Save

Samson‘s Moment of Truth

in Biblical Interpretation
Autor:in:
Bruce Herzberg Bentley University, Waltham, MA

Search for other papers by Bruce Herzberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Zitierung herunterladen Berechtigungen erhalten

Optionen für den Zugriff

Nutzen Sie bitte eine der untenstehenden Zugriffsmöglichkeiten, um den vollständigen Artikel zu lesen.

Institutszugang

Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.

Über Institut einloggen

Kauf

Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):

36,93 €

Weitere Zugriffsmöglichkeiten

Auf DeepDyve mieten
Token einlösen

Samson gives away the secret of his strength, the story says, because Delilah nags him. Since only an incredibly stupid person could have failed to recognize her plan to betray him, Samson has been tagged as a musclebound lamebrain ever since. But nothing else in the story suggests that he is stupid—quite the opposite, in fact. The problem, then, is not Samson’s intelligence but the narrator’s weak explanation for Samson’s moment of truth. Elevating Samson’s complex characterization—and bracketing the “nagging”—reveals a Samson who has powerful reasons for allowing Delilah to cut his hair. Moreover, two retellings of the Samson tale, Milton’s Samson Agonistes and DeMille’s film Samson and Delilah, diminish or eliminate the “nagging”explanation and find far more satisfying alternative explanations for Samson’s actions. The biblical narrator, we may conclude, has misread the story or attempted to engineer an unsatisfactory interpretation and is thus “unreliable”, though in a way rather different from the modern critical understanding of the unreliable narrator.

Kennzahlen

Insgesamt Letzte 365 Tage In den letzten 30 Tagen
Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen 383 117 10
Gesamttextansichten 35 2 2
PDF-Downloads 98 10 8