Transhumanism and Christianity
A Ratzingerian Approach to the Concept of Biotechnological Human Enhancement
In: Religion and TheologySearch for other papers by Markus Lipowicz in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Although supporters of transhumanism present their agenda as a secular movement that specifically challenges the basic ontological and ethical premises of Christian metaphysics, there are also techno-progressive thinkers who claim that Christians should endorse a moderate version of biotechnological human enhancement. The main objective of this essay is to scrutinise this claim by outlining the relationship between transhumanism and Christian anthropology from the perspective of Joseph Ratzinger’s thought. The order of this analysis is constituted by three steps: first, I will critically analyse Benedikt Paul Göcke’s main arguments in favor of a Christian transhumanism; secondly, I will discuss the normative foundation of the techno-progressive agenda with regard to Ratzinger’s/Benedict XVI’s critique of the modern concept of freedom and its anthropological implication – the technological “new man”; finally, I will refer the notion of the posthuman to Ratzinger’s theo-evolutionary image of Jesus Christ as the “man of the future.”
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Bardziński, Filip. “Transhumanism and Evolution. Considerations on Darwin, Lamarck and Transhumanism.” Ethics in Progress 5, no. 2 (2014): 103–115. Online: https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/eip/article/view/9365.
-
Benedict XVI. Caritas in Veritate (Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI to the Bishops, Priests and Deacons, Men and Women Religious, the Lay Faithful, and All People of Good Will on Integral Human Development in Charity and Truth), 29 June 2009. Online: https://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/pl/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate.html.
-
Benedict XVI. Spe Salvi (Encyclical Letter Spe Salvi of the Supreme Pontiff Benedict XVI to the Bishops, Priests, and Deacons, Men and Women, Religious and All the Lay Faithful on Christian Hope), 30 November 2007. Online: http://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20071130_spe-salvi.html.
-
Bostrom, Nick. “A History of Transhumanist Thought.” Journal of Evolution and Technology 14, no. 1 (2005): 1–25. Online: http://jetpress.org/volume14/bostrom.html.
-
Boyer, John, and Geoffrey Meadows. “Thomas Aquinas: Teacher of Transhumanity?” Pages 186–197 in Thomas Aquinas: Teacher of Humanity. Edited by John P. Hittinger and Daniel C. Wagner. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015.
-
Campa, Riccardo. “Transhumanism and Epistemology.” Swissfuture. Magazin für Zukunftsmonitoring 2 (2009): 18–22. Online: https://www.swissfuture.ch/de/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2013/08/02_09_Transhuman.pdf.
-
Clay, Eugene. 2005. “Transhumanism and the Orthodox Christian Tradition.” Pages 157–180 in Building Better Humans. Refocusing the Debate on Transhumanism, Edited by Hava Tirosh-Samuelson and Kenneth L. Mossman. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
-
Damberger, Thomas, and Estella Hebert. “Is Pedagogy Transhuman? Reflections on the Relationship between Pedagogy and Transhumanism.” Studia Paedagogica Ignatiana 20, no. 1 (2017): 41–56. Online: doi.org/10.12775/SPI.2017.1.00.
-
Ferrando, Francesca. “Posthumanism, Transhumanism, Antihumanism, Metahumanism, and New Materialisms: Differences and Relations.” Existenz 8 (2013): 26–32.
-
Fisher, Matthew Zaro. “More Human than Human? Toward a ‘Transhumanist’ Christian Theological Anthropology.” Pages 23–38 in Religion and Transhumanism: The Unknown Future of Human Enhancement. Edited by Calvin Mercer and Tracy J. Trothen. Santa Barbara, CA; Oxford: Praeger, 2015.
-
Goldberg, Steve. 2009. “Does the Wall Still Stand? The Implications of Transhumanism for the Separation of Church and State.” Speech at the Workshop on Transhumanism and the Future of Democracy, Templeton Research Lectures at the Arizona State University Center for the Study of Religion and Conflict, April 24: 2–6. Online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1408586.
-
Göcke, Benedikt Paul. “Christian Cyborgs: A Plea for a Moderate Transhumanism.” Faith and Philosophy 34, no. 3 (2017): 347–364. Online: doi.org/10.5840/faithphil201773182.
-
Green, Brian Patrick. “The Catholic Church and Technological Progress: Past, Present, and Future.” Religions 8, no. 6 (2017): 1–16. Online: doi.org/10.3390/rel8060106.
-
Green, Brian Patrick. “Transhumanism and Roman Catholicism: Imagined and Real Tensions.” Theology and Science 13, no. 2 (2015): 187–201. Online: doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2015.1023528.
