Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Sex and reproductive status affect sheltering and exploratory behaviours with high intra-individual variability in crayfish
in BehaviourSearch for other papers by Sydney Atkinson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Erin Bryan in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Jack Kruse in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Nathan Sarachick in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Lauren Mathews in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The contexts in which individuals demonstrate behavioural consistency or variability have been the subject of research focus. We studied exploratory and sheltering behaviour in the crayfish F. virilis to understand how these behaviours vary by sex and reproductive readiness and to quantify the repeatability of these behaviours. Crayfish were tested in two sets of three rounds, one in the summer non-reproductive season and another in the autumn reproductive season. Reproductive crayfish spent more time outside the shelter and were more likely to accept a food item than non-reproductive crayfish. In the non-reproductive season, females spent more time outside the shelter than males, and over both seasons, females were more likely to seek and accept a food item. Repeatability estimates were low, indicating high intra-individual variability in these behaviours. Sheltering and exploratory behaviours were not correlated. This indicates sex or reproductive readiness have strong effects on both sheltering and exploratory behaviours.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
-
Adriaenssens, B. & Johnsson, J.I. (2011). Shy trout grow faster: exploring links between personality and fitness-related traits in the wild. — Behav. Ecol. 22: 135-143.
-
Belgrad, B.A. & Griffen, B.D. (2018). Personality interacts with habitat quality to govern individual mortality and dispersal patterns. — Ecol. Evol. 8: 7216-7227.
-
Bell, A.M., Hankison, S.J. & Laskowski, K.L. (2009). The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. — Anim. Behav. 77: 771-783.
-
Bürkner, P.C. (2017). brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. — J. Stat. Soft. 80: 1-28.
-
Carter, A.J., Feeney, W.E., Marshall, H.H., Cowlishaw, G. & Heinsohn, R. (2013). Animal personality: what are behavioural ecologists measuring? — Biol. Rev. 88: 465-475.
-
Crino, O.L., Buchanan, K.L., Trompf, L., Mainwaring, M.C. & Griffith, S.C. (2017). Stress reactivity, condition, and foraging behavior in zebra finches: effects on boldness, exploration, and sociality. — Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 244: 101-107.
-
Dammhahn, M. & Almeling, L. (2012). Is risk taking during foraging a personality trait? A field test for cross-context consistency in boldness. — Anim. Behav. 84: 1131-1139.
-
Dingemanse, N.J., Kazem, A.J., Réale, D. & Wright, J. (2010). Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 81-89.
-
Driscoll, J., Kola, M. & Mathews, L. (2020). Perception of alarm cues influences the outcome of shelter competition in crayfish. — Ethology 126: 584-592.
-
Englund, G. & Krupa, J.J. (2000). Habitat use by crayfish in stream pools: influence of predators, depth and body size. — Freshw. Biol. 43: 75-83.
-
Figler, M.H., Blank, G.S. & Peeke, H.V. (2005). Shelter competition between resident male red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard) and conspecific intruders varying by sex and reproductive status. — Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 38: 237-248.
-
Fujimoto, S., Hirata, B. & Nagayama, T. (2011). Dominance hierarchy-dependent behavioural plasticity of crayfish avoidance reactions. — J. Exp. Biol. 214: 2718-2723.
-
Galib, S.M., Sun, J., Twiss, S.D. & Lucas, M.C. (2022). Personality, density and habitat drive the dispersal of invasive crayfish. — Sci. Rep. 12: 1-12.
-
Garvey, J.E., Stein, R.A. & Thomas, H.M. (1994). Assessing how fish predation and interspecific prey competition influence a crayfish assemblage. — Ecology 75: 532-547.
-
Gherardi, F., Aquiloni, L. & Tricarico, E. (2012). Behavioral plasticity, behavioral syndromes and animal personality in crustacean decapods: an imperfect map is better than no map. — Curr. Zool. 58: 567-579.
-
Graham, Z.A. & Angilletta Jr, M.J. (2022). Distinguishing between unreliability and dishonesty: a comparative study of aggressive communication in crayfish. — Funct. Ecol. 36: 73-82.
-
Hamr, P. (2002). Orconectes. — In: Biology of freshwater crayfish (Holdich, D.M., ed.). Blackwell, Oxford, p. 585-608.
-
Hanshew, B.A. & Garcia, T.S. (2012). Invasion of the shelter snatchers: behavioural plasticity in invasive red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. — Freshw. Biol. 57: 2285-2296.
