THE USE AND MISUSE OF MATHEMATICAL FLIGHT MODELS
äºIsrael Journal of Ecology and EvolutionSearch for other papers by C.J. PENNYCUICK in
Current site
Google Scholar
There are two types of mathematical flight models. A particular model is constructed by an observer or experimenter to describe observations of a particular animal in particular circumstances, and may include any amount of detail about wing kinematics, vortex wake structure, etc., provided that such details have been observed. The detailed results apply only to the particular animal observed. A general model attempts to predict certain aspects of performance for any flying animal, based on estimates of body mass, wingspan, wing area, and very little else. This calls for simplified methods of calculation. It is not possible to improve the accuracy by introducing additional details, because such details are unknown for most species. Confidence in the predictions of a general model depends on feeding back field observations, and trying to eliminate discrepancies by adjusting variables whose values are only roughly known or guessed. The computer programs by Pennycuick (1989b, Bird Flight Performance, Oxford Univ. Press) were designed to facilitate this process, and are recommended for the use of field observers.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Alerstam T.1976Bird migration in relation to wind and topography. Berlings, Lund, Sweden
-
Bernstein M.H., Thomas S.P., Schmidt-Nielsen K.Power input during flight of the fish crow Corvus ossifragus J. Exp. Biol 1973 58 401 410
-
Biewener A.A., Dial K.P., Goslow G.E.Pectoralis muscle force and power output during flight in the starling J. Exp. Biol 1992 164 1 18
-
Gnaiger E.Concepts of efficiency in biological calorimetry and metabolic flux control Thermochim. Acta 1990 172 31 52
-
Greenewalt C.H.Hummingbirds Doubleday New York 1961
-
McMahon T.A.Muscles, reflexes and locomotion Princeton University Press PrincetonNJ 1984
-
Norberg U.M., Kunz T.H., Steffensen J.F., Winter Y., Helversen O.The cost of hovering and forward flight in a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga sericina, estimated from aerodynamic theory J. Exp. Biol 1993 182 207 227
-
Pennycuick C.J.A wind tunnel study of gliding flight in the pigeon Columba livia J. Exp. Biol 1968a 49 509 526
-
Pennycuick C.J.Power requirements for horizontal flight in the pigeon Columba livia J. Exp. Biol 1968b 49 527 555
-
Pennycuick C.J.The mechanics of bird migration Ibis 1969 111 525 556
-
Pennycuick C.J., Mechanics of flight. Avian biology. Vol Farner D.S., King J.R.Academic Press New York 1975 5 1 75
-
Pennycuick C.J.1982 75 106The flight of petrels and albatrosses (Procellariiformes), observed in South Georgia and its vicinity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B300
-
Pennycuick C.J.Flight of auks (Alcidae) and other northern seabirds compared with southern Procellariiformes: ornithodolite observations J. Exp. Biol 1987 128 335 347
-
Pennycuick C.J.Span-ratio analysis used to estimate effective L/D ratio in the double-crested cormorant Phalacrocorax auritus, from field observations J. Exp. Biol 1989a 142 1 15
-
Pennycuick C.J.Bird flight performance Oxford University Press Oxford 1989b
-
Pennycuick C.J.Predicting wingbeat frequency and wavelength of birds J. Exp. Biol 1990 150 171 185
-
Pennycuick C.J., Adapting skeletal muscles to be efficient. Efficiency and economy in animal physiology Blake R.W.Cambridge University Press Cambridge 1991 33 42
-
Pennycuick C.J., Obrecht H.H., Fuller M.R.Empirical estimates of body drag of large waterfowl and raptors J. Exp. Biol 1988 135 253 264
-
Pennycuick C.J., Fuller M.R., Oar J.J., Kirkpatrick S.J.Falcon versus grouse: flight adaptations of a predator and its prey J. Avian Biol 1994 25 39 49
-
Rayner J.M.V.Vertebrate flapping flight mechanics and aerodynamics, and the evolution of flight in bats Biona Rep 1986 5 27 74
-
Rayner J.M.V.On aerodynamics and the energetics of vertebrate flapping flight Contemp. Math 1993 141 351 400
-
Rothe H.J., Nachtigall W.Pigeon flight in a wind tunnel I. Aspects of wind tunnel design, training methods and flight behaviour of different pigeon races. J. Comp. Physiol. B 1987 157 91 98
-
Rothe H.J., Biesel W., Nachtigall W.Pigeon flight in a wind tunnel II. Gas exchange and power requirements. J. Comp. Physiol. B 1987 157 99 109
-
Schmitz F.W.4th ed. 1960Aerodynamik des Flugmodells. Carl Lange, Dulsberg
-
Tucker V.A.Metabolism during flight in the laughing gull, Larus atricilla Am. J. Physiol 1972 222 237 245
-
Tucker V.A.Bird metabolism during flight: evaluation of a theory J. Exp. Biol 1973 58 689 709
-
Tucker V.A.Body drag, feather drag and interference drag of the mounting strut in a peregrine falcon, Falco peregrinus J. Exp. Biol 1990a 149 449 468
-
Tucker V.A.Measuring aerodynamic interference drag between a bird body and the mounting strut of a drag balance J. Exp. Biol 1990b 154 439 461
-
Wells D.J.Muscle performance in hovering hummingbirds J. Exp. Biol 1993 178 39 57
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 184 | 20 | 5 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 7 | 0 | 0 |
THE USE AND MISUSE OF MATHEMATICAL FLIGHT MODELS
äºIsrael Journal of Ecology and EvolutionSearch for other papers by C.J. PENNYCUICK in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
There are two types of mathematical flight models. A particular model is constructed by an observer or experimenter to describe observations of a particular animal in particular circumstances, and may include any amount of detail about wing kinematics, vortex wake structure, etc., provided that such details have been observed. The detailed results apply only to the particular animal observed. A general model attempts to predict certain aspects of performance for any flying animal, based on estimates of body mass, wingspan, wing area, and very little else. This calls for simplified methods of calculation. It is not possible to improve the accuracy by introducing additional details, because such details are unknown for most species. Confidence in the predictions of a general model depends on feeding back field observations, and trying to eliminate discrepancies by adjusting variables whose values are only roughly known or guessed. The computer programs by Pennycuick (1989b, Bird Flight Performance, Oxford Univ. Press) were designed to facilitate this process, and are recommended for the use of field observers.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 184 | 20 | 5 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 7 | 0 | 0 |
