Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Möchten Sie über diese Zeitschrift informiert bleiben? Klicken Sie bitte auf die Buttons, um unsere Alerts zu abonnieren.
Quantifying the future value of cacheable food using fox squirrels (sciurus niger)
in Israel Journal of Ecology and EvolutionBiology Department, Dixie State University of Utah
Search for other papers by Marius van der Merwe in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Joel S. Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Burt P. Kotler in
Current site
Google Scholar
Food caching allows foraging decisions to include both present and future food value. We developed and tested a conceptual framework for measuring animals’ perceptions of future vs. present food value. Fox squirrels (Sciurus niger) are well-known caching animals in North America. We measured giving-up densities (GUDs) of fox squirrels to test the following hypotheses: (1) all else equal, animals should prefer cacheable to non-cacheable foods, and (2) the option value of a cacheable food should change seasonally and be highest preceding lean periods. We presented squirrels with experimental food patches containing either shelled hazelnuts, hazelnuts with their shells intact (to affect cacheability) or both kinds. Our data support both hypotheses. Squirrels exploited food patches with cacheable nuts more thoroughly and left them at lower GUDs. The squirrels’ perception of the future value of hazelnuts with their shells intact was found to be 32% higher than their present value. GUDs also varied by season, fall > spring >winter > summer, likely corresponding to food availability. Season and food cacheability interacted to further determine GUDs. The difference in GUDs between cacheable and non-cacheable nuts varied similarly: fall > spring > winter > summer, likely corresponding to changing food availability, reproductive opportunities and pending energetic shortfalls.
Kauf
Sofortzugang erwerben (PDF-Download und unbegrenzter Online-Zugang):
Institutszugang
Melden Sie sich mit Open Athens, Shibboleth oder Ihren institutionellen Anmeldedaten an.
Persönliche Anmeldung
Melden Sie sich mit Ihrem brill.com-Konto an
-
Brown JS.1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 22:37–47.
-
Brown JS, , Kotler BP, , Valone TJ. 1994. Foraging under predation: a comparison of energetic and predation costs in rodent communities of the Negev and Sonoran deserts. Aust J Zool. 42:435–448.
-
Brown JS, , Mitchell WA. 1989. Diet selection on depletable resources. Oikos. 54:33–43.
-
Brown JS, , Morgan RA. 1995. Effects of foraging behavior and spatial scale on diet selectivity. Oikos. 74:122–136.
-
Charnov EL.1976. Optimal foraging and the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol. 9:129–136.
-
Chesson J.1983. The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology. 64:1297–1304.
-
Clarke MF, , Kramer DL. 1994. The placement, recovery and loss of scatter hoards by eastern chipmunks, Tamias striatus. Behav Ecol. 5:353–361.
-
Clayton NS, , Dickinson A. 1998. Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature. 395:272–274.
-
Emlen JM.1966. The role of time and energy in food preference. Am Nat. 100:611–617.
-
Gendron RP, , Reichman OJ. 1995. Food perishability and inventory management: a comparison of three caching strategies. Am Nat. 145:948–968.
-
Gerber LR, , Reichman OJ, , Roughgarden J. 2004. Food hoarding: future value in optimal foraging decisions. Ecol Model. 175:77–85.
-
Gorman OT, , Roth RR. 1989. Consequences of a temporally and spatially variable food supply for an unexploited gray squirrel (S. carolinensis) population. Am Midl Nat. 121:41–60.
-
Gurnell J.1996. The effects of food availability and winter weather on the dynamics of a grey squirrel population in southern England. J Appl Ecol. 33:325–338.
-
Hadj-Chikh LZ, , Steele MA, , Smallwood PD. 1996. Caching decisions by gray squirrels: a test of the handling time and perishability hypotheses. Anim Behav. 52:941–948.
-
Heller R.1980. On optimal diet in a patchy environment. Theor Popul Biol. 17:201–214.
-
Herrera J, , McDonald MW. 1997. Consumption by eastern woodrats (Neotoma floridana) of food infected by fungi. Am Midl Nat. 1 37:282–289.
-
Hodges CM, , Wolf LL. 1981. Optimal foraging in bumblebees: why is nectar left behind in flowers? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 9:41–44.
