The North Caucasus in Contemporary U.S.-Russia Relations: Key Problems and Implications for the Future
äºIran and the CaucasusSearch for other papers by Maxim A. Suchkov in
Current site
Google Scholar
The North Caucasus is a most significant but a least understood problem in contemporary U.S.-Russia relations. The United States as one of the prime pace-setters in the region shaped its own attitude towards Russiaâs most volatile region. Over more than twenty years, Washington experienced at least three major stages in its âCaucasus strategyâ, and each stage had its impact on the North Caucasus. Since the beginning, the two states stuck to conflicting narratives of developments in the region. With time, some of the assessments were re-evaluated, but some continue to impede cooperation on key security issues. The present article explores these phenomena and examines what implications major events like the 9/11 attacks, the Caucasus Emirate enlistment among top terrorist organisations, the Boston marathon bombings, etc. had for the U.S.-Russia joint efforts in fighting terrorism. It also assesses areas of potential disagreement in the North Caucasus between the two countries.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 373 | 83 | 7 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 161 | 1 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 10 | 0 | 0 |
The North Caucasus in Contemporary U.S.-Russia Relations: Key Problems and Implications for the Future
äºIran and the CaucasusSearch for other papers by Maxim A. Suchkov in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
The North Caucasus is a most significant but a least understood problem in contemporary U.S.-Russia relations. The United States as one of the prime pace-setters in the region shaped its own attitude towards Russiaâs most volatile region. Over more than twenty years, Washington experienced at least three major stages in its âCaucasus strategyâ, and each stage had its impact on the North Caucasus. Since the beginning, the two states stuck to conflicting narratives of developments in the region. With time, some of the assessments were re-evaluated, but some continue to impede cooperation on key security issues. The present article explores these phenomena and examines what implications major events like the 9/11 attacks, the Caucasus Emirate enlistment among top terrorist organisations, the Boston marathon bombings, etc. had for the U.S.-Russia joint efforts in fighting terrorism. It also assesses areas of potential disagreement in the North Caucasus between the two countries.
| å ¨é¨æé´ | è¿å»ä¸å¹´ | è¿å»30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| æè¦æµè§æ¬¡æ° | 373 | 83 | 7 |
| å ¨ææµè§æ¬¡æ° | 161 | 1 | 0 |
| PDFä¸è½½æ¬¡æ° | 10 | 0 | 0 |
