Socratesâ Death and the Invention of Morality
äºHistory of Philosophy & Logical AnalysisSearch for other papers by Javier Echeñique in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
I argue for the thesis that Socrates was the inventor of morality. I define morality as a kind of practical standpoint, and argue that Socrates was the first to draw attention to the characteristic marks of the moral standpoint: what I call the Decisiveness of Moral Reasons, on the one hand, and other-regardingness and the use of substantive moral principles, on the other. Socrates characterised the moral standpoint, however, in the course of justifying his own most vital decisions. Accordingly, I also argue that in order to invent morality qua practical standpoint, Socrates had to establish its practicality, and that given some Socratic assumptions he was entitled to do so simply by acting in ways that exhibited practical adherence to the Decisiveness of Moral Reasons. Finally, I argue that given the supreme demandingness of the moral standpoint a complete demonstration of its practicality could only be achieved by Socratesâ act of knowingly causing his own death.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Plato. Euthyphro, Apology, Crito. Burnet, J. (ed.), 1924. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Plato. Phaedo. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Rowe, C. J. (ed.), 1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Sophocles. Philoctetes. Lloyd-Jones, H. (ed., tr.), 1994. Loeb Classical Library 21. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Xenophon. Hellenica. Carleton, L. (tr.), 1918. Brownson. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library 88, 89. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Adkins, W. H. 1972. Moral Values and Political Behaviour in Ancient Greece: from Homer to the End of the Fifth Century. London: Chatto and Windus.
-
Annas, J. 2008. Virtue Ethics and the Charge of Egoism. In: Bloomfield, P. (ed.), Morality and Self-Interest. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 205â222.
-
Baier, K. 1958. The Moral Point of View: A Rational Basis of Ethics (abridged edition). New York: Random House.
-
Burnet, J. 1924. Platoâs Euthyphro, Apology of Socrates, and Crito. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Dancy, J. 2004. Ethics without Principles. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Dorsey, D. 2016. The Limits of Moral Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Dover, J. K. 1974. Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
-
Gómez-Lobo, A. 1994. The Foundations of Socratic Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett.
-
Hare, R. 1981. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Hegel, G. W. F. 1873. The Philosophy of History. J. Sibree (tr.), 2001. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
-
Irwin, T. 1995. Platoâs Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Kahn, C. 1998. Pre-Platonic Ethics. In: Everson, S. (ed.), Ethics. Companions to Ancient Thought 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 27â48.
-
Kraut, R. 1984. Socrates and the State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Mackie, J. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin Books.
-
Nussbaum, M. 1976. Consequences and character in Sophoclesâ Philoctetes. Philosophy and Literature 1(1), 25â53.
-
Payne, A. 2006. Eudaimonism and the Demands of Justice. The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter (404).
-
Prichard, H. A. 1949. Moral Obligation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Reeve, C. D. C 1989. Socrates in the Apology. Indianapolis: Hackett.
-
Rowet, C. 2017. Ethics before Socrates. In: Golob, S & Timmermann, J. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5â14.
-
Santas, G. X. 1979. Socrates: Philosophy in Platoâs Early Dialogues. New York: Routledge.
-
Vasilou, I. 2008. Aiming at Virtue in Plato. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Vlastos, G. 1971. Introduction: The Paradox of Socrates. In: Vlastos, G. (ed.), The Philosophy of Socrates. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1â21.
-
Vlastos, G. 1973. Platonic Studies. Princeton: Princeton Univertsity Press.
-
Vlastos, G. 1985. Socratesâ Disavowal of Knowledge. The Philosophical Quarterly 35(183), 1â31.
-
Vlastos, G. 1991. Happiness and Virtue in Socratesâ Moral Theory. In: Vlastos, G. (ed.), Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 200â232.
-
White, N. 2002. Individual and Conflict in Greek Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Socratesâ Death and the Invention of Morality
äºHistory of Philosophy & Logical AnalysisSearch for other papers by Javier Echeñique in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
I argue for the thesis that Socrates was the inventor of morality. I define morality as a kind of practical standpoint, and argue that Socrates was the first to draw attention to the characteristic marks of the moral standpoint: what I call the Decisiveness of Moral Reasons, on the one hand, and other-regardingness and the use of substantive moral principles, on the other. Socrates characterised the moral standpoint, however, in the course of justifying his own most vital decisions. Accordingly, I also argue that in order to invent morality qua practical standpoint, Socrates had to establish its practicality, and that given some Socratic assumptions he was entitled to do so simply by acting in ways that exhibited practical adherence to the Decisiveness of Moral Reasons. Finally, I argue that given the supreme demandingness of the moral standpoint a complete demonstration of its practicality could only be achieved by Socratesâ act of knowingly causing his own death.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 2 | 2 | 2 |