-
Holling CS.1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomol. 91:385–398.
-
Holling CS1965. The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem Entomol Soc Can. 45:1–60.
-
Holt RD.1977. Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. Theor Popul Biol. 12:197–229.
-
Holt RD, , Kotler BP. 1987. Short-term apparent competition. Am Nat. 130:412–430.
-
Horne EA, , McDonald M, , Reichman OJ. 1998. Changes in cache contents over winter in artificial dens of the eastern woodrat (Neotoma floridana). J Mammal. 79:898–905.
-
Janzen DH.1977. Why fruits rot, seeds mold, and meat spoils. Am Nat. 1 11:691–713.
-
Jedlicka DM.1993. A foraging approach to habitat selection in time and space in three sciurid rodents [Unpublished PhD dissertation]. Chicago IL: University of Illinois at Chicago.
-
Jorge MLSP, , Brown JS, , van der Merwe M. 2012. Handling time and the evolution of caching behavior. Behav Ecol. 23:410–417.
-
Kotler BP, , Blaustein L. 1995. Titrating food and safety in a heterogeneous environment: when is the risky patch of equal value? Oikos. 74:251–258.
-
Kotler BP, , Brown JS. 1990. Harvest rates of two species of gerbilline rodents. J Mammal. 71:591–596.
-
Kotler BP, , Brown JS, , Hickey M. 1999. Food storability and the foraging behavior of fox squirrels (Sciurus niger). Am Midl Nat. 142:77–86.
-
Lanham CR.1998. Mechanisms of coexistence in urban fox squirrels and gray squirrels [MSc thesis]. Chicago IL: University of Illinois at Chicago.
-
Lucas JR.1994. Regulation of cache stores and body-mass in Carolina chickadees (Parus carolinensis). Behav Ecol. 5:171–181.
-
MacArthur R, , Pianka E. 1966. On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat. 100:603–609.
-
MacDonald IMV.1996. Investigating grey squirrel spatial memory with respect to cache recovery mechanisms [Ph.D. thesis]. Exeter United Kingdom: University of Exeter.
-
MacDonald IMV.1997. Field experiments on duration and precision of grey and red squirrel spatial memory. Anim Behav. 54:879–891.
-
Montgomery SD, , Whelan JB, , Mosby HS. 1975. Bioenergetics of a woodlot gray squirrel population. J Wildlife Manage. 39:709–717.
-
Morgan RA, , Brown JS, , Thorson JM. 1997. The effect of spatial scale on the functional response of fox squirrels. Ecology. 78:1087–1097.
-
Olsson O, , Molokwu M. 2007. On the missed opportunity cost, GUD, and estimating environmental quality. Isr J Ecol Evol. 53:263–278.
-
Post D, , Reichman OJ. 1991. Effect of food perishability, distance, and competitors on caching behavior by Eastern woodrats. J Mammal. 72:513–517.
-
Preston SD, , Jacobs LF. 2009. Mechanism of cache decision making in fox squirrels (Sciurus niger). J Mammal. 90:787–795.
-
Reichman OJ.1988. Caching behavior by Eastern woodrats, Neotoma floridana, in relation to food perishability. Anim Behav. 36:1525–1532.
-
Rychlik L, , Jancewicz E. 2002. Prey size, prey nutrition, and food handling by shrews of different body sizes. Behav Ecol. 13:216–223.
-
Schmidt KA, , Ostfeld RS. 2008. Eavesdropping squirrels reduce their future value of food under the perceived presence of cache robbers. Am Nat. 171:386–393.
-
Sherry D.1984. Food storage by black-capped chickadees: memory for the location and contents of caches. Anim Behav. 32:451–464.
-
Shettleworth SJ.1990. Spatial memory in food-storing birds. Phil Trans Biol Sciences. 329:143–151.
-
Smallwood PD, , Steele MA, , Faeth SH. 2001. The ultimate basis of the caching preferences of rodents, and the oak-dispersal syndrome: tannins, insects, and seed germination. Amer Zool. 41:840–851.
-
Smith CC, , Follmer D. 1972. Food preferences of squirrels. Ecology. 53:83–91.
-
Smith CC, , Reichman OJ. 1984. The evolution of food caching by birds and mammals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 15:329–351.
