The present contribution is a first step of an ongoing investigation on the conceptualisation of âstupidity, foolishness, madnessâ in Iranian, as a selected case-study for an assessment of the controversial role played by phonosemantic/ideophonic paradigms in lexical production and areal diffusion of cognate words. The discussion will challenge the commonly- accepted interpretation of the Young Avestan term mÅ«ra- as prototypically referring to mental/cognitive impairment, based on a review of the attempts at etymological reconstruction and a closer scrutiny of disregarded evidence from Middle and New Iranian.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 914 | 478 | 13 |
| Full Text Views | 21 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 49 | 2 | 0 |
The present contribution is a first step of an ongoing investigation on the conceptualisation of âstupidity, foolishness, madnessâ in Iranian, as a selected case-study for an assessment of the controversial role played by phonosemantic/ideophonic paradigms in lexical production and areal diffusion of cognate words. The discussion will challenge the commonly- accepted interpretation of the Young Avestan term mÅ«ra- as prototypically referring to mental/cognitive impairment, based on a review of the attempts at etymological reconstruction and a closer scrutiny of disregarded evidence from Middle and New Iranian.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 914 | 478 | 13 |
| Full Text Views | 21 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 49 | 2 | 0 |