FOOD SEGREGATION OF SYMPATRIC MULLUS BARBATUS AND MULLUS SURMULETUS IN THE AEGEAN SEA
In: Israel Journal of Ecology and EvolutionSearch for other papers by VASSILIKI VASSILOPOULOU in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by COSTAS PAPACONSTANTINOU in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by GEORGE CHRISTIDES in
Current site
Google Scholar
This study analyzes the feeding habits of Mullus barbatus and M. surmuletus, which were found to co-exist in areas of different bathymetry in the central Aegean Sea. Smaller specimens, whose stomachs contained relatively more food in comparison to larger specimens, were found in shallower waters. Stomach content analysis of M. barbatus revealed that crustaceans, polychaetes, and bivalves were the most important prey categories, while M. surmuletus appeared to depend almost exclusively on crustaceans. The latter fact, as well as the fact that bottom sediment was not found in the stomachs of M. surmuletus, while such material appeared quite often in M. barbatus stomachs, suggests that the two species possibly adopt different foraging practices. A discrepancy in certain morphological characteristics associated with prey selection was found between the two species. Ontogenetic shifts appeared in the diet of both goatfishes; interspecific dietary segregation was more pronounced, however, in relation to ontogenetic changes in diet at the intraspecific level. Diet breadth of M. barbatus and M. surmuletus differed in relation to sampling site, as well as size of specimens. Segregation of the feeding niche between the two species possibly contributes to the reduction of interspecific competition, facilitating the coexistence of the two goatfishes in the oligotrophic Aegean Sea.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Uiblein, F. 1991. Ontogenetic shifts in resource use and shoaling tendency related to body size in Red Sea goatfish (Parupeneus forsskali). P.S.Z.N.I. Mar. Ecol. 12: 153–161.
-
Hugueny, B., Pouilly, M. 1999. Morphological correlates of diet in an assemblage of west African freshwater fishes. J. Fish Biol. 54: 1310–1325.
-
Golani, D., Galil, B. 1991. Trophic relationships of colonizing and indigenous goatfishes (Mullidae) in the eastern Mediterranean with special emphasis on decapod crustaceans. Hydrobiologia 218: 27–33.
-
Wahbeh, M.I., Ajiad, A. 1985. The food habits of goatfish, Parupeneus barberinus (Lacepede) from Aqaba, Jordan. J. Fish. Biol. 27: 147–154.
-
Machias, A., Somarakis, S., Tsimenides, N. 1998. Bathymetric distribution and movements of red mullet Mullus surmuletus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 166: 247–257.
-
Lee, C.K.C. 1973. The feeding of Upeneus moluccensi (Bleeker) on fishing grounds near Hong Kong. Hong Kong Fish. Bull. 3: 47–53.
-
Sogard, S. 1984. Utilization of meiofauna as a food source by a grassbed fish, the spotted dragonet Callionymus pauciradiatus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 17: 183–191.
-
Ben-Eliahu, M.N., Golani, D. 1990. Polychaetes (Annelida) in the gut contents of goatfishes (Mullidae), with new polychaete records for the Mediterranean coast of Israel and the Gulf of Elat. P.S.Z.N.I. Mar. Ecol. 11: 193–205.
-
Golani, D. 1994. Niche separation between colonizing and indigenous goatfish (Mullidae) along the Mediterranean coast of Israel. J. Fish Biol. 45: 503–513.
-
Platell, M.E., Potter, I.C. 1998. Distributions, size compositions and diets of two abundant benthic ambush-feeding teleosts in coastal waters of south-western Australia. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 78: 587–608.
-
Bray, J.R., Curtis, J.T. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27: 325–349.
-
Labropoulou, M., Plaitis, W. 1995. Selective predation on small crustaceans by six demersal fish species in Iraklion bay (Cretan Sea, north-eastern Mediterranean). In: Eleftheriou, A., Ansell, A.D., Smith, C.J., eds. Biology and ecology of swallow coastal waters. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, pp. 351–357.
-
Stergiou, K.I., Christou, E.D., Georgopoulos, D., Zenetos, A., Souvermezoglou, A. 1997. The Hellenic Seas: Physics, chemistry, biology and fisheries. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 35: 415–538.
-
Gerking, S.D. 1994. Feeding ecology of fish. Academic Press, San Diego.
-
Peterson, C.C., Winemiller, K.O. 1996. Ontogenetic diet shifts and scale-eating in Roeboides dayi, a neotropical characid. Env. Biol. Fish. 49: 111–118.
