The Hybrid Story of Balaam (Numbers 22â24): Theology for the Diaspora in the Torah
äºBiblical InterpretationSearch for other papers by Ulrike Sals in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The strange character of Numbers 22â24 as a story about foreigners and their attempts to rule YHWH can successfully be read with Homi Bhabha's concept of hybridity and Gayatri Spivak's subaltern. Focusing on the characters' relationships in this text, Balak is the hegemon and Balaam the subaltern, and this constitutes much of their communicational failures. The donkey's episode serves as a lesson for the reader as well as for Balaam who is the hegemon in this case: he learnsâas Balak does notâthat God is the real worldly and 'wordly' hegemon. This monotheistic message is explained to the Judaean readers/listeners through non-Judean protagonists. Many details point to an origin of the final text in a reception of the deuteronomistic YHWH/Assur/Israel constellation and theology in Persian times.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 487 | 55 | 6 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 163 | 5 | 3 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 133 | 11 | 8 |
The Hybrid Story of Balaam (Numbers 22â24): Theology for the Diaspora in the Torah
äºBiblical InterpretationSearch for other papers by Ulrike Sals in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The strange character of Numbers 22â24 as a story about foreigners and their attempts to rule YHWH can successfully be read with Homi Bhabha's concept of hybridity and Gayatri Spivak's subaltern. Focusing on the characters' relationships in this text, Balak is the hegemon and Balaam the subaltern, and this constitutes much of their communicational failures. The donkey's episode serves as a lesson for the reader as well as for Balaam who is the hegemon in this case: he learnsâas Balak does notâthat God is the real worldly and 'wordly' hegemon. This monotheistic message is explained to the Judaean readers/listeners through non-Judean protagonists. Many details point to an origin of the final text in a reception of the deuteronomistic YHWH/Assur/Israel constellation and theology in Persian times.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 487 | 55 | 6 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 163 | 5 | 3 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 133 | 11 | 8 |
