Alternative mating tactics and male mating success in two species of fiddler crab
äºBehaviourSearch for other papers by Miranda L. Dyson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Patricia R.Y. Backwell in
Current site
Google Scholar
The use of alternative male mating tactics can determine the strength of sexual selection on male traits and have implications for sexual dimorphism. We examined size-based mating success in two species of fiddler crabs where males use each of two alternative tactics to obtain matings. In Uca annulipes, larger males were more successful when using the primary mating tactic (burrow mating) but the full size range of males mated when using the secondary tactic (surface mating). In Uca urvillei, both burrow and surface mating males were larger than the average sized male in the population. Standardised directional selection gradients indicated that selection on male size was stronger in U. urvillei than U. annulipes, reflecting the differences between species in male mating success. Our results also showed that sexual size dimorphism was greater in the species with stronger sexual selection on male size than in the species with weaker sexual selection.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Backwell P.R.Y., Passmore N.I. (1996). Time constraints and multiple choice criteria in the sampling behaviour and mate choice of the fiddler crab, Uca annulipes. â Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38: 407-416.
-
Backwell P.R.Y., Jennions M.D., Passmore N.I., Christy J.H. (1999). Female choice in the synchronously waving fiddler crab, Uca annulipes. â Ethology 105: 415-422.
-
Booksmythe I., Milner R.N.C., Jennions M.D., Backwell P.R.Y. (2010). How do weaponless male fiddler crabs avoid aggression? â Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 485-491.
-
Brockmann H.J. (2001). The evolution of alternative strategies and tactics. â Adv. Stud. Behav. 30: 1-51.
-
Christy J.H. (1978). Female choice and the breeding behaviour of the fiddler crab, Uca beebei. â J. Crust. Biol. 7: 624-635.
-
Christy J.H. (1982). The mating system of the sand fiddler crab Uca pugilator. â PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
-
Christy J.H. (1983). Female choice in the resource-defense mating system of the sand fiddler crab Uca pugilator (Bosc). â Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12: 169-180.
-
Christy J.H. (1987). Female choice and the breeding behaviour of the fiddler crab Uca beebei. â J. Crust. Biol. 7: 624-635.
-
Christy J.H., Salmon M. (1984). Ecology and evolution of mating systems of fiddler crabs (genus Uca). â Biol. Rm. 59: 483-509.
-
Christy J.H., Schober U.M. (1994). A test for resource-defense mating in the fiddler crab Uca beebei. â Anim. Behav. 48: 795-802.
-
Crane J. (1975). Fiddler crabs of the world. Ocypodidae: genus Uca. â Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
deRivera C.E. (2005). Long searches for male-defended breeding burrows allows female fiddler crabs, Uca crenulata, to release larvae on time. â Anim. Behav. 70: 289-297.
-
deRivera C.E., Vehrencamp S.L. (2001). Male versus female mate searching in fiddler crabs: a comparative analysis. â Behav. Ecol. 12: 182-191.
-
Detto T., Backwell P.R.Y. (2009). The fiddler crab Uca mjoebergi uses ultraviolet cues in mate choice but not aggressive interactions. â Anim. Behav. 78: 407-411.
-
Gross M.R. (1982). Sneakers, satellites and parental males: polymorphic mating strategies in North American sunfishes. â Z. Tierpsychol. 60: 1-26.
-
Gross M.R. (1996). Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. â Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 92-97.
-
Henmi Y. (2003). Trade-off between brood size and brood interval and the evolution of underground incubation in three fiddler crabs (Uca perplexa, U. vocans and U. dussumieri). â J. Crust. Biol. 23: 46-54.
-
Hensen S.A., Warner R.R. (1997). Male and female alternative reproductive behaviors in fishes: a new approach using intersexual dynamics. â Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 571-592.
-
Kahn A., Holman L., Backwell P.R.Y. (2014). Female preferences for timing in a fiddler crab with synchronous courtship waving displays. â Anim. Behav. 98: 35-39.
-
Magurran A.E., Seghers B.H. (1994). The cost of sexual harassment in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. â Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 258: 89-92.
