Chapter 6 Jurisdiction, Territory, Sovereignty: Giulio Pace and the Dominion of the Sea
于SovereigntySearch for other papers by Joshua Freed in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
The chapter sheds new light on the 1619 treatise by Giulio Pace, De dominio maris Hadriatici. In modern scholarship, despite of the date of publication, Pace’s work is usually thought to reflect a pre-Grotian Bartolist tradition of reasoning, recognizing Venetian rule over the Adriatic Sea in complete continuity with the tradition developed in the fifteenth-century legal commentary literature on the Digest concerning the division and occupation of property. By contrast Freed suggests that Pace, probably consciously bypassing Grotius’ 1608 Mare liberum, by concentrating, like Grotius, on the status of the sea as res, yet by introducing an innovative three-fold distinction, arguing that the sea was res nullius as a matter of property, res communis as a matter of use, and capable of someone’s dominium. The legal significance of Pace’s decision to classify the Adriatic as res nullius can be seen in the subsequent claims of occupatio that can be made over res nullius: The first occupant over unclaimed res nullius is entitled to a new title of dominium. In theory, Venice could own the Adriatic, either by occupation or by prescription of time, and exercise its jurisdiction. Pace could serve as Venetian answer to Grotius and as functional equivalent to John Selden’s Mare clausum option just by elegantly refining the old mos-italicus tradition.
Cocceji Heinrich von, Grotius Illustratus seu Commentarii ad Hugonis Grotii de Jure Belli et Pacis Libros Tres, 4 vols. (Breslau, Johann Jakob Korn: 1752).
Cozzi G., “Venezia dal Rinascimento all’Età barocca”, in Storia di Venezia, vol. 6: Dal Rinascimento al Barocco, ed. Cozzi G. – Prodi P. (Rome: 1994) 3–128.
Fedele D., The Medieval Foundations of International Law: Baldus de Ubaldis (1327–1400), Doctrine and Practice of the Ius Gentium (Leiden – Boston: 2021).
Fredona R., “Angelo degli Ubaldi and the Gulf of the Venetians: Custom, Commerce and Control of the Sea Before Grotius” in Fredona R. – Reinert S. A. (eds.), New Perspectives on the History of Political Economy (Boston: 2018) 29–74.
Marta Giacomo Antonio, Tractatus De Iurisdictione per et inter iudicem Ecclesiasticum et Secularem exercenda, Vol. 1 (Avignon, Giovanni Battista Bellagamba: 1620).
Moschetti C. M., Questioni di diritto pubblico marittimo negli scritti dei giuristi napoletani della prima metà del Seicento (Naples: 1984).
Odofredus, Interpretatio, in vndecim primos pandectarom libros (Lyon, s.n.: 1550), reimpr. Lectura super digesto veteri vol. 1 (Bologna: 1967).
Odofredus, Super tribus libris codicis, Praelectiones (quae Lecturae appellantur) (Lyon, s.n.: ), reimpr. Lectura super codice (Bologna: 1969).
Philippi Jean, Iuris responsa praepositis in limine praefatione, singulorum responsorum argumentis (Lyon, Symphorien Béraud – Étienne Michel: 1584).
Scovazzi T., “The Origin of the Theory of Sovereignty of the Sea”, in Castillo L. (ed.), Law of the Sea: From Grotius to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Leiden – Boston: 2015) 48–63.
Squitinio della liberta veneta nel quale si adducono anche le raggioni dell’Impero romano sopra la citta et signoria di Venetia (Mirandola, Giovanni Benincasa: 1612).
Straumann B., “Is modern liberty ancient? Roman remedies and natural rights in Hugo Grotius’s early works on natural law,” Law and History Review 27.1 (2009) 55–86.
Vieira M. B., “Mare Liberum vs. Mare Clausum: Grotius, Freitas, and Selden’s Debate on Dominion over the Seas,” Journal of the History of Ideas 64.3 (2003) 361–377.
| 全部期间 | 过去一年 | 过去30天 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 摘要浏览次数 | 699 | 297 | 67 |
| 全文浏览次数 | 10 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF下载次数 | 23 | 9 | 1 |
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Statement | Cookie Settings | Accessibility | Legal Notice | Sitemap | Copyright © 2016-2026