-
Hayes, N.M., Butkas, K.J., Olden, J.D. & Jake Vander Zanden, M. (2009). Behavioural and growth differences between experienced and naïve populations of a native crayfish in the presence of invasive rusty crayfish. — Freshw. Biol. 54: 1876-1887.
-
Hazlett, B. & Bach, C. (2010). Individuality in the predator defense behaviour of the crab Heterozius rotundifrons. — Behaviour 147: 587-597.
-
Jurcak, A.M., Lahman, S.E., Wofford, S.J. & Moore, P.A. (2016). Behavior of crayfish. — In: Biology and ecology of crayfish (Longshaw, M. & Stebbing, P., eds). Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, p. 117-131.
-
Kurvers, R.H., Nolet, B.A., Prins, H.H., Ydenberg, R.C. & van Oers, K. (2012). Boldness affects foraging decisions in barnacle geese: an experimental approach. — Behav. Ecol. 23: 1155-1161.
-
Lihoreau, M., Brepson, L. & Rivault, C. (2009). The weight of the clan: even in insects, social isolation can induce a behavioural syndrome. — Behav. Process. 82: 81-84.
-
MacKay, R.N. & Moore, P.A. (2021). Parasites differentially impact crayfish personality in different contexts. — Behaviour 158: 921-943.
-
Martin III, A.L. & Moore, P.A. (2007). Field observations of agonism in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus: shelter use in a natural environment. — Ethology 113: 1192-1201.
-
Mather, J.A. & Logue, D.M. (2013). The bold and the spineless: invertebrate personalities. — In: Animal personalities: behaviour, physiology, and evolution (Carere, C. & Maestripieri, D., eds). University of Chicago Press, London, p. 13-35.
-
McCarthy, K., Kjærsgaard, A., Bahrndorff, S., Schou, T.M., Manenti, T., Loeschcke, V. & Pertoldi, C. (2015). The effect of social isolation on locomotor activity in the houseflies (Musca domestica). — J. Insect Behav. 28: 288-296.
-
Michalko, R., Košulič, O. & Řežucha, R. (2017). Link between aggressiveness and shyness in the spider Philodromus albidus (Araneae, Philodromidae): state dependency over stability. — J. Insect Behav. 30: 48-59.
-
Nakagawa, S., Johnson, P.C. & Schielzeth, H. (2017). The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. — J. Roy. Soc. Interface 14: 20170213.
-
Patoka, J., Kalous, L. & Bartoš, L. (2019). Early ontogeny social deprivation modifies future agonistic behaviour in crayfish. — Sci. Rep. 9: 1-5.
-
Peeke, H.V., Sippel, J. & Figler, M.H. (1995). Prior residence effects in shelter defense in adult signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana)): results in same-and mixed-sex dyads. — Crustaceana 68: 873-881.
-
Pike, T.W., Samanta, M., Lindström, J. & Royle, N.J. (2008). Behavioural phenotype affects social interactions in an animal network. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 275: 2515-2520.
-
Pintor, L.M., Sih, A. & Bauer, M.L. (2008). Differences in aggression, activity and boldness between native and introduced populations of an invasive crayfish. — Oikos 117: 1629-1636.
-
R Core Team (2021). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, available online at https://www.R-project.org/.
-
Reaney, L.T. & Backwell, P.R. (2007). Risk-taking behavior predicts aggression and mating success in a fiddler crab. — Behav. Ecol. 18: 521-525.
-
Reisinger, L.S., Elgin, A.K., Towle, K.M., Chan, D.J. & Lodge, D.M. (2017). The influence of evolution and plasticity on the behavior of an invasive crayfish. — Biol. Invas. 19: 815-830.
-
Roche, D.G., Careau, V. & Binning, S.A. (2016). Demystifying animal ‘personality’ (or not): why individual variation matters to experimental biologists. — J. Exp. Biol. 219: 3832-3843.
-
Sbragaglia, V. & Breithaupt, T. (2022). Daily activity rhythms, chronotypes, and risk-taking behavior in the signal crayfish. — Curr. Zool. 68: 177-183.
-
Schadegg, A.C. & Herberholz, J. (2017). Satiation level affects anti-predatory decisions in foraging juvenile crayfish. — J. Comp. Physiol. A 203: 223-232.
-
Schausberger, P., Gratzer, M. & Strodl, M.A. (2017). Early social isolation impairs development, mate choice and grouping behaviour of predatory mites. — Anim. Behav. 127: 15-21.
-
Sih, A., Bell, A. & Johnson, J.C. (2004). Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 372-378.
-
Sih, A., Mathot, K.J., Moirón, M., Montiglio, P.-O., Wolf, M. & Dingemanse, N.J. (2015). Animal personality and state-behaviour feedbacks: a review and guide for empiricists. — Trends Ecol. Evol. 30: 50-60.