-
Matsumura S., Arlinghaus R., Diekmann U. (2012). Standardizing selection strengths to study selection in the wild: a critical comparison and suggestions for the future. â Bioscience 62: 1039-1054.
-
Mautz B., Detto T., Wong B., Kokko H., Jennions M.D., Backwell P.R.Y. (2011). Male fiddler crabs defend multiple burrows to attract additional females. â Behav. Ecol. 22: 261-267.
-
Milner R.N.C., Detto T., Jennions M.D., Backwell P.R.Y. (2010). Experimental evidence for a seasonal shift in the strength of female mating preference. â Behav. Ecol. 21: 311-316.
-
Milner R.N.C., Jennions M.D., Backwell P.R.Y. (2011). Keeping up appearances: male fiddler crabs wave faster in a crowd. â Biol. Lett. 8: 176-178.
-
Murai M., Goshima S., Henmi Y. (1987). Analysis of the mating system of the fiddler crab, Uca lactea. â Anim. Behav. 35: 1334-1342.
-
Nakasone M., Murai M. (1998). Mating behaviour of Uca lactea perplexa. â J. Crust. Biol. 28: 70-77.
-
Oliveira R., Taborsky M., Brockmann H. (2008). Alternative reproductive tactics. â Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
-
Reaney L.T. (2009). Female preferences for male phenotypic traits in a fiddler carb: do females use absolute or comparative evaluation? â Anim. Behav. 77: 139-143.
-
Reaney L., Backwell P.R.Y. (2007). Temporal constraints and female preference for burrow width in the fiddler crab, Uca mjoebergi. â Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61: 1515-1521.
-
Reaney L.T., Sims R.A., Sims S.W., Jennions M.D., Backwell P.R.Y. (2008). Experiments with robots explain synchronized courtship in fiddler carbs. â Curr. Biol. 18: R62-R63.
-
Reaney L.T., Maurer G., Backwell P.R.Y., Linde C.C. (2012). Paternity analysis of two male mating tactics in the fiddler crab, Uca mjoebergi. â Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 66: 1017-1024.
-
Ribeiro P.B., Daleo P., Iribarne O.O. (2010). Density affects mating mode and large male mating advantage in a fiddler crab. â Oecologia 164: 931-941.
-
Slatyer R.A., Jennions M.D., Backwell P.R.Y. (2012). Polyandry occurs because females initially trade sex for protection. â Anim. Behav. 83: 1203-1206.
-
Soulsbury C.D., Kervinen M., Lebigre C. (2014). Sexual sixe dimorphism and the strength of sexual selection in mammals and birds. â Evol. Ecol. Res. 14: 63-76.
-
Taborsky M. (1994). Sneakers, satellites and helpers: parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. â Adv. Study Behav. 23: 1-100.
-
Yamaguchi T. (2001). The mating system of the fiddler crab Uca lactea (Decapoda, Brachyura, Ocypodidae). â Crustaceana 74: 389-399.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 604 | 88 | 15 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 181 | 4 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 56 | 9 | 0 |
Alternative mating tactics and male mating success in two species of fiddler crab
äºBehaviourSearch for other papers by Miranda L. Dyson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Patricia R.Y. Backwell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
The use of alternative male mating tactics can determine the strength of sexual selection on male traits and have implications for sexual dimorphism. We examined size-based mating success in two species of fiddler crabs where males use each of two alternative tactics to obtain matings. In Uca annulipes, larger males were more successful when using the primary mating tactic (burrow mating) but the full size range of males mated when using the secondary tactic (surface mating). In Uca urvillei, both burrow and surface mating males were larger than the average sized male in the population. Standardised directional selection gradients indicated that selection on male size was stronger in U. urvillei than U. annulipes, reflecting the differences between species in male mating success. Our results also showed that sexual size dimorphism was greater in the species with stronger sexual selection on male size than in the species with weaker sexual selection.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 604 | 88 | 15 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 181 | 4 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 56 | 9 | 0 |