-
Holub, Grzegorz. “Creating Better People? Some Considerations on Genetic Enhancement.” The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 10, no. 4 (2010): 723–740.
-
Hughes, James. “Contradictions from the Enlightenment Roots of Transhumanism.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35, no. 6 (2010): 622–640. Online: doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhq049.
-
More, Max. “The Philosophy of Transhumanism.” Pages 3–17 in The Transhumanist Reader. Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future. Edited by Max More and Natasha Vita-More. Chichester; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. Online: doi.org/10.1002/9781118555927.ch1.
-
More, Max. 1990. “Transhumanism: Towards a Futurist Philosophy.” Extropy 6 (1990): 6–12. Online: http://fennetic.net/irc/extropy/ext6.pdf.
-
Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World – Gaudium et Spes, Promulgated by His Holiness, Pope Paul VI, 7 December 1965. Online: http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en.html.
-
Pötzsch, Holger and Katherine N. Hayles. “FCJ–172 Posthumanism, Technogenesis, and Digital Technologies: A Conversation with N. Katherine Hayles.” The Fibreculture Journal 23 (2014): 95–107. Online: http://twentythree.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-172-posthumanism-technogenesis-and-digital-technologies-a-conversation-with-katherine-n-hayles/.
-
Ranisch, Robert and Stefan Lorenz Sorgner. “Introducing Post- and Transhumanism.” Pages 7–27 in Post- and Transhumanism. An Introduction. Edited by Robert Ranisch and Stefan L. Sorgner. Beyond Humanism: Trans- and Posthumanism 1. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang, 2014.
-
Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. “Concerning the Notion of Person in Theology.” Translated by Michael Waldstein. Communio 17, no. 3 (1990): 439–454. Online: https://www.communio-icr.com/files/ratzinger17-3.pdf.
-
Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. “Conscience and Truth.” Communio 37 (2010): 529–538. Online: https://www.communio-icr.com/files/ratzinger37-3.pdf.
-
Ratzinger Benedict XVI, Joseph. “Europe in the Crisis of Cultures.” Communio 32 (2005): 345–356.
-
Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. Introduction to Christianity. Translated by J.R. Foster. Preface translated by Michael J. Miller. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 2004.
-
Ratzinger Benedict XVI, Joseph. “On Hope.” Communio 35, no. 2 (2008): 301–315. Online: https://www.communio-icr.com/files/ratzinger35-2.pdf.
-
Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. Truth and Tolerance. Christian Belief and World Religions. Translated by Henry Taylor. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 2004.
-
Rowland, Tracey. Ratzinger’s Faith. The Theology of Pope Benedict XVI. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
-
Sandberg, Anders. “Morphological Freedom – Why We Not Just Want It, but Need It.” Pages 56–64 in The Transhumanist Reader. Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future. Edited by Max More and Natasha Vita-More. Chichester; Maldon, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. Online: doi.org/10.1002/9781118555927.ch5.
-
Sorgner, Stefan Lorenz. “The Future of Education: Genetic Enhancement and Metahumanities,” Journal of Evolution and Technology 25, no. 1 (2015): 31–48. Online: https://jetpress.org/v25.1/sorgner.htm.
-
Treder, Mike. “Transhumanism as Religion.” Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, 24 July 2009. Online: https://ieet.org/index.php/IEET2/more/treder20090724.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2539 | 205 | 24 |
| Full Text Views | 168 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 335 | 6 | 0 |
Transhumanism and Christianity
A Ratzingerian Approach to the Concept of Biotechnological Human Enhancement
In: Religion and TheologySearch for other papers by Markus Lipowicz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Although supporters of transhumanism present their agenda as a secular movement that specifically challenges the basic ontological and ethical premises of Christian metaphysics, there are also techno-progressive thinkers who claim that Christians should endorse a moderate version of biotechnological human enhancement. The main objective of this essay is to scrutinise this claim by outlining the relationship between transhumanism and Christian anthropology from the perspective of Joseph Ratzinger’s thought. The order of this analysis is constituted by three steps: first, I will critically analyse Benedikt Paul Göcke’s main arguments in favor of a Christian transhumanism; secondly, I will discuss the normative foundation of the techno-progressive agenda with regard to Ratzinger’s/Benedict XVI’s critique of the modern concept of freedom and its anthropological implication – the technological “new man”; finally, I will refer the notion of the posthuman to Ratzinger’s theo-evolutionary image of Jesus Christ as the “man of the future.”
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2539 | 205 | 24 |
| Full Text Views | 168 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 335 | 6 | 0 |
