar of animated graphics. R package version 1.0.9. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
-
Pertile JA, Ayala M, Whelan J, Guetersloh N, Clifford P, Dupin G, Garcia de la Chica A, Fernandez-Duque E (2025). Preliminary data on Azaraâs owl monkeys living in natural forest fragments. North Eastern Evolutionary Primatology 11th Annual Meeting. Philadelphia, PA, November 7-8, 2025.
-
Prior NH (2011). Whatâs in a moment: What can be learned about pair bonding from studying moment-to-moment behavioral synchrony between partners? Frontiers in Psychology 11: 1370.
-
R Core Team (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
-
Rook AJ, Penning PD (1991). Synchronisation of eating, ruminating and idling activity by grazing sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 157â166.
-
Rothwell ES, Carp SB, Savidge LE, Mendoza SP, Bales KL (2020). Relationship tenure differentially influences pair-bond behavior in male and female socially monogamous titi monkeys (Callicebus cupreus). American Journal of Primatology 82: e23181.
-
Savagian A, Fernandez-Duque E (2017). Do predators and thermoregulation influence choice of sleeping sites and sleeping behavior in Azaraâs Owl Monkeys (Aotus azarae azarae) in Northern Argentina? International Journal of Primatology 38: 80â99.
-
Singletary B, Tecot S (2020). Multimodal pair-bond maintenance: A review of signaling across modalities in pair-bonded nonhuman primates. American Journal of Primatology 82: e23105.
-
Spence-Aizenberg A, GarcÃa de la Chica A, Evans S, Fernandez-Duque E (2023). Communication in owl monkeys. In Owl monkeys: biology, adaptive radiation and behavioral ecology of the only nocturnal primate in the Americas (Fernandez-Duque E, ed.), pp. 497â533. Cham, Springer.
-
Tecot SR, Singletary B, Eadie E (2016). Why âmonogamyâ isnât good enough. American Journal of Primatology 78: 340â354.
-
Tomatsu S, Isoda M (2023). Tuning in to real-time social interactions in macaques. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 120: e2301614120.
-
Torrez L, Davis G, Crofoot M (2020). Do monkeys avoid areas of home range overlap because they are dangerous? A test of the risk hypothesis in white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus). International Journal of Primatology 41: 246â264.
-
Wartmann FM, Juárez CP, Fernandez-Duque E (2014). Size, site fidelity and overlap of home ranges and core areas in the socially monogamous owl monkey (Aotus azarae) of Northern Argentina. International Journal of Primatology 35: 919â939.
-
Wickham H (2007). Reshaping data with the reshape package. Journal of Statistical Software 21: 1â20.
-
Wickham H (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York, NY, Springer.
-
Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan LD, François R, Grolemund G, Hayes A, Henry L, Hester J, Kuhn M, Pedersen TL, Miller E, Bache SM, Müller K, Ooms J, Robinson D, Seidel DP, Spinu V, Takahashi K, Vaughan D, Wilke C, Woo K, Yutani H (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software 4: 1686.
-
Wickham H, François R, Henry L, Müller K, Vaughan D (2023). dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.1.4. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
-
Wickham H, Hester J, Bryan J (2024a). readr: Read rectangular text data. R package version 2.1.5. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
-
Wickham H, Vaughan D, Girlich M (2024b). tidyr: Tidy messy data. R package version 1.3.1. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
-
Zhou J, Li W-B, Wang X, Li J-H (2022). Seasonal change in activity rhythms and time budgets of Tibetan macaques. Biology 11: 1260.
Supplementary Materials
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 282 | 282 | 112 |
| Full Text Views | 17 | 17 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 37 | 37 | 8 |
Preliminary study of intra- and inter-group behavioural synchronization in owl monkeys (Aotus azarae) in the Argentine Chaco
In: Folia PrimatologicaFundación Para La Tierra, Centro IDEAL, Pilar, Ãeembucú Department, Paraguay
Search for other papers by Wendy Yael Kobrinsky in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mariana Inés Ayala in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Departament of Anthropology, Yale University, Connecticut, United States
Facultad de Recursos Naturales, Universidad de Formosa, Formosa, Argentina
Search for other papers by Eduardo Fernandez-Duque in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Laboratorio de EcologÃa y Comportamiento Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Search for other papers by Alba Garcia de la Chica in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Maintaining behavioural synchronization is crucial in primate groups to preserve cohesion among individuals. For primates with a monogamous mating system and pair-living social organization, maintaining strong bonds and cooperation is essential. The aim of this preliminary study was to explore behavioural synchronization in owl monkeys (Aotus azarae). We simultaneously observed five groups in the Argentinean Chaco to evaluate within-group synchronization between adult maleâfemale pair mates, between-group synchronization among males and among females, and the spatial dynamics of neighbouring groups. Pair mates showed a high degree of activity synchrony, often performing the same activity at the same time, with resting being the most synchronized behaviour. However, at the inter-group level, only resting showed a high degree of synchronization. All groups were active in the morning, began their first resting period at approximately the same time, and finished their activities at similar times, evidence of temporal synchronization. Neighbouring groups moved apart more often than they approached each other, particularly in the afternoon, suggesting active avoidance and potentially explaining the lack of inter-group encounters observed. These preliminary results provide insights into the social behaviour of the species and the cohesion they maintain. Further analyses are needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying cohesive behaviour and how it shapes group synchronization in Aotus azarae.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 282 | 282 | 112 |
| Full Text Views | 17 | 17 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 37 | 37 | 8 |
