The Threefold Body in Eschatological Perspective
With and Beyond Henri de Lubac on the Church
äºEcclesiologySearch for other papers by Eugene R. Schlesinger in
Current site
Google Scholar
In this article, I draw from Henri de Lubacâs ecclesiology to delineate the relations between the three forms of Christâs body (historical, ecclesial, and sacramental). Using the heuristic frameworks of scholastic sacramental theology and of spiritual exegesis, I demonstrate that language concerning the ecclesial body is significantly more complex than with the historical or sacramental bodies. The ecclesial body is at once entirely provisionalâthe sacrament of Christâand the fulfillment itselfâthe totus Christus. This leads me to pose the question: what aspects of the Church endure through eternity and which pass away? I argue that it is the faithful who abide, while the visible institutional structures of the Church will be no more. I clarify how the institutional aspects of the Church relate to the congregatio fidelium and suggest that academic ecclesiology concern itself with the lives of the faithful rather than simply with faith and order.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
3
âSusan K. Wood, Spiritual Exegesis and the Church in the Theology of Henri de Lubac (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998), p. 1; Joseph Simeon Flipper, âSacrament and Eschatological Fulfillment in Henri de Lubacâs Theology of Historyâ (Ph.D. diss, Marquette University, 2012); Matthew Thomas Gerlach, âLex Orandi, Lex Legendi: A Correlation of the Roman Canon and the Fourfold Sense of Scriptureâ (Ph.D. diss, Marquette University, 2011), pp. 290â296; Hans Boersma, Nouvelle Théologie and Sacramental Ontology: A Return to Mystery (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 157.
-
7
âLubac, Scripture in Tradition, pp. 182â194, 200; Henri de Lubac, Révélation divine; Affrontements mystiques; Athéisme et sens de lâhomme, Oevres Complètes IV (Paris: Cerf, 2006), pp. 71â77; Henri de Lubac, The Church: Paradox and Mystery, trans. James R. Dunne (Shannon, Ireland: Ecclesia, 1969), pp. 14â15.
-
8
âFlipper, âSacrament and Fulfillmentâ, pp. 129â134 (133). See also Lubac, Scripture in Tradition, pp. 7, 31, 34â35, 85, 90, 105.
-
9
âLubac, Scripture in Tradition, p. 31. See also Wood, Spiritual Exegesis, p. 33.
-
13
âGerlach, âLex Orandiâ, pp. 280â283; Flipper, âSacrament and Fulfillmentâ, p. 137.
-
18
âIbid., pp. 203â204.
-
19
âLubac, Corpus Mysticum, p. 24; Lubac, Scripture in Tradition, pp. 203â204.
-
21
âLubac, Scripture in Tradition, pp. 204â205; Lubac, Corpus Mysticum, p. 68; Lubac, Catholicism, pp. 25â45.
-
25
âIbid., pp. 64â65, 188â189, 198.
-
26
âIbid., pp. 193, 220; Lubac, Splendor, pp. 156â157. See also Wood, Spiritual Exegesis, pp. 55â59.
-
28
âIbid., p. 71.
-
29
âIbid., p. 66.
-
30
âIbid., pp. 68â69, 199.
-
32
âLubac, Corpus Mysticum, pp. 88, 13; Lubac, Splendor, pp. 143, 151â155.
-
35
âLubac, Corpus Mysticum, p. 24; Lubac, Splendor, p. 49; Lubac, Paradox and Mystery, p. 24.
-
39
âIbid., p. 202.
-
40
âIbid., pp. 204â207. See Flipper, âSacrament and Fulfillmentâ, pp. 184â187.
-
42
âIbid., pp. 133â144.
-
45
âibid., p. 202.
-
48
âHubert Schnackers, Kirche als Sakrament und Mutter: Zur Ekklesiologie von Henri de Lubac (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1979), pp. 160â169; Flipper, âSacrament and Fulfillmentâ, pp. 225â231.
-
50
âLubac, Paradox and Mystery, p. 27. As an Anglican, I affirm the general contours of de Lubacâs Catholic ecclesiology, while demurring at others. I do not prosecute my disagreements in this article.
-
51
âLubac, Splendor, pp. 84â88 (84, 88), citing Louis Bouyer, Dieu Vivant, 2:140.
-
52
âIbid., p. 79. See also Boersma, Sacramental Ontology, pp. 259â260.
-
53
âLubac, Splendor, pp. 264â265. See also Lubac, Motherhood/Particular, pp. 75â84; Lubac, Paradox and Mystery, p. 4.
-
62
âWood, Spiritual Exegesis, p. 39. So also Boersma, Sacramental Ontology, p. 151.
-
70
âIbid., pp. 204â205.
-
72
âIbid., p. 278.
-
76
âIbid., pp. 68, 74â76.
-
79
âLubac, Catholicism, pp. 37â39; Lubac, Corpus Mysticum, pp. 62, 70.
-
81
âLubac, Scripture in Tradition, pp. 202â203, 211â213; Lubac, Corpus Mysticum, pp. 62, 67â69; Lubac, Catholicism, pp. 37â39, 367â368; Lubac, Splendor, pp. 77â78, 155â157.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 414 | 113 | 8 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 203 | 2 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 42 | 2 | 0 |
The Threefold Body in Eschatological Perspective
With and Beyond Henri de Lubac on the Church
äºEcclesiologySearch for other papers by Eugene R. Schlesinger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
In this article, I draw from Henri de Lubacâs ecclesiology to delineate the relations between the three forms of Christâs body (historical, ecclesial, and sacramental). Using the heuristic frameworks of scholastic sacramental theology and of spiritual exegesis, I demonstrate that language concerning the ecclesial body is significantly more complex than with the historical or sacramental bodies. The ecclesial body is at once entirely provisionalâthe sacrament of Christâand the fulfillment itselfâthe totus Christus. This leads me to pose the question: what aspects of the Church endure through eternity and which pass away? I argue that it is the faithful who abide, while the visible institutional structures of the Church will be no more. I clarify how the institutional aspects of the Church relate to the congregatio fidelium and suggest that academic ecclesiology concern itself with the lives of the faithful rather than simply with faith and order.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 414 | 113 | 8 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 203 | 2 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 42 | 2 | 0 |
