The Ethnification of Politics and the Galvanization of Fear
In: Southeastern EuropeSearch for other papers by Asim Mujkić in
Current site
Google Scholar
The aim of this text is twofold. First, I intend to examine the importance of fear for the creation of ethnonationalist political entities in ex-Yugoslavia, especially in the areas where ethnic borders failed to coincide with political borders, such as Bosnia and Herzegovina after the 1989 Revolution. The region had entered into “a state of suspense and fear, dissolution of the sober little uniformities” (Brinton 1965: 173) and into a series of “aggressions and civil wars (total war) as the most extreme forms of the uncompleted ethnonational revolutions” (Sekulić 2006: 35). This is the first phase of the galvanization of fear, namely, the phase of revolutionary terror, referring to a series of small dictatorships of ethnonationalist extremists “embodied in governmental forms as rough-and-ready centralization” (Brinton 1965: 171). These extremists relied on the illegal use of force, ethnic cleansing and genocide. The second phase of the galvanization of fear excluded armed revolutionary violence due to the intervention of the international community, but implied various mechanisms of ruling ethnonationalist elites in preserving the necessary level of fear in politics for the same purpose of achieving the still unrealized goals of “the territorial-nationalist revolution.”1 My focus in the second part of the text will be how fear is structurally produced and politically organized in an ethnopolitical society such as Bosnia and Herzegovina through democratic institutions, for example political elections, for the purpose of achieving the basic political end – the creation of a (ethno)national state.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abulof U.2009. “‘Small Peoples’: The Existential Uncertainty of Ethnonational Communities” International Studies Quarterly 53(1): 227–248.
-
Anderson B.2006. Imagined Communities (London, New York: Verso).
-
Barkan J., 2004. “Foreword,” in Mills N., and Walzer M. (eds.) 50 Years of Dissent, (New Haven and London: Yale University Press): 243–246.
-
Berns L., 1987. “Thomas Hobbes,” in Strauss L., and Cropsey J. (eds.), History of Political Philosophy, (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press): 396–420.
-
Brinton C.1965. The Anatomy of Revolution (New York: Vintage Books).
-
Brubaker R.2004. Ethnicity Without Groups (Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: Harvard University Press).
-
Claeys G.1989. Thomas Paine. Social and Political Thought (Boston: Unwin Hyman).
-
Cohen M., 2004. “Rooted Cosmopolitanism,” in Mills ad N., Walzer M. (eds.), 50 Years of Dissent, (New Haven and London: Yale University Press): 252–262.
-
Goldwin A., 1987. “John Locke,” in Strauss L., and Cropsey J. (eds.), History of Political Philosophy (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press): 476–513.
-
Gržinič M.2003. Estetika kibersvijeta i učinci derealizacije (Zagreb, Sarajevo: Multimedijalni institut, Košnica).
-
Horowitz D.L.2003. “Electoral Systems: A Primer for Decision Makers,” Journal of Democracy 14, October 2003: 115–127; 116.
-
Kaufman M.2010. “Jefferson changed ‘subjects’ to ‘citizens’ in Declaration of Independence,” Washington Post July 3.
-
Kosik K.2007. O dilemama suvremene povijesti (Zagreb: Razlog).
-
Lukes S., 1992. “Marxism and Morality: Reflections on the Revolutions of 1989,” in Legters L. H. (ed.), Eastern Europe. Transformation and Revolution 1945-1991 (Lexington Mass., Toronto: D.C. Heath and Company): 612–21.
-
Mujkić A.2007. “We, the Citizens of Ethnopolis,” Constellations 14(1): 112–28.
-
Mujkić A., , Hulsey J.2010. “Explaining the Success of Nationalist Parties in Bosnia and Herzegovina,” Politička misao 47(2): Zagreb: 143–158.
-
Ost D.2005. The Defeat of Solidarity: Anger and Politics in Postcommunist Europe (New York: Cornell University Press).
-
Paine T.1987. Prava čovjeka i drugi spisi (Zagreb: Politička misao).
-
Podunavac M., , Keane J., , Sparks C.2008. Politika i strah (Zagreb: Politička kultura).
-
Reilly B.2002. “Electoral Systems for Divided Societies,” Journal of Democracy 13(2): April 2002: 156–170; 156.
-
——. 2008. “Introduction,” in Reilly B., and Nordlund P. (eds.) Political Parties in Conflict-Prone Societies: Regulation, Engineering and Democratic Development (Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press): 3–24.
-
Rorty R. 2007. “Democracy and Philosophy,” Kritika & Kontext 33: Bratislava: 8–26.
-
Sekulić B.2006. “Mir i rat u Bosni i Hercegovini. Od negativnog ka pozitivnom miru, Godišnjak 2006,” (Sarajevo: Fakultet političkih nauka: god. 1): 19–48.
-
Todorova M.1997. Imagining the Balkans (Oxford University Press).
-
Varshney A.2003. “Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict, and Rationality,” Perspectives on Politics 1: 85–99.
-
Žižek S.2007. “Introduction,” Slavoj Žižek Presents Robespierre. Virtue and Terror (London, New York: Verso): vii–xxxix.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 326 | 58 | 3 |
| Full Text Views | 124 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 33 | 0 | 0 |
The Ethnification of Politics and the Galvanization of Fear
In: Southeastern EuropeSearch for other papers by Asim Mujkić in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
The aim of this text is twofold. First, I intend to examine the importance of fear for the creation of ethnonationalist political entities in ex-Yugoslavia, especially in the areas where ethnic borders failed to coincide with political borders, such as Bosnia and Herzegovina after the 1989 Revolution. The region had entered into “a state of suspense and fear, dissolution of the sober little uniformities” (Brinton 1965: 173) and into a series of “aggressions and civil wars (total war) as the most extreme forms of the uncompleted ethnonational revolutions” (Sekulić 2006: 35). This is the first phase of the galvanization of fear, namely, the phase of revolutionary terror, referring to a series of small dictatorships of ethnonationalist extremists “embodied in governmental forms as rough-and-ready centralization” (Brinton 1965: 171). These extremists relied on the illegal use of force, ethnic cleansing and genocide. The second phase of the galvanization of fear excluded armed revolutionary violence due to the intervention of the international community, but implied various mechanisms of ruling ethnonationalist elites in preserving the necessary level of fear in politics for the same purpose of achieving the still unrealized goals of “the territorial-nationalist revolution.”1 My focus in the second part of the text will be how fear is structurally produced and politically organized in an ethnopolitical society such as Bosnia and Herzegovina through democratic institutions, for example political elections, for the purpose of achieving the basic political end – the creation of a (ethno)national state.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 326 | 58 | 3 |
| Full Text Views | 124 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 33 | 0 | 0 |