-
Hureau, J.C. 1966. Biologie compar�e de quelques poissons antartiques (Nototheniidae). Bull. Inst. Oceanogr. Monaco 68: 1–244.
-
Hyslop, E.J. 1980. Stomach content analysis—a review of methods and their application. J. Fish Biol. 17: 411–429.
-
Nelson, J.S. 1994. Fishes of the world. Wiley, New York.
-
Pielou, E.C. 1966. Shannon’s formula as a mean of specific diversity: its use and misuse. Amer. Nat. 100: 463–465.
-
Bauchot, M.L. 1987. Poissons osseux. In: Fischer, W., Schneider, M. and Bauchot, M.L., eds. Fiches FAO d’identification des esp�ces pour les besoins de la peche M�diterranee et mer Noire. Zone de Peche 37. Revision 1. Vol. II. Vert�br�s. FAO, Rome. pp. 893–1422.
-
Cushing, D.H. 1982. Climate and fisheries. Academic Press, London.
-
Vassilopoulou, V., Papaconstantinou, C. 1993. Feeding habits of red mullet (M. barbatus) in a gulf of central Greece. Fish. Res. 16: 69–83.
-
Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
-
Wainwright, P.C., Richard, B.A. 1995. Predicting patterns of prey use from morphology of fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish. 44: 97–113.
-
Labropoulou, M., Papadopoulou-Smith, K.N. 1999. Foraging behavior patterns of four sympatric demersal fishes. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 49: 99–108.
-
Scrimgeour, G.J., Winterbourn, M.J. 1987. Diet, food resource partitioning and feeding periodicity of two riffle-dwelling fish species in a New Zealand river. J. Fish Biol. 31: 309–324.
-
Labropoulou, M., Eleftheriou, A. 1997. The foraging ecology of two pairs of congeneric demersal fish species: importance of morphological characteristics in prey selection. J. Fish Biol. 50: 324–340.
-
Gosline, W.A. 1984. Structure, function and ecology in the goatfishes (Family Mullidae). Pac. Sci. 38: 312–323.
-
Labropoulou, M., Machias, A., Tsimenides, N., Eleftheriou, A. 1997. Feeding habits and antogenetic diet shift of the striped mullet Mullus surmuletus Linnaeus, 1758. Fish Res. 31: 257–267.
-
Platell, M.E., Potter, I.C., Clarke, K.R. 1998. Do the habitats, mouth morphology and diets of the mullids Upeneichthys stotti and U. lineatus in coastal waters of south-western Australia differ? J. Fish Biol. 52: 398–418.
-
Kuiter, R.H. 1993. Coastal fishes of South-eastern Australia. Crawford House Press, Bathurst, N.S.W.
-
Lombarte, A., Aguirre, H. 1997. Quantitative differences in the chemoreceptor systems in the barbels of two species of Mullidae (Mullus surmuletus and M. barbatus) with different bottom habitats. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 150: 57–64.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 152 | 43 | 13 |
| Full Text Views | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 13 | 0 | 0 |
FOOD SEGREGATION OF SYMPATRIC MULLUS BARBATUS AND MULLUS SURMULETUS IN THE AEGEAN SEA
In: Israel Journal of Ecology and EvolutionSearch for other papers by VASSILIKI VASSILOPOULOU in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by COSTAS PAPACONSTANTINOU in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by GEORGE CHRISTIDES in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
This study analyzes the feeding habits of Mullus barbatus and M. surmuletus, which were found to co-exist in areas of different bathymetry in the central Aegean Sea. Smaller specimens, whose stomachs contained relatively more food in comparison to larger specimens, were found in shallower waters. Stomach content analysis of M. barbatus revealed that crustaceans, polychaetes, and bivalves were the most important prey categories, while M. surmuletus appeared to depend almost exclusively on crustaceans. The latter fact, as well as the fact that bottom sediment was not found in the stomachs of M. surmuletus, while such material appeared quite often in M. barbatus stomachs, suggests that the two species possibly adopt different foraging practices. A discrepancy in certain morphological characteristics associated with prey selection was found between the two species. Ontogenetic shifts appeared in the diet of both goatfishes; interspecific dietary segregation was more pronounced, however, in relation to ontogenetic changes in diet at the intraspecific level. Diet breadth of M. barbatus and M. surmuletus differed in relation to sampling site, as well as size of specimens. Segregation of the feeding niche between the two species possibly contributes to the reduction of interspecific competition, facilitating the coexistence of the two goatfishes in the oligotrophic Aegean Sea.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 152 | 43 | 13 |
| Full Text Views | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 13 | 0 | 0 |