-
Sinn, D.L., Moltschaniwskyj, N.A., Wapstra, E. & Dall, S.R. (2010). Are behavioral syndromes invariant? Spatiotemporal variation in shy/bold behavior in squid. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 693-702.
-
Söderbäck, B. (1994). Interactions among juveniles of two freshwater crayfish species and a predatory fish. — Oecologia 100: 229-235.
-
Stamps, J.A., Briffa, M. & Biro, P.A. (2012). Unpredictable animals: individual differences in intraindividual variability (IIV). — Anim. Behav. 83: 1325-1334.
-
Stamps, J.A. & Biro, P.A. (2016). Personality and individual differences in plasticity. — Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 12: 18-23.
-
Stan Development Team (2020). RStan: the R interface to Stan. R package version 2.21.2. Stan Development Team, available online at http://mc-stan.org/.
-
Steele, A.N. & Moore, P.A. (2019). Express yourself: individuals with bold personalities exhibit increased behavioral sensitivity to dynamic herbicide exposure. — Ecotoxicol. Environ. S. Afr. 179: 272-281.
-
Tan, M.K., Chang, C.C. & Tan, H.T. (2018). Shy herbivores forage more efficiently than bold ones regardless of information-processing overload. — Behav. Process. 149: 52-58.
-
Tierney, A.J., Gunaratne, C., Jennison, K., Monroy, V. & Donnelly, L. (2008). Behavioral correlates of alternate male forms (form I and form II) in the crayfish Orconectes rusticus. — J. Crust. Biol. 28: 596-600.
-
Toscano, B.J., Gatto, J. & Griffen, B.D. (2014). Effect of predation threat on repeatability of individual crab behavior revealed by mark-recapture. — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68: 519-527.
-
Vainikka, A., Rantala, M.J., Niemelä, P., Hirvonen, H. & Kortet, R. (2011). Boldness as a consistent personality trait in the noble crayfish, Astacus astacus. — Acta Ethol. 14: 17-25.
-
Vehtari, A., Gelman, A. & Gabry, J. (2017). Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. — Stat. Comput. 27: 1413-1432.
-
Ward, A.J., Thomas, P., Hart, P.J. & Krause, J. (2004). Correlates of boldness in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). — Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55: 561-568.
-
Warren, A.H., Saltzman, L., Buckholt, M.A. & Mathews, L.M. (2009). Agonistic interactions differ by sex and season in the crayfish Orconectes quinebaugensis. — J. Crust. Biol. 29: 484-490.
-
Webster, M.M., Ward, A.J.W. & Hart, P.J.B. (2007). Boldness is influenced by social context in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). — Behaviour 144: 351.
-
Wetzel, J.E. (2002). Form alternation of adult female crayfishes of the genus Orconectes (Decapoda: Cambaridae). — Amer. Midl. Nat. 147: 326-337.
-
Yong, A.Y. & Lim, S.S. (2021). Plasticity of foraging strategies adopted by the painted ghost crab, Ocypode gaudichaudii, in response to in situ food resource manipulation experiments. — Zool. Stud. 60: e37.
-
Zhao, D. & Feng, P. (2015). Temperature increase impacts personality traits in aquatic non-native species: implications for biological invasion under climate change. — Curr. Zool. 61: 966-971.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 720 | 246 | 59 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 155 | 6 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 237 | 10 | 0 |
Sex and reproductive status affect sheltering and exploratory behaviours with high intra-individual variability in crayfish
in BehaviourSearch for other papers by Sydney Atkinson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Erin Bryan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jack Kruse in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nathan Sarachick in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lauren Mathews in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The contexts in which individuals demonstrate behavioural consistency or variability have been the subject of research focus. We studied exploratory and sheltering behaviour in the crayfish F. virilis to understand how these behaviours vary by sex and reproductive readiness and to quantify the repeatability of these behaviours. Crayfish were tested in two sets of three rounds, one in the summer non-reproductive season and another in the autumn reproductive season. Reproductive crayfish spent more time outside the shelter and were more likely to accept a food item than non-reproductive crayfish. In the non-reproductive season, females spent more time outside the shelter than males, and over both seasons, females were more likely to seek and accept a food item. Repeatability estimates were low, indicating high intra-individual variability in these behaviours. Sheltering and exploratory behaviours were not correlated. This indicates sex or reproductive readiness have strong effects on both sheltering and exploratory behaviours.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 720 | 246 | 59 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 155 | 6 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 237 | 10 | 0 |