-
Steele MA, , Koprowski JL. 2001. North American tree squirrels. Washington, London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
-
Steele MA, , Manierre S, , Genna T, , Contreras TA, , Smallwood PD. 2006. The innate basis of food hoarding decisions in grey squirrels: evidence for behavioural adaptations to the oaks. Anim Behav. 71:155–160.
-
Steele MA, , Smallwood PD, , Spunar A, , Nelsen E. 2001. The proximate basis of the oak-dispersal syndrome: detection of seed dormancy by rodents. Amer Zool. 41:852–864.
-
Tadesse SA, , Kotler BP. 2011. Seasonal habitat use by Nubian ibex (Capra Nubiana) evaluated with behavioral indicators. Isr J Ecol Evol 57:223–246.
-
van der Merwe M, , Burke AM, , Brown JS. 2007. Foraging ecology of North American tree squirrels on cacheable and less cacheable foods: a comparison of two urban habitats. Evol Ecol Res. 9:1–12.
-
Vander Wall SB. 1990. Food hoarding in animals. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Vander Wall SB, , Jenkins SH. 2003. Reciprocal pilferage and the evolution of food-hoarding behavior. Behav Ecol. 14:656–667.
-
Wauters LA, , Suhonen J, , Dhondt AA. 1995. Fitness consequences of hoarding behaviour in the Eurasian red squirrel. Proc Roy Soc London. 262:277–281.
-
Whitham TG.1977. Coevolution of foraging in Bombus and nectar dispensing in Chilopsis: a last dreg theory. Science. 197:593–596.
-
Xiao Z, , Gao X, , Jiang M, , Zhang Z. 2009. Behavioral adaptation of Pallas's squirrels to germination schedule and tannins in acorns. Behav Ecol. 20:1050–1055.
-
Xiao ZS, , Gao X, , Steele M, , Zhang Z. 2010. Frequency-dependent selection by tree squirrels: adaptive escape of nondormant white oaks. Behav Ecol. 21:169–175.
-
Xiao Z., , Gao X., , Zhang Z.2013. The combined effects of seed perishability and seed size on hoarding decisions by Pére David's rock squirrels. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 67:1067–1075.
-
Xiao Z., , Zhang Z.2012. Behavioural responses to acorn germination by tree squirrels in an old forest where white oaks have long been extirpated. Anim Behav. 83:945–951.
-
Zielinski DL.1989. Individual, temporal, and resource-mediated variation in consuming and hoarding patterns of the fox squirrel (Sciurus niger) [M. Sc. Thesis]. DeKalb IL: Northern Illinois University.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 846 | 84 | 13 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 39 | 0 | 0 |
Quantifying the future value of cacheable food using fox squirrels (sciurus niger)
in Israel Journal of Ecology and EvolutionBiology Department, Dixie State University of Utah
Search for other papers by Marius van der Merwe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joel S. Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Burt P. Kotler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Food caching allows foraging decisions to include both present and future food value. We developed and tested a conceptual framework for measuring animals’ perceptions of future vs. present food value. Fox squirrels (Sciurus niger) are well-known caching animals in North America. We measured giving-up densities (GUDs) of fox squirrels to test the following hypotheses: (1) all else equal, animals should prefer cacheable to non-cacheable foods, and (2) the option value of a cacheable food should change seasonally and be highest preceding lean periods. We presented squirrels with experimental food patches containing either shelled hazelnuts, hazelnuts with their shells intact (to affect cacheability) or both kinds. Our data support both hypotheses. Squirrels exploited food patches with cacheable nuts more thoroughly and left them at lower GUDs. The squirrels’ perception of the future value of hazelnuts with their shells intact was found to be 32% higher than their present value. GUDs also varied by season, fall > spring >winter > summer, likely corresponding to food availability. Season and food cacheability interacted to further determine GUDs. The difference in GUDs between cacheable and non-cacheable nuts varied similarly: fall > spring > winter > summer, likely corresponding to changing food availability, reproductive opportunities and pending energetic shortfalls.
| Insgesamt | Letzte 365 Tage | In den letzten 30 Tagen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aufrufe von Kurzbeschreibungen | 846 | 84 | 13 |
| Gesamttextansichten | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF-Downloads | 39 | 0 | 0 |
