A World without Mark: an Experiment in Erasure History
In: Biblical InterpretationSearch for other papers by Mark Goodacre in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Erasure History is a subset of the discipline of counter-factual history, an exploration in imagining history without a work that scholars see as pivotal. Erasing Mark’s gospel provides a fruitful thought experiment about the key role it plays in current scholarly reflections on Christian origins. This article imagines the erasure of Mark under three different headings. First, Mark is erased from the surviving manuscript record, imagining that Mark was indeed written and that it was a source for Matthew and Luke, but that no witness to it survived antiquity. Second, Mark is erased from history only to resurface in a handful of manuscript fragments in the 1890s and 1900s, and a more complete textual witness in 1945. Finally, and most drastically, the article imagines that the boy who grew up to be the author of Mark’s gospel did not survive childhood and that his gospel never existed.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 765 | 195 | 25 |
| Full Text Views | 236 | 15 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 530 | 33 | 3 |
A World without Mark: an Experiment in Erasure History
In: Biblical InterpretationSearch for other papers by Mark Goodacre in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Erasure History is a subset of the discipline of counter-factual history, an exploration in imagining history without a work that scholars see as pivotal. Erasing Mark’s gospel provides a fruitful thought experiment about the key role it plays in current scholarly reflections on Christian origins. This article imagines the erasure of Mark under three different headings. First, Mark is erased from the surviving manuscript record, imagining that Mark was indeed written and that it was a source for Matthew and Luke, but that no witness to it survived antiquity. Second, Mark is erased from history only to resurface in a handful of manuscript fragments in the 1890s and 1900s, and a more complete textual witness in 1945. Finally, and most drastically, the article imagines that the boy who grew up to be the author of Mark’s gospel did not survive childhood and that his gospel never existed.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 765 | 195 | 25 |
| Full Text Views | 236 | 15 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 530 | 33 | 3 |
