Denizenship as a Basis for Compulsory Diplomatic Protection: Does Residence Security as a Human Right Restrict State Sovereignty?

Tomoko Yamashita

Jump to Content

Chapter 5 Denizenship as a Basis for Compulsory Diplomatic Protection: Does Residence Security as a Human Right Restrict State Sovereignty?

于Human Rights and Power in Times of Globalisation

著者：

Tomoko Yamashita

Tomoko Yamashita
Search for other papers by Tomoko Yamashita in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed

类型:: 章节

Page Range:: 135–170

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004346406_007

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€42.00€35.00 excl. VAT

Add to Cart

找回访问令牌

Abstract

Diplomatic protection, with its origin in the international arbitrations of the 18th and 19th centuries, is one of the oldest principles in customary international law which protects ‘nationals’ abroad by using state-to-state procedures as a corollary of sovereign power. From an orthodox positivist view, states have the right to utilise this institution as a corollary of personal jurisdiction. It may, however, conflict with the global scheme of human rights protection. Although the possible restrictions of a state’s discretion in its exercise of diplomatic protection have been discussed for a century, this question has not attracted the interest of practitioners until recently, when the detainees at Guantanamo Bay camp asked their governments to exercise diplomatic protection on their behalf. Against this backdrop, this paper examines how states exercise personal jurisdictional power with a special focus on the classifications of societal membership – national, citizen, and denizen – as a legal basis for invoking diplomatic protection in the international sphere. The first section focuses on the fragility of the concept of ‘nationality’ in international law. The second section illustrates a predominant trend for residence-oriented protection of individuals in international human rights law, and this link to residence is sometimes superior to their formal nationality or citizenship. Based on these arguments, the third section scrutinises possible constrains on the discretion of a state in its exercise of diplomatic protection.

引用信息

Save
Cite
Email this content

Share Link

Copy this link, or click below to email it to a friend
Email this content
or copy the link directly:

https://brill.edhh.ma/abstract/book/edcoll/9789004346406/B9789004346406_008.xml
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.

Link copied successfully

折叠
展开
回到页面顶端

Human Rights and Power in Times of Globalisation

ISBN:: 9789004346406

出版社:: Brill | Nijhoff

印刷出版日期:: 07 Dec 2017

Subjects
- Human Rights and Humanitarian Law
  - Human Rights
- International Law
  - International Law: General Interest
  - Public International Law

Front Matter

统计数据

	全部期间	过去一年	过去30天
摘要浏览次数	661	132	27
全文浏览次数	138	0	0
PDF下载次数	117	0	0

African Studies	Education	Media Studies
American Studies	History	Middle East and Islamic Studies
Ancient Near East and Egypt	Human Rights and Humanitarian Law	Musicology
Art History	International Law	Philosophy
Asian Studies	International Relations	Religious Studies
Biblical Studies	Jewish Studies	Slavic and Eurasian Studies
Biology	Languages and Linguistics	Social Sciences
Book History and Cartography	Life Sciences	Theology and World Christianity
Classical Studies	Literature and Cultural Studies

Subjects

AppBar-Authors 2025

AppBar-Open Access 2025

AppBar-Product Information 2025

AppBar-Company 2025

AppBar-Contact 2025

Chapter 5 Denizenship as a Basis for Compulsory Diplomatic Protection: Does Residence Security as a Human Right Restrict State Sovereignty?

Abstract

引用信息

Share Link

Human Rights and Power in Times of Globalisation

目录

统计数据

统计数据